On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 3:50 PM George N. White III wrote:
>
>> >[...]
>> > Given the fact that an older kernel works, but a newer one doesn't, it
>> > sure seems like it is somehow related to the kernel. Since the same
>> > version of systemd works on an old kernel, it is unlikely to be
>> > sys
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 9:26 AM Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 2:04 PM stan via users
> wrote:
> >[...]
> > Given the fact that an older kernel works, but a newer one doesn't, it
> > sure seems like it is somehow related to the kernel. Since the same
> > version of systemd works on
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 2:04 PM stan via users
wrote:
>
> > Maybe the following is relevant:
> >
> >
> > # dracut --force --kver 6.4.12-200.fc38.x86_64 --verbose
> > dracut: Executing: /usr/bin/dracut --force --kver
> > 6.4.12-200.fc38.x86_64 --verbose
> > dracut: drac
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:38:08 +0100
Paul Smith wrote:
> Maybe the following is relevant:
>
>
> # dracut --force --kver 6.4.12-200.fc38.x86_64 --verbose
> dracut: Executing: /usr/bin/dracut --force --kver
> 6.4.12-200.fc38.x86_64 --verbose
> dracut: dracut module 'busy
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 11:41 PM Paul Smith wrote:
>
> > > > > Thanks, Stan. I guess the files are almost similar, since they
> > > > > have almost the same size:
> > > >
> > > > I agree. Your issue isn't the issue I had. Debugging these early
> > > > issues is hard, because it has to be done fr
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:15 PM stan via users
wrote:
>
> > > > Thanks, Stan. I guess the files are almost similar, since they
> > > > have almost the same size:
> > >
> > > I agree. Your issue isn't the issue I had. Debugging these early
> > > issues is hard, because it has to be done from the
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 19:33:41 +0100
Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 3:25 PM stan wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Stan. I guess the files are almost similar, since they
> > > have almost the same size:
> >
> > I agree. Your issue isn't the issue I had. Debugging these early
> > issues i
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 3:25 PM stan wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Stan. I guess the files are almost similar, since they have
> > almost the same size:
>
> I agree. Your issue isn't the issue I had. Debugging these early
> issues is hard, because it has to be done from the emergency console.
> But, I th
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 3:30 PM stan via users
wrote:
>
> > > > I have been able to take a screen-shot:
> > > >
> > > > https://i.imgur.com/nAsE6i6.jpg
> > >
> > > This means that dracut was unable to start systemd in order to
> > > continue the boot once the initramfs was finished creating the
>
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:02:12 +0100
Paul Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 4:23 PM stan via users
> wrote:
> >
> > > I have been able to take a screen-shot:
> > >
> > > https://i.imgur.com/nAsE6i6.jpg
> >
> > This means that dracut was unable to start systemd in order to
> > continue the
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 4:23 PM stan via users
wrote:
>
> > I have been able to take a screen-shot:
> >
> > https://i.imgur.com/nAsE6i6.jpg
>
> This means that dracut was unable to start systemd in order to continue
> the boot once the initramfs was finished creating the bootstrap. I
> have had t
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 17:44:52 +0100
Paul Smith wrote:
> I have been able to take a screen-shot:
>
> https://i.imgur.com/nAsE6i6.jpg
This means that dracut was unable to start systemd in order to continue
the boot once the initramfs was finished creating the bootstrap. I
have had this happen, b
On 8/24/23 09:44, Paul Smith wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 4:26 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
I have already file a bug but no answer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232838
I didn't have any problems, but
On 08/24/2023 10:44 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
I have been able to take a screen-shot:
https://i.imgur.com/nAsE6i6.jpg
Were you able to save the report and if so, can you attach it to your
reply? I doubt that I'll be able to make use of it, but with luck,
somebody here will.
___
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 4:26 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > > > > > Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have already file a bug but no answer:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
> Dear All,
>
> Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
>
> 6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
>
> I have already file a bug but no answer:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232838
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> Paul
Personal I do not have trouble with kernel > 6.4.8, but my brother
On Tue Aug22'23 04:19:23PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> From: Paul Smith
> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:19:23 +0100
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: Last kernel update leads to emergency mode
>
> On Tue, Aug
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 6:21 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> >>> Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
> >>>
> >>> 6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
> >>>
> >>> I have already file a bug but no answer:
> >>>
> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232838
> >>
> >> You didn't really provide
On 8/22/23 03:37, Paul Smith wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 4:31 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
I have already file a bug but no answer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232838
You didn't really provide any inf
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 2:26 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > > > Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
> > > >
> > > > 6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
> > > >
> > > > I have already file a bug but no answer:
> > > >
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232838
> > >
> > > I didn'
On Mon Aug21'23 05:13:34PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> From: Paul Smith
> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 17:13:34 +0100
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: Last kernel update leads to emergency mode
>
> On Mon, Aug 2
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 4:31 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
> >
> > 6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
> >
> > I have already file a bug but no answer:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232838
>
> You didn't really provide any info that would
On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 20:30:44 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 8/21/23 08:56, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
> >
> > 6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
> >
> > I have already file a bug but no answer:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232838
>
>
On 8/21/23 08:56, Paul Smith wrote:
Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
I have already file a bug but no answer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232838
You didn't really provide any info that would help. Can you get any
journal output or
On Mon, 2023-08-21 at 17:13 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 5:10 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> >
> > > Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
> > >
> > > 6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
> > >
> > > I have already file a bug but no answer:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 5:10 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>
> > Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
> >
> > 6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
> >
> > I have already file a bug but no answer:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232838
>
> I didn't have any problems, but I upd
On Mon, 2023-08-21 at 16:56 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
>
> 6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
>
> I have already file a bug but no answer:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232838
>
I didn't have any problems, but I updated
Dear All,
Are other also experience that with the new kernel:
6.4.10-200.fc38.x86_64
I have already file a bug but no answer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232838
Have a nice day,
Paul
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproje
28 matches
Mail list logo
