JD gmail.com> writes:
> For the last time:
> rpmbuild has no -j anything option!!!
>
JD -
Calm down. Have a glass of wine or a beer or whatever. Noone is saying
rpmbuild has a -j option. Several of us are trying to explain to you that
programs like rpmbuild can do things that the end user m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, David G. Miller wrote:
> Setting -j to be equal to the number of cores/CPUs is just playing it
> safe.
Yes, this is the default behavior of rpmbuild:
%_smp_mflags is defined in /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros:
%_smp_mflags %([ -z "$
On 11/29/2012 03:48 PM, David G. Miller wrote:
Gabriel VLASIU vlasiu.net> writes:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, JD wrote:
That does not make sense.
I have a unicore!! An old Athlon64 3700+,
In this case %{?_smp_mflags} is expanded to "-j1" or "" and you will have
exactly only one "cc1".
and ye
Gabriel VLASIU vlasiu.net> writes:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, JD wrote:
>
> > That does not make sense.
>
> > I have a unicore!! An old Athlon64 3700+,
> In this case %{?_smp_mflags} is expanded to "-j1" or "" and you will have
> exactly only one "cc1".
>
> > and yet ps -ef shows up to 4 m
On 29Nov2012 19:11, Gabriel VLASIU wrote:
| On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, JD wrote:
| > That does not make sense.
| :-)
|
| > I have a unicore!! An old Athlon64 3700+,
| In this case %{?_smp_mflags} is expanded to "-j1" or "" and you will have
| exactly only one "cc1".
|
| Just run: rpmbuild -E '%{?_smp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, JD wrote:
> That does not make sense.
:-)
> I have a unicore!! An old Athlon64 3700+,
In this case %{?_smp_mflags} is expanded to "-j1" or "" and you will have
exactly only one "cc1".
Just run: rpmbuild -E '%{?_smp_mflags}' and
On 11/29/2012 04:29 AM, Gabriel VLASIU wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Gabriel VLASIU wrote:
You can see multiple make proccesses. But only 2 (in my case) do the real
work:
user1 22073 12810 0 13:13 pts/000:00:00 make -f scripts/Makefile.build
Thunderbird/15.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Subject: Multi-Threaded make
While building the kernel from source RPM, I run
the
On 11/29/2012 03:04 AM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 28Nov2012 21:16, JD wrote:
| On 11/28/2012 08:21 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| > On 28Nov2012 15:37, JD wrote:
| > | While building the kernel from source RPM, I run
| > | the command ps -ef | grep make in another terminal,
| > | and I do see th
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 23:10:40 -0700,
JD wrote:
As a side note to Bruno, who wanted me to build and try this kernel:
I will reboot immediately after sending this message with this kernel
I just built.
I am not having kswapd issues any more with the version of that kernel
from the rawhide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Gabriel VLASIU wrote:
> You can see multiple make proccesses. But only 2 (in my case) do the real
> work:
> user1 22073 12810 0 13:13 pts/000:00:00 make -f scripts/Makefile.build
> obj=fs
> user1 24474 22073 0 13:15 pts/0
us: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
> DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
> RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
> Subject: Multi-Threaded make
>
> While building the kernel from source RPM, I run
&g
On 28Nov2012 21:16, JD wrote:
| On 11/28/2012 08:21 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| > On 28Nov2012 15:37, JD wrote:
| > | While building the kernel from source RPM, I run
| > | the command ps -ef | grep make in another terminal,
| > | and I do see that 4 make processes are running, with
| > | each o
On 29.11.2012, John Wendel wrote:
> I think you're seeing something seriously broken if your builds are taking a
> huge amount of time.
That's surely an oversimplification. Build speed depends on several
factors, e.g. how many options you have enabled in your .config has
huge impact. You can't c
On 11/28/2012 10:48 PM, John Wendel wrote:
On 11/28/2012 08:16 PM, JD wrote:
On 11/28/2012 08:21 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 28Nov2012 15:37, JD wrote:
| While building the kernel from source RPM, I run
| the command ps -ef | grep make in another terminal,
| and I do see that 4 make proces
On 11/28/2012 08:16 PM, JD wrote:
On 11/28/2012 08:21 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 28Nov2012 15:37, JD wrote:
| While building the kernel from source RPM, I run
| the command ps -ef | grep make in another terminal,
| and I do see that 4 make processes are running, with
| each one building obj
On 11/28/2012 08:21 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 28Nov2012 15:37, JD wrote:
| While building the kernel from source RPM, I run
| the command ps -ef | grep make in another terminal,
| and I do see that 4 make processes are running, with
| each one building objects for a different kernel source
On 28Nov2012 15:37, JD wrote:
| While building the kernel from source RPM, I run
| the command ps -ef | grep make in another terminal,
| and I do see that 4 make processes are running, with
| each one building objects for a different kernel source
| directory.
|
| However, something else seems to
While building the kernel from source RPM, I run
the command ps -ef | grep make in another terminal,
and I do see that 4 make processes are running, with
each one building objects for a different kernel source
directory.
However, something else seems to be single threaded
which is causing the hug
19 matches
Mail list logo