On Sat, 2021-11-20 at 22:22 +, Reon Beon via users wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-11-18 at 04:57 +, Reon Beon via users wrote:
> >
> > Do what? Remember that HyperKitty doesn't quote anything by default
> > and
> > most people here are seeing your post in their mail reader.
> >
> > poc
That quo
> On Thu, 2021-11-18 at 04:57 +, Reon Beon via users wrote:
>
> Do what? Remember that HyperKitty doesn't quote anything by default and
> most people here are seeing your post in their mail reader.
>
> poc
packagekit updates
___
On Thu, 2021-11-18 at 04:57 +, Reon Beon via users wrote:
> I wish it would automatically do it on reboot/shutdown.
Do what? Remember that HyperKitty doesn't quote anything by default and
most people here are seeing your post in their mail reader.
poc
_
I wish it would automatically do it on reboot/shutdown.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-
Hello,
tl;dr is packagekit supposed to download updates in the background?
On Fedora Workstation, I have long been in the habit of installing
updates through Gnome Software every time before I shut down my
computer. Recently, however, I decided to see how the automatic
background updates work
On 9/26/21 6:10 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
Quite right this is a type error ! In the application when I choose
Applications /System Tools /Problem Reporting the URL is spelled
correctly . What now ?
Has it something to do with Bugzilla ? I think it is very important to
report problems so t
On 9/21/21 11:59 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
When I want to do a Problem Reporting ( Bugzilla ? ) I get the message
: https://retrace.fedoraproject .org does not excist ( server error 404 ).
Well of course it doesn't. There's a space before the final .org that
makes it into an invalid url.
Hay
On 9/21/21 11:59 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
When I want to do a Problem Reporting ( Bugzilla ? ) I get the message :
https://retrace.fedoraproject .org does not excist ( server error 404 ).
Well of course it doesn't. There's a space before the final .org that
makes it into an invalid url.
To all ,
When I activate the screensaver I get the message " Mate-Screensaver quit
unexpectedly".
Application crsh Package-Kit : The same message.
When this happens ( after a delay of ca. 5 minutes ) I get a blue screen
and have to turn off the cumputer by force ; So tturn hardware OFF.
W
To all,
When I activate the screesaver I get the message : Mate-Screensaver quit
unexpectedly : Application crash, Packagekit idem : Application crash .
When this happens ( after a delay of 5 minutes ) I get a blue screen and
have to turn off the system by force , so hardware OFF.
When
Bug 1979048 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979048>
TLDNR:
Fedora 34, updated from Fedora 33 and using zsh. System has been updated
using dnf.
zsh uses:
PackageKit-command-not-found.x86_64 : Ask the user to install command line
programs automatically
% xindy
zsh:
der of magnitude.
https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/issues
Richard.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US
e from texlive.
I can, of course, update with dnf, but I was wondering if there is a way to
raise the limit of packages packagekit is willing to process so I wouldn't have
to worry about it?
--
Terveisin / Regards,
Matti Pulkkinen
___
users maili
system, with 147M for f26, which I have am not yet
>> running. When I do upgrade, it will be via dnf system-upgrade, so the
>> PackageKit data does nothing for me.
>>
>> Alternatively, you can remove PackageKit and gnome-software if you
>> don't use them:
>&g
On Sun, 2017-12-03 at 10:18 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 02/12/2017 alle 19.21 -0500, Todd Zullinger ha scritto:
> > I don't make use of PackageKit and
> > Gnome Software, so I "solve" this for myself by removing those
> > packages rather than t
Il giorno sab, 02/12/2017 alle 19.21 -0500, Todd Zullinger ha scritto:
> I don't make use of PackageKit and
> Gnome Software, so I "solve" this for myself by removing those
> packages rather than trying to fix it.
This seem is a finally solution.
Why not do it for all
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 19:21:55 -0500
Todd Zullinger wrote:
While I'm sure some bugs are not viewed by any maintainers, I'd wager
that's far fewer than thoss which are viewed and the maintainer simply
lacks enough time to do anything with it.
On the other hand there are the b
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 19:21:55 -0500
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> While I'm sure some bugs are not viewed by any maintainers, I'd wager
> that's far fewer than thoss which are viewed and the maintainer simply
> lacks enough time to do anything with it.
On the other hand there are the bugs which are on
, so as a reporter we can only guess. It would be ideal
if all bug reports led to fixes, but that's not likely.
With this particular PackageKit issue, I think that it might be
lingering for longer because the users most affected are less likely
to be folks that would dig into the probl
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 12:35:51 -0800
Joe Zeff wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easier to mask the service and be done with it? Or,
> if that prevents it from running when you need it, disable it.
You're right. I suppose I should get around to doing that.
___
use
On 12/02/2017 12:17 PM, stan wrote:
You'll also have to move the file
kde-org.freedesktop.PackageKit.service
to
kde-org.freedesktop.PackageKit.service.bak
in the /usr/share/dbus-1/services directory if you have kde installed.
This will have to be done every time PackageKit is updated, but
n I do upgrade, it will be via dnf system-upgrade, so the
> PackageKit data does nothing for me.
>
> Alternatively, you can remove PackageKit and gnome-software if you
> don't use them:
>
> sudo dnf remove PackageKit* gnome-software
Another alternative for disabling P
On 12/02/2017 11:58 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
Not DONTCARE, more "really busy with other stuff". If somebody else
figures out a good way to invalidate the cache (probably done in
libdnf), I'm happy to review patches and build packages. It can't *all*
be on my shoulders, right? Richard
That's
Not DONTCARE, more "really busy with other stuff". If somebody else figures
out a good way to invalidate the cache (probably done in libdnf), I'm happy
to review patches and build packages. It can't *all* be on my shoulders,
right? Richard
On 2 Dec 2017 19:00, "Joe Zeff" wrote:
> On 12/02/2017 1
On 12/02/2017 10:54 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Both tickets have been around for a long time without any fixes,
unfortunately.
Judging by the lack of response on some bugzillas I've entered, the
appropriate resolution would be Closed, DON'TCARE.
___
Dario Lesca wrote:
How to I can disable packagekid to download update?
I do not use these packages downloaded uselessly from packagekit into
/var/cache/PackageKit/*/*/updates/... because I run sometimes when I
want and can, after, reboot, "sudo dnf update".
Unfortunately this co
How to I can disable packagekid to download update?
I do not use these packages downloaded uselessly from packagekit into
/var/cache/PackageKit/*/*/updates/... because I run sometimes when I
want and can, after, reboot, "sudo dnf update".
Unfortunately this command (dnf) do not use the
Hi,
My journal is full of these PackageKit messages, one of them each
second and never stop. Anyone knows how to stop them?
I have opened this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479665
sep 06 21:27:18 xenon PackageKit[32714]: get-updates transaction
/1315687_cdacdeee from uid
w Fedora 24, now 25, I do this step.
>
> sudo systemctl mask dnf-makecache dnf-makecache.timer packagekit
> packagekit-offline-update
> sudo systemctl stop dnf-makecache dnf-makecache.timer packagekit
> packagekit-offline-update
>
> rm -rf /var/cache/PackageKit/*
>
> And a
Dario Lesca:
>> Why not use the same cache of dnf?
Matthew Miller:
> That is work in progress. Both systems use the cache a little
> differently and grew up independently, so there is some work to align
> them.
Separate caching for the metadata, but pooled caching (and automated
purging control)
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 03:21:06PM +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > That cache _is_ the packagekit database. You can remove it safely.
> Why not use the same cache of dnf?
That is work in progress. Both systems use the cache a little
differently and grew up independently, so there is som
Il giorno mar, 27/12/2016 alle 11.42 -0500, Matthew Miller ha scritto:
> That cache _is_ the packagekit database. You can remove it safely.
Why not use the same cache of dnf?
In this way when someone use dnf install something the cache will be
removed.
IMHO Two cache of same (BIG!) things
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 08:58:46PM +, Schlaegel wrote:
> What would be a good course of action?
> I'm reluctant to use root to just delete the files, assuming that they are
> in some PackageKit database somewhere.
That cache _is_ the packagekit database. You can remove it safel
e dnf-makecache.timer packagekit
> packagekit-offline-update
> sudo systemctl stop dnf-makecache dnf-makecache.timer packagekit
> packagekit-offline-update
>
>
> rm -rf /var/cache/PackageKit/*
>
>
>
> And all still work.
Another way to avoid that PackageKit do
Il giorno lun, 26/12/2016 alle 20.58 +, Schlaegel ha scritto:
> What would be a good course of action?
After install a new Fedora 24, now 25, I do this step.
sudo systemctl mask dnf-makecache dnf-makecache.timer packagekit
packagekit-offline-update
sudo systemctl stop dnf-makecache
On 12/26/2016 04:21 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2016-12-26 at 20:58 +, Schlaegel wrote:
After a month of updates, I started seeing warnings about the size of the
var partition. Somehow /var/cache/PackageKit/24/metadata is still there and
very large. I tried `sudo pkcon re
t;
> I then worked through an issue with the stock repositories and packages
> causing my Nvidia graphics to lock up, and I eventually had a working
> system.
>
> After a month of updates, I started seeing warnings about the size of the
> var partition. Somehow /var/cache/PackageKit/
causing my Nvidia graphics to lock up, and I eventually had a working
system.
After a month of updates, I started seeing warnings about the size of the
var partition. Somehow /var/cache/PackageKit/24/metadata is still there and
very large. I tried `sudo pkcon refresh force -c -1` but I still have 3.3
On my Fedora 23 systems, /var/cache/PackageKit/metadata/updates/packages
is full of .rpm files. For example, 2.7G on my desktop.
/var/cache/PackageKit/metadata/fedora/packages has some too.
"sudo dnf clean packages" doesn't seem to change this. What does it
change?
What is
| From: stan
Thanks for your useful response. But there are still things that
puzzle/annoy me.
| On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:22:36 -0400 (EDT)
| "D. Hugh Redelmeier" wrote:
|
| > On my Fedora 23
| > systems, /var/cache/PackageKit/metadata/updates/packages is full
| > of .rpm
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:22:36 -0400 (EDT)
"D. Hugh Redelmeier" wrote:
> On my Fedora 23
> systems, /var/cache/PackageKit/metadata/updates/packages is full
> of .rpm files. For example, 2.7G on my desktop.
>
> /var/cache/PackageKit/metadata/fedora/packages has some
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:14:29 -0400 (EDT)
"D. Hugh Redelmeier" wrote:
> Isn't dnf the user interface to PackageKit?
I always disable PackageKit, so I'm probably not the best person to
answer this. But, my understanding is that PackageKit operates
independently of dnf
On 18/03/16 22:15, stan wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:14:29 -0400 (EDT)
"D. Hugh Redelmeier" wrote:
Isn't dnf the user interface to PackageKit?
I always disable PackageKit, so I'm probably not the best person to
answer this. But, my understanding is that PackageKit op
On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 08:29 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 24 October 2015 at 06:57, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > Where does packageKit keep its log
>
> It should all be in the systemd journal.
And so it is. Thanks.
Now all I have to do is learn the right way to extract th
On 24 October 2015 at 06:57, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Where does packageKit keep its log
It should all be in the systemd journal.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/us
Where does packageKit, which is (I assume) invoked by the KDE apper
program, keep its log. The log can be viewed in apper, but I would
like to have it in text form, so I can edit and search it.The
Fedora "User Guide - Managing Software" claims "Every completed
transaction recor
Can I configure packagekit so when it pops up that there are updates, I
can click install WITHOUT restarting the system?
--
-- Steve
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora
On 29.08.2013 16:21, chandan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On Fedora 19, the packagekit daemon runs once in while in the background.
> Can somebody please inform me about the systemd service that is responsible
> for spawning the packagekit daemon?
>
> - chandan
>
http
Hello all,
On Fedora 19, the packagekit daemon runs once in while in the background.
Can somebody please inform me about the systemd service that is responsible
for spawning the packagekit daemon?
- chandan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 19:26 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Quicksort wrote:
> >
> > Platform: *Fedora 17 x64*
> >
> >
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > Usually, updates frequency is high. But for about one week, none.
> >
> > How can I check my
Quicksort wrote:
Platform: *Fedora 17 x64*
Hello everybody,
Usually, updates frequency is high. But for about one week, none.
How can I check my installed YUM (refresh-packagekit ?) still
correctly does its work ? And what should I do if it does not ?
I have cron run "yum -y --downloa
On 02/21/2013 11:17 PM, Quicksort wrote:
Platform: *Fedora 17 x64*
Hello everybody,
Usually, updates frequency is high. But for about one week, none.
How can I check my installed YUM (refresh-packagekit ?) still
correctly does its work ? And what should I do if it does not ?
Thanks
Platform: *Fedora 17 x64*
Hello everybody,
Usually, updates frequency is high. But for about one week, none.
How can I check my installed YUM (refresh-packagekit ?) still
correctly does its work ? And what should I do if it does not ?
Thanks.
--
users mailing list
users
So, I keep getting this message:
Unable to send message to PackageKit
when I go into yum.
Looking through the archives, it was suggested that one should have
PackageKit-yum and PackageKit-yum-plugin if not, we should install.
I did have it, but I went an did a
sudo yum reinstall
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:42:29 -0500
Fedora User wrote:
> Yum keeps complaining. Any ideas what to try or file a bug against?
Nothing, it usually means one of PackageKit yum deps is missing.
sudo rpm -qa | grep PackageKit-yum
you should have: PackageKit-yum and PackageKit-yum-plugin
if
Yum keeps complaining. Any ideas what to try or file a bug against?
While I am at it, I have an incomplete yum transaction that I do not
want to complete. Does anyone know how to get yum to forget about it?
Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subs
How do I turn off the requiremnt for PackageKit to have signed pkgs?
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidel
On 03/27/2012 02:59 PM, Andy Blanchard wrote:
On 27 March 2012 19:54, Mark Haney
Sounds like you've hit the same bug myself and several others have. Is
so, it's not PackageKit causing the problem so much as Apper repeatedly
calling it - about every five minutes or so seems to b
On 27 March 2012 20:00, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I think uninstalling apper and the yum PK plugin would probably be
> better than ripping out everything PK.
Just remove PackageKit-yum-plugin if you don't want PK to check it's
caches after each command line action. I agree its a na
ccurately, but it's actually much worse
than that. The PackageKit yum plugin causes PK to update after every
yum transaction. While this is necessary as PK is used for the GUI
updater, I think the default wait time after the last yum transaction
is a bit short.
I think uninstalling apper and
same bug myself and several others have. Is so,
it's not PackageKit causing the problem so much as Apper repeatedly calling
it - about every five minutes or so seems to be the norm when this
happens. If you don't mind doing updates manually, then uninstalling Apper
will fix the problem
On 03/27/2012 02:45 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
On 03/27/2012 11:34 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
Why is it that PackageKit is sitting in the background constantly
leaving me pretty much unable to install any software from the command
line? Did I configure something to make it do that? And how in the
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Mark Haney wrote:
> Why is it that PackageKit is sitting in the background constantly leaving me
> pretty much unable to install any software from the command line? Did I
> configure something to make it do that? And how in the world can I make it
>
On 03/27/2012 11:34 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
Why is it that PackageKit is sitting in the background constantly
leaving me pretty much unable to install any software from the command
line? Did I configure something to make it do that? And how in the
world can I make it stop?
yum remove
Why is it that PackageKit is sitting in the background constantly
leaving me pretty much unable to install any software from the command
line? Did I configure something to make it do that? And how in the
world can I make it stop?
--
Mark Haney
Software Developer/Consultant
AB Emblem
ma
endent of the underlying package management system. On
> Fedora, it's essentially a GUI for yum, but not the only one.
[...snip...]
Not only that, but unlike yum (which of course I like and use often),
PackageKit is D-Bus aware so it can be responsive to things happening
on the desktop, suc
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:33:31 + Andy Blanchard
wrote:
> PackageKit isn't one of my favourite parts of Fedora, but a lot of the
> problems people are having and citing here are not actually to do with
> PackageKit but are in fact the fault of Apper. If you don't mind doi
PackageKit isn't one of my favourite parts of Fedora, but a lot of the
problems people are having and citing here are not actually to do with
PackageKit but are in fact the fault of Apper. If you don't mind doing
manual updates with yum, then uninstalling Apper might make your life a
On 03/14/2012 11:06 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 12:10 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > What exactly is the purpose of PackageKit?
>
> It's an abstraction over various package management and dependency
> solving backends. The website has lots o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/14/2012 12:10 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What exactly is the purpose of PackageKit?
It's an abstraction over various package management and dependency
solving backends. The website has lots of information:
http://www.packagekit.org/
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:56:40 + Ian Malone
wrote:
> On 14 March 2012 12:40, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:36 +
> > Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> What exactly is the purpose of PackageKit?
> >
> > I could but a sarcastic comme
On 14 March 2012 12:40, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:36 +
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>> What exactly is the purpose of PackageKit?
>
> I could but a sarcastic comment here, but I'd better not.
> I find it to be the most annoying interface yet in
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:40:12 -0400 Tom Horsley
wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:36 +
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> > What exactly is the purpose of PackageKit?
>
> I could but a sarcastic comment here, but I'd better not.
> I find it to be the most annoy
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 12:10 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What exactly is the purpose of PackageKit?
> Is it essential?
No.
> It is used by yum in some way?
Other way round. It uses yum. It's an attempt at a "universal" interface
that's independent of the underly
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:10:36 +
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What exactly is the purpose of PackageKit?
I could but a sarcastic comment here, but I'd better not.
I find it to be the most annoying interface yet in a
long history of annoying interfaces to software package
management system
What exactly is the purpose of PackageKit?
Is it essential?
It is used by yum in some way?
I'm asking because I get an error message
---
Fetch Job Error - Plasma Desktop Shell
Unknown error. (Unable to fetch item from backend)
---
whe
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 17:05 +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:32:44AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> > In the past few weeks, when you update have you had the tool freeze
> > on you after it is finished? I've reported bug 761092 that I can
> > reproduce reliabl
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 13:28 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 09:21 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
>
> >
> > Indeed so - however it is not unusual for abrt to require pulling in
> > several hundred megabytes of debuginfo stuff in order to file a report
> > - and I wonder if that might put a
Richard Hughes wrote:
I think I've found this bug a few hours ago. Could someone try
building PK with the upstream commit
f8ba469a9d992269ca655dc2c21b995cd877fe15 please? Thanks.
Richard,
I looked at that commit, but the 0.6 branch does not have the same code
so your commit cannot apply to th
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:32:44AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> In the past few weeks, when you update have you had the tool freeze
> on you after it is finished? I've reported bug 761092 that I can
> reproduce reliably on three different computers but I haven't seen
> anyone else talk abo
On 14 December 2011 15:32, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> -Asks for reboot or logout
> -The reboot/logout window is not clickable.
> -The gpk-update-viewer process is using 100% CPU time.
I think I've found this bug a few hours ago. Could someone try
building PK with the upstream commit
f8ba469a9d9
To those of you that use Fedora 16, Gnome, and use the Software Updates
tool:
In the past few weeks, when you update have you had the tool freeze on
you after it is finished? I've reported bug 761092 that I can reproduce
reliably on three different computers but I haven't seen anyone else
tal
On 12/13/2011 09:21 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
>
> Indeed so - however it is not unusual for abrt to require pulling in
> several hundred megabytes of debuginfo stuff in order to file a report
> - and I wonder if that might put a significant number of users off and
> abandon completing the report at
On 12/13/2011 06:21 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
This may already be inhibiting the provision of some fraction of
important abrt entries? It would be interesting to hear other people's
view on this aspect?
In some cases, that might even be a good thing, IMAO. As I mentioned in
another thread, I'm
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 12:36 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
>> It appears that upgrading abrt in F16 from 2.0.6-1 to 2.0.7-2 is going
>> to require installation of PackageKit, which I long ago purged from my
>> s
abrt-2.0.6-1 managed to do pull down debug info without PackageKit.
Not sure what it used
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 12/13/2011 04:08 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:42 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 12:36 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
>>> It appears that upgrading abrt in F16 from 2.0.6-1 to 2.0.7-2 is going
>>> to re
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:42 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 12:36 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> > It appears that upgrading abrt in F16 from 2.0.6-1 to 2.0.7-2 is going
> > to require installation of PackageKit, which I long ago purged from my
> > s
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 12:36 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> It appears that upgrading abrt in F16 from 2.0.6-1 to 2.0.7-2 is going
> to require installation of PackageKit, which I long ago purged from my
> system. Just wondering, why the additional requirement?
>
ABRT will pull do
It appears that upgrading abrt in F16 from 2.0.6-1 to 2.0.7-2 is going
to require installation of PackageKit, which I long ago purged from my
system. Just wondering, why the additional requirement?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options
Hi,
This is F14.
I tried an update:
menu: System-Administration-Software Update (which is PackageKit)
...
Transaction error:
could not add package update for
sane-backends-libs-1.0.22-5.fc14(i686)updates:
sane-backends-libs-1.0.22-5.fc14.i686
which means the update process was interrupted and
On 15 October 2011 17:51, Ardhan Madras wrote:
> Sorry, It's actually the router that has CDMA connection.
> My FC15 box connected and using it as gateway. The router
> connection got slw when PackageKit was running in the FC15.
Right, so PackageKit thinks you've g
Thats what I was looking for, thanks Frank.
Ardhan
--- frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Frank Murphy
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Disable yum update check for PackageKit
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:04:24 +0100
On 15/10/11 17:51, Ardhan Madras wrote:
> Sorry, I
On 15/10/11 17:51, Ardhan Madras wrote:
> Sorry, It's actually the router that has CDMA connection.
> My FC15 box connected and using it as gateway. The router
> connection got slw when PackageKit was running in the FC15.
>
> I want to disable automatic Package
Sorry, It's actually the router that has CDMA connection.
My FC15 box connected and using it as gateway. The router
connection got slw when PackageKit was running in the FC15.
I want to disable automatic PackageKit yum update check.
Ardhan
--- hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 October 2011 12:51, Ardhan Madras wrote:
> How to disable PackageKit's yum update that sometime
> run in background?, I have very sloow and limited CDMA
> internet connection.
PackageKit shouldn't be doing background operations when on mobile
broad
Hi Sam,
Unfortunately the package is not installed. To be more clear here the
process of PackageKit.
[root@sandybridge Downloads]# ps ax | grep yum
7185 ?SN 0:04 /usr/bin/python /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yum
Any pointer how to disable this automatic background process
Ardhan Madras writes:
Hi All,
How to disable PackageKit's yum update that sometime
run in background?, I have very sloow and limited CDMA
internet connection. I feel disturbed by this that eat the
whole modem bandwidth and make my application has no
bandwidth portion. I'm using
Hi All,
How to disable PackageKit's yum update that sometime
run in background?, I have very sloow and limited CDMA
internet connection. I feel disturbed by this that eat the
whole modem bandwidth and make my application has no
bandwidth portion. I'm using FC15.
Ardha
On 06/05/2011 01:26 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 08:16 +0800, H Xu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I didn't use PackageKit when I was using Fedora 14. Now it seems that I
>> can't uninstall PackageKit without uninstalling those packages. Is this
&g
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
