Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-06-03 Thread Go Canes
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 10:28 PM home user wrote: > I have no idea how to compare the one iso file to the several directories and > files on the stick. You can mount the iso file with "sudo mount file.iso /mnt", and then use "diff -r /mnt /stick" or similar. Assumes: - you don't already have som

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-06-03 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2023-06-03 at 09:01 +0200, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 20:28:10 -0600 home user wrote: > > > But diff can't compare contents of binary files. > > No: it can: > >   diff /bin/ls /bin/pwd >   Binary files /bin/ls and /bin/pwd differ > > In your case you

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-06-03 Thread Francis . Montagnac
Hi On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 20:28:10 -0600 home user wrote: > But diff can't compare contents of binary files. No: it can: diff /bin/ls /bin/pwd Binary files /bin/ls and /bin/pwd differ In your case you only need to know if the files differ, thus use diff --brief -r ... diff --brief /bin/ls

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-06-02 Thread Tim via users
On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 20:28 -0600, home user wrote: > I looked around for another way to check the sticks. I thought if I > put something huge on the stick, and then use diff, that would do the > job. My /home is over 22 GB. So if I re-format the stick, copy > /home to the stick, and do a "diff

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-06-02 Thread home user
On 6/1/23 3:38 PM, George N. White III wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:05 PM home user mailto:mattis...@comcast.net>> wrote: [... snip ...] The crooks copy name-brand packaging.  Bogus USB drives can be introduced anywhere in the supply chain, so the problem is usually discovered only when it r

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-06-01 Thread home user
On 5/31/23 2:44 PM, Go Canes wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 4:05 PM home user wrote: 2. I used Fedora Media Writer to put Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-37-1.7.iso" on stick_1; no hint of trouble. I tested it in the left USB-3 port; it failed. I tested it in the right port; it succeeded.

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-06-01 Thread Tim via users
On Thu, 2023-06-01 at 18:38 -0300, George N. White III wrote: > USB3 uses frequencies higher than USB2, so other devices can be > affected by poor shielding at the ports, and kinked cables or > excessively long leads connecting port to system board cause > deterioration of the signals. Are both po

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-06-01 Thread George N. White III
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 5:05 PM home user wrote: > (replying to Tim and George) > > Thank-you Tim and George. > > On 5/29/23 7:01 AM, George N. White III wrote: > > > Early USB-3 was problematic. Have you used USB memory sticks before? > There have been cheap USB sticks that advertise a much hi

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-06-01 Thread Stephen P. Carrier
You can also use dd to copy the usb stick back to a file, and compare the two files with cmp. (The original iso file should be an initial segment of the stick copy.) Maybe you can use cmp to directly compare the iso and the usb device, but I've never done it that way. --Stephen On Wed, May 31, 2

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-05-31 Thread Go Canes
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 4:05 PM home user wrote: > 2. I used Fedora Media Writer to put > Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-37-1.7.iso" on stick_1; no hint of trouble. I > tested it in the left USB-3 port; it failed. I tested it in the right port; > it succeeded. Instead of Media Writer, you co

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-05-31 Thread home user
(replying to Tim and George) Thank-you Tim and George. On 5/29/23 7:01 AM, George N. White III wrote: Early USB-3 was problematic. Have you used USB memory sticks before? There have been cheap USB sticks that advertise a much higher capacity than they actually provide. I've been using U

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-05-29 Thread George N. White III
On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 9:17 PM home user wrote: > On 3/23/23 1:25 PM, home user wrote: > > While preparing to upgrade to Fedora-37 (planned for mid-April), I > noticed that my emergency tools are seriously out of date. Those are > memtest, Fedora live, and rescue. memtest was dealt with in a t

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-05-28 Thread Tim via users
On Sun, 2023-05-28 at 18:17 -0600, home user wrote: > I'm puzzled and troubled that the USB stick method does not work. It could just be /that/ USB stick. Did you have another to try? -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.90.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu May 4 15:21:22 UTC 2023 x86_64 Boilerplate: A

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively. [SOLVED]

2023-05-28 Thread home user
On 3/23/23 1:25 PM, home user wrote: While preparing to upgrade to Fedora-37 (planned for mid-April), I noticed that my emergency tools are seriously out of date.  Those are memtest, Fedora live, and rescue.  memtest was dealt with in a thread earlier this month.  Now I'm trying to update my F

Re: Fedora USB live: not lively.

2023-03-23 Thread Roger Heflin
Did both of the sticks fail to boot in the exact same way? Or did they fail differently? Failing to boot differently each time on 2 different sticks (and on the same stick several times) would make me think that there was an issue with the USB on the workstation you are trying to boot being unre

Fedora USB live: not lively.

2023-03-23 Thread home user
While preparing to upgrade to Fedora-37 (planned for mid-April), I noticed that my emergency tools are seriously out of date. Those are memtest, Fedora live, and rescue. memtest was dealt with in a thread earlier this month. Now I'm trying to update my Fedora live USB stick to Fedora-36. I