On 11/25/21 13:46, John Pilkington wrote:
Thank you for that link. I hadn't been aware of that possibility.
But I was really thinking of the Hyperkitty display, which appears as
the archive default. Having a too-large local mailbox I don't often
use it, and its multiple endpoints seemed le
On 25/11/2021 19:38, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 11/23/21 14:06, John Pilkington wrote:
I'm used to reading messages in order of time of arrival. Threaded
display in Thunderbird, or the presentation of the archive by
Hyperkitty, doesn't do this
Right... Hyperkitty also shows messages in thread
On 11/23/21 14:06, John Pilkington wrote:
I'm used to reading messages in order of time of arrival. Threaded
display in Thunderbird, or the presentation of the archive by
Hyperkitty, doesn't do this
Right... Hyperkitty also shows messages in threaded mode, where replies
are grouped in the l
On Thu, 2021-11-25 at 14:10 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 11:18 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I prefer Evolution to TBird. It lets you fall back to threading by
> > Subject if the headers aren't present. I do that and don't see any
> > threading issues.
> >
> > You ca
On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 11:18 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I prefer Evolution to TBird. It lets you fall back to threading by
> Subject if the headers aren't present. I do that and don't see any
> threading issues.
>
> You can also ignore a thread or subthread.
I've never seen a mail client
On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 20:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > I prefer Evolution to TBird. It lets you fall back to threading by
> > Subject if the headers aren't present. I do that and don't see any
> > threading issues.
>
> One can also turn off threading in T-Bird and sort by subject
> instead. Jus
On 24/11/2021 19:18, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 13:43 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
Frankly, one feature I would like to see implemented in T-Bird is a way to
ignore and not show some
of these "sub" sorted items within a thread that veer off on
meaningless (at least to me) tang
On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 13:43 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 24/11/2021 06:06, John Pilkington wrote:
> > I'm used to reading messages in order of time of arrival. Threaded
> > display in Thunderbird, or the presentation of the archive by
> > Hyperkitty, doesn't do this; the current thread about NVID
On 24/11/2021 06:06, John Pilkington wrote:
I'm used to reading messages in order of time of arrival. Threaded display in
Thunderbird, or the presentation of the archive by Hyperkitty, doesn't do this;
the current thread about NVIDIA drivers is utterly disjointed in both, with
recent posts bu
On 11/23/21 9:19 PM, Tim via users wrote:
Other people manage to do this, why can't you? (That's a generic
"everyone else" you question, I'm not referencing you John.)
Because nobody ever taught them how to do it and they don't know how to
learn things like that on their own.
___
On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 22:06 +, John Pilkington wrote:
> I'm used to reading messages in order of time of arrival. Threaded
> display in Thunderbird, or the presentation of the archive by
> Hyperkitty, doesn't do this; the current thread about NVIDIA drivers
> is utterly disjointed in both, w
John,
On 2021-11-24 09:06, John Pilkington wrote:
I'm used to reading messages in order of time of arrival. Threaded
display in Thunderbird, or the presentation of the archive by
Hyperkitty, doesn't do this; the current thread about NVIDIA drivers
is utterly disjointed in both, with recent pos
On 23/11/2021 22:26, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/23/21 14:06, John Pilkington wrote:
I'm used to reading messages in order of time of arrival. Threaded
display in Thunderbird, or the presentation of the archive by
Hyperkitty, doesn't do this; the current thread about NVIDIA drivers
is utterly di
On 11/23/21 14:06, John Pilkington wrote:
I'm used to reading messages in order of time of arrival. Threaded
display in Thunderbird, or the presentation of the archive by
Hyperkitty, doesn't do this; the current thread about NVIDIA drivers is
utterly disjointed in both, with recent posts burie
I'm used to reading messages in order of time of arrival. Threaded
display in Thunderbird, or the presentation of the archive by
Hyperkitty, doesn't do this; the current thread about NVIDIA drivers is
utterly disjointed in both, with recent posts buried at random partway
up the display. Is th
15 matches
Mail list logo
