Il giorno mar, 10/12/2019 alle 12.08 -0500, Todd Zullinger ha scritto:
> That appears to me to have been covered in the thread Dario
>
> started on the devel list last month:
Yes, other questions are covered in that tread, this is a new
question/tread (split package into MIT/Heimdal kerberos)
>
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2019-12-10 18:31, Dario Lesca wrote:
>> A curiosity:
>>
>> Why the samba mit/heimdal kerberos is not managed as it
>> is done for many other projects in which the packages are
>> divided into more sub-packages, like for example
>> dovecot-mysql/dovecot-pgsql or samba-vfs-glus
On 2019-12-10 18:31, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 10/12/2019 alle 17.18 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
>> Then, when you update the updates from the fedora repo won't be referenced.
>
> Thanks Ed, you mean "when you update the *samba* updates from the fedora repo
> won't be referenced." ...
Il giorno mar, 10/12/2019 alle 17.18 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
> Then, when you update the updates from the fedora repo won't be
> referenced.
Thanks Ed, you mean "when you update the *samba* updates from the
fedora repo won't be referenced." ... but all other update are
performed
You confirm
On 2019-12-10 17:03, Dario Lesca wrote:
> I must rebuild samba.src on my Fedora 31 (to convert experimental MIT
> Kerberos to Heimdal Kerberos).
>
> Into my samba.spec I change only mit/heimdal flag and set +1 the package
> version.
>
> Then I rebuild and deploy new package on my personal reposit
I must rebuild samba.src on my Fedora 31 (to convert experimental MIT
Kerberos to Heimdal Kerberos).
Into my samba.spec I change only mit/heimdal flag and set +1 the
package version.
Then I rebuild and deploy new package on my personal repository,
configure my ADDC server to use it (mysamba.rep
