On 17/12/2019 17:21, Richard Shaw wrote:
Since I did a *LITTLE* CFD in college I decided to take a look and as
I expected OpenFOAM will likely not be easy to package...
1. It's designed to install to $HOME or /opt (but I believe that can
be modified).
2. It uses a custom build system (
Since I did a *LITTLE* CFD in college I decided to take a look and as I
expected OpenFOAM will likely not be easy to package...
1. It's designed to install to $HOME or /opt (but I believe that can be
modified).
2. It uses a custom build system (wmake) and the documentation seems to
indicate
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:12 PM linux guy wrote:
> Subject says it all.
>
Well, not exactly... :)
Since all packages are maintained by volunteers it might be a good idea to
explain:
1. What is the package about? A link to upstream for those that want more
information?
2. What the value of the
Subject says it all.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https:
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 14:25 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
> if you hadn't heard of OpenFoam, you had the option of ignoring the
> post, or doing a quick check to find out what it was about (as I said,
> it took me three seconds) - what's the point of a long thread
> casti
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 08:23 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> I have scotch building from a source RPM with minimal rpmlint output
>> (at least what I can personally fix).
>
> You're making open source booze? ;-)
Why not? :)
I didn't name it :) I'm n
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 08:23 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I have scotch building from a source RPM with minimal rpmlint output
> (at least what I can personally fix).
You're making open source booze? ;-)
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to
On 12/23/2011 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
You seem to have missed the point of the complaint
you seem to miss the point of my complaint, which is about your
incessant, pedantic, self-centered, nanny-routine
now I'm feeding you. I've said my piece - you may have the last word
--
Claud
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 14:25 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
> if you hadn't heard of OpenFoam, you had the
> option of ignoring the post, or doing a quick check to find out what
> it was about (as I said, it took me three seconds)
You seem to have missed the point of the complaint,
forests around here - there are too many
passing time in self-laudatory pedestal mounting, while slinging
put-downs of others
the Openfoam project is probably of great interest to a very small
subset of listmembers - they would have appreciated the new information
if they hadn't heard it -
l
>> information to what you posted originally.
>>
>
> /aim at high horse ---> The OpenFOAM®
> (Open Field Operation and Manipulation) CFD Toolbox is a free, open
> source CFD software package produced by OpenCFD Ltd. It has a large
> user base ac
kernel. It's a niche interest, but of course I
know that only because of information from another poster, since your
reply adds precisely no useful information to what you posted
originally.
/aim at high horse --->
The OpenFOAM® (Open Field Operation and Manipula
> never heard of Google??
Long before Google came manners. You might like to look those up on
google too
> as already explained, thread was already open: I will not spend any more
> time (that I don't have) to add any single line why I didn't (or I forgot to)
> add the d
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Antonio M wrote:
> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
>
> On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
> think that the instruction module load openmpi-x86_64 should be read
> module load openmpii38
On 12/22/2011 11:47 PM, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
> as already explained, thread was already open: I will not spend any more
> time (that I don't have) to add any single line why I didn't (or I forgot to)
> add the description of Openfoam...
You are totally inc
On 12/22/2011 08:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 16:32 +0100, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
never heard of Google??
Unbelievable. Do you *still* not get it? In words of one syllable: why
do you make me look at a web page to see if I want this? Why do you not
just t
On 12/22/2011 07:39 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Make the effort to explain yourself just a little bit. Not all of us
are rocket scientists.
Not only that, not all of us share your interests. Just because this
project is very important to you doesn't mean that world+dog is going to
recognize it wi
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 16:47 +0100, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
> as already explained, thread was already open
Wrong. There is a discussion about two month ago. Your new message is
not part of that thread and makes no reference to it.
I'm done discussing this.
poc
--
users mailing list
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 16:32 +0100, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
> never heard of Google??
Unbelievable. Do you *still* not get it? In words of one syllable: why
do you make me look at a web page to see if I want this? Why do you not
just tell the list in the first place?
poc
--
users mail
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 15:47 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> 2011/12/22 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:27 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> >> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
> >>
> >> On the download page http
>Messaggio originale
>Da: ed.gres...@greshko.com
>Data: 22-dic-2011
16.39
>A: "Community support for Fedora users"
>Ogg: Re: R: Re: Openfoam is
available!!!
>
>On 12/22/2011 11:32 PM, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
>>
never heard of Google?
On 12/22/2011 11:32 PM, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
> never heard of Google??
I am sure he has heard of Google...and so have I.
But, the point is don't make people search to determine what you are
talking about in order to see if they are interested to know more.
Make the effort to explai
>Messaggio originale
>Da: pocallag...@gmail.com
>Data: 22-dic-2011
16.22
>A:
>Ogg: Re: Openfoam is available!!!
>
>On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 15:47
+0100, Antonio M wrote:
>> 2011/12/22 Patrick O'Callaghan :
>> > On Thu, 2011-
12-22 at 09:27
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 15:47 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> 2011/12/22 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:27 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> >> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
> >>
> >> On the download page http://www.open
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 15:12 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> So if you don't already know what openfoam is, you definitely don't
> need it,
> and you are safe to just ignore the threads about it. :-)
>
Thanks for the explanation, but a single line from the OP saying
"C
On Thursday 22 December 2011 10:09:16 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:27 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> > Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
> >
> > On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
>
2011/12/22 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:27 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
>> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
>>
>> On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
>> think that the instruction module lo
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Antonio M wrote:
> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
>
> On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
> think that the instruction module load openmpi-x86_64 should be read
> module load openmpii38
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:27 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
>
> On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
> think that the instruction module load openmpi-x86_64 should be read
> module load openmpi
Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
think that the instruction module load openmpi-x86_64 should be read
module load openmpii386 in case of 32 bit.
Shall it be included in the official repos
urce.php
>>3. Wanting to be compiled in the location it's installed to is bad...
>
> There's still a lot of old-school left in OpenFOAM. Object files go into
> subdirectories within each library. The #include strategy is particularly
> stupid - each library requires
in this: http://www.openfoam.org/git.php
>3. Wanting to be compiled in the location it's installed to is bad...
There's still a lot of old-school left in OpenFOAM. Object files go into
subdirectories within each library. The #include strategy is particularly
stupid - each library re
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:20 AM, David Gaden wrote:
> (First post, am I doing it right?)
Well I can read it so I guess so! :)
> I saw you guys were looking at OpenFOAM, and Richard attempted a build but
> gave up. I suspect this was bad timing - the guys at OpenCFD just patche
(First post, am I doing it right?)
I saw you guys were looking at OpenFOAM, and Richard attempted a build but gave
up. I suspect this was bad timing - the guys at OpenCFD just patched their
repository to accommodate the DSO linking changes (i.e. yesterday). Also, as
an (independent
Ok, I'm pretty much giving up. This is some strange software from a
build/install point of view. The build takes forever, bundles a lot of
projects... If anyone is interested in the source RPM I started let me
know. An easier option may be FreeFOAM. It's a fork of OpenFOAM that
uses c
Wow this thing is strange.
It appears that you build in place, and by that I mean all the install
documentation I found says you go ahead and extract the archive to
it's installation place and build it.
You even have to source a bashrc file just to set it up so it will
build. I'm building now. I
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 02:30 AM, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
>>
>> has anyone installed successfully Openfoam in Fedora??
>> (http://www.openfoam.org
>>
>>
>> I think that it should be included in
On 10/21/2011 02:30 AM, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
>
> has anyone installed successfully Openfoam in Fedora??
> (http://www.openfoam.org
>
>
> I think that it should be included in official repo, as it is widely used in
> teh academic world.
>
> Tnx
Apparentl
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:30 AM, antonio.montagn...@alice.it
wrote:
>
>
> has anyone installed successfully Openfoam in Fedora??
> (http://www.openfoam.org
>
>
> I think that it should be included in official repo, as it is widely used in
> teh academic world.
I'm
has anyone installed successfully Openfoam in Fedora?? (http://www.openfoam.org
I think that it should be included in official repo, as it is widely used in
teh academic world.
Tnx
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
40 matches
Mail list logo
