Hi,
>>> Can someone from the Spice community chime in? Why is
>>> spice-space.org shipping a Fedora 18 build of libvirt (0.10.2.x)
>>> rather than Fedora 19 (1.0.5.x)? Who does the builds, and how often
>>> are they updated?
>> I do builds when releasing new virt-viewer versions, and I use the lat
Hi Christophe,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:57:04PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote:
If someone provides newer windows binaries -- which aren't missing
dlls, like the ones at http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/
-- I will test then.
[...]
Please someone give me newer binaries I can test!
Hi Eric,
Hi,
Still hoping someone takes my test results and fix the windows port. ;-)
I configured my host to accept remote tcp libvirtd connections, once
with sasl security and the seccond time without any security. Both
setups were validated by a linux client, who could connect using virsh
an
Hi,
Still hoping someone takes my test results and fix the windows port. ;-)
I configured my host to accept remote tcp libvirtd connections, once
with sasl security and the seccond time without any security. Both
setups were validated by a linux client, who could connect using virsh
and virt-
Hi there,
As the newer windows binaries kindly provided by teuf won't work because
of missing DLLs, I returned to the latest binaries provided by
spice-space.org.
remove-viewer.exe works fine, after I foud where to put TLS
certificates. Not that user-friendly though. :-)
virt-viewer and virs
