Re: Non-responsive maintainer: joost

2018-01-25 Thread Richard Shaw
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > I was going to say the devel list, per the Non-responsive > Maintainer Policy¹. > > I imagine that's what Richard intended. :) > > ¹ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_ > package_maintainers > > Yes... autocomplete err

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: joost

2018-01-25 Thread Todd Zullinger
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 07:19 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I have bug reports for both fpc and lazarus that have >> gone for weeks without any response and it's preventing >> me from building cqrlog on armv7hl in rawhide due to >> lazbuild and hedgewars has a segmentatio

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: joost

2018-01-25 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 07:19 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > I have bug reports for both fpc and lazarus that have gone for weeks without > any response and it's preventing me from building cqrlog on armv7hl in > rawhide due to lazbuild and hedgewars has a segmentation fault due to a bug > in fpc.

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: joost

2018-01-25 Thread Richard Shaw
They are largely referenced in the fedora-active-user output but here are the BZ links: fpc: needs bootstrap for armhfp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491788 SIGSEGV during game shutdown with hedgewars 0.9.23 (hwengine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526848 CQRLOG fai

Non-responsive maintainer: joost

2018-01-25 Thread Richard Shaw
Per the policy I am asking here if anyone knows how to get in touch with joost (jo...@cnoc.nl). I have bug reports for both fpc and lazarus that have gone for weeks without any response and it's preventing me from building cqrlog on armv7hl in rawhide due to lazbuild and hedgewars has a segmentati