On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 10:39:03PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> This one doesn't even appear at
>
> http://www.openprinting.org/printers/manufacturer/Canon
>
> How did you determine in advance that it will work; or you just took
> your chances?
I heard from someone that all new Canon laser p
Matthew Miller writes:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:53:23AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Has anyone gotten a laser printer recently, which worked out of the
> box without any fiddling, or downloading any blobs?
Yes. After getting fed up with a Brother printer which was supposed to work
but did
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:53:23AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Has anyone gotten a laser printer recently, which worked out of the
> box without any fiddling, or downloading any blobs?
Yes. After getting fed up with a Brother printer which was supposed to work
but did not, I just got a Canon M
On 10/19/19 11:53 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
My printer's is on its last legs. I'm having some trouble finding a printer that's
currently widely available on sale (US) and which appears as "works perfectly"
on http://www.openprinting.org/printers/
I did find some Lexmark model, but when I chec
maybe a hint:
bought 9 years ago an Samsung ML-2851ND for ~110€
(OEM cartridge: ~90€ /5000 pages, non-OEM available ~ half prize).
http://www.openprinting.org/printer/Samsung/Samsung-ML-2851ND
Duplex, LAN and what was also an benefit: one part of the wearout components is
build into the cartidg
My printer's is on its last legs. I'm having some trouble finding a printer
that's currently widely available on sale (US) and which appears as
"works perfectly" on http://www.openprinting.org/printers/
I did find some Lexmark model, but when I check up on the replacement toner
cartridges,
