On 01/16/2013 01:29 AM, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> Gentle People:
>
> My suggestion: Use Fedora 14 and immediately load all updates.
>
> Results from my testing:
> Fedora 17 x64 - Not usable way to many bugs.
> Fedora 17 x32 - Barely usable, not ready for prime time!
>
>
On 01/15/2013 10:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
listen stupid troll: i am a USER, these are not MY bigs
and the only one who is wasting anybodys time are trolls
like you!
If you really think he's a troll, stop responding and see if he goes away.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 01/15/2013 07:49 PM, Thomas Dineen wrote:
When a customer says you have a quality problem then you have one.
Maybe you should ask for your money back...
Stop wasting you time and mine screaming at me and fix you bugs!!
This is a *community* project and since you are using this wonder
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> Bug reports are more useful than "it doesn't work".
I agree. That's why most of my problems are logged in bugzilla. But
they generally follow the standard Fedora bug lifecycle: bug is
created, then ignored for two releases, then closed bec
Am 15.01.2013 19:49, schrieb Thomas Dineen:
> Reindl Harald:
>
> I would rather have something unsupported that works than something that dose
> not work!
what YOU want does nobody interest in the context YOU SUGGEST
doing your mistakes to other persons
and as long you are running windows sto
Reindl Harald:
I would rather have something unsupported that works than something that
dose not work!
Quality like beauty is in the eye of the beholder!
When a customer says you have a quality problem then you have one.
Stop wasting you time and mine screaming at me and fix you bugs!!
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:29:05 -0800
Thomas Dineen wrote:
> Gentle People:
>
> My suggestion: Use Fedora 14 and immediately load all updates.
Which leaves you with a system that is dangerously insecure
If you want to run a long term Fedora like system from that era you want
to be running C
Am 15.01.2013 18:29, schrieb Thomas Dineen:
> Gentle People:
>
> My suggestion: Use Fedora 14 and immediately load all updates.
>
> Results from my testing:
> Fedora 17 x64 - Not usable way to many bugs.
> Fedora 17 x32 - Barely usable, not ready for prime time!
Am 15.01.2013 18:24, schrieb Tethys:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> where was F17 unstable?
>>
>> running in production since months for any sort of
>> servers, routers and gateways without a single crash
>
> Different environment, different experiences. My work d
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:29:05 -0800
Thomas Dineen wrote:
> Gentle People:
>
> My suggestion: Use Fedora 14 and immediately load all updates.
>
Never suggest to anyone that they use an unsupported version.
As they can be many security issues.
> I would suggest that the Fedora Gro
On 01/15/2013 06:29 PM, Thomas Dineen wrote:
Gentle People:
My suggestion: Use Fedora 14 and immediately load all updates.
At the risk of feeding the trolls... Which updates? It has been EOL for
ages, has not received (security) updates in ages and has more security
holes than swiss ch
On 01/15/2013 05:29 PM, Thomas Dineen wrote:
Gentle People:
My suggestion: Use Fedora 14 and immediately load all updates.
Results from my testing:
Fedora 17 x64 - Not usable way to many bugs.
Not sure what this has to do with F18 install methods but I'm using F17
x86
Gentle People:
My suggestion: Use Fedora 14 and immediately load all updates.
Results from my testing:
Fedora 17 x64 - Not usable way to many bugs.
Fedora 17 x32 - Barely usable, not ready for prime time!
I am staying with Fedora 14!
I would suggest th
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> where was F17 unstable?
>
> running in production since months for any sort of
> servers, routers and gateways without a single crash
Different environment, different experiences. My work desktop, running
an up to date F17, hangs solid pret
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:11:15 +
Tethys wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Bill Davidsen
> wrote:
>
> > After using every release from four on, 17 still looks like the
> > sweet spot between functionality and stability, hope this one is
> > in the ballpark.
>
> Uhhh... wow. Your exper
Am 15.01.2013 18:11, schrieb Tethys:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>> After using every release from four on, 17 still looks like the sweet spot
>> between functionality and stability, hope this one is in the ballpark.
>
> Uhhh... wow. Your experiences are very diff
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> After using every release from four on, 17 still looks like the sweet spot
> between functionality and stability, hope this one is in the ballpark.
Uhhh... wow. Your experiences are very different to mine. I've used
every RH and then Fedora
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Preupgrade has been deprecated for F18. Use Fedup
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp). As always, it's a good idea to
read the Release Notes
(http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Release_Notes/sect-Release_Notes-Changes_for_Sysadmin.html)
Typical Fedor
On 01/15/2013 04:09 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
>I have two different F-18 installs to deal with.
>
>F-18 beta upgraded almost daily, once more just now, do I need to do
>any more than that?
>
>and
>
>This F-17 XFCE Live install which is configured the way
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:09 -0500, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
> I have two different F-18 installs to deal with.
>
> F-18 beta upgraded almost daily, once more just now, do I need to do
> any more than that?
No.
> and
>
> This F-17 XFCE Live install which is co
I have two different F-18 installs to deal with.
F-18 beta upgraded almost daily, once more just now, do I need to do
any more than that?
and
This F-17 XFCE Live install which is configured the way I want it
and upgraded also. I downloaded both F-18 Live spins for XFCE and
21 matches
Mail list logo
