On 07/23/14 01:41, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> If I go back far enough with my linux testing, I remember zeroconf working.
> Or at least I think so; am going back quite a while. Probably before adding
> avahi.
Now that you mention it, you are most probably right. I recall there always
being a
On 07/22/2014 01:25 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 23:32, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:55 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use it.
This option does not seem to be available
On 07/22/14 23:32, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 07/22/2014 10:55 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use
>>> it. This option does not seem to be available.
>> Oh, I've never seen a case w
On 22.07.2014 17:27, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:54 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:43, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On
On 07/22/2014 10:55 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use it.
This option does not seem to be available.
Oh, I've never seen a case where you could have a "fall back" position.
This is wha
On 07/22/2014 10:54 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:43, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But wh
On 07/22/2014 10:49 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:43, poma wrote:
file /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf: symbolic link to
`/etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf'
# cat /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf
[main]
plugins=
On 22.07.2014 16:57, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:43 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz w
On 22.07.2014 16:43, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconf
On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use
> it. This option does not seem to be available.
Oh, I've never seen a case where you could have a "fall back" position.
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladl
On 07/22/2014 10:43 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysco
On 07/22/2014 10:40 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Do you have access to the system to use the GUI tools of network manager?
(I'm assuming you are using nm).
I cannot see anyplace to specify use zeroconf if no dhcp.
This is gnome3 on F20...
I don't
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
On 07/22/2014 10:27 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 22 22:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even
when connected peer-to-peer the HW is now ca
On 07/22/14 22:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
>> Do you have access to the system to use the GUI tools of network manager?
>> (I'm assuming you are using nm).
>>
>>
> I cannot see anyplace to specify use zeroconf if no dhcp.
>
> This is gnome3 on F20...
>
>
>
I don't regularly use gnome. KDE
On 07/22/14 22:43, poma wrote:
> file /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
> /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf: symbolic link to
> `/etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf'
>
> # cat /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf
> [main]
> plugins=keyfile
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ fi
On 07/22/2014 10:19 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even when
connected peer-to-peer the HW is now capable to detect this situation and auto
On 07/22/14 22:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 22 22:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
>> FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even
>> when connected peer-to-peer the HW is n
On Jul 22 22:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
>
> FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even
> when connected peer-to-peer the HW is now capable to detect this
> situation and aut
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
with scripts for each wifi connection and I ca
On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even when
connected peer-to-peer the HW is now capable to detect this situation and auto
configure itself using standard cables.
--
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
>>> with scripts for each wifi connection and I can't find any for my ethernet
>>>
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
with scripts for each wifi connection and I can't find any for my ethernet
adapter.
Well, "ip link" will/should give a list of link
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
> with scripts for each wifi connection and I can't find any for my ethernet
> adapter.
Well, "ip link" will/should give a list of links.
I use network-manager, as I have no
On 07/22/2014 12:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/21/14 22:55, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a headless system that I cannot connect to. So I was thinking to put a
direct connection to it and my notebook. Both ethernets would use the zeroconf
(169.254.0.0/16) addresses. I could then use fpi
On 07/22/2014 12:16 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 12:34 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have considerable routing and addressing knowledge. Besides being
one of the authors of rfc 1918, and worked on CIDR, here at IETF I
contribute to ipv6ops and ipv6man.
Sorry, didn't mean to impune
On 07/21/14 22:55, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have a headless system that I cannot connect to. So I was thinking to put
> a direct connection to it and my notebook. Both ethernets would use the
> zeroconf (169.254.0.0/16) addresses. I could then use fping
>
> fping -g 169.254.0.0/16
>
> And S
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 12:34 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have considerable routing and addressing knowledge. Besides being
> one of the authors of rfc 1918, and worked on CIDR, here at IETF I
> contribute to ipv6ops and ipv6man.
Sorry, didn't mean to impune you, but I don't remember who's
On 07/21/2014 02:19 PM, Fernando Gozalo wrote:
Hi,
So given ipv6 local-scope, how do I learn the other system's addr.
According to http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Linux+IPv6-HOWTO/x1162.html
ip -6 neigh show
Oow. that works! Will note that down for next time!
thanks
--
users mailing list
u
Hi,
> So given ipv6 local-scope, how do I learn the other system's addr.
According to http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Linux+IPv6-HOWTO/x1162.html
ip -6 neigh show
Regards,
Fernando.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.
Kind of.
No zeroconf. For some reason. But at least ipv6 local-scope.
Used wireshark to capture dhcp probes to get MAC address.
Converted MAC address into IPv6 local scope address.
ssh ipv6%interface
and I am in!
Now to later do this later to the actual box rather than between two
noteboo
On 07/21/2014 11:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 10:55 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a headless system that I cannot connect to. So I was thinking
to put a direct connection to it and my notebook. Both ethernets
would use the zeroconf (169.254.0.0/16) addresses. I could then
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 10:55 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have a headless system that I cannot connect to. So I was thinking
> to put a direct connection to it and my notebook. Both ethernets
> would use the zeroconf (169.254.0.0/16) addresses. I could then use
> fping
>
> fping -g 169.25
I have a headless system that I cannot connect to. So I was thinking to
put a direct connection to it and my notebook. Both ethernets would use
the zeroconf (169.254.0.0/16) addresses. I could then use fping
fping -g 169.254.0.0/16
And SHOULD be able to get its address, and then SSH into th
34 matches
Mail list logo
