On 17 Jul 2023 at 17:29, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:29:17 -0400
Subject:works fine - Re: F38 install fails on a Lenovo x120e - Failed
to set
new efi boot traget
From: Robert Moskowitz
To: Community support for Fedora users ,
Roger
I got the error again when the install got to that point. I told it to
ignore and continue installing.
I have a usable system.
I did notice on boot an option to edit the EFI firmware. I selected
that and got an error that cannot boot into the EFI editor.
But that is ok. the system is work
On 7/17/23 16:07, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
First computer was a 1963 IBM 1130 with punch cards back in
1975. So started with old machines that still were working.. High
School..
I started with a teletype 55 baudot to a GE MarkV in '66. Best I can
figure out was our school (Euclid OH) w
On 17 Jul 2023 at 11:25, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 11:25:31 -0400
To: Community support for Fedora users
From: Robert Moskowitz
Subject:F38 install fails on a Lenovo x120e - Failed to set
new efi boot
I was getting ready to try again.
I pulled the CD drive and tried to get into bios setup, but was not fast
enough and it started booting F38!
It got as far as a things like
[Failed] Failed to start systemd-login.service - User Login Management.
then a bunch more and hung.
So I am going to d
Yes, some did have efi back then. i have some fm2 mbs that did. There will
be an option in the bios to enable efi if it does. efi dates to early
itanium systems in 2002. it was so bad it took years to make it to x86
systems. very little was in the classic bios menu and most config was in a
mess
Bios ver is "current", ver 1.17 dated 11/7/2012!
Did we have EFI back then?
Oh, F37 live CD booted fine.
On 7/17/23 13:17, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:25 AM Robert Moskowitz wrote:
this system had F22 on it.
I just went through all the steps to blow away the old partiti
Well
that command gets:
WARNING: UEFI firmware can not be updated in legacy BIOS mode
Then I get a url for fwupd...
Oh, the ethernet is working. Seems it got unplugged from the switch.
Ooops.
Anything else I should try before looking into firmware ver on this
box? Like how to find t
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 1:56 PM Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> I just recalled. There was a /boot/efi partition on the old F22 setup.
>
> But booting up F37 live now.
If you haven't done so, now would be a good time to update the
laptop's firmware. Get on the latest version.
And the kernel docs ha
I just recalled. There was a /boot/efi partition on the old F22 setup.
But booting up F37 live now.
On 7/17/23 13:17, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:25 AM Robert Moskowitz wrote:
this system had F22 on it.
I just went through all the steps to blow away the old partitions a
Well I am going to have to boot off a liveCD.
I have F37 handy. Will try that now and download the F38 one.
Oh I was using the Netinstal. And it had problems with my ethernet. It
worked when I had booted F22 to check things out before then install.
So I had to use the wiFi.
On 7/17/23
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:25 AM Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> this system had F22 on it.
>
> I just went through all the steps to blow away the old partitions and
> install F38.
>
> It tried for maybe an hour with the spindizzy on "Installing boot loader".
>
> If finally came back with a dialog box
It has the AMD E-350 duo core CPU which I am pretty sure is x64.
On 7/17/23 12:58, Barry wrote:
On 17 Jul 2023, at 16:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
What should I do at this point. It IS an old system that has had a number of
ver of Fedora on it. It was booting F22 just fine, it seemed but n
On 7/17/23 12:18, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 11:25 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
this system had F22 on it.
I just went through all the steps to blow away the old partitions and
install F38.
It tried for maybe an hour with the spindizzy on "Installing boot
loader".
If
> On 17 Jul 2023, at 16:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> What should I do at this point. It IS an old system that has had a number of
> ver of Fedora on it. It was booting F22 just fine, it seemed but now it is
> all gone...
Is it a 64bit system or 32bit? Fedora needs 64bit now.
Barry
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 11:25 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> this system had F22 on it.
>
> I just went through all the steps to blow away the old partitions and
> install F38.
>
> It tried for maybe an hour with the spindizzy on "Installing boot
> loader".
>
> If finally came back with a dialog
this system had F22 on it.
I just went through all the steps to blow away the old partitions and
install F38.
It tried for maybe an hour with the spindizzy on "Installing boot loader".
If finally came back with a dialog box with an error of:
The following error occurred while installing the
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020, 02:10 Michal Schorm, wrote:
> Hello,
> I am deploying VMs via kickstart files, so the process can be
> completely non-interactive.
>
> Right now I'm stuck with Fedora 33.
> The following command works completely fine on F32, F31 and so on, but not
> F33.
> Can you please help
Hello,
I am deploying VMs via kickstart files, so the process can be
completely non-interactive.
Right now I'm stuck with Fedora 33.
The following command works completely fine on F32, F31 and so on, but not F33.
Can you please help me fix it?
virt-install \
--connect qemu:///system \
--ne
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 01:32 +, Eric Smith wrote:
> Upgrading the BIOS to a version with new AMD Ryzen microcode solved the
> problem.
When replying via HyperKitty please follow long-standing practice and
quote the context as HK doesn't do this by default.
poc
___
Upgrading the BIOS to a version with new AMD Ryzen microcode solved the problem.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraprojec
> I had the same problem, I usually buy AMD processors, but I read about
> the problem, I bought an Intel box. Still, the whole boot process
> seemed to take place up, but ended in an infinite loop waiting for
> startup process to end.
I ran into that also with F30, but it's not the same problem
> Questions about F31 should be directed to the Fedora Test list.
Sorry, since F31RC1.9 was approved for release, it hadn't occurred to me to
post to the test list. However, I have done so now.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
I had the same problem, I usually buy AMD processors, but I read about
the problem, I bought an Intel box. Still, the whole boot process
seemed to take place up, but ended in an infinite loop waiting for
startup process to end. I threw in the towel on Fedora and went to
Ubuntu. But ubuntu 19.04
On Sun, 2019-10-27 at 20:22 -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
> I have a new Ryzen 7 3800X system, and since Fedora 30 won't install on
> that, I tried Fedora 31 RC1.9 Workstation Live. That boots up fine, but
> when I try to install to my "disk" (M.2 NVMe), if file system encryption is
> enabled, it hangs
I have a new Ryzen 7 3800X system, and since Fedora 30 won't install on
that, I tried Fedora 31 RC1.9 Workstation Live. That boots up fine, but
when I try to install to my "disk" (M.2 NVMe), if file system encryption is
enabled, it hangs at "Creating luks on /dev/nvme0n1p6". I let it sit there
for
On 05/05/18 15:57, SternData wrote:
Why not do it from the command line via dnf?
https://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-fedora-27-fedora-28/
-- -- Steve ___
Ok, I did the dnf system upgrade as you suggested during the "free" time
after 03:00 to avoid
On 05/05/18 15:57, SternData wrote:
Why not do it from the command line via dnf?
https://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-fedora-27-fedora-28/
-- -- Steve ___
Well, that just wasn't what I set out to do. The the beta version
installed easily in a VM and I expected this to work a
On 05/05/2018 01:43 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> .
>
> I put /Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-1.1.iso on a flash drive using
> the Fedora Media Writer and started the installer on an updated Fedora
> 27 computer, The process starts without a problem after doing the
> initial check but stops when it
.
I put /Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-1.1.iso on a flash drive using
the Fedora Media Writer and started the installer on an updated Fedora
27 computer, The process starts without a problem after doing the
initial check but stops when it does:
"Started User Manager for UID 1000." then n
On 12/16/2015 10:57 AM, dwoody5654 wrote:
/
From what you are saying, the only way to do a custom install for a
desktop computer is to use netinstall and use:/
I didn't say that at all. You can use a DVD as the install source. You
can put the ISO, rather than the install tree, on the hard dr
On 12/16/2015 12:02 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:09 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
The documentation says the following:
harddrive
Install from a tree or full installation ISO image on a local hard drive. The
tree or ISO image must be on a file system which is mountable in the
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:09 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
>
> The documentation says the following:
>
> harddrive
> Install from a tree or full installation ISO image on a local hard drive. The
> tree or ISO image must be on a file system which is mountable in the
> installation environment. Supported
On 12/15/2015 06:13 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/15/2015 02:22 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
On 12/15/2015 04:20 PM, cs wrote:
On 12/15/2015 03:20 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/15/2015 01:09 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
I have been using the following with no problems:
url --url
http://mirrors.kernel.org/f
On 12/15/2015 02:22 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
On 12/15/2015 04:20 PM, cs wrote:
On 12/15/2015 03:20 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/15/2015 01:09 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
I have been using the following with no problems:
url --url
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/22/Everything/i386/os/
Howeve
On 12/15/2015 04:20 PM, cs wrote:
On 12/15/2015 03:20 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/15/2015 01:09 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
I have been using the following with no problems:
url --url
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/22/Everything/i386/os/
However, One computer I need to upgrade is in a
On 12/15/2015 03:31 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 12/15/2015 01:09 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
Is there documentation elsewhere that has more details on the use of
an OS tree?
Are you specifying --dir relative to /home, or did you include "/home"
in the path?
I tried using /home as part of the path
On 12/15/2015 01:09 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
Is there documentation elsewhere that has more details on the use of
an OS tree?
Are you specifying --dir relative to /home, or did you include "/home"
in the path?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscript
On 12/15/2015 01:09 PM, dwoody5654 wrote:
I have been using the following with no problems:
url --url http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/22/Everything/i386/os/
However, One computer I need to upgrade is in another city and in an
area that has power outages on occasion but It has battery b
I have been using the following with no problems:
url --url http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/22/Everything/i386/os/
However, One computer I need to upgrade is in another city and in an
area that has power outages on occasion but It has battery backup.
During a netinstall, if the power
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/30/2015 05:27 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> Crippling an upstream tool is beyond anything other distros patch.
>
>
> It's not crippled. The efi modules are packaged separately. If you know
> that you want to run grub2-install, then you need
On 08/30/2015 05:27 AM, Tom H wrote:
Crippling an upstream tool is beyond anything other distros patch.
It's not crippled. The efi modules are packaged separately. If you
know that you want to run grub2-install, then you need to install the
"grub2-efi-modules" package. When you run grub2-i
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Gordon Messmer
> wrote:
>> On 08/29/2015 01:03 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
>>>
>>> I hadn't read that page. I stand corrected.
>>>
>>> How nice that Fedora diverges from upstream.
>
On 08/30/2015 01:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I've already hinted at this, because those entries are either wrong or
> suboptimal. Each distro has its own /etc/default/grub which contains
> its own unique GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= which really only applies to that
> distro. The Ubuntu GRUB menu entries f
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 08/29/2015 11:12 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> > grub2-mkconfig will add entries for other operating systems it can find.
>>> > That will be done based on the output of the os-prober tool.
>> This is why one of my first modifications post-
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/29/2015 01:03 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
>>
>> I hadn't read that page. I stand corrected.
>>
>> How nice that Fedora diverges from upstream.
>
> It does, considerably:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/
On 08/29/2015 11:12 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > grub2-mkconfig will add entries for other operating systems it can find.
>> > That will be done based on the output of the os-prober tool.
> This is why one of my first modifications post-install is to
> /etc/default/grub to add
>
> GRUB_DISABLE_OS_P
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> grub2-mkconfig will add entries for other operating systems it can find.
> That will be done based on the output of the os-prober tool.
This is why one of my first modifications post-install is to
/etc/default/grub to add
GRUB_DISABLE_OS
On 08/29/2015 04:31 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>> >
>>> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
>> so grub2-efi installs it, but how do you modify/maintain it??
>
> You don't. If you modify the grub2 binary, the signature is invalid
> and the system won't boot (under Secure Boot). There is almost
On 08/29/2015 01:03 PM, Tom H wrote:
the grub2-install command
>creates a custom grubx64.efi, deletes the original installed one, and looks
>for grub.cfg in /boot/grub2/."
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
I hadn't read that page. I stand corrected.
How nice that Fedora diverges from upstr
On 08/29/2015 12:51 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
Not according to the documentation, which indicates that:
>"grub2-install shouldn't be used on EFI systems. The grub2-efi package
>installs a prebaked grubx64.efi on the EFI System partition, which
>looks for grub.cfg on the ESP in/EFI/fedora/ where
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/29/2015 03:20 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> grub2-install works on non-SB systems.
>> And there's no reason that it shouldn't work on SB systems. Aren't the
>> grub and shim executables simply copied from "/usr/something"? So they
>> should b
On 08/29/2015 02:59 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> grub2-install works on non-SB systems.
>> And there's no reason that it shouldn't work on SB systems. Aren't the
>> grub and shim executables simply copied from "/usr/something"? So they
>> should be signed.
>
that was not my writing, someone else se
On 08/29/2015 03:00 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
it
would really be nice if there was some HOW-TO or documentation
on all
this new UEFI/shim packages...
There is.
https://fedoraproject.or
On 08/29/2015 04:15 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
it would really be nice if there was some HOW-TO or documentation on all
this new UEFI/shim packages...
There is.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
On 08/29/2015 03:20 AM, Tom H wrote:
grub2-install works on non-SB systems.
And there's no reason that it shouldn't work on SB systems. Aren't the
grub and shim executables simply copied from "/usr/something"? So they
should be signed.
Not according to the documentation, which indicates that:
"
On 08/29/2015 02:17 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
>> >
>> > yum install grub2-efi grub2-efi-modules shim
> grub2-efi-modules is not necessary unless you plan on going off the
> rails with GRUB modules that aren't baked into the signed Fedora GRUB
> EFI OS Loader
On 08/29/2015 06:20 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> > grub2-install does not apply on UEFI systems at all, it should not be
>> > used. Instead you reinstall shim and grub2-efi packages.
> grub2-install works on non-SB systems.
SB-systems?
>
> And there's no reason that it shouldn't work on SB systems. Aren't t
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Paul Cartwright
> wrote:
>>
>> I installed my new drive, and everything was fine. I added another OS,
>> and now I can't do the grub2-install anymore. What am I missing??
>>
>> # grub2-install /dev/sda
>> gr
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Paul Cartwright
wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 12:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> grub2-install does not apply on UEFI systems at all, it should not be
>> used. Instead you reinstall shim and grub2-efi packages.
>>
> ok, I wasn't aware of this shim package, but I see how th
On 08/28/2015 12:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> grub2-install does not apply on UEFI systems at all, it should not be
> used. Instead you reinstall shim and grub2-efi packages.
>
ok, I wasn't aware of this shim package, but I see how that works now...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2
yum insta
On 08/28/2015 12:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> grub2-install does not apply on UEFI systems at all, it should not be
> used. Instead you reinstall shim and grub2-efi packages.
>
thanks, I got some other replies that mentioned efibootmgr, and that did
the trick.
my default grub was ubuntu, but I want
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Paul Cartwright
wrote:
> I installed my new drive, and everything was fine. I added another OS,
> and now I can't do the grub2-install anymore. What am I missing??
>
> # grub2-install /dev/sda
> grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/modinfo.sh doesn't exi
I installed my new drive, and everything was fine. I added another OS,
and now I can't do the grub2-install anymore. What am I missing??
# grub2-install /dev/sda
grub2-install: error: /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/modinfo.sh doesn't exist.
Please specify --target or --directory.
boot is mounted:
/de
Hi,
Trying to do an f22 Live Workstation install on my new Toshiba P50
laptop and the install fails with:
[ 187.874987] localhost dracut-initqueue[471]: Warning: Could not boot.
[ 187.891048] localhost systemd[1]: Received SIGRTMIN+20 from PID 472
(plymouthd).
[ 187.893397] localhost
I am trying to run a Fedora 20 Live stick on my system and the
graphics is failing, probably due to my NVidia graphics card. I can
get it to boot into single user mode but then I don't know what
file(s) to modify to get into a "safe" graphics mode. I am hoping for
a pointer to more recent docs than
Hi,
>> Turns out I was able to get it to install by choosing the second
>> option, Troubleshooting, then choosing "Use Basic VGA", which must
>> just load a basic VGA Xorg driver.
>>
> Glad it worked for you, I tried the basic graphics (uses VESA xdriver),
> which didn't work, removed the "nomodes
Alex wrote:
Hi,
The normal graphical install just segfaults when it tries to load a
module.
Regarding doing this across the network with VNC. First, there is no
networking enabled at the time the Xorg server starts, so it basically
fails before I have networking installed.
I happened to be r
Hi,
>> The normal graphical install just segfaults when it tries to load a
>> module.
>>
>> Regarding doing this across the network with VNC. First, there is no
>> networking enabled at the time the Xorg server starts, so it basically
>> fails before I have networking installed.
I happened to be
Alex wrote:
Hi,
What are my options right now? I know I could probably go back to fc16
or wait until fc18 and hope it's fixed, or buy another video card, but
I'd like to see if there's something I'm missing that I can do right
now. Text mode isn't an option for me, because I need better control
Hi,
>> What are my options right now? I know I could probably go back to fc16
>> or wait until fc18 and hope it's fixed, or buy another video card, but
>> I'd like to see if there's something I'm missing that I can do right
>> now. Text mode isn't an option for me, because I need better control
>>
Alex wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install fc17 from a USB key and the graphical install
crashes with a segfault and falls back to text-mode install. I have an
Asus P8B-M motherboard with an onboard "Aspeed AST2050 with 16MB VRAM"
video chip.
How can I copy the /tmp/X.org log file to the USB key so
Alex writes:
Hi,
I'm trying to install fc17 from a USB key and the graphical install
crashes with a segfault and falls back to text-mode install. I have an
Asus P8B-M motherboard with an onboard "Aspeed AST2050 with 16MB VRAM"
video chip.
How can I copy the /tmp/X.org log file to the USB key s
Hi,
I'm trying to install fc17 from a USB key and the graphical install
crashes with a segfault and falls back to text-mode install. I have an
Asus P8B-M motherboard with an onboard "Aspeed AST2050 with 16MB VRAM"
video chip.
How can I copy the /tmp/X.org log file to the USB key so I can attempt
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 20:33 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:03:52PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > >Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > >>Any clues on how to debug this further?
> > >
> > >Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run pr
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:03:52PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> >>Any clues on how to debug this further?
> >
> >Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look at the
> >"Errors" tab
> >for more clues.
>
> lg, I do n
On 07/21/2012 01:50 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> #yum install lg
This is F17
root@f17 ~]# yum info lg
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Error: No matching Packages to list
So, may you need to explain more where you got "lg" from and what "lg" is?
--
Never
#yum install LG
- sorry, Android tablet is not letting me
On Jul 20, 2012 1:04 PM, "Patrick Dupre" wrote:
>
> On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>
>> Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>>>
>>> Any clues on how to debug this further?
>>
>>
>> Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look a
On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
Any clues on how to debug this further?
Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look at the "Errors"
tab
for more clues.
lg, I do not have such a command!
--
=
Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> Any clues on how to debug this further?
Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look at the "Errors" tab
for more clues.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
Attempting to install the "put windows" extension for gnome3:
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/39/put-windows/
I get the "Download and install 'Put Window' from extensions.gnome.org?"
dialog and OK it and the extension apparently fails to install
somewhere.
Couldn't find anything obvious (
Sorry if this is a duplicate. Haveing email problems and have not
gotten a confirmation of reciept.
Thanks
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Fedora 16 (x86_64) install fails with checksum error
Date: Saturday 21 April 2012 5:38 pm
From: Robert Hedman
To: users
Around 02:42pm on Saturday, November 06, 2010 (UK time),
valent.turko...@gmail.com scrawled:
> Looks there is some issue with mono-addins version.
>
> I get this error:
> # pkcon install banshee
> Simulating install[=]
> Starting [
Looks there is some issue with mono-addins version.
I get this error:
# pkcon install banshee
Simulating install[=]
Starting [=]
Running [=]
Resolving dependencies
Around 01:15pm on Saturday, November 06, 2010 (UK time),
valent.turko...@gmail.com scrawled:
> Can you install and use Banshee or is it just my system screwed somehow?
It works fine for me, installed by yum.
What specific problems/errors are you getting?
Steve
--
Website: www.stevesearle.
Can you install and use Banshee or is it just my system screwed somehow?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Is this only me or you also can't install banshee on Fedora 14?
# yum install banshee
Loaded plugins: appmarket, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit,
remove-with-leaves
Adding en_US to language list
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package bans
87 matches
Mail list logo
