On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 16:03:37 +1030
Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 09 February 2017, Kevin Fenzi sent:
> > Unfortunately, it's kind of subjective what a good summary /
> > description would be. Perhaps the guideline could say "Describe what
> > the package is as if to someone who had no idea
Allegedly, on or about 09 February 2017, Kevin Fenzi sent:
> Unfortunately, it's kind of subjective what a good summary /
> description would be. Perhaps the guideline could say "Describe what
> the package is as if to someone who had no idea what it was" ?
> But in some cases there's packages li
Allegedly, on or about 09 February 2017, Patrick O'Callaghan sent:
> I can't see the message this is in reply to. Was it perhaps cross-
> posted from somewhere else?
The first message was mine, I hit "reply" to a package-announce message,
but should have used forward.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ unam
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 00:04 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/08/2017 11:56 PM, Tim wrote:
> > I wish that sort of useless description would result in packages getting
> > an automatic banning.
>
> No, not banning. There should be guidelines for what an acceptable
> description consists of, and any
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 00:04:16 -0800
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/08/2017 11:56 PM, Tim wrote:
> > I wish that sort of useless description would result in packages
> > getting an automatic banning.
>
> No, not banning. There should be guidelines for what an acceptable
> description consists of, and
On 02/08/2017 11:56 PM, Tim wrote:
I wish that sort of useless description would result in packages getting
an automatic banning.
No, not banning. There should be guidelines for what an acceptable
description consists of, and any package that doesn't meet them should
be rejected until it doe
Allegedly, on or about 07 February 2017, upda...@fedoraproject.org sent:
> Name: nitrokey-app
> Product : Fedora 24
> Version : 0.6.3
> Release : 1.fc24
> URL : https://github.com/Nitrokey/nitrokey-app
> Summary : Nitrokey's Application
> Description :
> Nitrokey's A
