Re: Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg.

On 11/10/23 11:26, Ger van Dijck wrote: On 11/9/23 21:16, Ger van Dijck wrote: On 11/8/23 18:54, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/8/23 08:51, Ger van Dijck wrote: While upgrading I had one problem : I had to allowerasing ffmpeg : dnf advised to use skip-broken. When I want to install (dnf install

Re: Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg.

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:42:59 + ja wrote: > From someone on this list? > > dnf swap ffmpeg-free ffmpeg --allowerasing > > Replaces the incompatible stuff in the fedora repos with the "normal" stuff > from rpmfusion. I've got that in my notes as one of the first things I do now (after instal

Re: Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg.

On Fri, 2023-11-10 at 17:26 +0100, Ger van Dijck wrote: > > On 11/9/23 21:16, Ger van Dijck wrote: > > > > On 11/8/23 18:54, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 11/8/23 08:51, Ger van Dijck wrote: > > > > While upgrading I had one problem : I had to allowerasing ffmpeg : > > > > dnf advised to use skip-

Re: Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg.

On 11/9/23 21:16, Ger van Dijck wrote: On 11/8/23 18:54, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/8/23 08:51, Ger van Dijck wrote: While upgrading I had one problem : I had to allowerasing ffmpeg : dnf advised to use skip-broken. When I want to install (dnf install ffmpeg) there seem to be problems. To g

Re: Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg.

On 11/8/23 18:54, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/8/23 08:51, Ger van Dijck wrote: While upgrading I had one problem : I had to allowerasing ffmpeg : dnf advised to use skip-broken. When I want to install (dnf install ffmpeg) there seem to be problems. To get better answers you need to provide mor

Re: Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg.

On 8 Nov 2023 at 17:51, Ger van Dijck wrote: To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date sent: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 17:51:19 +0100 Subject:Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg. From: "Ger van Dijck" Sen

Re: Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg.

On 11/8/23 08:51, Ger van Dijck wrote: While upgrading I had one problem : I had to allowerasing ffmpeg : dnf advised to use skip-broken. When I want to install (dnf install ffmpeg) there seem to be problems. To get better answers you need to provide more details, like what exactly was the "

Re: Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg.

On 11/8/23 10:02, Harald Labes wrote: Try dnf install ffmpeg-free. That should work. If you want the full fledged ffmpeg from rpmfusion.org, install the reposetories from rpmfusion and try dnf install --allowerasing ffmpeg. But be aware that many of the original packages of fedora are then replac

Re: Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg.

Here is the RPMFusion page advising to replace ffmpeg-free with ffmpeg. It uses dnf swap. https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/Multimedia ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg.

Try dnf install ffmpeg-free. That should work. If you want the full fledged ffmpeg from rpmfusion.org, install the reposetories from rpmfusion and try dnf install --allowerasing ffmpeg. But be aware that many of the original packages of fedora are then replaced by rpmfusion stuff. Cheers

Upgrade Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 . Install problem with FFmeg.

Hay Fedora users, I upgraded Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 0n a Dell laptop N3701 ( more than 10 years old !) without problems. Great ! and Fedora39 runs perfectly : More Great On this machine I use Windows 10 Professional (unprotected mode / bios and uefi discrepancies) and all runs

Re: Fedora31 install problem -

On 11/1/19 5:34 PM, john.mel...@gmail.com wrote: The workaround was simple - just add an EFI boot selection to the BIOS list before all others, and it now boots as expected. As to why the installer chose to install an EFI image when the machine was not configured to use EFI, I have filed a bug o

Re: Fedora31 install problem -

On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 12:06 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 10/31/19 23:43, Tim via users wrote: > > You could go back to gparted, and remove your partitions, making it > > a > > blank drive. > . > Tim: > > That is what the Anaconda installerwanted. I created a new "1 TB" > partition wit gparted a

Re: Fedora31 install problem -

On 10/31/19 23:43, Tim via users wrote: You could go back to gparted, and remove your partitions, making it a blank drive. . Tim: That is what the Anaconda installerwanted. I created a new "1 TB" partition wit gparted and then it went without any problems.It just popped up the Complete notice

Re: Fedora31 install problem -

On Thu, 2019-10-31 at 15:18 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote: > I have been trying to install Fedora 31XFCE Spin. I've spent more > time at it than I care to admitbut can"t get the Anaconda installer > to see a clear one terabyte drive. I re-partitioned it with Gparted > and gave it an ext4 file system. Th

Re: Fedora31 install problem -

On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:33:18 -0400 Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 10/31/19 16:01, stan via users wrote: > > Were you trying to install > > UEFI from a BIOS boot, or vice versa? Won't work. > > I'm not sure how that one boots, the last several Fedira's have been > upgrades. Maybe I should try the UE

Re: Fedora31 install problem -

On 10/31/19 16:01, stan via users wrote: Were you trying to install UEFI from a BIOS boot, or vice versa? Won't work. I'm not sure how that one boots, the last several Fedira's have been upgrades. Maybe I should try the UEFI installer? -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA _

Re: Fedora31 install problem -

On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:34:13 -0400 Bob Goodwin wrote: > On 10/31/19 15:25, Joe Zeff wrote: > > Have you tried selecting a Custom layout? > . > > Yes, the alternative is automatic which I believe gives an LVM, not > what I want. You configured a / mount point? Were there any warning messages

Re: Fedora31 install problem -

On 10/31/19 15:25, Joe Zeff wrote: Have you tried selecting a Custom layout? . Yes, the alternative is automatic which I believe gives an LVM, not what I want. -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: Fedora31 install problem -

On 10/31/2019 01:18 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: I have been trying to install Fedora 31XFCE Spin. I've spent more time at it than I care to admitbut can"t get the Anaconda installer to see a clear one terabyte drive. I re-partitioned it with Gparted and gave it an ext4 file system. The problem see

Fedora31 install problem -

. I have been trying to install Fedora 31XFCE Spin. I've spent more time at it than I care to admitbut can"t get the Anaconda installer to see a clear one terabyte drive. I re-partitioned it with Gparted and gave it an ext4 file system. The problem seems to be that I don't want LVM, choosing

Feeling REALLY stupid - Re: F30 install problem on Lenovo x131e

Boy is a power issue! My rats nest of power cables for all my power adapters for all the notebooks on my desk... The adapter for the new notebook was unplugged and I was doing the install off of battery.  So just before the install finished, it shut off from not enough electrons.  And of cou

Re: F30 install problem on Lenovo x131e

Try to boot on battery only (w/o adapter) and on AC adapter only (w/o battery). May be this is a power issue since it is able to start booting. Memory problems usually lead to BSOD, not power off. 21.06.2019, 18:56, "Robert Moskowitz" : > I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked. > >

Re: F30 install problem on Lenovo x131e

x120e memory is different than the x130e so no shortcut there. On 6/21/19 2:40 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 6/21/19 1:36 PM, stan via users wrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:54:52 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked. Any recommendations on wh

Re: F30 install problem on Lenovo x131e

On 6/21/19 1:36 PM, stan via users wrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:54:52 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked. Any recommendations on what I can do with this system?  I will check on memory, but otherwise, HELP.  Please? First recommendation is

Re: F30 install problem on Lenovo x131e

On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:54:52 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked. > Any recommendations on what I can do with this system?  I will check > on memory, but otherwise, HELP.  Please? First recommendation is relax. The system won't get worse by let

Re: F30 install problem on Lenovo x131e

I am very concerned that the Lenovo x131e is bricked. I put in the Win10 HD.  It starts to boot and the windows logo starts spinning and the system promptly shuts down. It may be memory, and I will have to see if I have any matching memory here (see if it uses the same as my x120e which I hav

Re: F30 install problem on Lenovo x131e

Looks like internal hardware problem. Unplug the power adapter and battery and then try to remove and install again the drive, memory and other removable parts. 21.06.2019, 04:18, "Robert Moskowitz" : > This is really bad.  It won't get past the Lenovo logo screen with the > USB CD/DVD drive att

Re: F30 install problem on Lenovo x131e

This is really bad.  It won't get past the Lenovo logo screen with the USB CD/DVD drive attached.  It shuts down immediately.  No listening to F12.  Even without the drive, I can't get it to respond to any keystroke before shutting down. Either the boot info is totally hosed from the install (

Re: F30 install problem on Lenovo x131e

Do you know what is your gpu unit? Best is if you download liveDVD and try. You like xfce --> https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/30/Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Xfce-Live-x86_64-30-1.2.iso or torrent https://torrent.fedoraproject.org/torrents/Fedora-Xfce-Live-x86_64-30.torre

F30 install problem on Lenovo x131e

I have a refurbished x131e.  I pulled the 320G HD and installed an empty 500GB SSD.  From a USB SD I started the x64 NetInstall. In the install process, I set my location (Detroit), changed the host name, left the drive setup as default.  Then I selected a bunch of software.  I selected the Xf

Re: avidemux install problem

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 19:34 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > You can try enabling the testing repos but I don't have a good way to > > check > > to see if they're there yet. > > The usual way is: > > dnf --enablerepo= ... > > but

Re: avidemux install problem

On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:23 +, Richard Ibbotson wrote: > On Thursday 19 November 2015 11:15:01 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 19:34 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > According to Google,

Re: avidemux install problem

On Thursday 19 November 2015 11:15:01 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 19:34 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan > > > > > > wrote: > > > According to Google, several people are having this issue: > > > > > > $ sudo dnf install --

Re: avidemux install problem

On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 19:34 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan il.com> > wrote: > > > According to Google, several people are having this issue: > > > > $ sudo dnf install --allowerasing avidemux > > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:14:07

Re: avidemux install problem

On 11/18/2015 05:34 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan mailto:pocallag...@gmail.com>> wrote: According to Google, several people are having this issue: $ sudo dnf install --allowerasing avidemux Last metadata expiration check performed 0:14:

Re: avidemux install problem

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > According to Google, several people are having this issue: > > $ sudo dnf install --allowerasing avidemux > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:14:07 ago on Thu Nov 19 > 00:32:09 2015. > Error: nothing provides libx264.so.142()(

avidemux install problem

According to Google, several people are having this issue: $ sudo dnf install --allowerasing avidemux   Last metadata expiration check performed 0:14:07 ago on Thu Nov 19 00:32:09 2015. Error: nothing provides libx264.so.142()(64bit) needed by avidemux-qt-2.6.8-3.fc22.x86_64 (Note that this is

[OT] Re: Install Problem with Fedora 20 (No Local Standard Disks)

On 06/27/14 16:34, Rolf Turner wrote: > On 27/06/14 17:56, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 06/26/2014 06:58 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: >>> Jeff, >>> >>> Thanks very much. >> >> No problem, but my name is Joe, not Jeff. Yes, I know why you got it >> wrong, but that doesn't mean that I don't like having my n

Re: Install Problem with Fedora 20 (No Local Standard Disks)

On 27/06/14 17:56, Joe Zeff wrote: On 06/26/2014 06:58 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Jeff, Thanks very much. No problem, but my name is Joe, not Jeff. Yes, I know why you got it wrong, but that doesn't mean that I don't like having my name mangled. Joe: I get called "Ralph" or "Rolph" or "

Re: Install Problem with Fedora 20 (No Local Standard Disks)

Le jeudi 26 juin 2014 à 20:58 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis a écrit : Hi, I used to have a weird behavior, with Fedora live install, on some machines (Slightly old Dell for example) on USB stick, if I generate it with the fedora tool I can't see any space on the Disk. On the same laptop if I generate th

Re: Install Problem with Fedora 20 (No Local Standard Disks)

On 06/26/2014 06:58 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Jeff, Thanks very much. No problem, but my name is Joe, not Jeff. Yes, I know why you got it wrong, but that doesn't mean that I don't like having my name mangled. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change su

Re: Install Problem with Fedora 20 (No Local Standard Disks)

Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:11:01 -0700 On 06/26/2014 04:47 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > The system boots to Windows without any problem. I was planning on > overwriting the disc and getting rid of the windows product entirely. I > have checked sum the installation disc, and have even created a s

Re: Install Problem with Fedora 20 (No Local Standard Disks)

On 06/26/2014 04:47 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: The system boots to Windows without any problem. I was planning on overwriting the disc and getting rid of the windows product entirely. I have checked sum the installation disc, and have even created a second Fedora 20 installation disc and have

Install Problem with Fedora 20 (No Local Standard Disks)

Everyone, I purchased a used (refurbished) Dell Optiplex 755 that came with Windows 7 installed. I am trying to install Fedora 20, but when I get to the "Installation Destination" screen the fedora installer is not finding any "Local Standard Discs", which means I have been unable to start any in

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 17:49 -0400, David wrote: > > Use a torrent download (the same site has torrent versions). It's > likely > > to be faster, not to mention easier to restart partial downloads. > > > > poc > > > > > His complaint was that his download did not complete. A torrent would > be >

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 8 June 2014 22:54, Doug wrote: > I'd have the file in 20 minutes or so. The estimate was 4 1/2 hours! I said to > go ahead, and then after about 2 1/2 hours I accidentally aborted it. I'll try > again late tonite. Hi Doug. Good to hear from you again. If you are using Firefox to download, th

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 8 June 2014 23:40, David wrote: > It took a while but I remembered that from school. But I admit that I > had to Google search it for reference. > > So? The people here are, mostly, ordinary people that try to help > people with problems. Insulting *paid help* is just stupid. Insulting > *free

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 06/08/2014 08:55 PM, Doug wrote: OI downloaded the whole thing and burned a DVD. Thanx to the folks who advised me to get the 64-bit version. I'll install it later tonite, if I don't run into any further trouble. When it's installed and running I'll post back, and if it doesn't install and

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 06/09/14 08:55, Doug wrote: > BTW: I did not see any checksum information on the download site. > I just took it on faith that it was OK. Up until now, I've always had > good downloads, when I did have a checksum to verify with. https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify -- Do not condemn the judgm

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 06/08/2014 06:42 PM, David wrote: On 6/8/2014 6:06 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: Doug optonline.net> writes: Well, the reason was that I had the disk. So I listened to the sage advice from the list here, and started to download the file. I have the usual cable connection, and I

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 6/8/2014 7:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/09/14 07:21, David wrote: >> IMHO? Torrents sucked then. And they suck now. > > I live in Taiwan. If it were not for torrents I'd be missing some very > good shows. I was not aware of that. >> As for this person? People like *you*? The unpaid help

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 06/09/14 07:21, David wrote: > IMHO? Torrents sucked then. And they suck now. I live in Taiwan. If it were not for torrents I'd be missing some very good shows. > > As for this person? People like *you*? The unpaid helpers here? He > insulted 'you' IMO. If you don't care? You need to make tha

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 6/8/2014 6:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/09/14 06:40, David wrote: >> I am impressed Ed. Most, in my experience, torrents die quickly due to >> lack of seeds. I gave up on torrents when I upgraded from telephone >> lines and 56k modems. I have no idea but many, many yeaRS AGO, > > FWIW, mayb

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 06/09/14 06:40, David wrote: > I am impressed Ed. Most, in my experience, torrents die quickly due to > lack of seeds. I gave up on torrents when I upgraded from telephone > lines and 56k modems. I have no idea but many, many yeaRS AGO, FWIW, maybe things have changed againwith more people

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 6/8/2014 6:06 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > Doug optonline.net> writes: > >> Well, the reason was that I had the disk. So I listened to the sage >> advice from the list here, and started to download the file. I have >> the usual cable connection, and I thought >> I'd have the fil

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 6/8/2014 6:13 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/09/14 05:49, David wrote: >> His complaint was that his download did not complete. A torrent would be >> a complete restart. And a torrent, at this late date, would/could be >> slow since the possibility od acctive 'seeds' would/could be small. > > Ju

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 06/09/14 05:49, David wrote: > His complaint was that his download did not complete. A torrent would be > a complete restart. And a torrent, at this late date, would/could be > slow since the possibility od acctive 'seeds' would/could be small. Just for the heck of it, I'm re-downloading the to

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

Doug optonline.net> writes: > Well, the reason was that I had the disk. So I listened to the sage > advice from the list here, and started to download the file. I have > the usual cable connection, and I thought > I'd have the file in 20 minutes or so. The estimate was 4½ hours! I

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 6/8/2014 5:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 16:54 -0400, Doug wrote: >> Well, the reason was that I had the disk. So I listened to the sage >> advice from the list here, and started to download the file. I have >> the >> usual cable connection, and I thought >> I'd hav

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 6/8/2014 5:29 PM, Doug wrote: > > On 06/08/2014 05:17 PM, David wrote: >> On 6/8/2014 4:54 PM, Doug wrote: >>> On 06/08/2014 01:35 AM, Roger wrote: On 06/08/2014 03:21 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > > On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, "Doug" > wrote: >> Tr

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 16:54 -0400, Doug wrote: > Well, the reason was that I had the disk. So I listened to the sage > advice from the list here, and started to download the file. I have > the > usual cable connection, and I thought > I'd have the file in 20 minutes or so. The estimate was 4½ hou

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 06/08/2014 05:17 PM, David wrote: On 6/8/2014 4:54 PM, Doug wrote: On 06/08/2014 01:35 AM, Roger wrote: On 06/08/2014 03:21 PM, Pete Travis wrote: On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, "Doug" mailto:dmcgarr...@optonline.net>> wrote: Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a multiboot system (Wi

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 6/8/2014 4:54 PM, Doug wrote: > > On 06/08/2014 01:35 AM, Roger wrote: >> On 06/08/2014 03:21 PM, Pete Travis wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, "Doug" >> > wrote: >>> > >>> > Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a multiboot system >>> (Windows

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 06/08/2014 01:35 AM, Roger wrote: On 06/08/2014 03:21 PM, Pete Travis wrote: On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, "Doug" > wrote: > > Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a multiboot system (Windows 8.1 + PCLOS 32 + PCLOS 64) into a standard partition. > Got

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On 06/08/2014 03:21 PM, Pete Travis wrote: On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, "Doug" > wrote: > > Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a multiboot system (Windows 8.1 + PCLOS 32 + PCLOS 64) into a standard partition. > Got up past setting passwords for root and

Re: Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

On Jun 7, 2014 9:01 PM, "Doug" wrote: > > Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a multiboot system (Windows 8.1 + PCLOS 32 + PCLOS 64) into a standard partition. > Got up past setting passwords for root and user. Then it crashed with the following message: > > *

Install problem (Fedora 20-32bit

Trying to install Fedora 20 32-bit version on a multiboot system (Windows 8.1 + PCLOS 32 + PCLOS 64) into a standard partition. Got up past setting passwords for root and user. Then it crashed with the following message: *** The following error occurred whil ins

Re: Install problem

On 01/19/2014 08:04 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: On 01/19/2014 03:37 PM, Doug wrote: Trying to install Fedora 32 KDE on second hard drive. This drive has been partitioned with /dev/sdb1 formatted as NTFS, and /dev/sdb5 and /dev/sdb6 formatted as ext4. The Fedora install disk says there is on

Re: Install problem

On 01/19/2014 03:37 PM, Doug wrote: Trying to install Fedora 32 KDE on second hard drive. This drive has been partitioned with /dev/sdb1 formatted as NTFS, and /dev/sdb5 and /dev/sdb6 formatted as ext4. The Fedora install disk says there is only 2.77MB available on the disk. What gives, and ho

Install problem

Trying to install Fedora 32 KDE on second hard drive. This drive has been partitioned with /dev/sdb1 formatted as NTFS, and /dev/sdb5 and /dev/sdb6 formatted as ext4. The Fedora install disk says there is only 2.77MB available on the disk. What gives, and how do I fix it? After mounting the d

Re: VMware install problem -

Am 05.09.2013 19:54, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA: > On 05/09/13 13:01, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 05.09.2013 18:43, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA: >>> 2013-09-05T12:32:39.424-05:00| vthread-3| I120: The header path >>> "/lib/modules/3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64/build/include"

Re: VMware install problem -

Am 05.09.2013 18:43, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA: > 2013-09-05T12:32:39.424-05:00| vthread-3| I120: The header path > "/lib/modules/3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64/build/include" for the kernel > "3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64" is valid. Whoohoo! > 2013-09-05T12:32:43.232-05:00| vthread-3| W110

Re: VMware install problem -

On 09/05/2013 03:08 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > However I am still unable to enter the key. It wont even let me type > in the "enter key" box. Yeah, I had this problem too. Try this: sudo /usr/lib/vmware/bin/vmware-vmx --new-sn xxx (from: https://communities.vmware.com/thread/

Re: VMware install problem -

On 05/09/13 16:51, Raman Gupta wrote: On 09/05/2013 03:08 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: However I am still unable to enter the key. It wont even let me type in the "enter key" box. Yeah, I had this problem too. Try this: sudo /usr/lib/vmware/bin/vmware-vmx --new-sn xxx (from: h

Re: VMware install problem -

On 05/09/13 14:12, Reindl Harald wrote: you are *not* following the instructions because they are clearly contain these two curl-commands downloading the patches, if you follwed the first step "cd /tmp" to the /tmp directory and the full path is referred by the next steps curl -Ohttp://pkgbuild

Re: VMware install problem -

On 05/09/13 13:54, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: On 05/09/13 13:01, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.09.2013 18:43, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA: 2013-09-05T12:32:39.424-05:00| vthread-3| I120: The header path "/lib/modules/3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64/build/include" for the kerne

Re: VMware install problem -

On 05/09/13 13:01, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.09.2013 18:43, schrieb Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA: 2013-09-05T12:32:39.424-05:00| vthread-3| I120: The header path "/lib/modules/3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64/build/include" for the kernel "3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64" is valid. Whoohoo! 2013-09-05T1

VMware install problem -

The trial version of VMware Workstation 9 expired last night. I bought a new version but after the expiration I found it would not accept an entry for a new key so I ran the vmware uninstall app. and installed the new one from scratch. It starts but only runs to the point where I get the messa

F18 Install Problem

I am working with a pair of spanking new HP ProLiant ML110 G& servers. Both have the RAID Hot Swap SATA Arrays and I have tried Installation with the drive arrayed as 1 Logical Drive and as four separated drives with the same result in both configurations. I have also used the Full Installat

Re: USB Live Install problem -

Well, since you've solved it using a real drive, this is a bit late, but, ... On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > On 29/12/12 13:14, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >> >> Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA writes: >> >>>Is there a way I can install withou

Re: USB Live Install problem -

On 29/12/12 13:14, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA writes: Is there a way I can install without using the USB flash drive? There is no optical drive in that box. Is there a scheme for installing over the LAN connection? Yes, but first

Re: USB Live Install problem -

Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA writes: Is there a way I can install without using the USB flash drive? There is no optical drive in that box. Is there a scheme for installing over the LAN connection? Yes, but first you need to make sure that your target comp

Re: USB Live Install problem -

On 12/29/2012 05:04 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: <> > Is there a scheme for installing over the LAN connection? from my bookmarks, this link may do it for you; [watch line wrap] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Installation_Guide/s1-begininstall-perform-nfs-x8

USB Live Install problem -

On this computer I have a copy of "Fedora-18-Beta-x86_64-Live-XFCE.iso" I would like to install on another computer. It has a GiGabyte GA-E350N motherboard which has a recognized problem booting from a thumb drive. I've used "livecreator" on

Re: Firefox install-problem

On 04.08.2012, James Wilkinson wrote: > Even though the build was OK, you still might want to do a memtest of > your system. I solved the problem. The culprit is prelink, which lets parts of the package clash. Didn't find the related bugreport st once, though, and spent some hours digging into t

Re: Firefox install-problem

Heinz Diehl wrote: > Firefox, built from .srpm from F17-updates repository, fails to install: > This is the error-message which shows up: > > "Unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox;501bceec: > cpio: Digest mismatch" > > The package is original Fedora and not altered in a

Firefox install-problem

Hi, Firefox, built from .srpm from F17-updates repository, fails to install: This is the error-message which shows up: "Unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox;501bceec: cpio: Digest mismatch" The package is original Fedora and not altered in any way. Extracted it, ran "r

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On 01/06/12 18:54, Carroll Grigsby wrote: Bob: Take a look here: http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f16.html Although this site is for Fedora 16, it worked OK for me on Fedora 17, and I expect that the new version will be available within the next few days. It's a bit like a cafete

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:54:28 -0400, Carroll Grigsby wrote: > Bob: > Take a look here: > > http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f16.html > > Although this site is for Fedora 16, it worked OK for me on Fedora 17, > and I expect that the new version will be available within the next few > da

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:20:45 -0400 "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote: > > Big whack > Bob: Take a look here: http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f16.html Although this site is for Fedora 16, it worked OK for me on Fedora 17, and I expect that the new version will be available

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On 01/06/12 17:11, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: Can you download that file with your favourite browser? If yes, userpm -ivh rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm to install it within the directory you downloaded it to. Yes that works: [root@box7 bobg]# wget http:/

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On 01/06/12 16:24, Michael Schwendt wrote: Good. So, that raises the question why you have .repo files for rpmfusion repos in /etc/yum.repos.d/? And those are damaged or invalid. Let's continue with the instructions at: http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration What works for you? What doesn't? I

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On 01/06/12 16:28, Michael Schwendt wrote: These typos (wrong space characters= in the earlier reply caused too much confusion. It should have been rpm -e rpmfusion-free-release rpmfusion-nonfree-release Sorry. This is very basic RPM usage. One should not simply sit and wait for step-by-ste

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 22:24 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:11:19 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > > On 01/06/12 15:53, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Try again. Use cut'n'paste. Don't introduce type mistakes. > > > What you've run is not what I've suggest

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:16:06 -0400, Elliott Chapin wrote: > On 06/01/2012 04:11 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > On 01/06/12 15:53, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> Try again. Use cut'n'paste. Don't introduce type mistakes. > >> What you've run is not what I've suggested. > >> > >

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:11:19 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > On 01/06/12 15:53, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Try again. Use cut'n'paste. Don't introduce type mistakes. > > What you've run is not what I've suggested. > > > > [root@box9 bobg]# rpm -e rpmfusion-release-nonfre

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On 06/01/2012 04:11 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > On 01/06/12 15:53, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> Try again. Use cut'n'paste. Don't introduce type mistakes. >> What you've run is not what I've suggested. >> > >[root@box9 bobg]# rpm -e rpmfusion-release-nonfree >rpmfusion-

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On 01/06/12 15:53, Michael Schwendt wrote: Try again. Use cut'n'paste. Don't introduce type mistakes. What you've run is not what I've suggested. [root@box9 bobg]# rpm -e rpmfusion-release-nonfree rpmfusion-release-free error: package rpmfusion-release-nonfree is not installed er

Re: F-17 vlc/rpmfusion install problem -

On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:10:42 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > On 01/06/12 13:33, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:48:17 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > > >> On 01/06/12 12:07, suvayu ali wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Bob Goodwin

  1   2   >