On 08/19/2015 09:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 15:04 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Don't use digests (they are a waste of time in this day and age),
or if
you do then use a mailer that supports direct replying to a digest
message (not to the digest itself). Evolution can d
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 15:04 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > Don't use digests (they are a waste of time in this day and age),
> or if
> > you do then use a mailer that supports direct replying to a digest
> > message (not to the digest itself). Evolution can do this and I
> think
> > Thunderbird also.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:31:19PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 09:55 +0900, Scott Mattan wrote:
> > Is there a better way of viewing this list without having to copy
> > paste titles and contents?
>
> Don't use digests (they are a waste of time in this day and age),
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 09:55 +0900, Scott Mattan wrote:
> Is there a better way of viewing this list without having to copy
> paste titles and contents?
Don't use digests (they are a waste of time in this day and age), or if
you do then use a mailer that supports direct replying to a digest
messag
I have changed my settings from digest.
I will additionally try to add the pam_securetty.so to my su file when I
get home tonight (JST)
Thanks
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/19/15 08:55, Scott Mattan wrote:
> > Sorry about the other post, this one may not come in c
On 08/19/15 08:55, Scott Mattan wrote:
> Sorry about the other post, this one may not come in correctly either...
>
> In anycase, I will explain this after the main issue...
>
> I have the following differences in my /etc/pam.d/su file:
>
> Fedora22:
> #%PAM-1.0
> authsufficient pa
Sorry about the other post, this one may not come in correctly either...
In anycase, I will explain this after the main issue...
I have the following differences in my /etc/pam.d/su file:
Fedora22:
#%PAM-1.0
authsufficient pam_rootok.so
# Uncomment the following line to implicit
