Hi.
For years, we are using (not at the same time) the same IP on the
wired and wifi interfaces on our laptops.
For Fedora-40 it was necessary to configure NetworkManager with:
[connection-dad-default]
ipv4.dad-timeout=0
Ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/40/ChangeSet
On 10/29/22 00:40, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Was trying to get the apache to run on two interfaces,
and thought it was work on both,
but checked and it wasn't running on either?
So questions:
Can apache work with 2 different IPs or can it only listen
to one? Is doing it wit
On Sat, 2022-10-29 at 17:40 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II via users
wrote:
> Had two Listen lines in httpd.conf but commented the
> second one and it is working on that ip/port.
> Listen 192.168.16.104:8081
> #Listen 192.168.24.104:8081
You could simplify that to just:
Listen 8081
If you want it
On 29 Oct 2022 at 8:56, Barry wrote:
From: Barry
Subject:Re: Trying to get apache to run on two
interfaces.. But get errors. Probable doing something
wrong? or impossible. Thanks
Date sent: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 08:56:50 +0100
To
> On 29 Oct 2022, at 08:41, Michael D. Setzer II via users
> wrote:
>
> Was trying to get the apache to run on two interfaces,
> and thought it was work on both,
> but checked and it wasn't running on either?
>
> The two networks. One a wired on motherboard
&g
Was trying to get the apache to run on two interfaces,
and thought it was work on both,
but checked and it wasn't running on either?
The two networks. One a wired on motherboard
connection, and another being a USB wireless 5G
enp2s0:
flags=4163
mtu 1500
inet 192.168.16.104 ne
On 6/9/20 10:09 AM, Doug McGarrett wrote:
games looks like playing cards. And Thunderbird, while showing a letter,
has it
wrapped in a wig that covers where ears would be. Is that supposed to be
feathers?
If you look closer, you'll see that it's a bird with its wings wrapping
around the envel
Tim via users kirjoitti 9.6.2020 klo 17.55:
the controllers on video games that I never play, there's nothing
sensible about why a game uses the square button, or the green
button, etc., it's all arbitrary. They do nothing to contribute to
ease of use.
I don't know about you, but I can't think o
On 6/9/20 12:01 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
I don't know about GUIs in general, but I do know that
only one icon means anything to anyone :-). They invented
the envelope icon to mean mail, and everyone recognized it,
so they set off the dynamite in the icon factory and
exploded cryptic icons all ove
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 09:52 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:33 AM Beartooth wrote:
> > Years ago, I think about the time OSX first appeared, there were
> > reports of an eminent industrial psychologist (whose name I've forgotten)
> > who had said that all modern GUIs w
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 15:32 +, Beartooth wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jun 2020 11:40:15 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > If you think the layout is problematic, I'd suggest discussing it on the
> > Evo mailing list and eventually filing an RFE.
> >
> > The icons are determined by the current st
I don't know about GUIs in general, but I do know that
only one icon means anything to anyone :-). They invented
the envelope icon to mean mail, and everyone recognized it,
so they set off the dynamite in the icon factory and
exploded cryptic icons all over everything, and not
one of them can be re
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:33 AM Beartooth wrote:
> Years ago, I think about the time OSX first appeared, there were
> reports of an eminent industrial psychologist (whose name I've forgotten)
> who had said that all modern GUIs were downright wrong-headed. Does
> anybody remember? And was t
On Tue, 09 Jun 2020 11:40:15 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> If you think the layout is problematic, I'd suggest discussing it on the
> Evo mailing list and eventually filing an RFE.
>
> The icons are determined by the current style dictated by Gnome, not by
> Evolution itself. The same appli
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 00:25 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 11:40 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > If you think the layout is problematic, I'd suggest discussing it on
> > the Evo mailing list and eventually filing an RFE.
> >
> > The icons are determined by the current st
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 11:40 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> If you think the layout is problematic, I'd suggest discussing it on
> the Evo mailing list and eventually filing an RFE.
>
> The icons are determined by the current style dictated by Gnome, not
> by Evolution itself. The same applies
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 10:39 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> Icon choices really annoy me, so many of them are just so completely
>
> arbitrary that they convey no meaning. You eventually get used to
>
> clicking on the third icon across by habit. And too many of them are
>
> too similar. On Evo
On Mon, 2020-06-08 at 16:13 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> How is it that "a picture is worth a thousand words" yet current
> GUI's hide important details. For years we had folders that all
> looked the same even when they reside on very different
> filesystems. Why do icons for disks oft
You know, the fact about needing to remember how you get somewhere is
interesting to me. I could “see” that as a mouse user, having to remember
visual interfaces and where to click when could get confusing. Perhaps we blind
people have our own little command line, even in visual interfaces. We
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 13:59, Beartooth wrote:
> In another thread, Bob Marcan wrote:
>
> > Seems almost nobody is using the command line.
> > GUI for everything.
> > I like to see how will they solve the repetitive task.
>
> Well, what follows seems typical enough to be of possibl
Many blind people use the command line on Linux, mainly because the GUI isn’t
all that great with a screen reader. Although web services can be hard to use,
especially when TUI’s with “fancy” use of Unicode box drawing characters make
things overly verbose and complex. But there is this thing wh
In another thread, Bob Marcan wrote:
> Seems almost nobody is using the command line.
> GUI for everything.
> I like to see how will they solve the repetitive task.
Well, what follows seems typical enough to be of possible interest.
I've been around long enough to know o
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:02:03AM -0500, sean darcy wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777893
>
I hit this too trying to use the ifcfg- files, per the email with subject
"network bridge does not get an IP address".
I see no failure in the dmesg file you attached to that bu
On 11/27/19 5:36 PM, Bill Shirley wrote:
My 70-persistent-net.rules looks like this:
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="00:25:22:36:97:f9", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*",
NAME="lan4"
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="00:e0:29:37:0e:7
My 70-persistent-net.rules looks like this:
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:25:22:36:97:f9",
ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="lan4"
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:e0:29:37:0e:78",
ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="
On 11/27/19 12:39 PM, Bill Shirley wrote:
I don't run FC31 but on all my other Fedora systems, I add net.ifnames=0
to the kernel
command line /etc/default/grub:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.md.uuid=41012be5:1df005d4:cfee0bd3:e112219a
*net.ifnames=0* rd.shell rd.timeout=65 consoleblank=600 rcu_nocbs=0
I don't run FC31 but on all my other Fedora systems, I add net.ifnames=0 to the
kernel
command line /etc/default/grub:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.md.uuid=41012be5:1df005d4:cfee0bd3:e112219a *net.ifnames=0* rd.shell rd.timeout=65 consoleblank=600
rcu_nocbs=0-15"
Then regenerate the grub menu:
# leg
On 11/27/19 8:09 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 2019-11-26 19:58, Sean Darcy wrote:
On boot:
kernel: asix 2-3:1.0 eth0: register 'asix' at usb-:00:14.0-3, ASIX
AX88772 USB 2.0 Ethernet, 00:0e:c6:dc:01:aa
kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver asix
kernel: asix 2-3:1.0 enp0s20u3: ren
On 2019-11-26 19:58, Sean Darcy wrote:
On boot:
kernel: asix 2-3:1.0 eth0: register 'asix' at usb-:00:14.0-3, ASIX
AX88772 USB 2.0 Ethernet, 00:0e:c6:dc:01:aa
kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver asix
kernel: asix 2-3:1.0 enp0s20u3: renamed from eth0
then I unplug and plug:
kern
Just upgraded to FC31. It's a multihomed machine used as a router. One
interface "external" goes to the cable modem. The other interface
"internal" goes to a switch.
cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-external | grep -v \#
TYPE=Ethernet
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
DEVICE=external
ONBOOT=yes
DEFROUTE=yes
On 02/13/2018 01:57 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
This surprises me, as this is saying the home plug device is only
running at 100 Mbps, but it is packaged as 500 Mbps and the device
itself has 500 Mbps physically stamped on the front of it. I did set the
manual configuration to 500 Mbps and full d
do (at
least on that port). Typically, a switch won't advertise a higher speed
than it can do. It can, however, connect at a lower speed than it
advertises. In other words, 10Mbps and 100Mbps aren't the _only_ speeds
it can do, but it can't go above 100Mbps on that port.
As an exam
On 02/14/18 05:35, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 13/2/18 9:42 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 02/13/18 05:46, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> Just further to this, on my system when the auto negotiate box is checked
>>> the link
>>> entry and the duplex entry are removed from the dialog.
>>
>> Which makes perf
On 13/2/18 8:51 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 05:43, Stephen Morris wrote:
I am using a home plug device to get ethernet access across the home electrical
wires. The home plug device is provide 500 Mb/s, so having seen this thread I've
checked my ethernet configuration and like Terry is sayi
On 13/2/18 9:42 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 05:46, Stephen Morris wrote:
Just further to this, on my system when the auto negotiate box is checked the
link
entry and the duplex entry are removed from the dialog.
Which makes perfect sense, right?
If the negotiation is automatic then dis
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:16 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 12/02/18 21:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 05:43, Stephen Morris wrote:
I am using a home plug device to get ethernet access across the home
electrical
wires. The home plug device is provide 500 Mb/s, so having seen this
thread I've
If auto neg is set on one end, and not on the other end, then the
standards says set things to 100mb/half (for gbit cards) since you
were unable to get information from the other end I believe this was
judged the most likely to work reasonably by the people who write the
standard. On 100mbit adapt
On 12/02/18 21:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 05:43, Stephen Morris wrote:
I am using a home plug device to get ethernet access across the home electrical
wires. The home plug device is provide 500 Mb/s, so having seen this thread I've
checked my ethernet configuration and like Terry is sayin
On 02/13/18 05:46, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Just further to this, on my system when the auto negotiate box is checked the
> link
> entry and the duplex entry are removed from the dialog.
Which makes perfect sense, right?
If the negotiation is automatic then displaying the manual choices would b
On 02/13/18 05:43, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I am using a home plug device to get ethernet access across the home
> electrical
> wires. The home plug device is provide 500 Mb/s, so having seen this thread
> I've
> checked my ethernet configuration and like Terry is saying my settings have
> auto
>
On 13/2/18 8:43 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 13/2/18 8:05 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 04:21, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have just noticed that most of my systems now have their Ethernet
interfaces
running at 100 MBits/s half duplex rather than the expected 1GBits/s.
I think some update has
On 13/2/18 8:05 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 04:21, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have just noticed that most of my systems now have their Ethernet interfaces
running at 100 MBits/s half duplex rather than the expected 1GBits/s.
I think some update has caused this to happen, probably about 5
On 02/13/18 04:21, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> I have just noticed that most of my systems now have their Ethernet interfaces
> running at 100 MBits/s half duplex rather than the expected 1GBits/s.
>
> I think some update has caused this to happen, probably about 5 days ago
> (noticed
I have just noticed that most of my systems now have their Ethernet
interfaces running at 100 MBits/s half duplex rather than the expected
1GBits/s.
I think some update has caused this to happen, probably about 5 days ago
(noticed something was slow). These are KDE/Plasma GUI systems but I&#
On 07/19/2017 08:59 AM, InvalidPath wrote:
> Anyone other ideas?.. Anyone?
There's nothing in the logs that indicate why the new routes aren't
being applied?
I'm not sure how routes are applied with NM, but it appears to run
the standard ifup-routes script, passing it the name of the interface.
C
Anyone other ideas?.. Anyone?
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:59 PM, InvalidPath
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Rick Stevens
> wrote:
>
>> On 07/18/2017 11:05 AM, InvalidPath wrote:
>> > Thanks Rick, Yeah I'm certain. The network interface enp62s0u1u2 is the
>> > usb-c adapter built i
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/18/2017 11:05 AM, InvalidPath wrote:
> > Thanks Rick, Yeah I'm certain. The network interface enp62s0u1u2 is the
> > usb-c adapter built into the dock. So once docked that int comes up
> > and, before the F26 upgrade the routes would
On 07/18/2017 11:05 AM, InvalidPath wrote:
> Thanks Rick, Yeah I'm certain. The network interface enp62s0u1u2 is the
> usb-c adapter built into the dock. So once docked that int comes up
> and, before the F26 upgrade the routes would get applied. Not they don't :(
Hmmm. Are you using NM to contr
Thanks Rick, Yeah I'm certain. The network interface enp62s0u1u2 is the
usb-c adapter built into the dock. So once docked that int comes up and,
before the F26 upgrade the routes would get applied. Not they don't :(
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/18/2017 08:19 AM
On 07/18/2017 08:19 AM, InvalidPath wrote:
> Anyone? Seems like an issue of this caliber would be important. I know
> it is for me when I am forced to resort to manually inputting custom
> routes each morning.
You specifically said "while docked". Are you certain your system is
recognizing when
Anyone? Seems like an issue of this caliber would be important. I know it
is for me when I am forced to resort to manually inputting custom routes
each morning.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 9:14 AM, InvalidPath wrote:
> Pre-F26 upgrade I used a route file to apply work related routes while
> docked
Pre-F26 upgrade I used a route file to apply work related routes while
docked, for some reason since the upgrade when I look via route or ip route
I am no longer getting the ones from the file applied.
I did verify the name of my interface is correct.. the name changed once
after an update so that'
Greetings,
I am looking for a FOSS graphical interface to ONLY USE,
NOT manage, an already existing MySql or Maria DB database.
In other words, I only need a decent GUI that, with as
little setup as possible, lets me
choose a table in a database
find a record in it
create or modify records in o
idge both the LAN and Wifi interfaces so that the
> communication is done using the bridge and serviced by either interface
> that is currently active?
>
> I'm using the default Network Manager and mostly use the laptops for
> working and testing KVM with virtual hosts.
>
> T
On 11/14/2012 05:34 PM, Frank Pikelner wrote:
Is there a way to bridge both the LAN and Wifi interfaces so that the
communication is done using the bridge and serviced by either interface
that is currently active?
I'm using the default Network Manager and mostly use the laptops for
workin
Hello,
I'm running a couple of Lenovo T410 with Fedora 16 and 17. The laptops are
generally connected via LAN or WiFi to the same subnet (typically same DHCP
address).
Is there a way to bridge both the LAN and Wifi interfaces so that the
communication is done using the bridge and servic
ivers that will allow F16 to channel the
> audio through the hdmi or am I going to need to use the regular sound
> interfaces.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg Ennis
>
>
Do you have another sound card besides the digital out in your video
card? If you do, Pulse Audio is probably def
allow F16 to channel the
> audio through the hdmi or am I going to need to use the regular sound
> interfaces.
If you are using a AMD 5000 or 6000 card you might want to get some background
at:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyMzA
--
users mailing list
users@lists.
16 to channel the
> audio through the hdmi or am I going to need to use the regular sound
> interfaces.
Depends what graphics card and hardware you have.
Alan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
nel the
> audio through the hdmi or am I going to need to use the regular sound
> interfaces.
Lots of things to check since there could be many different
source of this problem. Look in the sound control center
app and see if the hardware tab mentions HDMI. If it
doesn't then the video dr
Everyone,
I am trying to use an hdmi interface between an f16 system and a
flatscreen tv. The video display is great, but there is no sound via
the hdmi. Are there any drivers that will allow F16 to channel the
audio through the hdmi or am I going to need to use the regular sound
interfaces
Hi,
>> I have an existing fedora15 x86_64 server with two interfaces that
>> I've moved to a different motherboard and processor with dual onboard
>> Intel 1000mbs ethernet controllers on it (e1000e driver). After moving
>> the system to the new motherboard,
On 10/04/2011 09:51 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an existing fedora15 x86_64 server with two interfaces that
> I've moved to a different motherboard and processor with dual onboard
> Intel 1000mbs ethernet controllers on it (e1000e driver). After moving
> the system
Hi,
I have an existing fedora15 x86_64 server with two interfaces that
I've moved to a different motherboard and processor with dual onboard
Intel 1000mbs ethernet controllers on it (e1000e driver). After moving
the system to the new motherboard, for some reason the ethernet
interfaces ch
d 2 inet lines above.
And its not just NetoworkManager messing up.
Ive taken both interfaces (main, alias) from NM's control,
and I get the same *last-upped-interface-wins* behavior
[j...@groucho network-scripts]$ ip addr show dev eth0
2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state
UNKNOWN qlen 100
65 matches
Mail list logo
