On Fedora 40, the version of hplip is 3.23.12.
On https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing/gethplip the version
is Version: 3.24.4.
The release notes at the above url seem to indicate that the only changes are
addition kinds of HP printer.
So, is it correct that there is no need
On 6/17/20 11:03 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> Zdenek have kind of question: why there are so many patches in the
> hplip package?
> Is it any problem with accepting Fedora patches by source tree maintainer?
Yes, it is - HP upstream is unresponsive in most bugfix cases.
> Is there a
denek Dohnal wrote:
>> There isn't a sucg list, but basically you can check git log at
>> https://github.com/zdohnal/hplip .
> Thanks,
>
> So I have HP M1132 MFT 2 and it basically works wi 3.20.6 and WITHOUT
> plugin. yay!!
>
> It's not trouble
And please don't try to reinstall plugin. It seems they haven't built a
new one yet or they aren't planning to.
See http://www.openprinting.org/download/printdriver/auxfiles/HP/plugins/
On 6/16/20 3:01 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm HPLIP maintain
There isn't a sucg list, but basically you can check git log at
https://github.com/zdohnal/hplip .
On 6/16/20 3:14 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 03:01:22PM +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm HPLIP maintainer in Fedora and I wou
Hi all,
I'm HPLIP maintainer in Fedora and I would like to ask *the users which
have HP printers which needed their HP plugin to test the scratch build*
of new hplip.
HPLIP released a new version 3.20.6, where most models, which previously
required HP plugin, were set to do not require p
Den 2019-06-30 kl. 23:51, skrev Robert Moskowitz:
> Have you installed hplip-gui?
Yes. Here is what I have installed:
$ rpm -qa |grep ^hplip
hplip-libs-3.18.12-9.fc29.x86_64
hplip-common-3.18.12-9.fc29.x86_64
hplip-gui-3.18.12-9.fc29.x86_64
hplip-3.18.12-9.fc29.x86_64
>
> On 6/30/1
Have you installed hplip-gui?
On 6/30/19 5:13 PM, Jon Ingason wrote:
When I try to start hp-toolbox I get following error:
error: Unable to load DBus libraries. Please check your installation and
try again.
error: Please upgrade your python installation to the latest available
version.
I am
:44 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux and hplip-3.18.12-9.fc29
What is the problem?
--
Regards
Jon Ingason
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
_removed
File "", line 1006, in _gcd_import
File "", line 983, in _find_and_load
File "", line 965, in
_find_and_load_unlocked
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ui5'
$
Did you install hplip-gui?
Oh, a dependency that isn't installed w
6, in _gcd_import
File "", line 983, in _find_and_load
File "", line 965, in
_find_and_load_unlocked
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ui5'
$
Did you install hplip-gui?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedora
On 6/28/19 11:24 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
Hi all ,
It seems the whole world has problems with this piece of beautiful
software .
Hp-setup functionates fine : After the setup run HP-check and be sure
that the scanner is detected .
All I have ever gotten from hp-setup is:
$ hp-setup
HP L
Hi all ,
It seems the whole world has problems with this piece of beautiful
software .
Hp-setup functionates fine : After the setup run HP-check and be sure that
the scanner is detected .
When upgrading I never had any problems ; When I had to do a new install
very often the scanfunct
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 2:53 PM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
> Been a bit over a week since my last update. Tried to do one a couple
> minutes ago and got:
>
I had a similar problem on my wife's computer with CUPS. It wouldn't even
update with --best --allowerasing.
I ended up doing a "rpm -e --nod
On 12/24/18 4:49 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/25/18 4:52 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Been a bit over a week since my last update. Tried to do one a couple minutes
ago and got:
Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
hplip-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
- nothing
On 12/25/18 4:52 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Been a bit over a week since my last update. Tried to do one a couple
> minutes ago and got:
>
>
>
> Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
> hplip-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
> - nothing provides
Been a bit over a week since my last update. Tried to do one a couple
minutes ago and got:
Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
hplip-3.18.6-10.fc28.x86_64
- nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by
hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
Problem 2: cannot
On 12/18/18 4:24 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello
>
> Thank,
> However:
>
> dnf --enablerepo updates-testing update hplip
> Fedora 28 - x86_64 - Test Updates 400 kB/s | 9.5 MB 00:24
>
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:10 ago on Tue 18
Hello
Thank,
However:
dnf --enablerepo updates-testing update hplip
Fedora 28 - x86_64 - Test Updates 400 kB/s | 9.5 MB 00:24
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:10 ago on Tue 18 Dec 2018 09:21:31 AM CET.
Dependencies resolved.
Problem: problem with installed package
On 12/18/18 5:41 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Here are some errors that I got:
>
> dnf update
> Last metadata expiration check: 1:43:32 ago on Mon 17 Dec 2018 08:55:07 PM
> CET.
> Dependencies resolved.
>
> Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for packag
Hello,
Here are some errors that I got:
dnf update
Last metadata expiration check: 1:43:32 ago on Mon 17 Dec 2018 08:55:07 PM CET.
Dependencies resolved.
Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
- nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit
Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> I note that a recent update ends with:
>
> Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
> hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
> - nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by
> hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
> Problem 2: cannot in
I note that a recent update ends with:
Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
hplip-3.18.3-1.fc28.x86_64
- nothing provides libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit) needed by
hplip-3.18.6-11.fc28.x86_64
Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package
hplip-libs
On 09/11/13 04:21, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 01:13 PM, Jim issued this missive:
>> Fedora 18
>>
>> I understand that if you install the hplip drivers and your printer is
>> supported, that when you plug in your usb cable into computer to printer
>&
Fedora 18
I understand that if you install the hplip drivers and your printer is
supported, that when you plug in your usb cable into computer to printer
that it Automatically will be recognised and setup up on computer,, Is
that a correct assumption ??
--
users mailing list
users
On 09/10/2013 01:13 PM, Jim issued this missive:
Fedora 18
I understand that if you install the hplip drivers and your printer is
supported, that when you plug in your usb cable into computer to printer
that it Automatically will be recognised and setup up on computer,, Is
that a correct
;> My user is part of the sys and lp group, selinux is in permissive mode.
>>
>>
>> Even in permissive mode, SELinux would complain if needed and you don't
>> mention any alerts. That's one blind ally you can write off. Second,
>> do you have the hplip (?) pac
>
>
> Even in permissive mode, SELinux would complain if needed and you don't
> mention any alerts. That's one blind ally you can write off. Second,
> do you have the hplip (?) packages installed? I ask because not
> everybody knows they're needed, and if noth
x27;t
mention any alerts. That's one blind ally you can write off. Second,
do you have the hplip (?) packages installed? I ask because not
everybody knows they're needed, and if nothing else, we can eliminate
another possibility.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Anyone have this combination working?
Fedora complains that it cannot communicate with the device.
My user is part of the sys and lp group, selinux is in permissive mode.
If I manually enter the ub bus and id in hp-setup it can see enough to
create the queues but still says it can't communicate w
HP printer
> would please add their comments to the above referenced bug.
>
> I have not been able to find a build of hplip for Fedora 16 that I can
> downgrade to as a workaround.
That last comment was a bit premature. Downgrading to the following
build of hplip results in the top margin
not been able to find a build of hplip for Fedora 16 that I can
downgrade to as a workaround.
Steven P. Ulrick
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http
The printer is attached to another machine. The print dialogue
window from Firefox shows the correct host for the printer. When I tried
attaching the printer to the machine hosting the vm, it showed up under
that machine's name.
>
> Try eliminating HPLIP from the equation altogether to
o the printer, and not to e.g. the host's
queue.
Try eliminating HPLIP from the equation altogether to see if the problem
still happens: use another driver entirely (e.g. gutenprint, or a driver
listed under manufacturer 'Generic') and make sure you are not using the
'hp' ba
int most web pages in irefox. I've tried
> > > printing to a ps file, but end up with a blank page as soon as the page
> > > becomes a little complex.
> >
> > If you have problems when you print to PS files then it is highly
> > unlikely your problem is with h
k page as soon as the page
> > becomes a little complex.
>
> If you have problems when you print to PS files then it is highly
> unlikely your problem is with hplip, or at least not the only problem.
> Try reinstalling CUPS and ghostscript.
>
> Richard
> --
> users mailing
complex.
If you have problems when you print to PS files then it is highly
unlikely your problem is with hplip, or at least not the only problem.
Try reinstalling CUPS and ghostscript.
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscripti
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:25 -0400, "Barry" wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:34 +, "Tim Waugh" wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 10:44 -0400, Barry wrote:
> > > I followed Manuel's suggestion, uninstalled the HPLIP that I had, and
> > >
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:34 +, "Tim Waugh" wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 10:44 -0400, Barry wrote:
> > I followed Manuel's suggestion, uninstalled the HPLIP that I had, and
> > reinstalled the hplip rpms. And I end up in the same situation. I can
> > print
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 10:44 -0400, Barry wrote:
> I followed Manuel's suggestion, uninstalled the HPLIP that I had, and
> reinstalled the hplip rpms. And I end up in the same situation. I can
> print very simple files, local text files, pdfs and a simple web page on
> the host
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:02 +, "Tim Waugh" wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 23:34 -0400, Barry wrote:
> > I set up FC 13 as a guest on a KVM host, and I installed the latest
> > HPLIP from the sourceforge site. (The fedora rpm hadn't worked at all.)
>
>
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 23:34 -0400, Barry wrote:
> I set up FC 13 as a guest on a KVM host, and I installed the latest
> HPLIP from the sourceforge site. (The fedora rpm hadn't worked at all.)
OK, that needs some more explanation. :-)
What's wrong with the Fedora RPM?
Tim.
*/
2010/10/31 Barry
> I set up FC 13 as a guest on a KVM host, and I installed the latest
> HPLIP from the sourceforge site. (The fedora rpm hadn't worked at all.)
> I'm trying to print to an HP3050 attached to another box on my LAN, but
> it seems to be driver problem with
I set up FC 13 as a guest on a KVM host, and I installed the latest
HPLIP from the sourceforge site. (The fedora rpm hadn't worked at all.)
I'm trying to print to an HP3050 attached to another box on my LAN, but
it seems to be driver problem with FC 13.
I can print very simple files -
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:38 -0700, JD wrote:
> Just wanted to know if the foomatic hplip drivers
> and the hpcups drivers are mutually exclusive?
No, they can both be installed at once, and both be used at once (by
different queues).
> This sourceforge project provides the shell scri
Just wanted to know if the foomatic hplip drivers
and the hpcups drivers are mutually exclusive?
Reason I ask is that the foomatic hplip project
configured itself (when I installed it) so that
none of the hplip drivers got installed, but
the hpcups drivers did.
This sourceforge project
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Mikkel wrote:
> I can tell you this much - it is a glables problem, and not a cups
> problem. If you try printing to the CD with gedit, selecting the CD
> as your media, it will work without complaining. For some reason
> glabels is ignoring the page size, I think.
On 04/19/2010 08:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Hopefully someone can tell me definitively if this is a bug or not.
>
> I've been having a lot of trouble getting my CD/DVD printing to work
> properly in F12 after having it work perfectly in F11 on my HP
> Photosmart C5580. I've re-tweaked the glabel
Hopefully someone can tell me definitively if this is a bug or not.
I've been having a lot of trouble getting my CD/DVD printing to work
properly in F12 after having it work perfectly in F11 on my HP
Photosmart C5580. I've re-tweaked the glabels template and can get it
pretty close but no matter w
49 matches
Mail list logo
