On 28 March 2015 at 11:33, Ian Malone wrote:
>
> Differential pricing, if a menu option can be disabled it can be monetized.
>
(Or at least the sales people will think so.)
--
imalone
http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change s
On 27 March 2015 at 23:26, Pete Travis wrote:
> On 03/27/2015 03:30 PM, Mickey wrote:
>> Is this true with Linux, Fedora ? I though Secure Boot was overcome as a
>> problem.
>>
>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2015/03/23/microsoft-may-lock-out-o
On 03/27/2015 03:30 PM, Mickey wrote:
> Is this true with Linux, Fedora ? I though Secure Boot was overcome as a
> problem.
>
>
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2015/03/23/microsoft-may-lock-out-other-oses-with-windows-10/?intcmp=ob_article_footer_text&intcmp=obnetwork
I'm not
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 05:30:41PM -0400, Mickey wrote:
>> Is this true with Linux, Fedora ? I though Secure Boot was overcome
>> as a problem.
>
> I've been watching this, and the concern are threefold.
>
> First, Microsoft previously had requ
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 05:30:41PM -0400, Mickey wrote:
> Is this true with Linux, Fedora ? I though Secure Boot was overcome
> as a problem.
I've been watching this, and the concern are threefold.
First, Microsoft previously had required that manufacturers make
SecureBoot and UEFI optional; ind
Is this true with Linux, Fedora ? I though Secure Boot was overcome as
a problem.
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2015/03/23/microsoft-may-lock-out-other-oses-with-windows-10/?intcmp=ob_article_footer_text&intcmp=obnetwork
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
