On 06/20/2013 06:06 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 06/17/2013 01:30 PM, poma wrote:
On 06.06.2013 14:46, Gary Stainburn wrote:
Hi folks.
I've followed the instructions to install the flash plugin by
downloading the
YUM version and then installing the RPM. I got no errors when doing
any of
this
On Thursday 20 June 2013 11:51:18 Stephen Morris wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> Does your version of firefox see the totem plugins?
> Even though you have the Fedora 64 bit version of Firefox installed
> if they haven't changed the upstream defaults then it is presumably
> still looking for its plug
On 06/20/2013 08:25 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
On Thursday 20 June 2013 11:06:48 Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Gary,
You haven't mentioned whether you are using the 64 bit version of
Fedora with the 64 bit version of firefox. I'm using the upstream
nightly version of firefox and have had the sam
On Thursday 20 June 2013 11:06:48 Stephen Morris wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> You haven't mentioned whether you are using the 64 bit version of
> Fedora with the 64 bit version of firefox. I'm using the upstream
> nightly version of firefox and have had the same problem, which I have
> subsequently sol
On 06/17/2013 01:30 PM, poma wrote:
On 06.06.2013 14:46, Gary Stainburn wrote:
Hi folks.
I've followed the instructions to install the flash plugin by downloading the
YUM version and then installing the RPM. I got no errors when doing any of
this. However, flash still does not work in Firefox.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Does "nspluginwrapper.i686" still work with the Flash plugin on x86_64?
>
>
I have had problems recently with 32 bit Flash locking up my 64 bit Firefox
21 when Firefox 20 worked fine on the same system. Making the switch from
the 32 bit Fla
On 06.06.2013 14:46, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I've followed the instructions to install the flash plugin by downloading the
> YUM version and then installing the RPM. I got no errors when doing any of
> this. However, flash still does not work in Firefox. If I do 'about:plugins'
>
On Friday 07 June 2013 02:26:32 T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> You have the 32-bit version of the Flash Player installed on a 64-bit
> system. 64-bit Firefox cannot use 32-bit NPAPI plugins. This might
> have happened if you downloaded the "adobe-release" RPM on a 32-bit
> system or you used an old
Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 06 June 2013, Gary Stainburn sent:
>> [gary@gary ~]$ rpm -qa|grep firefox
>> firefox-21.0-3.fc17.x86_64
>
> x86_64 means 64-bit
>
>> [gary@gary ~]$ rpm -qa|grep flash
>> flash-plugin-11.2.202.285-release.i386
>
> i386 means 32-bit
>
> Probably isn't compatib
Allegedly, on or about 07 June 2013, Michael Schwendt sent:
> Does "nspluginwrapper.i686" still work with the Flash plugin on
> x86_64?
>
> $ yum search wrapper firefox|grep 86
> nspluginwrapper.i686 : A compatibility layer for Netscape 4 plugins
Mine has it installed. And I've been viewing
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 18:26:32 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Gary Stainburn
> wrote:
> > Hi folks.
> >
> > I've followed the instructions to install the flash plugin by downloading
> > the
> > YUM version and then installing the RPM. I got no errors when doing a
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Gary Stainburn
wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I've followed the instructions to install the flash plugin by downloading the
> YUM version and then installing the RPM. I got no errors when doing any of
> this. However, flash still does not work in Firefox. If I do 'about:plu
Allegedly, on or about 06 June 2013, Gary Stainburn sent:
> [gary@gary ~]$ rpm -qa|grep firefox
> firefox-21.0-3.fc17.x86_64
x86_64 means 64-bit
> [gary@gary ~]$ rpm -qa|grep flash
> flash-plugin-11.2.202.285-release.i386
i386 means 32-bit
Probably isn't compatible without some sort of handler
Am 06.06.2013 14:46, schrieb Gary Stainburn:
> I've followed the instructions to install the flash plugin by downloading the
> YUM version and then installing the RPM. I got no errors when doing any of
> this. However, flash still does not work in Firefox. If I do 'about:plugins'
> it isn't li
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:22:34 +0100 Gary Stainburn
wrote:
> Reindl, I had installed the flash RPM too.
>
> Frank, there were selinux entries in the audit log but there was no timestamp
> on the entries I was unable to re-create them by running firefox and
> accessing youtube.
>
> Rejy, I did as
Reindl, I had installed the flash RPM too.
Frank, there were selinux entries in the audit log but there was no timestamp
on the entries I was unable to re-create them by running firefox and
accessing youtube.
Rejy, I did as you suggested below and I can now watch videos on youtube. I
haven't y
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:46:17 +0100
Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
selinux?
su -c "cat /var/log/audit/audit.log | grep mozilla"
--
Regards,
Frank - I check for new mail app. 20min
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscriptio
On 06/06/2013 06:16 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I've followed the instructions to install the flash plugin by downloading the
> YUM version and then installing the RPM. I got no errors when doing any of
> this. However, flash still does not work in Firefox. If I do 'about:plugins'
Hi folks.
I've followed the instructions to install the flash plugin by downloading the
YUM version and then installing the RPM. I got no errors when doing any of
this. However, flash still does not work in Firefox. If I do 'about:plugins'
it isn't listed.
Any suggestions on what to try next.
19 matches
Mail list logo
