On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 16:49 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 11:36 PM, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > We are in stable stage so I do not expect NIC name changes without
> > consistent reason.
>
> I've never noticed it before, but this does look like a bug in
> Fedora.
>
> On my workstation,
On 12/09/2015 11:36 PM, Cristian Sava wrote:
We are in stable stage so I do not expect NIC name changes without
consistent reason.
I've never noticed it before, but this does look like a bug in Fedora.
On my workstation, for instance, /var/log/anaconda/anaconda.journal.log
contains:
Jul 21 2
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 09:36 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 12:39 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 12/09/2015 12:41 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > > I Installed F23 Server with static address but after updating
> > > that
> > > it
> > > got an automatic one. Why that?
> > ...
>
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 12:39 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 12:41 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > I Installed F23 Server with static address but after updating that
> > it
> > got an automatic one. Why that?
> ...
> > [root@s217 network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eno1
> > HWADDR=00:1E:67:8B:B9:3
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 13:52 +, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> Yeah, strange a bit, but it seems you have some udev rules
> configured. It can cause interface naming mess maybe.
>
No, nothing configured.
That happen on F23 server & workstation installs on real hardware.
Steps to reproduce:
Install
On 12/09/2015 12:41 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
I Installed F23 Server with static address but after updating that it
got an automatic one. Why that?
...
[root@s217 network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eno1
HWADDR=00:1E:67:8B:B9:31
...
[root@s217 network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth1
HWADDR=00:1E:67:8B:B9:30
Yeah, strange a bit, but it seems you have some udev rules configured. It
can cause interface naming mess maybe.
ср, 9 дек. 2015 г. в 16:02, Cristian Sava :
> On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 12:02 +, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> > Yep, sorry. So you restarted after changing BOOTPROTO? Try looking
> > int
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 12:02 +, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> Yep, sorry. So you restarted after changing BOOTPROTO? Try looking
> into dmesg or journalctl -n1000 | egrep "eno|eth", or something like
> that.
Yes, I allways rebooted.
Again, that config was working well until recent updates.
For now
Yep, sorry. So you restarted after changing BOOTPROTO? Try looking into
dmesg or journalctl -n1000 | egrep "eno|eth", or something like that.
ср, 9 дек. 2015 г. в 14:52, Cristian Sava :
> On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 11:47 +, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> > But BOOTPROTO=dhcp is set for eth1. For which
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 11:47 +, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> But BOOTPROTO=dhcp is set for eth1. For which interface do you want
> static config? Did you restart the networking after you made config
> changes?
Read again, eth1 is not connected!
Only eno1 is in use!
C.S.
--
users mailing list
use
But BOOTPROTO=dhcp is set for eth1. For which interface do you want static
config? Did you restart the networking after you made config changes?
ср, 9 дек. 2015 г. в 14:39, Cristian Sava :
>
> >
> > Might
> > BOOTPROTO=static
> > help?
> >
> > suomi
>
> No, it does not help
>
> C.S.
>
> --
> user
>
> Might
> BOOTPROTO=static
> help?
>
> suomi
No, it does not help
C.S.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 12/09/2015 09:51 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 10:41 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote:
I Installed F23 Server with static address but after updating that it
got an automatic one. Why that? I consider that extremely dangerous.
That was verified and happened on different hardware b
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 10:41 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote:
> I Installed F23 Server with static address but after updating that it
> got an automatic one. Why that? I consider that extremely dangerous.
> That was verified and happened on different hardware boxes.
> Do I miss something? Does anyone els
I Installed F23 Server with static address but after updating that it
got an automatic one. Why that? I consider that extremely dangerous.
That was verified and happened on different hardware boxes.
Do I miss something? Does anyone else saw that?
This is what I have (eno1 wired, eth1 not connected)
15 matches
Mail list logo