he/dnf/updates-1eb77e9f45b4391a/packages/kernel-devel-5.15.4-
> 101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm:
> md5 mismatch of result
> Some packages were not downloaded. Retrying.
> kernel-devel-5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.rpm
> 5.3 MB/s | 15 MB 00:02
Though that error message w
'diff' has two sources. I had
thought it worth reporting as something persistent. I don't know of any
reason for a 'change on the system'.
You could try running "rpm -qV kernel-devel" and see if it flags any
modified files.
__
dates-1eb77e9f45b4391a/packages/kernel-devel-5.15.4-101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm:
md5 mismatch of result
What do you think is strange about the package name? It's a deltarpm
file, so it shows the versions that are involved.
kernel-devel-5.15.4-101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm
The packa
On 11/30/21 03:26, John Pilkington wrote:
For several recent kernel updates, dnf has complained about this but has
updated as normal. I've just noticed that the package name looks
strange, too. Should it get a BZ?
/var/cache/dnf/updates-1eb77e9f45b4391a/packages/kernel-devel-5.15.
/var/cache/dnf/updates-1eb77e9f45b4391a/packages/kernel-devel-5.15.4-101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm:
md5 mismatch of result
Some packages were not downloaded. Retrying.
kernel-devel-5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.rpm 5.3 MB/s | 15 MB
00:02
This means that the delta rpm is broken for
(1/6): kernel-5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.rpm
92 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00
(2/6): kernel-devel-5.15.4-101.fc34_5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.drpm
3.1 MB/s | 3.0 MB 00:00
(3/6): kernel-modules-extra-5.15.5-100.fc34.x86_64.rpm
3.4 MB/s | 2.0 MB 00:00
(4/6): exfatprogs-1.
RESOLVED!
> did you try to update your kernel or do a general update?
> dnf update kernel
> or dnf update
> or a downgrade of kernel-devel?
> dnf downgrade kernel-devel
The system was fully updated at the time (6 hours ago).
Now the rest of the kernel*4.10.14* rpms are avail
Hi
did you try to update your kernel or do a general update?
dnf update kernel
or dnf update
or a downgrade of kernel-devel?
dnf downgrade kernel-devel
suomi
On 13/03/2019 01.42, Mayavimmer wrote:
When dnf installing virtualbox it installed:
kernel-devel-4.20.14-200.fc29.x86_64
...but my
When dnf installing virtualbox it installed:
kernel-devel-4.20.14-200.fc29.x86_64
...but my kernel is:
kernel-core-4.20.13-200.fc29.x86_64
So naturally virtualbox crashes with:
$ LANG=C virtualbox
WARNING: The vboxdrv kernel module is not loaded. Either there is no module
available for
On 15/03/16 09:52, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
On 2016-03-14 at 10:08:41 Rick Stevens wrote:
On 03/13/2016 03:20 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
Note that there is no versioning dependencies between kernel and
kernel-devel so if you only dnf upgrade kernel (or dnf upgrade
kernel-devel) they will fall out
On 2016-03-14 at 10:08:41 Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 03/13/2016 03:20 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>
>
> >> Note that there is no versioning dependencies between kernel and
> >> kernel-devel so if you only dnf upgrade kernel (or dnf upgrade
> >> kernel-devel) they
On 03/13/2016 03:20 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
Note that there is no versioning dependencies between kernel and
kernel-devel so if you only dnf upgrade kernel (or dnf upgrade
kernel-devel) they will fall out of sync.
You need to dnf update kernel kernel-devel together (or not filter
the dnf
t is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the
> > > > kernel to the next level kernel-devel is not updated, I have to
> > > > do it manually when I run into a problem that it is not
> > > > installed.
> > > >
> > > > How can
Had the problem but it seems to have resolve in the latest kernel 4.4
updates
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
t is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the
> > > > kernel to the next level kernel-devel is not updated, I have to
> > > > do it manually when I run into a problem that it is not
> > > > installed.
> > > >
> > > > How can
On 11 March 2016 at 13:53, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 2016-03-11 at 07:38:24 Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Erik P. Olsen
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the
> > > kernel to the
On 2016-03-11 at 07:38:24 Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Erik P. Olsen
> wrote:
>
> > It is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the
> > kernel to the next level kernel-devel is not updated, I have to do
> > it manually when I
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> It is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the kernel
> to the next level kernel-devel is not updated, I have to do it manually
> when I run into a problem that it is not installed.
>
> How can I train dnf to
On 03/11/16 17:28, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> It is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the kernel
> to the next level kernel-devel is not updated, I have to do it manually
> when I run into a problem that it is not installed.
>
> How can I train dnf to pull in kernel
It is not a bug but merely an irritation whenever I update the kernel
to the next level kernel-devel is not updated, I have to do it manually
when I run into a problem that it is not installed.
How can I train dnf to pull in kernel-devel when the kernel is updated?
--
Erik
--
users mailing
Richard Shaw gmail.com> writes:
> Added this to dnf.conf:
> installonlypkgs=kernel,kernel-devel
>
>
> And now it's not removing kernel-devel... I'm not sure if the kernel one
is needed (not sure where the defaults come from and if they're overwritten
On 10/05/2015 08:33 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Indeed! I noticed after I had responded. I guess a backport bug report
> is in order against dnf.
Well, with F21 going EOL soon and the fact that you've discovered the need to
make a change to the config file would seem to make this unnecessary.
--
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 05:45:09AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 05:21 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 08:06:42AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >> I'm assuming this is DNF and not some other change...
> >>
> >> Yum allowed multi
On 10/05/2015 06:05 AM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
> On 10/04/15 17:45, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 10/05/2015 05:21 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 08:06:42AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>> I'm assuming this is DNF and not some other change...
>>
On 10/04/15 17:45, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 05:21 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 08:06:42AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> I'm assuming this is DNF and not some other change...
>>>
>>> Yum allowed multiple kernel-devel packages
On 10/05/2015 05:21 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 08:06:42AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> I'm assuming this is DNF and not some other change...
>>
>> Yum allowed multiple kernel-devel packages to be installed, dnf does not,
>> which prevents you
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 08:06:42AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm assuming this is DNF and not some other change...
>
> Yum allowed multiple kernel-devel packages to be installed, dnf does not,
> which prevents you from building kernel modules for other kernel releases.
>
On 10/04/2015 10:50 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Documentation[1] to the rescue, you just have to know where to look because
> it isn't kernel specific...
>
> Added this to dnf.conf:
> installonlypkgs=kernel,kernel-devel
>
> And now it's not removing kernel-devel... I&
Documentation[1] to the rescue, you just have to know where to look because
it isn't kernel specific...
Added this to dnf.conf:
installonlypkgs=kernel,kernel-devel
And now it's not removing kernel-devel... I'm not sure if the kernel one is
needed (not sure where the defaults c
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/04/2015 10:33 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > No clue what's going on here...
> >
>
> Can you simply install the previous ones to see if they will install.
# dnf install kernel-devel-4.1.5-100.fc21.x86_64
Lo
On 10/04/2015 10:33 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> No clue what's going on here...
>
Can you simply install the previous ones to see if they will install.
--
In reality, some people should stick to running Windows and others should stay
away from computers altogether.
--
users mailing list
users@li
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/04/2015 09:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I'm assuming this is DNF and not some other change...
> >
> > Yum allowed multiple kernel-devel packages to be installed, dnf does
> not, which prevents you from buil
On 10/04/2015 09:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm assuming this is DNF and not some other change...
>
> Yum allowed multiple kernel-devel packages to be installed, dnf does not,
> which prevents you from building kernel modules for other kernel releases.
>
> Was there
I'm assuming this is DNF and not some other change...
Yum allowed multiple kernel-devel packages to be installed, dnf does not,
which prevents you from building kernel modules for other kernel releases.
Was there a good reason for this change in behavior?
Thanks,
Richard
--
users mailing
> Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 23:45:40 +0200
> From: mschwe...@gmail.com
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Yum fails to install kernel-devel
>
> On Fri, 2 May 2014 10:52:56 -0700, Luke Nath wrote:
>
> >
> > yum -y update updated more than 11500 pa
On Fri, 2 May 2014 10:52:56 -0700, Luke Nath wrote:
>
> yum -y update updated more than 11500 packages, because I had not
> run updates for quite a while.
A direct upgrade from F18 to F20?
> Marking kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm as an update to
> kernel-devel-3
yum -y update updated more than 11500 packages, because I had not
run updates for quite a while.
Everything installed except for kernel-devel.
So, I downloaded the file directly from
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/updates/20/x86_64/kernel-devel-3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64.rpm
then I ran yum
RPM in their repositories. How
hard can it be?
> yum install kernel-devel and everything else worked fine.
Which bring us back to the question of what kernel RPMs were
installed/available on your server system.
> So, when I started to have problems on the new server with Fedora 13, I
r was already 'prepered' by someone
else. They let
me the server after using it for a while and I successfully installed
Asterisk on it with no problems at all.
yum install kernel-devel and everything else worked fine.
So, when I started to have problems on the new server with Fedora 1
you have no kernel RPM installed, then
where did your kernel come from. I have both a kernel and a
kernel-headers package installed (in fact, I have a couple of kernels
installed) on most of my systems.
On my 1 F11 system, I have:
> # rpm -q -a kernel\*
> kernel-headers-2.6.30.10-105.2.2
Albert Bonomo writes:
> I'm trying to install an Asterisk server o a Fedora 11 server, 64 bit.
---
> [r...@ns310181 include]# yum install kernel-devel
> Setting up Install Process
> No package kernel-devel available
ernel-headers-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64
*The question would be, where ?*
*So, I wonder why 'uname -r' gives me this crap: 2.6.33.5--grs-ipv4-64
And why 'yum install kernel-devel' doesn't work ?
Thanks for the answer.
you'r the man
Albert
2010/8/12 Kevin J.
On 08/12/2010 02:04 PM, Albert Bonomo wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to install an Asterisk server o a Fedora 11 server, 64 bit.
> The process required from me to install the kernel-devel package.
> I run 'yum install kernel-devel' and it tells me there is no
>
Hi,
I'm trying to install an Asterisk server o a Fedora 11 server, 64 bit.
The process required from me to install the kernel-devel package.
I run 'yum install kernel-devel' and it tells me there is no kernel-devel
packages.
[r...@ns310181 include]# uname -r
2.6.33.5--
On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 14:47 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> Try 'yum install kernel-PAE-devel'.
I had looked for kernel-PAE-devel in the gnome packagekit application,
it wasn't there. Yum found it. I have no idea why the packagekit
application didn't show it - but now that it is installed, it does sh
version magic
> '2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686 SMP mod_unload 686 ' should be
> '2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE SMP mod_unload 686 '
>
> Should there be a PAE version of kernel-devel? I can't find a package
> for it.
>
> Brian
>
>
VirtualBox builds O
Should there be a PAE version of kernel-devel? I can't find a package
for it.
Brian
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
47 matches
Mail list logo
