On 17/2/18 5:02 am, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 02/15/2018 01:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 16/2/18 6:52 am, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 02/14/2018 01:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 14/2/18 10:05 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 08:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
So from my pers
On 02/15/2018 01:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 16/2/18 6:52 am, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 02/14/2018 01:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> On 14/2/18 10:05 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 08:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> So from my perspective the vlc package you
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 10:21:27 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> IMO, I feel the problem with using the Fedora name in a repo or site makes
> people
> think it is formally affiliated with and endorsed by The Fedora Project.
> Companies
> such as Disney, Apple, Samsung, and others go to great lengt
On 16/2/18 6:52 am, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 02/14/2018 01:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 14/2/18 10:05 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 08:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
So from my perspective the vlc package you had problems with works fine
on my system.
The packages I h
On 02/14/2018 01:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 14/2/18 10:05 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 08:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> So from my perspective the vlc package you had problems with works fine
>>> on my system.
>>>
>>> The packages I have installed are:
>>>
>>
On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 23:19 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 15/2/18 8:59 pm, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 10:21 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 02/15/18 10:06, Tim wrote:
> > > > On 02/13/18 20:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > > > Sorry for the confusion. The repo
On 15/2/18 8:59 pm, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 10:21 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/15/18 10:06, Tim wrote:
On 02/13/18 20:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Sorry for the confusion. The repo name misled me into thinking it
was an official Fedora one.
Ed Greshko:
Understand
On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 10:21 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 02/15/18 10:06, Tim wrote:
> > On 02/13/18 20:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > Sorry for the confusion. The repo name misled me into thinking it
> > > > was an official Fedora one.
> >
> > Ed Greshko:
> > > Understandable. IMO, they
On 02/14/18 15:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 02/15/18 04:24, Kevin Cummings wrote:
>> On 02/13/18 16:59, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 02/14/18 05:23, Stephen Morris wrote:
I use Negativo17 because in the past I have found that rpmfusion were very
tardy
with their Nvidia binary files in kee
On 02/15/18 10:06, Tim wrote:
> On 02/13/18 20:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> Sorry for the confusion. The repo name misled me into thinking it
>>> was an official Fedora one.
> Ed Greshko:
>> Understandable. IMO, they should be discouraged from using the
>> "fedora" name for that very reason.
On 02/13/18 20:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> Sorry for the confusion. The repo name misled me into thinking it
>> was an official Fedora one.
Ed Greshko:
> Understandable. IMO, they should be discouraged from using the
> "fedora" name for that very reason.
I have mixed feelings about that.
On 14/2/18 10:05 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 08:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
So from my perspective the vlc package you had problems with works fine
on my system.
The packages I have installed are:
bash-4.4$ rpm -qa vlc*
vlc-core-3.0.0-25.20180109git0c462fc.fc27.x8
On 14/2/18 8:59 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/14/18 05:23, Stephen Morris wrote:
I use Negativo17 because in the past I have found that rpmfusion were very tardy
with their Nvidia binary files in keeping pace with kernel version changes. I
have
all the negativo17 repositories enabled and all the
On 02/15/18 04:24, Kevin Cummings wrote:
> On 02/13/18 16:59, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 02/14/18 05:23, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> I use Negativo17 because in the past I have found that rpmfusion were very
>>> tardy
>>> with their Nvidia binary files in keeping pace with kernel version changes.
>>>
On 02/13/18 16:59, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 02/14/18 05:23, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> I use Negativo17 because in the past I have found that rpmfusion were very
>> tardy
>> with their Nvidia binary files in keeping pace with kernel version changes.
>> I have
>> all the negativo17 repositories enable
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 08:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> So from my perspective the vlc package you had problems with works fine
> on my system.
>
> The packages I have installed are:
>
>
> bash-4.4$ rpm -qa vlc*
> vlc-core-3.0.0-25.20180109git0c462fc.fc27.x86_64
> vlc-3.0.0-25.20180109git0c4
On 02/14/18 05:23, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I use Negativo17 because in the past I have found that rpmfusion were very
> tardy
> with their Nvidia binary files in keeping pace with kernel version changes. I
> have
> all the negativo17 repositories enabled and all the rpmfusion repositories
> enab
On 14/2/18 7:55 am, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/13/2018 12:44 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Ed, just my 2 cents worth, I have the same setup as Patrick, and
like Patrick I use the negativo17 repositories for Nvidia (I found
rpmfusion to be not reliable enough with their binary files for
nvidia), but
On 13/2/18 11:51 pm, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 13:36 +0100, Jon Ingason wrote:
Den 2018-02-13 kl. 13:14, skrev Ed Greshko:
On 02/13/18 19:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
3.0.0-rc5-0-gf53236af09)
Oh, you mention "fedora-multimedia". Is that an actual fedora sponsored r
On 02/13/2018 12:44 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Ed, just my 2 cents worth, I have the same setup as Patrick, and like
Patrick I use the negativo17 repositories for Nvidia (I found rpmfusion
to be not reliable enough with their binary files for nvidia), but I'm
also using their repositories for
On 14/2/18 12:34 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 20:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Sorry for the confusion. The repo name misled me into thinking it was
an official Fedora one.
Understandable. IMO, they should be discouraged from using the "fedora" name
for
that very reason.
Hi Ed, just
On 02/13/18 20:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion. The repo name misled me into thinking it was
> an official Fedora one.
Understandable. IMO, they should be discouraged from using the "fedora" name
for
that very reason.
--
A motto of mine is: When in doubt, try it out
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 13:36 +0100, Jon Ingason wrote:
> Den 2018-02-13 kl. 13:14, skrev Ed Greshko:
> > On 02/13/18 19:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> 3.0.0-rc5-0-gf53236af09)
> >
> > Oh, you mention "fedora-multimedia". Is that an actual fedora sponsored
> > repo or a
> > 3rd party repo li
Den 2018-02-13 kl. 13:14, skrev Ed Greshko:
> On 02/13/18 19:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
3.0.0-rc5-0-gf53236af09)
>
> Oh, you mention "fedora-multimedia". Is that an actual fedora sponsored repo
> or a
> 3rd party repo like rpmfusion? I ask since I've not heard of that one.
>
It is netati
On 02/13/18 19:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 08:10 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 02/13/18 07:58, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> Some time in recent weeks vlc stopped working for me, i.e. it will no
>>> longer play .avi, .mp4 or .mkv files but just lists a continuous stream
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 08:10 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 02/13/18 07:58, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Some time in recent weeks vlc stopped working for me, i.e. it will no
> > longer play .avi, .mp4 or .mkv files but just lists a continuous stream
> > of errors to the console (see below). I'm cu
On 02/13/18 07:58, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Some time in recent weeks vlc stopped working for me, i.e. it will no
> longer play .avi, .mp4 or .mkv files but just lists a continuous stream
> of errors to the console (see below). I'm currently on:
>
> $ rpm -qa vlc\*
> vlc-extras-3.0.0-25.2018010
Some time in recent weeks vlc stopped working for me, i.e. it will no
longer play .avi, .mp4 or .mkv files but just lists a continuous stream
of errors to the console (see below). I'm currently on:
$ rpm -qa vlc\*
vlc-extras-3.0.0-25.20180109git0c462fc.fc27.x86_64
vlc-core-3.0.0-25.20180109git0c46
28 matches
Mail list logo
