Re: Failed Delta RPMs observed in repo

2020-02-10 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 09:36 -0500, John Mellor wrote: > Question for the repo managers, > > Why do I sometimes see invalid checksums for drpm downloads? E.g: > This excerpt from the update this morning: > > > /var/cache/dnf/updates-7fc4c739b3909d9f/packages/selinux-policy- > > targeted-3.14.4-46

Re: Failed Delta RPMs observed in repo

2020-02-09 Thread George N. White III
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 17:14, stan via users wrote: > On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 09:36:54 -0500 > John Mellor wrote: > > > Question for the repo managers, > > > > Why do I sometimes see invalid checksums for drpm downloads? E.g: > > This excerpt from the update this morning: > > > > > > /var/cache/dnf/

Re: Failed Delta RPMs observed in repo

2020-02-09 Thread stan via users
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 09:36:54 -0500 John Mellor wrote: > Question for the repo managers, > > Why do I sometimes see invalid checksums for drpm downloads? E.g: > This excerpt from the update this morning: > > > /var/cache/dnf/updates-7fc4c739b3909d9f/packages/selinux-policy-targeted-3.14.4-46

Failed Delta RPMs observed in repo

2020-02-09 Thread John Mellor
Question for the repo managers, Why do I sometimes see invalid checksums for drpm downloads? E.g: This excerpt from the update this morning: /var/cache/dnf/updates-7fc4c739b3909d9f/packages/selinux-policy-targeted-3.14.4-46.fc31_3.14.4-47.fc31.noarch.drpm: md5 mismatch of resultSome pac