On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 17:26 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >I assume that all is well now?
>
> Gilboa,
> Thanks for the follow up, unfortunately it seems there is no ogl
> support for the external monitor with nvidia when using Linux:(
>
> Hard to believe really, possibly something to do with m
>I assume that all is well now?
Gilboa,
Thanks for the follow up, unfortunately it seems there is no ogl
support for the external monitor with nvidia when using Linux:(
Hard to believe really, possibly something to do with my laptop,
it is a _total_ pos...
I have an HP I have to setup sooner or
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 21:20 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >Your nVidia driver installation is broken.
> >I see that you're using the driver directory from nvidia.com.
> >Have you considered using the RPMFusion drivers? [1]
>
> I am, I was using the kmods but when the update for newest kernel
>
>Your nVidia driver installation is broken.
>I see that you're using the driver directory from nvidia.com.
>Have you considered using the RPMFusion drivers? [1]
I am, I was using the kmods but when the update for newest kernel
lagged, I switched to the akmod.
Thanks!
jlc
--
users mailing list
us
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 00:21 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >What's the output of glxinfo?
>
> Gilboa,
> I am guessing this has something to do with the fact that I disable
> the Laptops built in LCD and enable only a external LCD?
>
> The output is rather long, but:
> # glxinfo
> name of displa
>It is kind of confusing to get right driver.
>The nv site points to 195.36.24 but the class of the card points to the
>legacy drivers 173
Turns out that with no xorg.conf and just the laptops built in LCD
enabled, ogl works fine. As soon as I disable the laptop LCD and
use the external lcd there
On 06/18/2010 05:26 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Sorry I was in hurry this morn.
>>
>> The driver for that is 195.36.31
>> http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux-display-amd64-195.36.31-driver.html
>>
>> It is an old card but still fast enough to handle most video
>>
> Hi,
> I am using the 195.
>Sorry I was in hurry this morn.
>
>The driver for that is 195.36.31
>http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux-display-amd64-195.36.31-driver.html
>
>It is an old card but still fast enough to handle most video
Hi,
I am using the 195.36.24-1 akmod which is nearly as new...
Thanks!
jlc
--
users mailing
>What's the output of glxinfo?
Gilboa,
I am guessing this has something to do with the fact that I disable
the Laptops built in LCD and enable only a external LCD?
The output is rather long, but:
# glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
Error: glXCreateContext failed
64 GLX Visuals
visual x bf lv rg
On 06/18/2010 11:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Have you been here yet?
>> http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_28166.html
>>
>>
>> See if any of these helps
>>
> Is that url a typo?
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 3.0 Update 6 with mptfusion driver fix...
>
> I am guessing it won't help:)
>
>Have you been here yet?
>http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_28166.html
>
>
>See if any of these helps
Is that url a typo?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 3.0 Update 6 with mptfusion driver fix...
I am guessing it won't help:)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 06/18/2010 10:09 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is
>> no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy
>> driver, but their legacy driver does not support the version 1.8 X.org
>> server that Fedora 13 ships.
On 06/18/2010 10:09 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is
>> no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy
>> driver, but their legacy driver does not support the version 1.8 X.org
>> server that Fedora 13 ships.
>Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is
>no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy
>driver, but their legacy driver does not support the version 1.8 X.org
>server that Fedora 13 ships.
Well, the release notes say its supported? Equivale
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Anyone know why this card using the nvidia closed source driver from rpm
> fusion doesn't work with fgfs?
Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is
no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy
driver, but their legacy
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 23:40 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Anyone know why this card using the nvidia closed source driver from rpm
> fusion doesn't work with fgfs?
>
> When starting fgfs it suggests the card doesn't support opengl?
> Pretty sure that card does ogl... I am using the akmod as the
16 matches
Mail list logo
