JD wrote:
>On 08/10/2010 06:13 AM, Matthew J. Roth wrote:
>
>> JD wrote:
>>
>>> To do that, you need a library interface or sysctl command line
>>> that would "affine" the process and it's threads to
>>> to a set of cpu's (I am not certain if there is granularity here
>>> as far as se
JD wrote:
>
> Thank you Matt! I am glad Linux has kept up with this
> area which is becoming more and more important as
> cpu's multiply their cores.
> Perhaps there will be a refinement that will allow
> the setting of core affinity as well.
> AMD released the 8-core cpu in 2009
>
> http://www.g
JD wrote:
>On 08/10/2010 06:13 AM, Matthew J. Roth wrote:
>
>> JD wrote:
>>
>>> To do that, you need a library interface or sysctl command line
>>> that would "affine" the process and it's threads to
>>> to a set of cpu's (I am not certain if there is granularity here
>>> as far as se
On 08/10/2010 06:13 AM, Matthew J. Roth wrote:
> JD wrote:
>> To do that, you need a library interface or sysctl command line
>> that would "affine" the process and it's threads to
>> to a set of cpu's (I am not certain if there is granularity here
>> as far as selecting a subset of cores from a
JD wrote:
>
> To do that, you need a library interface or sysctl command line
> that would "affine" the process and it's threads to
> to a set of cpu's (I am not certain if there is granularity here
> as far as selecting a subset of cores from a cpu).
JD and Michael,
Take a look at taskset:
t
On 08/09/2010 03:23 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
> JD wrote:
>> On 08/09/2010 01:37 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
>>
>>> Kwan Lowe wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Michael Miles
wrote:
>>
> Well, 3D animation is my thing and has been since the Amiga plat
JD wrote:
>On 08/09/2010 01:37 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>> Kwan Lowe wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Michael Mileswrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Well, 3D animation is my thing and has been since the Amiga platform.
The power to render many m
On 08/09/2010 01:37 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
> Kwan Lowe wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Well, 3D animation is my thing and has been since the Amiga platform.
>>> The power to render many minutes of animation and still have functional
>>> machine to
Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>
>>>
>> Well, 3D animation is my thing and has been since the Amiga platform.
>> The power to render many minutes of animation and still have functional
>> machine to do the rest of my daily activity.
>>
>> I us
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
>>
> Well, 3D animation is my thing and has been since the Amiga platform.
> The power to render many minutes of animation and still have functional
> machine to do the rest of my daily activity.
>
> I use a virtual machine running windows 7 fo
On 08/09/2010 06:51 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> JD wrote:
>>On 08/08/2010 01:15 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>>> Are you going to really use a lot of CPU power? (such as video processing)
>>> Probably not.
>>>
>>> If you are just planning to have a fast general-use computer, than
>>> do not worr
JD wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 01:15 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> Are you going to really use a lot of CPU power? (such as video processing)
>> Probably not.
>>
>> If you are just planning to have a fast general-use computer, than
>> do not worry too much about the CPU, as AMD or Intel and 4 or 6 core
On 08/08/2010 01:15 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Joshua C. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to
>> take.
>>
>> We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
>> linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core ap
Joshua C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to take.
>
> We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
> linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core apps then
> intel might have the lead. When it comes to scal
On Sunday, August 08, 2010 19:41:33 Joshua C. wrote:
> How can I judge if a particular _linux_ app will work well with a
> 6-/4-core cpu? What to look for? How does the OS interact with the app
> in allowing it to use the resources? Is the app solely responsible for
> utilizing all the system resou
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Robert Myers wrote:
>> This is what I mean with scalability. As for the windows-apps: most of
>> them (still) cannot use all the cores and a more-than-2-cores cpu is a
>> waste-of-money in most of the time. Lets go back to linux.
>>
>
> Chrome uses all eight thread
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
>
> Well, the question is not why I need "that much" power but simply will
> a linux app run better on a 6-core than on a 4-core processor? Of
> course it depends on the ability of this app to utilize all this
> cores/threads. And I know that whate
2010/8/8 Michael Miles :
> JD wrote:
>> On 08/08/2010 10:21 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I myself was going to replace my Phenom 2 965 with the 1090T as it was a
>>> simple chip replacement but I decided to wait for the Bulldozer series.
>>> The 1090T is a big improvement but in reality i
JD wrote:
>On 08/08/2010 10:21 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>>
>> I myself was going to replace my Phenom 2 965 with the 1090T as it was a
>> simple chip replacement but I decided to wait for the Bulldozer series.
>> The 1090T is a big improvement but in reality it is only a Phenom 2 with
>>
On 08/08/2010 10:21 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>
> I myself was going to replace my Phenom 2 965 with the 1090T as it was a
> simple chip replacement but I decided to wait for the Bulldozer series.
> The 1090T is a big improvement but in reality it is only a Phenom 2 with
> 2 more cores added.
>
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to take.
>
> We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
> linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core apps then
> intel might have
john wendel wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 08:12 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to
>> take.
>>
>> We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
>> linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core a
On 08/08/2010 08:12 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to take.
>
> We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
> linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core apps then
> intel might have the lead.
Hi,
I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to take.
We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core apps then
intel might have the lead. When it comes to scalability then amd is on
the move
24 matches
Mail list logo
