ra via users wrote:
On Fri Jul04'25 10:29:06AM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote:
snip
Thank you! I don't however understand why I can see the characters
all right (from what I can tell) on chromium-browser upgraded as with
firefox and everything else. I was thinking that this may
n chromium-browser upgraded as with
firefox and everything else. I was thinking that this may indicate
something missing in my firefox fonts support.
Best wishes,
Ranjan
Actually, a question that comes to my mind is whether Firefox comes with
any fonts at all, or does it only use what's alread
hat I can tell) on chromium-browser upgraded as
with firefox and everything else. I was thinking that this may
indicate something missing in my firefox fonts support.
Actually, a question that comes to my mind is whether Firefox comes with
any fonts at all, or does it only use what's alre
with firefox and
everything else. I was thinking that this may indicate something missing in my
firefox fonts support.
Actually, a question that comes to my mind is whether Firefox comes with
any fonts at all, or does it only use what's already on the system?
$ dnf search firefox
On Fri Jul04'25 03:20:42PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> From: Jeffrey Walton
> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 15:20:42 -0400
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> CC: home user
> Reply-To: noloa...@gmail.com, Community support for Fedora users
>
> Subject: Re: firefox font
On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 2:31 PM home user via users
wrote:
>
> On 7/4/2025 10:32 AM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > Thank you! I don't however understand why I can see the characters all
> > right (from what I can tell) on chromium-browser upgraded as with firefox
>
On 7/4/2025 10:32 AM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
On Fri Jul04'25 10:29:06AM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote:
snip
Thank you! I don't however understand why I can see the characters all right
(from what I can tell) on chromium-browser upgraded as with firefox and
On 7/4/25 10:32 AM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
On Fri Jul04'25 10:29:06AM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote:
snip
Thank you! I don't however understand why I can see the characters all right
(from what I can tell) on chromium-browser upgraded as with firefox and
every
On Fri Jul04'25 10:29:06AM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote:
> From: home user via users
> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 10:29:06 -0600
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: home user
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: firefox fonts probl
On 7/4/25 3:37 AM, Tim via users wrote:
On Tue, 2025-07-01 at 11:38 -0500, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
I have a strange problem in that many of the fonts on firefox look
weird and unreadable: an example is at https://ibb.co/bjCGrZNm (This
is a website https://plumz.me/archives/14050/ I
On Tue, 2025-07-01 at 11:38 -0500, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> I have a strange problem in that many of the fonts on firefox look
> weird and unreadable: an example is at https://ibb.co/bjCGrZNm (This
> is a website https://plumz.me/archives/14050/ I found out when I
> searched
On 06/30/2025 11:11 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Firefox no longer works for me.
After I start it up and click on a tab,
it immediately gives me the "firefox not responding" popup.
Also, I get two firefox processes instead of one.
| ps -l -C firefox
F S UID PID PPID C PRI
Firefox no longer works for me.
After I start it up and click on a tab,
it immediately gives me the "firefox not responding" popup.
Also, I get two firefox processes instead of one.
| ps -l -C firefox
F S UID PIDPPID C PRI NI ADDR SZ WCHAN TTY TIME CMD
0 t 10
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Firefox no longer works for me.
After I start it up and click on a tab,
it immediately gives me the "firefox not responding" popup.
Also, I get two firefox processes instead of one.
| ps -l -C firefox
F S UID PIDPPID C PRI
Hi,
I have a strange problem in that many of the fonts on firefox look weird and
unreadable: an example is at https://ibb.co/bjCGrZNm (This is a website
https://plumz.me/archives/14050/ I found out when I searched on DDG with the
terms "firefox fonts fedora 42" which possibly has
On Sat, 2025-05-17 at 19:20 +0200, François Patte wrote:
> The problem was not fedora updates but systemd-resolved.service when
> DoT is activated. I can't say why!
> I needed to use dns servers configured with DoT, so I activated this
> service in systemd-resolved.servic
Le 02/05/2025 à 22:26, François Patte a écrit :
Bonjour,
Since last update, my firefox and thunderbird are going more and more
slowly: they take 3 mn to start, when I click on a link in a mail it
takes about 2 mn to get it in firefox (which is already started).
firefox 137.0 thunderbird
On Sat, 2025-05-17 at 14:30 +0200, François Patte wrote:
> > I don't use Thunderbird, but Firefox has no problem with systemd-
> > resolved.service.
>
> What is your config? Do you use DNSOverTLS?
I use whatever is the default in Fedora 42. I haven´t changed anything
DNS-r
Le 17/05/2025 à 13:51, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit :
On Sat, 2025-05-17 at 10:14 +0200, François Patte wrote:
Le 02/05/2025 à 22:26, François Patte a écrit :
Bonjour,
Since last update, my firefox and thunderbird are going more and more
slowly: they take 3 mn to start, when I click on a
On Sat, 2025-05-17 at 10:14 +0200, François Patte wrote:
> Le 02/05/2025 à 22:26, François Patte a écrit :
> > Bonjour,
> >
> > Since last update, my firefox and thunderbird are going more and more
> > slowly: they take 3 mn to start, when I click on a link in a mail
Le 02/05/2025 à 22:26, François Patte a écrit :
Bonjour,
Since last update, my firefox and thunderbird are going more and more
slowly: they take 3 mn to start, when I click on a link in a mail it
takes about 2 mn to get it in firefox (which is already started).
firefox 137.0 thunderbird
Is anyone using this Firefox plugin?
https://github.com/freaktechnik/advanced-github-notifier
I'm just wondering if anyone else is seeing the same problem, or not. The
rendering of notifications, in the notification popup, is slightly garbled.
It looks like the rendered font is a littl
On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 03:51 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Quick fixes if your Firefox slows down,
> <https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/quick-fixes-if-your-firefox-slows-down>.
Hmm, just looked at some of that, there was a bit of a how to tie your
shoelaces feel to it.
--
On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 4:27 PM François Patte
wrote:
>
> Since last update, my firefox and thunderbird are going more and more
> slowly: they take 3 mn to start, when I click on a link in a mail it
> takes about 2 mn to get it in firefox (which is already started).
>
> firefox
Hi.
On Sun, 04 May 2025 22:32:24 +0200 François Patte wrote:
> As fotr the GPU driver I use the Nvidia driver from rpmfusion repo and I
> suppose that during every update akmod does its jobs...
If you don't reboot too early it should work yes.
> How to be sure?
For example like this:
1. glxin
Le 04/05/2025 à 18:54, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit :
On Sat, 2025-05-03 at 22:50 +0200, François Patte wrote:
Running firefox --safe-mode (as you suggested, but nothing has changed)
I got this message:
[GFX1-]: RenderCompositorSWGL failed mapping default framebuffer, no dt
[Parent 193916,
On Sat, 2025-05-03 at 22:50 +0200, François Patte wrote:
> Running firefox --safe-mode (as you suggested, but nothing has changed)
> I got this message:
>
> [GFX1-]: RenderCompositorSWGL failed mapping default framebuffer, no dt
> [Parent 193916, Main Thread] WARNING: failed to
On Fri, 2025-05-02 at 22:26 +0200, François Patte wrote:
> Since last update, my firefox and thunderbird are going more and more
> slowly: they take 3 mn to start, when I click on a link in a mail it
> takes about 2 mn to get it in firefox (which is already started).
>
>
Le 2025-05-03 18:29, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit :
On Sat, 2025-05-03 at 10:53 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
I'm in Nova Scotia. Normally, many apps use European mirrors via
cross-Atlantic cables. I've
seen issues recently thatI suspect are due to the Iberian Peninsula
power
problems.
power
problems.
You can run traceroute to see if that's happening, though it seems
unlikely.
I was thinking of this but I don't know if I will understand the
messages. I'll try tomorrow.
Running firefox --safe-mode (as you suggested, but nothing has changed)
I got this message:
On Sat, 2025-05-03 at 10:53 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> I'm in Nova Scotia. Normally, many apps use European mirrors via
> cross-Atlantic cables. I've
> seen issues recently thatI suspect are due to the Iberian Peninsula power
> problems.
You can run traceroute to see if that's happening
On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 5:27 PM François Patte <
francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> Since last update, my firefox and thunderbird are going more and more
> slowly: they take 3 mn to start, when I click on a link in a mail it
> takes about 2 mn to get it
On Fri, 2025-05-02 at 22:26 +0200, François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> Since last update, my firefox and thunderbird are going more and more
> slowly: they take 3 mn to start, when I click on a link in a mail it
> takes about 2 mn to get it in firefox (which is already started
Bonjour,
Since last update, my firefox and thunderbird are going more and more
slowly: they take 3 mn to start, when I click on a link in a mail it
takes about 2 mn to get it in firefox (which is already started).
firefox 137.0 thunderbird 128.9esr
What is the problem?
Thznk you
03/28/2025 12:15 PM, Roger Wells via users wrote:
>>
> >> Running from command line: firefox
>> >> env: ‘firefox-wayland’: No such file or directory
>> >> Run from desktop icon: icon swirls for about 15 seconds then
>> disappears.
>> >
>> > First, r
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 21:02, Roger Wells via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> On 3/28/25 2:57 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 03/28/2025 12:15 PM, Roger Wells via users wrote:
>
>> Running from command line: firefox
> >
Thanks for the reply.
On 3/28/25 2:57 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/28/2025 12:15 PM, Roger Wells via users wrote:
Hi,
Updated F41 via "software" icon on desktop today, 28Mar2025, which I
do each week at this time
Now firefox doesn't launch.
Running from command line: firefo
On 03/28/2025 12:15 PM, Roger Wells via users wrote:
Hi,
Updated F41 via "software" icon on desktop today, 28Mar2025, which I do
each week at this time
Now firefox doesn't launch.
Running from command line: firefox
env: ‘firefox-wayland’: No such file or directory
Run from des
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 2:16 PM Roger Wells via users
wrote:
>
> Updated F41 via "software" icon on desktop today, 28Mar2025, which I do
> each week at this time
> Now firefox doesn't launch.
> Running from command line: firefox
> env: ‘firefox-wayland’: No
Hi,
Updated F41 via "software" icon on desktop today, 28Mar2025, which I do
each week at this time
Now firefox doesn't launch.
Running from command line: firefox
env: ‘firefox-wayland’: No such file or directory
Run from desktop icon: icon swirls for about 15 seconds then di
Friday there was an update to Firefox. Bunch of other stuff as well and
this evening my system failed to come out of suspend (I suspend every
Friday afternoon until Sat night). So a cold start, and Firefox
starting up had its new list from that update, it seems.
So no dire warnings from
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> But how to update the cert file? Which one is it or will the next
>> firefox update replace it?
Barry:
> I would have assumed that the cert is shipped with firefox itself.
>
Though I would have presumed it came with the browser, they're qui
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 9:31 AM Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 2/27/25 8:17 AM, Barry wrote:
> >
> >> On 27 Feb 2025, at 10:39, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >>
> >> But how to update the cert file? Which one is it or will the next firefox
> >> upda
On 2/27/25 8:17 AM, Barry wrote:
On 27 Feb 2025, at 10:39, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But how to update the cert file? Which one is it or will the next firefox
update replace it?
I would have assumed that the cert is shipped with firefox itself.
There is a signed trust list that every
> On 27 Feb 2025, at 10:39, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> But how to update the cert file? Which one is it or will the next firefox
> update replace it?
I would have assumed that the cert is shipped with firefox itself.
Barry
--
___
u
On 2/27/25 4:19 AM, Tim via users wrote:
On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 11:36 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On starting Firefox after installing the new .mozilla folder, I got a
page opened:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/welcome/25/
Warning me that Firefox will BREAK on Mar 14, 2025 due to
On 2/27/25 3:19 AM, Barry wrote:
On 26 Feb 2025, at 16:37, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On starting Firefox after installing the new .mozilla folder, I got a page
opened:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/welcome/25/
Warning me that Firefox will BREAK on Mar 14, 2025 due to expiring
On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 11:36 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On starting Firefox after installing the new .mozilla folder, I got a
> page opened:
>
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/welcome/25/
>
> Warning me that Firefox will BREAK on Mar 14, 2025 due to expiring c
> On 26 Feb 2025, at 16:37, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On starting Firefox after installing the new .mozilla folder, I got a page
> opened:
>
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/welcome/25/
>
> Warning me that Firefox will BREAK on Mar 14, 2025 due to expiring
I followed the process of copying my whole .mozilla hidden folder (after
first renaming the one created by firefox) from my old F38 system to my
new F41 system.
Seems to work. Probably brought along all sorts of old cruft that might
have been better lost.
One problem though.
On starting
Actually, it appears to be a kernel issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348401
Paul
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:22 PM Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:22 AM Paul Smith wrote:
> >
> > All from a sudden, I cannot start any browser but Firefox
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:22 AM Paul Smith wrote:
>
> All from a sudden, I cannot start any browser but Firefox:
>
> $ google-chrome
> [18285:18285:0226/112134.284230:ERROR:secret_portal_key_provider.cc(214)]
> Retrieved secret is empty.
> [18285:18285:0226/112134.284477:
Dear All,
All from a sudden, I cannot start any browser but Firefox:
$ google-chrome
[18285:18285:0226/112134.284230:ERROR:secret_portal_key_provider.cc(214)]
Retrieved secret is empty.
[18285:18285:0226/112134.284477:ERROR:object_proxy.cc(576)] Failed to
call method
Tim:
>> Just thought I'd try asking here, because I'm not having much luck with
>> Google...
>>
>> Many times, way too many damn times, if I try to access some address
>> with Firefox it will go into HTTPS mode when I don't want it to.
Will McDon
Just thought I'd try asking here, because I'm not having much luck with
Google...
Many times, way too many damn times, if I try to access some address
with Firefox it will go into HTTPS mode when I don't want it to.
For instance, I've actually typed http://192.168.1.254 to g
Hi,
Just thought I'd try asking here, because I'm not having much luck with
Google...
Many times, way too many damn times, if I try to access some address
with Firefox it will go into HTTPS mode when I don't want it to.
For instance, I've actually typed http://192.168.
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 14:32, Tim via users
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just thought I'd try asking here, because I'm not having much luck with
> Google...
>
> Many times, way too many damn times, if I try to access some address
> with Firefox it will go into HTTPS mode when
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 9:32 AM Tim via users
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just thought I'd try asking here, because I'm not having much luck with
> Google...
>
> Many times, way too many damn times, if I try to access some address
> with Firefox it will go into HTTPS mode w
ring when I use Firefox to view my locally
generated documentation (although they *are* rendered when I view RTD
documentation online). These characters render just fine in Google
Chrome, LibreOffice Writer, and KCharSelect, so I don't believe that I'm
missing a font.
Anyone have any id
On 1/13/25 11:51 AM, Jerry James wrote:
Do you have fontawsome-6-free-fonts installed? It's possible that the
applications you mention bundle that font.
I just installed it and restarted Firefox. No change.
--
If
> These characters are not rendering when I use Firefox to view my locally
> generated documentation (although they *are* rendered when I view RTD
> documentation online). These characters render just fine in Google
> Chrome, LibreOffice Writer, and KCharSelect, so I don't bel
I'm working on documenting some Python code with Sphinx and the Read the
Docs theme. This theme uses a couple of Unicode "private use area"
characters - U+F015 (house) and U+F06a (exclamation mark in circle).
These characters are not rendering when I use Firefox to view my lo
On 12/18/2024 02:13 PM, Dave Close wrote:
Don Marti wrote:
The current two preferences that it sets to false are:
dom.private-attribution.submission.enabled
browser.urlbar.suggest.quicksuggest.sponsored
I tried that in a new tab, with a page up with several ads. I already
had the first
On Wed, 2024-12-18 at 10:23 -0800, Don Marti wrote:
> The advantage of setting these in /etc/firefox/policies/policies.json
> is that they automatically take effect for all new users and profiles
Until such time that they change the names of the variables...
Any time programmers do annoyin
Don Marti wrote:
>The current two preferences that it sets to false are:
>
> dom.private-attribution.submission.enabled
> browser.urlbar.suggest.quicksuggest.sponsored
Thanks, Don. I'm adding these to my list of configuration variables to
disable. I'd gone away fr
begin Bob Marčan via users quotation of Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 03:53:07PM +:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:14:12 -0800
> "Don Marti" wrote:
>
> > On 12/17/24 11:10 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2024-12-17 at 18:31 -0800, Don Marti wrote:
> >
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:14:12 -0800
"Don Marti" wrote:
> On 12/17/24 11:10 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-12-17 at 18:31 -0800, Don Marti wrote:
> >> problem: Firefox quietly turned on ad tracking (see bug report from
> >> Alan Cox
> >
&
On 12/17/24 11:10 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Tue, 2024-12-17 at 18:31 -0800, Don Marti wrote:
problem: Firefox quietly turned on ad tracking (see bug report from
Alan Cox
I notice that the two options in "Firefox Data Collection and Use" of "
"Allow Firefox to send techn
On Tue, 2024-12-17 at 18:31 -0800, Don Marti wrote:
> problem: Firefox quietly turned on ad tracking (see bug report from
> Alan Cox
I notice that the two options in "Firefox Data Collection and Use" of "
"Allow Firefox to send technical and interaction data to Mozi
problem: Firefox quietly turned on ad tracking (see bug report from
Alan Cox here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297635
(partial) solution: It is possible to set up policies to turn stuff
like this off. I made a simple RPM to just deploy the policy file (so
I can make sure to set
Tim:
>> Usually I'd say the worse browser was MSIE (pronounce "misery").
ToddAndMargo:
> The "ActiveX" that went with misery was responsible for a lot of
> virus infections.
I'm not in the least surprised. The concept of "don't trust random
things" just isn't in their head (the programmers and t
ranslate.
>
> regards,
> Steve
>
Today i got with updates new version of firefox.
firefox-133.0.3-1.fc40.x86_64
The old one was firefox-133.0.2-1.fc40.x86_64
And now the mentioned sites work again.
Well.
--
___
users mailing list -- u
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 09:16:46 +1100
"Stephen Morris" wrote:
> >
> At what point does the second site fail for you? I didn't activate the
> translation and I can click on links in the page without any issues. I'm also
> not compiling firefox, I've dow
On 12/13/24 16:16, Tim via users wrote:
Usually I'd say the worse browser was MSIE (pronounce "misery").
The "ActiveX" that went with misery was responsible
for a lot of virus infections.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 02:58 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> The worst browser I have come across is Midori
With noscript running, all I see of their own website was a white page
with a spinning wait while we load graphic... Once I allowed
scripting, I saw a basic pretty useless website. H
0:44 -0800
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
---
https://mail.proton.me/u/0/all-mail/o4da3Tlhne-ORwaJYsVRoxzBZj3Qm8rbjFjY124klbUrx1BQyLu3kIBJKhL6_97rVobQc2a7keiXy3hb5LfJGg==
" wrote:
On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
---
https://mail.proton.me/u/0/all-mail/o4da3Tlhne-ORwaJYsVRoxzBZj3Qm8rbjFjY124klbUrx1BQyLu3kIBJKhL6_97rVobQc2a7keiXy3hb5LfJGg==
https://okusno.je/recept/dusen-regrat-z-jajc
On 12/13/24 01:07, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:02:33 -0800
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
oh ya. 1+ on the crap web sites.
oh ya. 2+ on the crap web sites AND browsers.
The worst browser I have come across is Midori
--
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:02:33 -0800
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
>
> oh ya. 1+ on the crap web sites.
oh ya. 2+ on the crap web sites AND browsers.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le
On 12/12/24 16:03, Tim wrote:
Tim:
I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
ToddAndMargo:
It is medical sites were patients look up their medical
records and Recreational Vehicles campgrounds. And a few
government sites.
I'm sure there are sites that fail i
Tim:
> > I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
ToddAndMargo:
> It is medical sites were patients look up their medical
> records and Recreational Vehicles campgrounds. And a few
> government sites.
I'm sure there are sites that fail in some browser
s" wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
> > >> I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
> > >>>
> > >>
> > > ---
> > > https://mail.proton.me/u/0/all-mail/o4da3Tlhn
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:38:30 +1100
"Stephen Morris" wrote:
> On 13/12/24 07:18, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:40:44 -0800
> > "ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
> >
> > On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
> >>
On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 08:38 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 13/12/24 07:18, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:40:44 -0800
> > "ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
> > > >
On 13/12/24 07:18, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:40:44 -0800
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
---
https://mail.proton.me/u/0
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:40:44 -0800
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
> On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
> > I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
>
---
https://mail.p
On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
It is medical sites were patients look up their medical
records and Recreational Vehicles campgrounds. And a few
government sites.
--
___
users ma
nsidered grandparent safe.
>
> I typically install both Brave and Firefox
> on my customers. If a web site does not work
> in one, try the other. A lot of sites no
> longer work with Firefox.
I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox. I find plenty of
sites th
On 2024-11-25 11:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 11/25/24 07:18, Frank Bures wrote:
I do not use Firefox as my default browser
I have eight browser installed. Firefox
is "currently" the default, but is varies.
I use them all for various things.
If you have not tried Brave Br
On 11/25/24 07:18, Frank Bures wrote:
I do not use Firefox as my default browser
I have eight browser installed. Firefox
is "currently" the default, but is varies.
I use them all for various things.
If you have not tried Brave Browser, you
should. It uses the "Blink" re
On 2024-11-25 06:52, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 17:04 -0500, Frank Bures wrote:
The above sequence is:
--> Firefox -> File -> eMail link
Cheers
Frank
Aha! You're not clicking on an email mailto: address in a page, like I
thought you were doing. You're emailing so
On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 17:04 -0500, Frank Bures wrote:
> The above sequence is:
>
> --> Firefox -> File -> eMail link
>
> Cheers
> Frank
Aha! You're not clicking on an email mailto: address in a page, like I
thought you were doing. You're emailing someo
On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 17:38 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> Tim:
> > > Yes. I have had to force it to quit sometimes. It doesn't always
> > > handle things gracefully if it can't access one of the mail servers.
>
> Patrick O'Callaghan:
> > Try taking it offline and on again (connection icon in the
Tim:
> > Yes. I have had to force it to quit sometimes. It doesn't always
> > handle things gracefully if it can't access one of the mail servers.
Patrick O'Callaghan:
> Try taking it offline and on again (connection icon in the lower left
> corner).
Tried that, too. But when it gets in a bad
thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41,
when I go into
--> Firefox -> File -> eMail link
I get told that Thunderbird is already running,
which it is.
The exact steps on how to reproduce it are missing. Simply i
firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41,
when I go into
--> Firefox -> File -> eMail link
I get told that Thunderbird is already running,
which it is.
The exact steps on how to reproduce it are missing. Simply installing
thunderbird, then configuring GN
On 25/11/24 02:34, Frank Bures wrote:
On 2024-11-23 17:50, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/11/24 05:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:43:08 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41
thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
Since upgrading
On 2024-11-23 17:50, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/11/24 05:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:43:08 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41
thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41,
when I go
On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 23:42 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 10:55 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > FWIW: Evolution has multiple parts (try 'pgrep evolution' to see them).
> > Simply quitting the GUI will not shut it down. I'm sure you know this,
> > but if you really want t
On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 10:55 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> FWIW: Evolution has multiple parts (try 'pgrep evolution' to see them).
> Simply quitting the GUI will not shut it down. I'm sure you know this,
> but if you really want to to stop it you should use 'evolution --force-
> shutdown' from
1 - 100 of 3167 matches
Mail list logo
