Re: test

On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 4:36 PM François Patte wrote: > > test Please don't spam the list. Contact the list admin if you have problems, . Jeff -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists

Re: [Test Day] Fedora 42 i18n Test Week 2025-03-04

Joining in today Den sön 2 mars 2025 kl 20:01 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee : > > Hello All, > > > Fedora QA and i18n team is hosting a Fedora Test Week to test the i18n > features in Fedora 42. This is nice opportunity for anyone interested in i18n > or in general to get started with contributing to

Re: [Test Day] [Final Call] GNOME 46 Apps

All done now Den mån 26 feb. 2024 kl 11:26 skrev Luna Jernberg : > > Have helped out as much as i could been sick and low on energy some of > the weeks, and will try to help out later today with the rest > > Den mån 26 feb. 2024 kl 07:03 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee : > > > > Hey Flocks, > > > > This

Re: [Test Day] [Final Call] GNOME 46 Apps

Have helped out as much as i could been sick and low on energy some of the weeks, and will try to help out later today with the rest Den mån 26 feb. 2024 kl 07:03 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee : > > Hey Flocks, > > This is a gentle reminder for contributors testing GNOME 46[0] to > submit their contrib

Solved? - Re: Test serial port application

I have found socat: socat -d -d pty,rawer,echo=0 pty,rawer,echo=0 on my system that is creating /dev/pts/18 and 19 and I can run screen to them and type back and forth.  So I SHOULD be able to simply use this... On 12/24/23 08:21, Roger Heflin wrote: If you have the arduino app attach to th

Re: Test serial port application

If you have the arduino app attach to the port and then exit the arduino port (once it has setup the port speed to work in its serial viewer), then cat from the port works and echo to the port works (while the cat is reading from it). My arduino program takes commands from serial, and outputs stat

Re: Test serial port application

On 12/24/23 06:36, Barry Scott wrote: On 24 Dec 2023, at 01:25, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I want to test a program that is supposedly talking serial to /dev/tty[]. e.g. ttyUSB0 I was thinking that I could run some program in some terminal window that would set up a serial /dev/tty and the

Re: Test serial port application

> On 24 Dec 2023, at 01:25, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > I want to test a program that is supposedly talking serial to /dev/tty[]. > e.g. ttyUSB0 > > I was thinking that I could run some program in some terminal window that > would set up a serial /dev/tty and the program could attach to tha

Re: [Test Week] F39 Anaconda WebUI Installer for Workstation is underway!

Hey! Helped out some yesterday, and will help out as much as i have time and energy during the week Den tis 29 aug. 2023 kl 04:02 skrev Sumantro Mukherjee : > > Hey folks, > > This week we will be testing the new Anaconda WebUI installer written with > React and Cockpit. This installer will be de

Re: [Test Week] F39 Anaconda WebUI Installer for Workstation is underway!

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 7:48 AM Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > H I guess I haven't been paying attention. Can someone point me > at the spe for this? > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 07:31:28 +0530 > Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > Hey folks, > > > > This week we will be testing the new Anaconda WebUI

Re: [Test Week] F39 Anaconda WebUI Installer for Workstation is underway!

H I guess I haven't been paying attention. Can someone point me at the spe for this? On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 07:31:28 +0530 Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey folks, > > This week we will be testing the new Anaconda WebUI installer written > with React and Cockpit. This installer will be defau

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.16 is underway

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1909308 On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 2:16 PM Luna Jernberg wrote: > jforbes is working on packing the 5.16.13 kernel that just dropped, will > be out to test later today :) > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 1:16 PM Sumantro Mukherjee > wrote: > >> Hey

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.16 is underway

jforbes is working on packing the 5.16.13 kernel that just dropped, will be out to test later today :) On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 1:16 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey All, > > Kernel 5.16 Test week is happening from 2022-01-23 to 2022-01-29. It's > fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and re

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.16 2022-01-23 through 2022-01-29

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 3:38 AM Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Lo! > > On 20.01.22 09:38, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > > I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.16 > > Test week is happening from 2022-01-23 to 2022-01-29. It's > > fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0]

Re: test

On 22/12/2021 05:34, bruce wrote: is list still operational? Yes... A few posts came in about 3 hrs ago. -- Did 황준호 die? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedo

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.15 2021-11-14 through 2021-11-21

On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 17:16 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > Sorry to be That Guy again, but although I understand why this > > announcement was cross-posted here, shouldn't replies be directed > > to > > the Test List? That's what it's for after all. > > > > poc > > > Hey! > > I kinda wish

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.15 2021-11-14 through 2021-11-21

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 4:12 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 15:01 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > Hey All, > > > > I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.15 > > Test week is happening from 2021-11-14 to 2021-11-21. It's > > fairly simple, hea

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.15 2021-11-14 through 2021-11-21

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 5:55 AM murph nj wrote: > Funny, after I posted this, I found where the email acknowledgements for > the tests came in, and then, a flood of badge messages as well. So, > problem solved. If someone did something in the background, thanks! > You are welcome :) The badges

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.15 2021-11-14 through 2021-11-21

On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 15:01 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey All, > > I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.15 > Test week is happening from 2021-11-14 to 2021-11-21. It's > fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the > test week and simpl

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.15 2021-11-14 through 2021-11-21

Funny, after I posted this, I found where the email acknowledgements for the tests came in, and then, a flood of badge messages as well. So, problem solved. If someone did something in the background, thanks! On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM murph nj wrote: > Not that the badges are the importa

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.15 2021-11-14 through 2021-11-21

Not that the badges are the important part, they are fun, so here's a question. How does one find out if the suite was run correctly? I ran them in the past, both by running it with the .config file with my credentials, as well as putting it in the testday wiki. (I think the 5.10, or maybe earli

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.15 2021-11-14 through 2021-11-21

Do the koji list-builds --package=kernel --after="2021-11-12" | grep "5.15 command, it was actually build on 12th. --- Best regards, Alex ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, November 15th, 2021 at 13:29, Richard Shaw wrote: > I can go to the koji web interface and see the kernel in >

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.15 2021-11-14 through 2021-11-21

I can go to the koji web interface and see the kernel in f35-updates-candidate running: koji list-builds --package=kernel --after="2021-11-13" | grep "5.15" Produces no results. Thanks, Richard ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.15 2021-11-14 through 2021-11-21

I just did mine - went smoothly on Lenovo Thinkpad with Ryzen 4500U I also as a user encourage other fellow fedorians to go for it - I'm thinking I'll ran on this 5.15.x.x for now. many thanks, L. On 15/11/2021 09:31, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: Hey All, I would like to invite all of you to pa

Re: test message

Well it seems I am still subscribed to the list despite my having sent unsubscribe mail. But anyway I am subscribed at my other email address so I don;t care if this one works or not. Time to change providers I think. I'll try again to unsubscribe here. ___

Re: test message

On 6/15/21 11:04 AM, stan via users wrote: On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:50:40 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: As far as switching to say Gmail that is something I am definitely considering. I am using my providers main address less and less to try to avoid these problems. I guess the way is to set up

Re: test message

On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:50:40 -0400 Frank McCormick wrote: > As far as switching to say Gmail that is something I am definitely > considering. I am using my providers main address > less and less to try to avoid these problems. I guess the way is to > set up a seperate inbox for fedora list mail.

Re: test message

The problem is still not resolved. I was dealing with the weekend staff at my provider so we'll see if thing are  any better with the weekday staff :) The strange thing today is that the list administrator flushed the queue this morning and several messages came in but nothing since then. A

Re: test message

Tim: >> If you use an external one (e.g. gmail, yahoo, or many others), >> you're not subject your provider's whims... George N. White III: > Or the whims of people who spend their time reporting content they > don't like to blocklists. The downside of the external email > providers is that your

Re: test message

On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 02:43, Tim via users wrote: > On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 15:11 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: > > My provider is refusing messages from this list. > > I'm chccking to see if that's still true. > > > > Well, it worked. But might I suggest not using your service provider's > email

Re: test message

On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 15:11 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: > My provider is refusing messages from this list. > I'm chccking to see if that's still true. > Well, it worked. But might I suggest not using your service provider's email. If you use an external one (e.g. gmail, yahoo, or many others)

RE: [Test Day] Fedora 34 Audio 2021-03-03

Dear all, Now this, is something interesting for an actual screen reader user such as myself and every blind person who uses Fedora.I’ve heard both good and bad things about pipewire, and I’m really tempted to upgrade to Rawhide and test if the transition from Pulse to Pipewire works with Orca.For

Re: test package

On 9/27/18 1:47 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 16:37 +, Rick Stevens wrote: >> On 9/27/18 9:34 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 16:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 17:19 -0700, stan wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 2

Re: test package

On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 16:37 +, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 9/27/18 9:34 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 16:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 17:19 -0700, stan wrote: > > > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:49:24 +0200 > > > > "Patrick Dupre" wrote: >

Re: test package

On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:11:52 +0100 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 17:19 -0700, stan wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:49:24 +0200 > > "Patrick Dupre" wrote: > > > > > How to install a testing update package? > > > > dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing > > That enables t

Re: test package

On 9/27/18 9:34 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 16:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 17:19 -0700, stan wrote: >>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:49:24 +0200 >>> "Patrick Dupre" wrote: >>> How to install a testing update package? >>> >>> dnf --enabler

Re: test package

On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 15:05 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 1:50 PM Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > How to install a testing update package? > > > > # dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing The actual dnf command (install, update, ...) is required. poc _

Re: test package

On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 16:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 17:19 -0700, stan wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:49:24 +0200 > > "Patrick Dupre" wrote: > > > > > How to install a testing update package? > > > > dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing > > That enables the repo

Re: test package

On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 17:19 -0700, stan wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:49:24 +0200 > "Patrick Dupre" wrote: > > > How to install a testing update package? > > dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing That enables the repo for the duration of the command, but does nothing with it. poc

Re: test package

On 9/25/18 2:57 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 9/24/18 11:49 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: >> Hello, >> >> How to install a testing update package? > Enable the testing repo and install the package: > > # dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing > > Pretty simple. > I think you forgot the "install" directi

Re: test package

On 9/25/18 2:49 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > How to install a testing update package? > Thank You can enable testing repo temporary for whole package that available to test with $ dnf update --enablerepo=updates-testing or just install any package that you want with $ dnf install --e

Re: test package

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 1:50 PM Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > How to install a testing update package? > # dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing You may need to add --refresh if it's been pushed recently to update the metadata. Thanks, Richard ___ us

Re: test package

On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 20:49 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > How to install a testing update package? sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing install poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to use

Re: test package

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:49:24 +0200 "Patrick Dupre" wrote: > How to install a testing update package? dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: test package

On 9/24/18 11:49 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > How to install a testing update package? Enable the testing repo and install the package: # dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing Pretty simple. -- - Rick Stevens, Syst

Re: test package

On 9/25/18 2:49 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > How to install a testing update package? dnf --enablerepo updates-testing install packagename -- Cardinal Rule of Presentations: "Tell them what you are going to tell them, tell them, then tell them what you told them." signature.asc Description: Ope

Re: test local rpm file in place for consistency, size, etc.

On 11/22/2011 08:44 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes: > >> The old keys are available at https://fedoraproject.org/en/keys under >> "OBSOLETE >> KEYS" if you want to download and import them. > > Should add that by default yum checks RPMs against ANY of your i

Re: test local rpm file in place for consistency, size, etc.

On 11/23/2011 12:19 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Skunk Worx wrote: >> .. >> foo.rpm : (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#6df2196f) >> ... >> >> They all say this -- which seems okay -- all things considered. They are >> Fedora 9 update rpms from

Re: test local rpm file in place for consistency, size, etc.

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Skunk Worx wrote: > .. > foo.rpm : (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#6df2196f) > ... > > They all say this -- which seems okay -- all things considered. They are > Fedora 9 update rpms from a couple years ago. That's just telling you RPM doesn't

Re: test local rpm file in place for consistency, size, etc.

On 11/22/2011 08:00 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Skunk Worx wrote: >> I have a set of .rpm files restored from backups. >> >> They have nothing to do with my current install except they are in the >> file system. >> >> Is there a command that will sweep these (s

Re: test local rpm file in place for consistency, size, etc.

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Skunk Worx wrote: > I have a set of .rpm files restored from backups. > > They have nothing to do with my current install except they are in the > file system. > > Is there a command that will sweep these (several hundred) .rpm files > and test their internal value

Re: test message ...

On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 19:09 -0700, James McKenzie wrote: > On 6/6/11 6:53 PM, Jamie Bohr wrote: > > Are my emails getting posted? Respond to jamieb...@gmail.com > > , if I don't get a response within a few > > minutes of sending this my guess is my message has not gon

Re: test message ...

On 6/6/11 6:53 PM, Jamie Bohr wrote: > Are my emails getting posted? Respond to jamieb...@gmail.com > , if I don't get a response within a few > minutes of sending this my guess is my message has not gone through. Yes, you are hitting the list. BTW, these types of me

Re: Test GIMP 2.7/2.8 ?

> I would love to test out GIMP 2.7/2.8 on Fedora but haven't seen any > RPM packages made for Fedora. If anybody knows of them please send me > the link. > > Thank you, > Valent. GIMP 2.7 packages for Fedora 13 are available thank to Luya - http://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/RPMS/ #fedora #gim

Re: Test GIMP 2.7/2.8 ?

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote: >>> > I there a way to test new GIMP 2.7/2.8 in Fedora? I looked in Rawhide >>> > repos and I still see only 2.6x versions there. Any plans to put 2.7 in >>> > Rawhide repost for testing purposes? >>> >>> Should I ask on development channel?

Re: test management system

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:28:45 +0100, Piscium wrote: > Hiya, > > I am looking for a test management system, to help software/firmware > testing. Something like an application that runs on a server that would > allow testers to create test plans, write test cases, mark test cases as > passed or fail

Re: test management system

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 19:28:45 +0100, Piscium wrote: > Hiya, > > I am looking for a test management system, to help software/firmware > testing. Something like an application that runs on a server that > would allow testers to create test plans, write test cases, mark test > cases as passed o

Re: Test upgrade from F13 to F14 using LVM snapshot?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Michael Semcheski wrote: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> The exception would be the /boot >> partition, but it should be possible to keep my old kernels, yes? > > I haven't tried this, but if everything else works, you ought to be > able to

Re: Test upgrade from F13 to F14 using LVM snapshot?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > The exception would be the /boot > partition, but it should be possible to keep my old kernels, yes? I haven't tried this, but if everything else works, you ought to be able to make an image of /boot using dd. (/boot being a relatively small

Re: Test, ignore

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 13:26:37 -0400, Marcel Rieux wrote: > Sorry, folks but it seems there is no test group and I want to see how gmail > interacts with Fedora's list when there is a Cc. I hope... p wont't mind if > I use his address. Posting test messages to lists is rude. Please stop doing

Re: Test, ignore

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > Sorry, folks but it seems there is no test group and I want to see how > gmail interacts with Fedora's list when there is a Cc. I hope... p won't > mind if I use his address. > Sorry, p. I'll need a second one. THis should be it. -- users ma

Re: test

2010/1/24 kevin : > test I don't know how many members the Fedora List has, but we probably all got this. I don't believe this is an appropriate method or forum to test your MTA, twice. -- Sam -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: htt

Re: Test GIMP 2.7/2.8 ?

>> > I there a way to test new GIMP 2.7/2.8 in Fedora? I looked in Rawhide >> > repos and I still see only 2.6x versions there. Any plans to put 2.7 in >> > Rawhide repost for testing purposes? >> >> Should I ask on development channel? > > You might file an RFE bug against gimp and see what the pa

Re: test

Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 01/10/2010 04:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> Not sure why you'd characterize my message as "hasty". Unless you are >> staying that in order for it not be be hasty I'd have to somehow do >> research on who Jon Stanley is and what he is doing to migrate the >> list. I s

Re: test

On 01/10/2010 04:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > Not sure why you'd characterize my message as "hasty". Unless you are > staying that in order for it not be be hasty I'd have to somehow do > research on who Jon Stanley is and what he is doing to migrate the > list. I suppose I didn't know that was v

Re: test

Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 01/10/2010 03:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> I was "generally" polite. Why are you making a big deal out of this? >> Haven't gotten enough sleep? >> >> I didn't know who the guy was that sent the test message >> >> But, FWIW, if I were the person sending the "o

Re: test

On 01/10/2010 03:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > I was "generally" polite. Why are you making a big deal out of this? > Haven't gotten enough sleep? > > I didn't know who the guy was that sent the test message > > But, FWIW, if I were the person sending the "official" test message I > would h

Re: test

On 01/10/2010 03:44 PM, Jon Stanley wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > >> AIUI, Jon is involved in the process of moving the mailing lists over to >> *.fedoraproject.org. His test messages are checking whether the new >> mailing lists are configured correctly, whe

Re: test

Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 01/10/2010 03:39 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > >>> >>> >> That is all well and good But, don't *expect* me or anyone else to >> be aware of that. >> > > Now that you have been made aware of it, I encourage you to not assume > that the other person has

Re: test

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > AIUI, Jon is involved in the process of moving the mailing lists over to > *.fedoraproject.org.  His test messages are checking whether the new > mailing lists are configured correctly, whereas a test message from you > or me would be chec

Re: test

On 01/10/2010 03:39 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> > That is all well and good But, don't *expect* me or anyone else to > be aware of that. Now that you have been made aware of it, I encourage you to not assume that the other person has not read the emails and generally be polite about such

Re: test

Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 17:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> Jon Stanley wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Kavon Farvardin wrote: >>> >>> I wonder how you got through my inbox filters…. Mailing list emails always ended up in the right

Re: test

On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 17:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > Jon Stanley wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Kavon Farvardin wrote: > > > >> I wonder how you got through my inbox filters…. Mailing list emails always > >> ended up in the right folder. > >> > > > > Very likely because the

Re: test

Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 01/10/2010 03:26 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> Jon Stanley wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Kavon Farvardin wrote: >>> >>> I wonder how you got through my inbox filters…. Mailing list emails always ended up in the right folder.

Re: test

On 01/10/2010 03:26 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > Jon Stanley wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Kavon Farvardin wrote: >> >>> I wonder how you got through my inbox filters…. Mailing list emails always >>> ended up in the right folder. >>> >> >> Very likely because the list address chang

Re: test

Jon Stanley wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Kavon Farvardin wrote: > >> I wonder how you got through my inbox filters…. Mailing list emails always >> ended up in the right folder. >> > > Very likely because the list address changed - see > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail

Re: test

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Kavon Farvardin wrote: > I wonder how you got through my inbox filters…. Mailing list emails always > ended up in the right folder. Very likely because the list address changed - see http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097844.html. Users wh

RE: test

I wonder how you got through my inbox filters.. Mailing list emails always ended up in the right folder. From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Jon Stanley Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 2:27 AM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org S