Re: kvm vs firefox issue?

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 4:58 PM Go Canes wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:04 AM Ron Yorston wrote: > > > > Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > > >This started only recently (kernel 6.0.18 or 6.1, or another update?) > > > > > >Is there a known problem. > > > > There is. It's in the 6.1 kernel and it i

Re: kvm vs firefox issue?

Thanks Ron, On 26/01/2023 23.04, Ron Yorston wrote: Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: This started only recently (kernel 6.0.18 or 6.1, or another update?) Is there a known problem. There is. It's in the 6.1 kernel and it isn't yet fixed in Fedora. (Not even in the 6.1.8 kernel currently in testing.)

Re: kvm vs firefox issue?

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:04 AM Ron Yorston wrote: > > Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > >This started only recently (kernel 6.0.18 or 6.1, or another update?) > > > >Is there a known problem. > > There is. It's in the 6.1 kernel and it isn't yet fixed in Fedora. > (Not even in the 6.1.8 kernel currently

Re: kvm vs firefox issue?

Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: >This started only recently (kernel 6.0.18 or 6.1, or another update?) > >Is there a known problem. There is. It's in the 6.1 kernel and it isn't yet fixed in Fedora. (Not even in the 6.1.8 kernel currently in testing.) Here's a SuSE bug report: https://bugzilla.suse.

kvm vs firefox issue?

I am running up-to-date f36. Recently I had kvm "virsh restore" take a long time. Normally it takes less than 10s but now it took 10-15m!. Then it took 30m (qemu-system-x86_64 running 100% CPU all the time) and I started looking around. I noticed that khugepaged is also running 100% CPU. Thinki

Re: Firefox issue

On 11/8/22 04:42, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 8/8/22 04:42, Andras Simon wrote: 2022-08-08 8:09 UTC+02:00, Samuel Sieb : On 8/7/22 01:38, Andras Simon wrote: If you click on "Lean more...", you'll end up in a few steps on this page: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Certificate-contains-the-same-

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/8/22 04:42, Andras Simon wrote: 2022-08-08 8:09 UTC+02:00, Samuel Sieb : On 8/7/22 01:38, Andras Simon wrote: If you click on "Lean more...", you'll end up in a few steps on this page: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Certificate-contains-the-same-serial-number-as-another-certificate w

Re: Firefox issue

> On 8/8/22 12:31, old sixpack13 wrote: > > What is your country? germany ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/8/22 12:31, old sixpack13 wrote: On 8/7/22 07:45, old sixpack13 wrote: Are you using the repo? yes What is your country? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firefox issue

> On 8/7/22 07:45, old sixpack13 wrote: > > Are you using the repo? yes ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en

Re: Firefox issue

2022-08-08 8:09 UTC+02:00, Samuel Sieb : > On 8/7/22 01:38, Andras Simon wrote: >> 2022-08-06 23:03 UTC+02:00, ToddAndMargo via users >> : >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Fedora 36 >>> firefox-102.0-1.fc36.x86_64 >>> >>> This seems to be an issue specific to the >>> repo's edition of Firefox. Everyone on >>> t

Re: Firefox issue

On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 4:11 AM Tim via users wrote: > On Sun, 2022-08-07 at 23:42 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > Only the repo's firefoxes are having this issue. > > In my case (all with working Firefoxes) it was the latest package for > F36, and a prior one: > > firefox-103.0.1-1.fc3

Re: Firefox issue

On Sun, 2022-08-07 at 23:42 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Only the repo's firefoxes are having this issue. In my case (all with working Firefoxes) it was the latest package for F36, and a prior one: firefox-103.0.1-1.fc36.x86_64 firefox-102.0-1.fc36.x86_64 And working on CentOS:

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/7/22 23:14, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 8/7/22 07:37, Alexander Dalloz wrote: Am 07.08.2022 um 15:53 schrieb Sam Varshavchik: Tim via users writes: Loading:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/ Brings up:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/Login/Index?ReturnUrl=%2f As an aside, I've written off Gigab

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/7/22 07:37, Alexander Dalloz wrote: Am 07.08.2022 um 15:53 schrieb Sam Varshavchik: Tim via users writes: Loading:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/ Brings up:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/Login/Index?ReturnUrl=%2f As an aside, I've written off Gigabyte as damaged goods. Their tech sup

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/7/22 01:38, Andras Simon wrote: 2022-08-06 23:03 UTC+02:00, ToddAndMargo via users : Hi All, Fedora 36 firefox-102.0-1.fc36.x86_64 This seems to be an issue specific to the repo's edition of Firefox. Everyone on the Firefox newsgroup get it to work. Removing and reinstalling did not help:

Re: Firefox issue

On Sun, 2022-08-07 at 14:52 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Who is your new go to motherboard supplier? My last two PCs were ASRock B250M Pro4 motherboards, they've had CentOS and Fedora installed on them, and I'd tried Ubuntu live. I can't complain about them. Relatively inexpensive and

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/7/22 19:37, Sam Varshavchik wrote: ToddAndMargo via users writes: On 8/7/22 06:53, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Tim via users writes: Loading:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/ Brings up:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/Login/Index?ReturnUrl=%2f As an aside, I've written off Gigabyte as damage

Re: Firefox issue

ToddAndMargo via users writes: On 8/7/22 06:53, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Tim via users writes: Loading:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/ Brings up:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/Login/Index?ReturnUrl=%2f As an aside, I've written off Gigabyte as damaged goods. Their tech support refuses to

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/7/22 07:45, old sixpack13 wrote: On 8/6/22 20:18, old sixpack13 wrote: ... New profile had the same problem. Does yours work? yes ! Are you using the repo? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: Firefox issue

On 7/8/22 16:04, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 8/6/22 22:34, Tim via users wrote: On Sat, 2022-08-06 at 21:04 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: Error code: SEC_ERROR_REUSED_ISSUER_AND_SERIAL Supplemental: I've never been to those websites before.  Have either of you? That could explain an old and new cert

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/7/22 06:53, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Tim via users writes: Loading:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/ Brings up:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/Login/Index?ReturnUrl=%2f As an aside, I've written off Gigabyte as damaged goods. Their tech support refuses to give you support if you tell them

Re: Firefox issue

On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 1:01 PM Tim via users wrote: > On Sun, 2022-08-07 at 09:53 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > As an aside, I've written off Gigabyte as damaged goods. Their tech > > support refuses to give you support if you tell them you're running > > Linux on their motherboards. Their ha

Re: Firefox issue

On Sun, 2022-08-07 at 09:53 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > As an aside, I've written off Gigabyte as damaged goods. Their tech > support refuses to give you support if you tell them you're running > Linux on their motherboards. Their hardware is MS-Windows only. Par for the course, unfortunately.

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/7/22 02:24, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I have cleared the cache several times. Also tried a fresh profile. Trying a new profile was a good idea. However, there's an old saying about people who keep trying the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

Re: Firefox issue

> On 8/6/22 20:18, old sixpack13 wrote: > ... > > > New profile had the same problem. > > Does yours work? yes ! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code o

Re: Firefox issue

Am 07.08.2022 um 15:53 schrieb Sam Varshavchik: Tim via users writes: Loading:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/ Brings up:  https://esupport.gigabyte.com/Login/Index?ReturnUrl=%2f As an aside, I've written off Gigabyte as damaged goods. Their tech support refuses to give you support if you te

Re: Firefox issue

Tim via users writes: Loading: https://esupport.gigabyte.com/ Brings up: https://esupport.gigabyte.com/Login/Index?ReturnUrl=%2f As an aside, I've written off Gigabyte as damaged goods. Their tech support refuses to give you support if you tell them you're running Linux on their motherbo

Re: Firefox issue

2022-08-07 11:00 UTC+02:00, ToddAndMargo via users : > On 8/7/22 01:38, Andras Simon wrote: >> If you click on "Lean more...", you'll end up in a few steps on this >> page: >> https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Certificate-contains-the-same-serial-number-as-another-certificate >> which *may* hel

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/7/22 01:38, Andras Simon wrote: 2022-08-06 23:03 UTC+02:00, ToddAndMargo via users : Hi All, Fedora 36 firefox-102.0-1.fc36.x86_64 This seems to be an issue specific to the repo's edition of Firefox. Everyone on the Firefox newsgroup get it to work. Removing and reinstalling did not help:

Re: Firefox issue

2022-08-06 23:03 UTC+02:00, ToddAndMargo via users : > Hi All, > > Fedora 36 > firefox-102.0-1.fc36.x86_64 > > This seems to be an issue specific to the > repo's edition of Firefox. Everyone on > the Firefox newsgroup get it to work. > Removing and reinstalling did not help: > > https://esupport.gi

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/7/22 01:22, Barry Scott wrote: On 07/08/2022 05:04, Samuel Sieb wrote: I get the same error that Todd does. What does curl report when you access that URL? $ curl https://esupport.gigabyte.com -o - Object moved Object moved to here. ___ u

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/6/22 20:48, Tim via users wrote: Do you have an alternative browser to test with? I listed them in my original post. I have cleared the cache several times. Also tried a fresh profile. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Re: Firefox issue

On 07/08/2022 05:04, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 8/6/22 20:48, Tim via users wrote: On Sat, 2022-08-06 at 19:57 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: How do I get a new cert? Just to be clear, this is a site cert you're concerned about? You simply cannot make a HTTPS connection to the site? It's n

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/6/22 22:04, Samuel Sieb wrote: Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. It might be a good idea to do exactly that if you haven't already. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/6/22 22:34, Tim via users wrote: On Sat, 2022-08-06 at 21:04 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: Error code: SEC_ERROR_REUSED_ISSUER_AND_SERIAL Supplemental: I've never been to those websites before. Have either of you? That could explain an old and new cert problem. Particularly if they'd repl

Re: Firefox issue

On Sat, 2022-08-06 at 21:04 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > Error code: SEC_ERROR_REUSED_ISSUER_AND_SERIAL Supplemental: I've never been to those websites before. Have either of you? That could explain an old and new cert problem. Particularly if they'd replaced/updated a cert improperly. --

Re: Firefox issue

On Sat, 2022-08-06 at 21:04 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > Error code: SEC_ERROR_REUSED_ISSUER_AND_SERIAL Try researching the error code. One thing that could be a possibility, is that some other certificate on your system has the same serial number. I'm not sure if uniqueness is required. --

Re: Firefox issue

Tim: >> Why do you want a new certificate? Is there a pop-up warning from >> the browser? Is there text telling you in a webpage from the >> website? Samuel Sieb: > The text is from firefox. I don't actually understand what the > message means. But it won't even let me see the cert from the si

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/6/22 20:48, Tim via users wrote: On Sat, 2022-08-06 at 19:57 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: How do I get a new cert? Just to be clear, this is a site cert you're concerned about? You simply cannot make a HTTPS connection to the site? It's not a user certificate that you're talking

Re: Firefox issue

On Sat, 2022-08-06 at 19:57 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > How do I get a new cert? Just to be clear, this is a site cert you're concerned about? You simply cannot make a HTTPS connection to the site? It's not a user certificate that you're talking about? (Personal ID credentials.) I'v

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/6/22 20:18, old sixpack13 wrote: On 8/6/22 19:05, Tim via users wrote: How do I get a new cert? can't answer your question, but why not update to firefox-103.0.1-1.fc36.x86_64 first and try again ? I checked dnf whatprovides a few day ago and was on the latest, but I see a new one no

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/6/22 20:26, Jerry James wrote: On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 8:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: How do I get a new cert? If you are certain that you're seeing the real gigabyte site, not some spoof site that's going to steal your data, then go to Firefox Settings, choose "Privacy & Security"

Re: Firefox issue

Nuking is often the best solution if your config files, certs and whatnot are broken beyond repair. Though you often need to remove everything the package manager didn't touch. I remember reinstalling php for dozens of times because I'm stupid enough to migrate php files from my previous Ubunt

Re: Firefox issue

On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 8:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > How do I get a new cert? If you are certain that you're seeing the real gigabyte site, not some spoof site that's going to steal your data, then go to Firefox Settings, choose "Privacy & Security" on the left, then scroll down to the

Re: Firefox issue

> On 8/6/22 19:05, Tim via users wrote: > > How do I get a new cert? can't answer your question, but why not update to firefox-103.0.1-1.fc36.x86_64 first and try again ? what is working here with your provided URL. if that doesn't work at your side I would suggest to check - the active FF a

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/6/22 19:05, Tim via users wrote: On Sat, 2022-08-06 at 14:03 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: https://esupport.gigabyte.com/ Secure Connection Failed An error occurred during a connection to esupport.gigabyte.com. You are attempting to import a cert with the same is

Re: Firefox issue

On Sat, 2022-08-06 at 14:03 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > https://esupport.gigabyte.com/ > Secure Connection Failed > > An error occurred during a connection to > esupport.gigabyte.com. You are attempting to > import a cert with the same issuer/serial > as an existing

Re: Firefox issue

or message: ...You are attempting to import a cert with the same issuer/serial as an existing cert, but that is not the same cert. I was trying to get a fresh set of certs. I do believe this is a Firefox issue, not an OS issue. ___ users mailing lis

Re: Firefox issue

On 8/6/22 15:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Removing and reinstalling did not help Was there any particlar reason to expect that to work, or was it just copying how Windows "works" because it keeps corrupting random files? ___ users mailing list

Firefox issue

Hi All, Fedora 36 firefox-102.0-1.fc36.x86_64 This seems to be an issue specific to the repo's edition of Firefox. Everyone on the Firefox newsgroup get it to work. Removing and reinstalling did not help: https://esupport.gigabyte.com/ Secure Connection Failed An error occurred during a

Re: Firefox issue

On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 09:35:50 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: > Like I said in one of my other posts, firefox runs just fine on one > of my other F25 systems. The system of which it fails is one that I > initially tried to upgrade from F22 -> F25, this failed, so I did a > F22 -> F24 upgrade. Howev

Re: Firefox issue

Like I said in one of my other posts, firefox runs just fine on one of my other F25 systems. The system of which it fails is one that I initially tried to upgrade from F22 -> F25, this failed, so I did a F22 -> F24 upgrade. However, after the system finished upgrading and I logged in I discov

Re: Firefox issue

On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:21:37 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: > I tried logging in as myself using the Gnome Classic desktop and > firefox still crashes. I created a new user and after logging in as > that user I ran firefox and it still crashes. I don't have any more ideas for testing the installed

Re: Firefox issue

Corey, I tried what you suggested. I downloaded the archive and ran the dnf buildep firefox and that version of firefox works. What's interesting is that the firefox directory contains several libraries that do not exist in /usr/lib64/firefox. For example there are several nss related lib

Re: Firefox issue

I tried logging in as myself using the Gnome Classic desktop and firefox still crashes. I created a new user and after logging in as that user I ran firefox and it still crashes. Paolo On 01/14/2017 10:18 AM, stan wrote: On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:04:24 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: I've checke

Re: Firefox issue

Yes I did run dnf distro-sync and it did update packages, but it made no difference. Paolo On 01/14/2017 02:01 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote: dnf distro-sync ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...

Re: Firefox issue

On 14 January 2017 at 01:18, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > After my rather strange upgrade to F25 from F22 documented in a previous > email to this list "Issue upgrading to F25" I'm now having an issue with > firefox. Firefox will crash on startup. I tried starting in safe-mode and > firefox still cra

Re: Firefox issue

On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:04:24 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: > I've checked all the libraries and the checksums match the libraries > on the system where firefox works fine. You've discovered non-deterministic binaries! :-) Is it possible it is an obsolete add-on causing the problem? I can't reme

Re: Firefox issue

I've checked all the libraries and the checksums match the libraries on the system where firefox works fine. Paolo On 01/14/2017 09:38 AM, stan wrote: On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:04:10 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: I tried removing firefox and re-installing it and it did pull in updated packages,

Re: Firefox issue

On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:04:10 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: > I tried removing firefox and re-installing it and it did pull in > updated packages, but it still crashes. Since this is an upgraded system, is it possible that there is an obscure library hanging around? If you do an ldd on /usr/bin/fi

Re: Firefox issue

I tried removing firefox and re-installing it and it did pull in updated packages, but it still crashes. Paolo On 01/13/2017 03:54 PM, stan wrote: On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:18:43 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: Anyone have any idea what's going on and how I can fix the problem? I don't know, but

Re: Firefox issue

On 01/13/2017 11:18 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > After my rather strange upgrade to F25 from F22 documented in a > previous email to this list "Issue upgrading to F25" I'm now having an > issue with firefox. Firefox will crash on startup. I tried starting > in safe-mode and firefox still crashes.

Re: Firefox issue

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:18:43 -0800 Paolo Galtieri wrote: > Anyone have any idea what's going on and how I can fix the problem? I don't know, but it seems that libraries are out of sync with the binaries. You could try a dnf reinstall of firefox to see if it will pull in the necessary bits. Pa

Firefox issue

After my rather strange upgrade to F25 from F22 documented in a previous email to this list "Issue upgrading to F25" I'm now having an issue with firefox. Firefox will crash on startup. I tried starting in safe-mode and firefox still crashes. I removed the .mozilla directory and started fire

Re: strange firefox issue

This did the trick. Why I can't remove plugins via the tools menu, but can remove add-ons, seems wrong. Thanks, Paolo On 10/01/2015 02:18 PM, Alchemist wrote: 2015-10-02 0:09 GMT+03:00 Paolo Galtieri >: Folks, I have 2 systems running FC22. Both are

Re: strange firefox issue

Allegedly, on or about 01 October 2015, Paolo Galtieri sent: > I tried removing the link in the ~/.mozilla/plugins > directory and re-starting firefox, but it still shows I have > 11.2.202.508 installed. When you did this, did you check that Firefox was completely quit and restarted? If you ha

Re: strange firefox issue

2015-10-02 0:09 GMT+03:00 Paolo Galtieri : > Folks, > I have 2 systems running FC22. Both are at the latest updates. On one > system firefox shows I have flash version 11.2.202.521 installed. This is > the latest version available from Adobe. On the other system firefox tells > me I have an o

strange firefox issue

Folks, I have 2 systems running FC22. Both are at the latest updates. On one system firefox shows I have flash version 11.2.202.521 installed. This is the latest version available from Adobe. On the other system firefox tells me I have an out of date version of flash 11.2.202.508. This i

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/26/14 12:28, Ahmad Samir wrote: <<<>>> <<>> <> -- peace out. in a world with out fences, who needs gates. tc.hago. g . -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fe

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/26/14 03:33, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 02:36 +0600, g wrote: and so, be prepared to hear from some gmail and cell phone users who will deny that such can easily be done, as well as replying interspersed, therefore they do not. :-) IN Gmail it's trivially easy. Hi

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 25 March 2014 21:27, g wrote: > > > On 03/25/14 23:17, Ahmad Samir wrote: >> >> On 25 March 2014 18:00, g wrote: > > <<>> > >>> maybe in your experiences, but mine has been just to rename > >>> users's ".mozilla" directory and when firefox was called, >>> firefox created a new ".mozilla" direc

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 02:36 +0600, g wrote: > and so, be prepared to hear from some gmail and cell phone > users who will deny that such can easily be done, as well > as replying interspersed, therefore they do not. :-) IN Gmail it's trivially easy. Hint: select the relevant part before hitting Re

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/26/14 01:43, Joe Zeff wrote: On 03/25/2014 12:27 PM, g wrote: in case you are not aware, "dead wood" means portions of a post that are not related or reference to what one is replying to. I'd like to add to that the fact that other poster's signatures, including anything added by the l

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/25/2014 12:27 PM, g wrote: in case you are not aware, "dead wood" means portions of a post that are not related or reference to what one is replying to. I'd like to add to that the fact that other poster's signatures, including anything added by the list software, is always deadwood and

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/25/14 23:17, Ahmad Samir wrote: On 25 March 2014 18:00, g wrote: <<>> maybe in your experiences, but mine has been just to rename >> users's ".mozilla" directory and when firefox was called, >> firefox created a new ".mozilla" directory. A Firefox profile directory is ~/.mozilla/

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 25 March 2014 18:00, g wrote: > > > On 03/25/14 18:52, Ahmad Samir wrote: > On 25 March 2014 13:08, g wrote: > <<<>>> > >>> thinking about that, a new profile is just about as easy a check >>> to make as disabling add-ons. >> >> >> It could be a pref in the profile not just an extension causi

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/25/14 18:52, Ahmad Samir wrote: On 25 March 2014 13:08, g wrote: <<<>>> thinking about that, a new profile is just about as easy a check to make as disabling add-ons. It could be a pref in the profile not just an extension causing the problem. Or maybe a corrupt *.sqlite database. Or

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 25 March 2014 13:08, g wrote: > > > On 03/25/14 13:30, Ahmad Samir wrote: > <<>> > >> Usually I'd try with a new profile first, if the problem doesn't >> happen there, then I try to track down why it's happening in the >> original profile. (i.e. I wasn't implying he just ditches his old >> prof

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/25/14 13:30, Ahmad Samir wrote: <<>> Usually I'd try with a new profile first, if the problem doesn't happen there, then I try to track down why it's happening in the original profile. (i.e. I wasn't implying he just ditches his old profile :)). thinking about that, a new profile is ju

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 24 March 2014 18:16, Ian Malone wrote: > > On 24 March 2014 08:14, Ahmad Samir wrote: > > On 23 March 2014 23:37, Bill Oliver wrote: > >> > >> > > >> Firefox will only allow one invocation of itself on my machine. > >> Sometimes, if I invoke the program by clicking an icon, it will come up >

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/25/14 03:45, Bill Oliver wrote: <<>> It happened after doing one of those "you have 1 billion upgrades waiting, continue?" things that I get every now and then. I'll > admit I tend to just hit "yes" rather than carefully look at all > zillion of the files that is in yum updates. And,

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, g wrote: which leads to a question, did this problem start after an upgrade, update or addition of an add-on? ria, such factors could also lead to solution. hth. my apologies. much luck in finding solution. It happened after doing one of those "you have 1 billion up

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/24/14 22:16, Ian Malone wrote: <<>> Or use about:addons to disable all plugins+extensions and see if the problem goes away (Firefox staying resident and preventing-relaunch if not killed so far as I can make out from this thread). If that does stop it happening then re-enable them one-by-

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 24 March 2014 08:14, Ahmad Samir wrote: > On 23 March 2014 23:37, Bill Oliver wrote: >> >> >> Firefox will only allow one invocation of itself on my machine. >> Sometimes, if I invoke the program by clicking an icon, it will come up with >> an error message that says you can only have one cop

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 23 March 2014 23:37, Bill Oliver wrote: > > Earlier this month, I posted that Firefox would not start for me. Ed > Greshko kindly showed my his output when he started Firefox from the > command line. I noticed a bunch of Gnome stuff and assumed that there was > some sort of dependency I was

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/24/14 08:58, Bill Oliver wrote: On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, g wrote: kills the process. is that not what you want, to able to kill window and process? Yeah, it'll work. I just have to remember it. I use GUIs by muscle memory, so I'll likely close the window 10 or 20 times before I re

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/24/14 08:57, Bill Oliver wrote: On Sun, 23 Mar 2014, Joe Zeff wrote: On 03/23/2014 07:06 PM, g wrote: 24.4.0 Maybe if you upgraded to the newest version this would Just Go Away. g's not having the problem, I am :-) lol. -- peace out. in a world with out fences, who needs

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, g wrote: kills the process. is that not what you want, to able to kill window and process? Yeah, it'll work. I just have to remember it. I use GUIs by muscle memory, so I'll likely close the window 10 or 20 times before I remember... billo -- users mailing list

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On Sun, 23 Mar 2014, Joe Zeff wrote: On 03/23/2014 07:06 PM, g wrote: 24.4.0 Maybe if you upgraded to the newest version this would Just Go Away. g's not having the problem, I am :-) billo -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription option

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/24/14 08:17, Joe Zeff wrote: On 03/23/2014 07:06 PM, g wrote: 24.4.0 Maybe if you upgraded to the newest version this would Just Go Away. if i was having problem op is having, i would well consider it. ;-) right now, i would rather stay where i am because i do am not having proble

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/23/2014 07:06 PM, g wrote: 24.4.0 Maybe if you upgraded to the newest version this would Just Go Away. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http:

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/24/14 05:07, Bill Oliver wrote: On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, g wrote: <<<>>> just what version and release are you having problems with? have you tried using to kill window? KDE 4.12.3 4.3.4 Firefox 27.0.1 24.4.0 % uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 3.13.6-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 S

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/24/14 05:37, Joe Zeff wrote: <> If you haven't already, open a bugzilla on it. The situation is odd enough that it should get somebody's attention fairly quickly, especially if your report includes an offer to get whatever debug info is needed. are you ever living in a dream world whe

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/23/2014 03:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Instead of using ps, you can simply use "killall /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox" (note I'm running 64bit) pkill -9 firefox -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/23/2014 03:38 PM, Bill Oliver wrote: The problem is that the process doesn't quit when I kill the window (hit the "x" on the upper right edge of the frame -- which it used to do). Instead, I have to choose File->Quit from the Firefox menu. The process should die when I kill the window. I

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, g wrote: On 03/24/14 04:38, Bill Oliver wrote: <> The problem is that the process doesn't quit when I kill the window (hit the "x" on the upper right edge of the frame -- which it used to do). Instead, I have to choose File->Quit from the Firefox menu. The process

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/24/14 04:38, Roger Heflin wrote: I actually wanted 2 separate users that were somewhat isolated from each other so the separate profiles was useful. in such case, using "firefox --no-remote -P " is the proper way. so far, op has not stated he is want to open in 2 profiles. -- peace

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/24/14 04:47, David wrote: <> Mozilla's advice is: "Firefox refuses to close using red X; have to right click on screen bottom to close" This specifically says "win XP" but I have seen others say this aboutit in Linux also. this is

Re: my stupid users trick -- the Firefox issue from earlier this month.wq

On 03/24/14 04:38, Bill Oliver wrote: <> The problem is that the process doesn't quit when I kill the window (hit the "x" on the upper right edge of the frame -- which it used to do). Instead, I have to choose File->Quit from the Firefox menu. The process should die when I kill the window. I

  1   2   >