Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-14 Thread Ed Greshko
On 15/05/2021 11:46, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Tried the correct address as soon as my mind quit pl aying tricks on me then caught on that the second ipv6 address wanted the tag of the local deviceĀ  attached So, everything is working as expected. Bottom line, it was just the wrong IPv4

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-14 Thread Robert McBroom via users
On 5/14/21 8:38 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 14/05/2021 19:35, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/12/21 6:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 13/05/2021 04:05, Roger Heflin wrote: Do an "ip route" on both the source and destination nodes. also do an "ip neigh" on both. And an "ip link" on both. Yes,

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-14 Thread Roger Heflin
Since it is allowing ipv6 and but blocking v4 it feels like an iptables/firewall setting blocking v4. Are there any firewall/iptables rules on either node and if so what do they look like? On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 7:39 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 14/05/2021 19:35, Robert McBroom via users wrote:

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-14 Thread Ed Greshko
On 14/05/2021 19:35, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/12/21 6:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 13/05/2021 04:05, Roger Heflin wrote: Do an "ip route" on both the source and destination nodes. also do an "ip neigh" on both. And an "ip link" on both. Yes, that would be very helpful if Robert w

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-14 Thread Robert McBroom via users
On 5/12/21 6:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 13/05/2021 04:05, Roger Heflin wrote: Do an "ip route" on both the source and destination nodes. also do an "ip neigh" on both. And an "ip link" on both. Yes, that would be very helpful if Robert would supply that information. Thanks for making that s

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Ed Greshko
On 13/05/2021 04:05, Roger Heflin wrote: Do an "ip route" on both the source and destination nodes. also do an "ip neigh" on both. And an "ip link" on both. Yes, that would be very helpful if Robert would supply that information. Thanks for making that suggestion. -- Remind me to ignore com

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Roger Heflin
Do an "ip route" on both the source and destination nodes. also do an "ip neigh" on both. And an "ip link" on both. On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 1:20 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 13/05/2021 01:08, Robert McBroom via users wrote: > > On 5/12/21 12:39 PM, Mike Wright wrote: > >> On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Ro

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Ed Greshko
On 13/05/2021 01:08, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/12/21 12:39 PM, Mike Wright wrote: On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/11/21 12:52 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 Trying this one ping fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 ping6

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Robert McBroom via users
On 5/12/21 12:39 PM, Mike Wright wrote: On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/11/21 12:52 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 Trying this one ping fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 ping6 ___ Same on f33, but bo

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Mike Wright
On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/11/21 12:52 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 Trying this one ping fe80::210:75ff:fe28:5e30 ping6 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Robert McBroom via users
On 5/11/21 12:52 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Installed Arch Linux on my Goflex Home NAS. I see it on the router from my ISP. It is connected through an access point to have a sufficient number of ethernet ports. I can't ping it using the ipv4 address I see on the router. There are two i

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-12 Thread Robert McBroom via users
On 5/11/21 9:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 11/05/2021 20:40, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/11/21 1:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 11/05/2021 12:52, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Installed Arch Linux on my Goflex Home NAS. I see it on the router from my ISP. It is connected through an acces

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 11/05/2021 20:40, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/11/21 1:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 11/05/2021 12:52, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Installed Arch Linux on my Goflex Home NAS. I see it on the router from my ISP. It is connected through an access point to have a sufficient number of

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-11 Thread Robert McBroom via users
On 5/11/21 1:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 11/05/2021 12:52, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Installed Arch Linux on my Goflex Home NAS. I see it on the router from my ISP. It is connected through an access point to have a sufficient number of ethernet ports. I can't ping it using the ipv4 addre

Re: Network entanglement

2021-05-10 Thread Ed Greshko
On 11/05/2021 12:52, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Installed Arch Linux on my Goflex Home NAS. I see it on the router from my ISP. It is connected through an access point to have a sufficient number of ethernet ports. I can't ping it using the ipv4 address I see on the router. There are two i

Network entanglement

2021-05-10 Thread Robert McBroom via users
Installed Arch Linux on my Goflex Home NAS. I see it on the router from my ISP. It is connected through an access point to have a sufficient number of ethernet ports. I can't ping it using the ipv4 address I see on the router. There are two ipv6 addresses shown. One declares a lifetime of 3600s