Re: Nvidia problem after kernel 2.6.32.9-70.fc12 update

2010-03-12 Thread Serguei Miridonov
On Friday 12 March 2010, Marcel Rieux wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: > > The nvidia module is missing. > > I haven't updated yet because I'm still waiting for kmod-nvidia, > the module needed by the kernel for nvidia cards (proprietary > driver only, I'm not sure. I

Re: Nvidia problem after kernel 2.6.32.9-70.fc12 update

2010-03-12 Thread Dario Lesca
Il giorno gio, 11/03/2010 alle 17.51 -0500, Marcel Rieux ha scritto: > Once again NVIDIA drivers are creating a mess. Go to Google, enter > 2.6.32.9-70 and fedora, you'll see. This should not happen. The kernel's dependencies should be linked with any additional

Re: Nvidia problem after kernel 2.6.32.9-70.fc12 update

2010-03-11 Thread Michael Hannon
Howdy. Just to add my $0.02, we've got a couple of dual-monitor systems around here, both running Fedora 12, 64-bit. We're using akmod-nvidia on both systems, and both systems are fully patched and rebooted with the latest kernel. Our experience is that the video works flawlessly on both syste

Re: Nvidia problem after kernel 2.6.32.9-70.fc12 update

2010-03-11 Thread Marcel Rieux
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: > The nvidia module is missing. I haven't updated yet because I'm still waiting for kmod-nvidia, the module needed by the kernel for nvidia cards (proprietary driver only, I'm not sure. I suppose so,) Now, when I do "yum update", kmod-nvidia is

Re: Nvidia problem after kernel 2.6.32.9-70.fc12 update

2010-03-11 Thread Dave Martin
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:16:55AM -0600, Andre Goree wrote: > I am also having these issues after the recent kernel update. I even > installed the up-to-date akmod-nvidia package, to no end. > > I was able to boot into the previous kernel and it worked though, so > that is my temporary workaro

Re: Nvidia problem after kernel 2.6.32.9-70.fc12 update

2010-03-11 Thread Andre Goree
Doron Bar Zeev wrote: > > > I have the same problem ( X won't startup ) with the new kernel. > There are these lines in /var/log/messages that seem to indicate what > serguei wrote: > > Mar 11 16:39:17 DoronPc kernel: NVRM: this kernel module has the version > 190.53. Please > Mar 11 16:39:17

Re: Nvidia problem after kernel 2.6.32.9-70.fc12 update

2010-03-11 Thread Doron Bar Zeev
I have the same problem ( X won't startup ) with the new kernel. There are these lines in /var/log/messages that seem to indicate what serguei wrote: Mar 11 16:39:17 DoronPc kernel: NVRM: this kernel module has the version 190.53. Please Mar 11 16:39:17 DoronPc kernel: NVRM: make sure that this k

Re: Nvidia problem after kernel 2.6.32.9-70.fc12 update

2010-03-11 Thread Serguei Miridonov
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Dario Lesca wrote: > This morning, after kernel + nvidia driver update I get this error: > > Mar 11 08:46:45 lesca kernel: NVRM: API mismatch: the client has > > the version 195.36.08, but Mar 11 08:46:45 lesca kernel: NVRM: > > this kernel module has the version 190.53.

Nvidia problem after kernel 2.6.32.9-70.fc12 update

2010-03-11 Thread Dario Lesca
This morning, after kernel + nvidia driver update I get this error: > Mar 11 08:46:45 lesca kernel: NVRM: API mismatch: the client has the version > 195.36.08, but > Mar 11 08:46:45 lesca kernel: NVRM: this kernel module has the version > 190.53. Please > Mar 11 08:46:45 lesca kernel: NVRM: mak