Re: OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-29 Thread Genes MailLists
On 09/29/2010 03:51 PM, James Mckenzie wrote: e. >> > The community should have seen this coming. Next up might be spinning off of > Java. Oracle is in the business of making money (lot of it.) > > Supporting 'free' software is not in their game plan. Basically, Oracle > bought Sun Microsyst

Re: OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-29 Thread James Mckenzie
Genes MailLists wrote: > >On 09/29/2010 12:51 PM, JD wrote: >> >> >> On 09/29/2010 07:09 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: Hundreds of thousands of Solaris installed bases will not dump Solaris and switch to Linux. Too darned expensive to do so. >>>I doubt there are 100's of 1,000's of bu

Re: OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-29 Thread Genes MailLists
On 09/29/2010 12:51 PM, JD wrote: > > > On 09/29/2010 07:09 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: >>> Hundreds of thousands of Solaris installed bases will not dump >>> Solaris and switch to Linux. Too darned expensive to do so. >>I doubt there are 100's of 1,000's of business' running opensolaris ... >

Re: OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-29 Thread JD
On 09/29/2010 07:09 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: >> Hundreds of thousands of Solaris installed bases will not dump >> Solaris and switch to Linux. Too darned expensive to do so. >I doubt there are 100's of 1,000's of business' running opensolaris ... Solaris runs all over USA, Europe, Asia and

Re: OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-29 Thread Genes MailLists
On 09/29/2010 11:05 AM, Michal wrote: > >>I doubt there are 100's of 1,000's of business' running opensolaris >> ... > I don't > opensolaris not solaris ? really ? wow .. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedo

Re: OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-29 Thread Genes MailLists
On 09/29/2010 02:08 AM, JD wrote: > > >> > Hundreds of thousands of Solaris installed bases will not dump > Solaris and switch to Linux. Too darned expensive to do so. I doubt there are 100's of 1,000's of business' running opensolaris ... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-28 Thread JD
On 09/28/2010 10:10 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 09/29/2010 12:12 AM, JD wrote: > >> Well, my reading of the "software crystal ball" :) tells me >> that business is in a nosedive worldwide. >> Oracle has already refused to participate in the new open >> source OS which is supposed to be based

Re: OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-28 Thread Genes MailLists
On 09/29/2010 12:12 AM, JD wrote: > Well, my reading of the "software crystal ball" :) tells me > that business is in a nosedive worldwide. > Oracle has already refused to participate in the new open > source OS which is supposed to be based on opensolaris. completely different - (open)solari

Re: OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-28 Thread JD
On 09/28/2010 08:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 19:46:11 -0700, >edik landave wrote: >> Long Life to LibreOffice! > Note that it is still possible they will get to use the openoffice.org > trademark as Oracle has been invited to participate. > See the H coverage of t

Re: OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 19:46:11 -0700, edik landave wrote: > Long Life to LibreOffice! Note that it is still possible they will get to use the openoffice.org trademark as Oracle has been invited to participate. See the H coverage of this: http://www.h-online.com/open/features/LibreOffice-A-fre

Re: OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-28 Thread edik landave
Long Life to LibreOffice! On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Dear folks, > > Upon reading some alerts, I have found out that OpenOffice is being forked > and now it will be LibreOffice.  It has the backing of Novel, Red Hat, ..., > etc.  This had to be done because of O

OpenOffice to LibreOffice

2010-09-28 Thread Antonio Olivares
Dear folks, Upon reading some alerts, I have found out that OpenOffice is being forked and now it will be LibreOffice. It has the backing of Novel, Red Hat, ..., etc. This had to be done because of Oracle's recent treatment of OpenSolaris, and the possibility of it doing something similar her