Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:47:13 -0500
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>> The question is one of policy, should a bug be marked CLOSED before the
>> average
>> user is FIXED? Meaning the fix is actually RELEASED.
>
> Depends on who bugzilla is for :-).
>
> If it is for developers, th
> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:47:13 -0500
> From: Bill Davidsen
> Subject: Propigation of bug fixes
>
> . . . .
>
> The question is one of policy, should a bug be marked CLOSED before the
> average
> user is FIXED? Meaning the fix is actually RELEASED.
>
>
I w
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:47:13 -0500
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> The question is one of policy, should a bug be marked CLOSED before the
> average
> user is FIXED? Meaning the fix is actually RELEASED.
Depends on who bugzilla is for :-).
If it is for developers, then they want to mark it closed
as so
Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548989 was CLOSED on Jan 21st,
with the note that glibc-2.11.90-10 was in RAWHIDE. Should a bug be marked
CLOSED before the fix makes it into release?
My FC11 system, updated a few days ago, shows glibc-2.10.2-1.i686, and both my
FC12 machines hav
