Allegedly, on or about 8 February 2018, Ed Greshko sent:
> Unless it is possible to inject malware into the device I can't see
> it mounting an attack on other devices on the LAN.
One of the links I mentioned discussed how to do that (or a link that
it linked to). There were various flaws in the
On 02/08/18 04:59, Tim wrote:
> Some cameras merely use a central server as a way of finding your
> camera by a name (ala dynamic DNS, mine initially lets you find it by
> serial number, if I recall correctly) and for traversing NAT.
Come to think of it, you are probably totally right on this whe
On 02/08/18 04:59, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 7 February 2018, Ed Greshko sent:
>> I guess I'm not clear on how things are supposed to work. It sounded
>> to me as if the camera was uploading videos into their cloud and if
>> someone wanted to view it they would access the cloud and not t
Allegedly, on or about 7 February 2018, Bob Goodwin sent:
> I don't know how I would test for those vulnerabilities
> beyond searching for what others have determined.
Likewise... Most of us are in that boat.
Though, in my case, I could see how insecure my camera was for myself.
If you connect
Allegedly, on or about 7 February 2018, Ed Greshko sent:
> I guess I'm not clear on how things are supposed to work. It sounded
> to me as if the camera was uploading videos into their cloud and if
> someone wanted to view it they would access the cloud and not the
> camera directly.
Some cameras
On 02/07/2018 11:22 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 02/07/18 13:36, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> I should have added that your firewall on your router is NOT a
>> replacement for having firewalls on your individual computers. I have
>> home automation along with a number of cameras. I don't use the cloud to
On 02/07/18 13:36, Rick Stevens wrote:
I should have added that your firewall on your router is NOT a
replacement for having firewalls on your individual computers. I have
home automation along with a number of cameras. I don't use the cloud to
handle my cameras (Foscams) although I could. I use
On 02/07/2018 10:26 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 02/06/2018 02:56 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>> I bought twoptz cameras which can be viewed and controlled with the
>> family iPhonesand of course they would like to use the "Armcrest"
>> cloud/server in order to view them while away during the day. The
>
On 02/06/2018 02:56 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I bought twoptz cameras which can be viewed and controlled with the
> family iPhonesand of course they would like to use the "Armcrest"
> cloud/server in order to view them while away during the day. The
> cameras would connect to my LAN and via my route
On 02/07/18 09:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
I guess I'm not clear on how things are supposed to work. It sounded to me as
if the
camera was uploading videos into their cloud and if someone wanted to view it
they
would access the cloud and not the camera directly.
.
Is that how the system works, vide
On 02/07/18 18:31, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 02/06/18 21:54, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 02/07/18 06:56, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>> I bought two ptz cameras which can be viewed and controlled with the family
>>> iPhones and of course they would like to use the "Armcrest" cloud/server in
>>> order to
>>> vie
On 02/07/18 05:34, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 6 February 2018, Bob Goodwin sent:
Thoughts and advice appreciated,
Oh, and check the security of the cameras, themselves. There's a huge
number of IP cams with insecure software that, not only exposes the
camera to exploits, but your LAN to
Allegedly, on or about 7 February 2018, Bob Goodwin sent:
> what I would like to know is if I am safe in using their cloud?
That's going to depend on their cloud *AND* the particular camera.
My simplistic advice would be to do searches against the names of their
cloud, and the camera, along with
On 02/07/18 05:27, Tim wrote:
Is your question that you want to block access to the cloud?
Chances are that you can do that, if you control your DNS server (hard
code the wrong answer for the cloud's domain name), or if you have a
customisable firewall (block its IP address).
+
No, what I wou
Allegedly, on or about 6 February 2018, Bob Goodwin sent:
> Thoughts and advice appreciated,
Oh, and check the security of the cameras, themselves. There's a huge
number of IP cams with insecure software that, not only exposes the
camera to exploits, but your LAN to exploits through the camera.
On 02/06/18 21:54, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/07/18 06:56, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I bought two ptz cameras which can be viewed and controlled with the family
iPhones and of course they would like to use the "Armcrest" cloud/server in
order to
view them while away during the day. The cameras would conn
Allegedly, on or about 6 February 2018, Bob Goodwin sent:
> I bought twoptz cameras which can be viewed and controlled with the
> family iPhonesand of course they would like to use the "Armcrest"
> cloud/server in order to view them while away during the day. The
> cameras would connect to my LA
On 02/07/18 06:56, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> Thoughts and advice appreciated,
Oh, and aren't you using a satellite internet connection? In the past you've
indicated if you exceed your data quota it is expensive. Are you concerned
about the
uploads of video may impact your wallet? :-)
--
A mot
On 02/07/18 06:56, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I bought twoptz cameras which can be viewed and controlled with the family
> iPhonesand of course they would like to use the "Armcrest" cloud/server in
> order to
> view them while away during the day. The cameras would connect to my LAN and
> via my
> rout
I bought twoptz cameras which can be viewed and controlled with the
family iPhonesand of course they would like to use the "Armcrest"
cloud/server in order to view them while away during the day. The
cameras would connect to my LAN and via my router to the Viasat modem. I
have always tried to a
20 matches
Mail list logo
