On 2013-11-15 13:53, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 11/15/2013 03:37 PM, Darlene Wallach wrote:
linux guy,
My name is Darlene Wallach. I purchased a 2T Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex
Desk disk from Costco a few years ago. I finally set it up and found
your very immensely helpful directions!
Thank y
On 11/15/2013 03:37 PM, Darlene Wallach wrote:
linux guy,
My name is Darlene Wallach. I purchased a 2T Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex
Desk disk from Costco a few years ago. I finally set it up and found
your very immensely helpful directions!
Thank you very much!!!
Darlene Wallach
On Thu, Sep 29,
linux guy,
My name is Darlene Wallach. I purchased a 2T Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex
Desk disk from Costco a few years ago. I finally set it up and found
your very immensely helpful directions!
Thank you very much!!!
Darlene Wallach
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:33 PM, linux guy wrote:
> Today I boug
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:38:13 -0700, JZ (Joe) wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 06:28 PM, David wrote:
> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
> > rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Fedora/2.0.0.23-1.fc10
> > Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666"
> >
> > Which looks like FC 10 and TBird 2.0.
On 10/02/2011 08:40 AM, Newbury wrote:
> To Daniel Thurman
>
> Why fight with physical hardware limitations?
>
> Install Virtualbox (it's free) and create as many bootable virtuals as you
> want, each reachable without a physical hard-on-the-hardware re-boot. And
> from my experience the actual b
To Daniel Thurman
Why fight with physical hardware limitations?
Install Virtualbox (it's free) and create as many bootable virtuals as you
want, each reachable without a physical hard-on-the-hardware re-boot. And from
my experience the actual boot times of the virtuals are only about 50% of
ph
On Sat October 1 2011, David wrote:
>
> The company that I work for has it's own server and the software that I
> use every day, provided by them, runs on Windows. None of it has a Linux
> clone and I seriously doubt that any of it ever will. And none of it
> will run on WINE (why would anyone act
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 21:21 -0400, David wrote:
> But I live in the real world. More people use Mac computers and software
> than use Linux and I only actually know one person that uses a Mac. And
> it is a new one and he runs Windows on it. And, unfortunately perhaps,
> Linux is still not real
On 10/01/2011 06:28 PM, David wrote:
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
> rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Fedora/2.0.0.23-1.fc10
> Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666"
>
> Which looks like FC 10 and TBird 2.0.0.23 to me.
[joe@khorlia Desktop]$ uname -r
2.6.35.14-96.fc1
On 10/1/2011 8:00 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 04:26 PM, David wrote:
>> But I would hope that you keep her Ubuntu more up-to-date than you do
>> your Fedora. The Fedora, F-10, that you are using and the TBird that you
>> are using, 2.0.0.24, were both EOL years ago.
>
> What are you talking
On 10/1/2011 7:55 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 19:32 -0400, David wrote:
>
>> Fedora 'out of the box' works for me too. But then I don't use laptops
>> and they seem to be a major source of problem(s).
>
> laptops often have short run, proprietary hardware that if no one
> pr
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 16:32 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Searching google, here is what Dell has to say:
> http://www.delltechcenter.com/page/3TB+drives%3A+OS+Behavior+Matrix
>
> I need a drive that I can partition at least to
> 15 partitions as I use many different OSes
> (windows, mac, linu
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 19:32 -0400, David wrote:
> Fedora 'out of the box' works for me too. But then I don't use laptops
> and they seem to be a major source of problem(s).
laptops often have short run, proprietary hardware that if no one
provides ample feedback to developers, may very well
On 10/01/2011 04:26 PM, David wrote:
> But I would hope that you keep her Ubuntu more up-to-date than you do
> your Fedora. The Fedora, F-10, that you are using and the TBird that you
> are using, 2.0.0.24, were both EOL years ago.
What are you talking about? I skipped F 10, going from F 9 to F 1
On 10/01/2011 04:35 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 20:32, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>> So, It looks to me, I will have to return the 3GB
>> drive back to the store and get a 2GB drive so
>> that I can have 15 partitions, of mixed OS for
>> multiboot operations.
> Surely you mea
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 20:32, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> So, It looks to me, I will have to return the 3GB
> drive back to the store and get a 2GB drive so
> that I can have 15 partitions, of mixed OS for
> multiboot operations.
Surely you meant 2TB. :)
FC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedo
Searching google, here is what Dell has to say:
http://www.delltechcenter.com/page/3TB+drives%3A+OS+Behavior+Matrix
I need a drive that I can partition at least to
15 partitions as I use many different OSes
(windows, mac, linux) and it appears to me
that I cannot use the MSDOS partition tables
fo
On 10/1/2011 7:07 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 17:58 -0400, David wrote:
>> On 10/1/2011 5:39 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 06:12, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
As a natural consequence, Linux is a priori not designed for
noobs and newbies who do not w
On 10/1/2011 7:09 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 03:53 PM, David wrote:
>> Curious. Is/was her Windows a recent purchase on a recent computer? And
>> what 'did not work'.
>
> She'd been running Win2K on that box for several years. It required the
> same almost constant maintenance (Scandisk,
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 17:58 -0400, David wrote:
> On 10/1/2011 5:39 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 06:12, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> >> As a natural consequence, Linux is a priori not designed for
> >> noobs and newbies who do not want to learn.
> >
> > I think this is a probl
On 10/01/2011 03:53 PM, David wrote:
> Curious. Is/was her Windows a recent purchase on a recent computer? And
> what 'did not work'.
She'd been running Win2K on that box for several years. It required the
same almost constant maintenance (Scandisk, defrag, anti-virus and so
on) that all Window
On 1 October 2011 23:28, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 02:58 PM, David wrote:
>> As much as*I* like Linux it will never become a common desktop until
>> that happens. Until it*just works*. IMO of course.
>
> My older sister runs Ubuntu on her desktop. At least 95% of the time It
> Just Works,
On 10/1/2011 6:28 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 02:58 PM, David wrote:
>> As much as*I* like Linux it will never become a common desktop until
>> that happens. Until it*just works*. IMO of course.
>
> My older sister runs Ubuntu on her desktop. At least 95% of the time It
> Just Works, whic
On 10/01/2011 02:58 PM, David wrote:
> As much as*I* like Linux it will never become a common desktop until
> that happens. Until it*just works*. IMO of course.
My older sister runs Ubuntu on her desktop. At least 95% of the time It
Just Works, which is more than you can say for Windows. The o
On 10/1/2011 5:39 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 06:12, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> As a natural consequence, Linux is a priori not designed for
>> noobs and newbies who do not want to learn.
>
> I think this is a problem.
>
> When I started using Linux back in 1999 (Caldera Ope
..snip..
> PS: Just including aliases for common Windows commands the users are
> expected to find would have helped a lot of newcomers, but actually
> the general concensus seems to be "this is Linux, it's not designed to
> please Windows users, windows users should learn Linux and how it
> works
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 06:12, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> As a natural consequence, Linux is a priori not designed for
> noobs and newbies who do not want to learn.
I think this is a problem.
When I started using Linux back in 1999 (Caldera OpenLinux before the
SCO fiasco, fwiw(, I expected the use
With further use I've found that the hot swap hard drives show up in Dolphin
just fine, even if they aren't mounted manual. It must have been just the
first time after formatting that they don't appear, whereas with fdisk, they
do.
For those that aren't aware a hot swap capable motherboard (and B
On Saturday 01 October 2011 03:31:53 Fernando Cassia wrote:
> So I eventually realized it´s not really the end-user´s job to know
> about the cylinder limits of DOS-style partition tables beforehand.
> And that if they fire fdisk on a bigger than 2TB hard drive, a warning
> message "hey, look, thi
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 23:31 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 21:57, Craig White wrote:
> > I don't think this exemplifies the problem with FOSS software except for
> > maybe indicating that sometimes the information is there for all to see
> > but some people don't actually
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 21:57, Craig White wrote:
> I don't think this exemplifies the problem with FOSS software except for
> maybe indicating that sometimes the information is there for all to see
> but some people don't actually look and rely upon misinformed web pages,
> people, etc.
I used t
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:12 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 14:54, linux guy wrote:
> > Lets be clear here. There isn't really a bug in fdisk.
>
> If it doesn't want the user about this, I consider it a bug. lack of
> documentation and human-readable feedback is a bug. :
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:56 PM, linux guy wrote:
>
> Great tip ! Thanks for sharing that.
>
>
I forgot to say, FOSS ROCKS ! It ain't perfect, but its very, very good
and for the most part it gets better with every release.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> On Sep 30, 2011, at 2:00 PM, linux guy wrote:
>
> As for the automount gpt issue, as far as I can tell, kernel support for
>> gpt is fairly new. I'm sure this issue will be address shortly, if it
>> hasn't been already.
>>
>
> I've been us
On Sep 30, 2011, at 2:00 PM, linux guy wrote:
As for the automount gpt issue, as far as I can tell, kernel support
for gpt is fairly new. I'm sure this issue will be address shortly,
if it hasn't been already.
I've been using a GPT disk in my laptop for quite a while, F12 at
least, dual
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 14:54, linux guy wrote:
> Lets be clear here. There isn't really a bug in fdisk.
If it doesn't want the user about this, I consider it a bug. lack of
documentation and human-readable feedback is a bug. :)
Like you say, firing fdisk on a >2TB disk should give users SOME
On 09/30/2011 10:57 AM, linux guy wrote:
> I file my fair share of bugs. Generally I like to post issues to
> discussion groups (mailing lists) to be sure there is indeed an issue
> and that I am not overlooking something.
>
> Lets see where this discussion goes and then I/we can determine if it
>
On 09/30/2011 10:54 AM, linux guy wrote:
> Now... could fdisk (and gparted) be improved ? Absolutely.Here is how:
As we're discussing in a different thread, if you want this done, file a
feature request in Bugzilla.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or chang
As for the automount gpt issue, as far as I can tell, kernel support for gpt
is fairly new. I'm sure this issue will be address shortly, if it hasn't
been already.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
I file my fair share of bugs. Generally I like to post issues to discussion
groups (mailing lists) to be sure there is indeed an issue and that I am not
overlooking something.
Lets see where this discussion goes and then I/we can determine if it
warrants a bugzilla entry.
When I was working on t
Lets be clear here. There isn't really a bug in fdisk. It just doesn't
handle any partition table types other than MSDOS. And MSDOS type partition
tables have the 2 TB limitation, not fdisk.
I don't blame developers for not updating fdisk. I think its an inferior
tool to parted (and gparted).
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 14:25, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> And, there'd be more progress if people filed bug reports instead of
> just ranting that somebody else shou
I was just making an observation, trying to influence people who DO
experience problems to actually FILE BUGS rather than just coming up
w
On 09/30/2011 08:32 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> a. A BUG REPORT ON FDISK is entered, so that:
> * It works correctly on drives bigger than 2TB, or
> * (interim solution) it displays a user-friendly message telling the user
> that for big drives as (the current drive size) gparted is
On 30 September 2011 16:32, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 19:33, linux guy wrote:
>> It turns out that the whole process can be done from within gparted, if you
>> know what you are doing.
>
> This exemplifies the problem with FOSS software and the "here's the
> recipe on how t
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:18 AM, linux guy wrote:
> Speaking of which, what is a good way to compare the files in two
> directories (recursively, of course) to ensure that they are exactly the
> same ?
>
> Something like diff for files ?
As opposed to diff for non files? :) I think you mean non
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 19:33, linux guy wrote:
> It turns out that the whole process can be done from within gparted, if you
> know what you are doing.
This exemplifies the problem with FOSS software and the "here's the
recipe on how to fix it" culture, . Don't get me wrong, I'm not
throwing bla
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:18:12 -0600,
linux guy wrote:
> Speaking of which, what is a good way to compare the files in two
> directories (recursively, of course) to ensure that they are exactly the
> same ?
>
> Something like diff for files ?
diff -rq
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedor
Speaking of which, what is a good way to compare the files in two
directories (recursively, of course) to ensure that they are exactly the
same ?
Something like diff for files ?
Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admi
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:33:27 -0600
> linux guy wrote:
>
> > Today I bought 2 3 TB hard drives to use in my new server.
>
> Did you actually get 2 that both worked? I was looking at
> the reviews for 3TB drives on newegg recently and they
> mak
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:33:27 -0600
linux guy wrote:
> Today I bought 2 3 TB hard drives to use in my new server.
Did you actually get 2 that both worked? I was looking at
the reviews for 3TB drives on newegg recently and they
make it sound very risky to try 3TB drives (or even
2TB drives).
--
us
Today I bought 2 3 TB hard drives to use in my new server.
I'm writing this in case other people aren't aware that some of the
traditional hard drive management methods don't work for drives larger than
2 TB.
Specifically, fdisk and MSDOS type partition tables.
Here is how I created a single par
51 matches
Mail list logo