RE: NFSv4

2012-06-19 Thread Pittigher, Raymond - ES
: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 3:35 PM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: NFSv4 2cents, cause I could get idmap'ing to work yesterday. I looked in all the wrong places. I had a dup ipaddress in the subnet and idmap would just show nobody for everyone. Doesnt sound like your problem. I

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-19 Thread gary artim
2cents, cause I could get idmap'ing to work yesterday. I looked in all the wrong places. I had a dup ipaddress in the subnet and idmap would just show nobody for everyone. Doesnt sound like your problem. I uses nis a while ago also and know nsswitch.conf or some such can change the lookup ordering,

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-18 Thread Ed Greshko
Ahh One thing that just popped into my mind. Again, recall that NIS is not in my memory. When you run NIS do you have user names and groups and such defined only in NIS databases? I mean, isn't the passwd files basically where only system users are defined? What were to happen if

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-18 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/18/2012 08:57 PM, Raymond Pittigher wrote: >> Well that all looks good. I know there have been changes to nfs-utils. One >> change >> involved the idmap service and no longer needing to run it on the client. >> But I >> just wrote a bugzilla against it for random mounts failing at boot time

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-18 Thread Raymond Pittigher
On 06/18/2012 08:17 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: Raymond Pittigher wrote: the fstab is set at defaults. i am guessing something has changed with the nfs-utils package maybe with nis? [root@dhcp5169 ~]# getfacl /users/zbarak/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: users/zbar

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-18 Thread Ed Greshko
Raymond Pittigher wrote: >the fstab is set at defaults. i am guessing something has changed with >the nfs-utils package maybe with nis? > >[root@dhcp5169 ~]# getfacl /users/zbarak/ >getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names ># file: users/zbarak/ ># owner: 4294967294 ># group: 429496

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-18 Thread Raymond Pittigher
On 06/18/2012 07:51 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/18/2012 07:40 PM, Raymond Pittigher wrote: I am using NIS to keep the users/groups the same across all systems. Yes it is old and outdated but it works for what I need it for. I have tried several different options including the defaults for all

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-18 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/18/2012 07:40 PM, Raymond Pittigher wrote: > I am using NIS to keep the users/groups the same across all systems. Yes it > is old > and outdated but it works for what I need it for. I have tried several > different > options including the defaults for all, this just happens to be where I am

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-18 Thread Raymond Pittigher
On 06/18/2012 07:27 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/18/2012 06:43 PM, Raymond Pittigher wrote: The server is RHEL6.2 and the clients are either Centos or Fedora and the problem seems to be with release 17. On all clients the mount uses defaults. So on the F17 box we have: 172.30.5.244:/users/

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-18 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/18/2012 06:43 PM, Raymond Pittigher wrote: > > > The server is RHEL6.2 and the clients are either Centos or Fedora and the > problem > seems to be with release 17. On all clients the mount uses defaults. So on > the F17 > box we have: > > 172.30.5.244:/users/ on /users type nfs4 > (rw,relat

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-18 Thread Raymond Pittigher
On 06/16/2012 11:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 06/16/2012 05:43 PM, Pittigher, Raymond - ES wrote: Yes, I configured the /etc/idmapd... file and set the Domain variable. Started the systemctl restart nfs-idmap.service. If I go back to NFSv3 it all looks OK. It also seems to be only a problem w

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-16 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/17/2012 10:40 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > Regardless of that I found that on my system rpc.idmapd would not start > on book > when the service was enabled. The only way I could get it to start on boot > was to > also enable NetworkManager-wait-online.service. I take that back It see

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-16 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/16/2012 05:43 PM, Pittigher, Raymond - ES wrote: > Yes, I configured the /etc/idmapd... file and set the Domain variable. > Started the systemctl restart nfs-idmap.service. One thing I noticedbut am still scratching my head I need to go back and check the "test" mailing list archi

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-16 Thread Joe Zeff
On 06/16/2012 03:05 AM, Pittigher, Raymond - ES wrote: not sure I have the authority to drop the bullcrap at the end of the email. I did not know about the -- and I am trying that in this email. FYI, the proper .sig separator is "-- " on a line of its own, and the space at the end is required

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-16 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/16/2012 05:43 PM, Pittigher, Raymond - ES wrote: > Yes, I configured the /etc/idmapd... file and set the Domain variable. > Started the systemctl restart nfs-idmap.service. If I go back to NFSv3 it all > looks OK. It also seems to be only a problem with Fedora 17 at the moment. I > did a c

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-16 Thread Reindl Harald
:53 AM > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: NFSv4 > > Am 16.06.2012 11:43, schrieb Pittigher: >> Email addresses of ITT Exelis employees have changed from itt.com to >> exelisinc.com. Please update your favorites and contact information to >> reflect these changes.

RE: NFSv4

2012-06-16 Thread Pittigher, Raymond - ES
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald [h.rei...@thelounge.net] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 5:53 AM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: NFSv4 Am 16.06.2012 11:43

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.06.2012 11:43, schrieb Pittigher: > Email addresses of ITT Exelis employees have changed from itt.com to > exelisinc.com. Please update your favorites and contact information to > reflect these changes. > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are > inte

RE: NFSv4

2012-06-16 Thread Pittigher, Raymond - ES
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Ian Chapman [packa...@amiga-hardware.com] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 4:40 AM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: NFSv4 On 06/16/2012 12

RE: NFSv4

2012-06-16 Thread Pittigher, Raymond - ES
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Ed Greshko [ed.gres...@greshko.com] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 5:17 PM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: NFSv4 On 06/16/2012 12:45 AM

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-16 Thread Ian Chapman
On 06/16/2012 12:45 AM, Raymond Pittigher wrote: Starting to use Fedora on a system or 2 instead of RHEL5 or 6 and I notice that on my NFSv4 mounts I get this drwx--x---. 28 4294967294 4294967294 4096 Apr 26 2011 user2 drwx--x---. 39 users1 user1 4096 Apr 26 2011 user1 Some users are displayed

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-15 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 15Jun2012 12:45, Raymond Pittigher wrote: | Starting to use Fedora on a system or 2 instead of RHEL5 or 6 and I | notice that on my NFSv4 mounts I get this | | drwx--x---. 28 4294967294 4294967294 4096 Apr 26 2011 user2 That is uid and gid -2, cast to unsigned 32-bit. I would gue

Re: NFSv4

2012-06-15 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/16/2012 12:45 AM, Raymond Pittigher wrote: > > > > Starting to use Fedora on a system or 2 instead of RHEL5 or 6 and I > notice that on my NFSv4 mounts I get this > > drwx--x---. 28 4294967294 4294967294 4096 Apr 26 2011 user2 > drwx--x---. 39 users1 user14096 Apr 26