On 11/5/18 8:39 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/11/18 05:16, Stephen Morris wrote:
I'm now even more confused after having used --allowerasing, even though it got
rid
of the messages, issuing dnf info makemkv and dnf info mmdtsdec, the version of
mmdtsdec listed in the message is the only version a
On 11/5/18 10:24 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/11/18 08:19, Temlakos wrote:
On 05/10/2018 07:29 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/11/18 07:13, Temlakos wrote:
What sort of problems does that "overlap" cause, and how does one work around
them?
They both contain some of the same packages. You may run
On 05/11/18 08:19, Temlakos wrote:
> On 05/10/2018 07:29 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 05/11/18 07:13, Temlakos wrote:
>>> What sort of problems does that "overlap" cause, and how does one work
>>> around them?
>>
>> They both contain some of the same packages. You may run into a situation
>> wher
On 05/10/2018 07:29 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/11/18 07:13, Temlakos wrote:
What sort of problems does that "overlap" cause, and how does one work around
them?
They both contain some of the same packages. You may run into a situation
where a
package is updated in one repo but you have anot
On 05/11/18 07:13, Temlakos wrote:
> What sort of problems does that "overlap" cause, and how does one work around
> them?
They both contain some of the same packages. You may run into a situation
where a
package is updated in one repo but you have another package from the other repo
which
i
On 05/10/2018 07:11 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/11/18 06:42, Temlakos wrote:
Just a minute. Are you saying makemkv is now on a repository or repositories
that
has an F28 version? A repository anyone can activate and, by so activating,
install
makemkv without having to compile and link it from
On 05/11/18 06:42, Temlakos wrote:
> Just a minute. Are you saying makemkv is now on a repository or repositories
> that
> has an F28 version? A repository anyone can activate and, by so activating,
> install
> makemkv without having to compile and link it from a tarball?
Yes.
https://negativ
On 05/10/2018 06:39 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/11/18 05:16, Stephen Morris wrote:
I'm now even more confused after having used --allowerasing, even though it got
rid
of the messages, issuing dnf info makemkv and dnf info mmdtsdec, the version of
mmdtsdec listed in the message is the only versi
On 05/11/18 05:16, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I'm now even more confused after having used --allowerasing, even though it
> got rid
> of the messages, issuing dnf info makemkv and dnf info mmdtsdec, the version
> of
> mmdtsdec listed in the message is the only version available and is still
> instal
On 8/5/18 8:28 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 7/5/18 12:25 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/07/18 06:08, Stephen Morris wrote:
With the sudo dnf upgrade I have just done I received the
following messages,
which I'm not sure what to do about.
Problem: package makemkv-1.12.2-2.fc27.x86_64 obsol
On 7/5/18 12:25 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/07/18 06:08, Stephen Morris wrote:
With the sudo dnf upgrade I have just done I received the following
messages,
which I'm not sure what to do about.
Problem: package makemkv-1.12.2-2.fc27.x86_64 obsoletes mmdtsdec <
1.12.2-2.fc27
provided by
On 05/07/18 06:08, Stephen Morris wrote:
> With the sudo dnf upgrade I have just done I received the following
> messages,
> which I'm not sure what to do about.
>
> Problem: package makemkv-1.12.2-2.fc27.x86_64 obsoletes mmdtsdec <
> 1.12.2-2.fc27
> provided by mmdtsdec-1.12.0-1.fc27.i686
>
Hi,
With the sudo dnf upgrade I have just done I received the following
messages, which I'm not sure what to do about.
Problem: package makemkv-1.12.2-2.fc27.x86_64 obsoletes mmdtsdec <
1.12.2-2.fc27 provided by mmdtsdec-1.12.0-1.fc27.i686
- cannot install the best update candidate for
13 matches
Mail list logo
