Re: F14 yum update conflict

On 04/08/2011 01:24 PM, Christopher K. Johnson wrote: > yum install yum-priorities Thanx! That's a good idea, although I do n ot know if it would have saved me from all that headache. I will try it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On 04/08/2011 10:24 AM, Greg Woods wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:14 -0700, JD wrote: > >> Looks like after deleting the offending rpm for libmad >> all is well now. >> Yum check shows no problems and yum update shows no problems. > > The lesson for all to learn from this thread is that you have

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On 04/08/2011 01:24 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:14 -0700, JD wrote: > > >> Looks like after deleting the offending rpm for libmad >> all is well now. >> Yum check shows no problems and yum update shows no problems. >> > > The lesson for all to learn from this thread i

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:14 -0700, JD wrote: > Looks like after deleting the offending rpm for libmad > all is well now. > Yum check shows no problems and yum update shows no problems. The lesson for all to learn from this thread is that you have to be very careful when using multiple third-part

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On 04/08/2011 01:05 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote: > > > 2011/4/8 Michael Schwendt > > > On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 21:36:20 -0700, JD wrote: > > > >> So stick to one third party repo instead of atleast stop using > > >> conflicting repos. Mplayer and vlc are both in

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On 04/08/2011 12:51 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > repoquery --exactdeps --whatrequires libmad > I see! OK. You're right! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fed

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 03:05:40 -0500, Manuel wrote: > Humm, Just did a quick reading... > > You could try (As Root in terminal): > > - yum clean all > > - yum makecache > > - yum -y update > > Hope this helps... No, it won't help. "clean all" kills more than necessary. You want to look up the

Re: F14 yum update conflict

2011/4/8 Michael Schwendt > On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 21:36:20 -0700, JD wrote: > > > >> So stick to one third party repo instead of atleast stop using > > >> conflicting repos. Mplayer and vlc are both in RPM Fusion. > > > It seems the failure is to enable rpmfusion _after_ atrpms. > > > > > > Plus,

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 21:36:20 -0700, JD wrote: > >> So stick to one third party repo instead of atleast stop using > >> conflicting repos. Mplayer and vlc are both in RPM Fusion. > > It seems the failure is to enable rpmfusion _after_ atrpms. > > > > Plus, it's a mistake to install atrpms' "libmad

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On 04/07/2011 01:00 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:33:19 +0530, Rahul wrote: > >> So stick to one third party repo instead of atleast stop using >> conflicting repos. Mplayer and vlc are both in RPM Fusion. > It seems the failure is to enable rpmfusion _after_ atrpms. > > Plu

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:33:19 +0530, Rahul wrote: > So stick to one third party repo instead of atleast stop using > conflicting repos. Mplayer and vlc are both in RPM Fusion. It seems the failure is to enable rpmfusion _after_ atrpms. Plus, it's a mistake to install atrpms' "libmad" explicitly

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:54:27 -0700, JD wrote: > > rpm -e libmad > Tried. It breaks several apps. I don't believe that. What does it break? The package doesn't contain anything important except virtual "Provides": http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/f14/libmad/ $ rpmls -p libmad-0.15.1b-4.fc14.i686.

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On 04/07/2011 11:45 AM, JD wrote: > I would further suggest that redhat Fedora repo adopt the apps > that the other two repos provide, and build them within the confines > of the the RH fedora repo to eliminate this problem. Fedora is committed to having nothing in its official repos that has (or

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On 04/08/2011 12:15 AM, JD wrote: > Problem is that Neither the Redhat Fedora repos, nor the other > two non-redhat fedora repos carry the same wanted apps. So > your suggestion is not feasible for people that want to use > mplayer or vlc, to name just two of the very many apps. So stick to one th

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On 04/07/2011 11:10 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/07/2011 11:24 PM, JD wrote: >> They offer rpms for apps the main fedora repo does not provide, but >> link them with libraries and packages with a slightly different >> build and version number than what Fedora Repo DOES provide, thus >> breakin

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On 04/07/2011 11:24 PM, JD wrote: > They offer rpms for apps the main fedora repo does not provide, but > link them with libraries and packages with a slightly different > build and version number than what Fedora Repo DOES provide, thus > breaking the dependency chain. It is unlikely that RPM Fus

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On 04/07/2011 08:44 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > rpm -e libmad Tried. It breaks several apps. How can contact the Fedora Repo , The ATRPMS Repo and RPMFusion rep mintainers to ask them why in tarnation hey screw up fedora users' installations in this way? They offer rpms for apps the main fed

Re: F14 yum update conflict

On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:53:15 -0700, JD wrote: > # rpm -e libmad0-0.15.1b-4.fc14.i686 > error: Failed dependencies: > libmad.so.0 is needed by (installed) xine-lib-1.1.19-22.1.fc14.i686 > libmad.so.0 is needed by (installed) > mplayer-4:1.0-81_snap20110324.fc14.i686 > libmad.so.0 is

F14 yum update conflict

# rpm -e libmad0-0.15.1b-4.fc14.i686 error: Failed dependencies: libmad.so.0 is needed by (installed) xine-lib-1.1.19-22.1.fc14.i686 libmad.so.0 is needed by (installed) mplayer-4:1.0-81_snap20110324.fc14.i686 libmad.so.0 is needed by (installed) vlc-1.1.8-68.1.fc14.i686 libmad