Noticed this same error in the logs, as I try to figure out if it's
related to the nvidia drivers being no longer loaded after yesterday's
updates.
I'm not sure if it's related, just suspecting it..
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 at 03:55, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/14/21 11:50 PM, Frank McCormick
On 1/14/21 11:50 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 1/14/21 6:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Hmmm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908005
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911038
_
Sounds like it has happened before ???
here too
On 1/14/21 6:13 PM, sixpack13 wrote:
> same here
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/
On 1/14/21 6:29 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:26 PM Frank McCormick wrote:
Saw a couple of errors in the middle of an update today on Fedora 33.
Couldn't figure out how to copy/paste so I have a small screenshot.
The system **seems** to work fine after this. Is it somet
On 1/14/21 6:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Hmmm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908005
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911038
_
Sounds like it has happened before ???
___
users m
Hmmm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908005
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911038
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduc
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:26 PM Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> Saw a couple of errors in the middle of an update today on Fedora 33.
>
> Couldn't figure out how to copy/paste so I have a small screenshot.
>
> The system **seems** to work fine after this. Is it something
> I should be concerned about?
same here
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedorapro
Saw a couple of errors in the middle of an update today on Fedora 33.
Couldn't figure out how to copy/paste so I have a small screenshot.
The system **seems** to work fine after this. Is it something
I should be concerned about?
Thanks
___
users mail
On 10/05/17 20:54, Corey Sheldon wrote:
> On 10/4/17 9:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 10/04/17 23:39, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> During the last update, I got:
>>>
>>> dnf update
>>>
>>> [DRPM 11/13] hplip-3.17.6-1.fc26_3.17.9-1.fc26.x86_64.drpm: done
>>> /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/policy.kern
On 10/04/17 23:39, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> During the last update, I got:
>
> dnf update
>
> [DRPM 11/13] hplip-3.17.6-1.fc26_3.17.9-1.fc26.x86_64.drpm: done
> /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/policy.kern: read error
> (tried to read 398 bytes from offset 3897904)
> cannot reconstruct rpm from disk
During the last update, I got:
dnf update
[DRPM 11/13] hplip-3.17.6-1.fc26_3.17.9-1.fc26.x86_64.drpm: done
/var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/policy.kern: read error
(tried to read 398 bytes from offset 3897904)
cannot reconstruct rpm from disk files
[DRPM 12/13] firefox-55.0.3-1.fc26_56.0-2.fc26.
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 22:56:33 +0100 Suvayu Ali
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:26:01PM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:28:03PM +0100, bitlord wrote:
> >
> > > I don't have any solutions for your problem, but do you have any other
> > > strange issues with your system,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:26:01PM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:28:03PM +0100, bitlord wrote:
>
> > I don't have any solutions for your problem, but do you have any other
> > strange issues with your system, crashes ...? Package checksums should
> > be verified before updat
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:28:03PM +0100, bitlord wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:50:12 +0100
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:57:36AM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > >
> > > While updating today, cpio failed on me randomly, twice! I see
> > > errors like this:
> > >
> > > Scr
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:50:12 +0100
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:57:36AM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> > While updating today, cpio failed on me randomly, twice! I see
> > errors like this:
> >
> > Scriptlet output:
> >1 error: unpacking of archive faile
Hello again,
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:57:36AM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> While updating today, cpio failed on me randomly, twice! I see errors
> like this:
>
> Scriptlet output:
>1 error: unpacking of archive failed on file
> /usr/share/doc/ffmpeg/COPYING.LGPLv3;54d881f2: cpio: open
>
Hi,
While updating today, cpio failed on me randomly, twice! I see errors
like this:
Scriptlet output:
1 error: unpacking of archive failed on file
/usr/share/doc/ffmpeg/COPYING.LGPLv3;54d881f2: cpio: open
2 error: ffmpeg-2.4.6-2.fc21.x86_64: install failed
Scriptlet output:
1 error:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:49:18AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 30.08.2013 00:46, schrieb Suvayu Ali:
> > Running transaction
> > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ARyh47: line 1: fg: no job control
> > error: %preun(nscd-2.17-13.fc19.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
> > Error in PREUN scriptlet in
Suvayu Ali gmail.com> writes:
> While updating my system today, I came across this issue:
>
> Running transaction
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ARyh47: line 1: fg: no job control
> error: %preun(nscd-2.17-13.fc19.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
> Error in PREUN scriptlet in rpm package nscd-2.17-13
Am 30.08.2013 00:46, schrieb Suvayu Ali:
> Running transaction
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ARyh47: line 1: fg: no job control
> error: %preun(nscd-2.17-13.fc19.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
> Error in PREUN scriptlet in rpm package nscd-2.17-13.fc19.x86_64
> Verifying : nscd-2.17-13.fc19.x86_
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:46:57 +0200
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While updating my system today, I came across this issue:
>
> Running transaction
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ARyh47: line 1: fg: no job control
> error: %preun(nscd-2.17-13.fc19.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status
> 1 Error in PREUN scrip
On 08/29/2013 03:46 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi,
While updating my system today, I came across this issue:
Running transaction
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ARyh47: line 1: fg: no job control
error: %preun(nscd-2.17-13.fc19.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
Error in PREUN scriptlet in rpm package nscd-2.
Hi,
While updating my system today, I came across this issue:
Running transaction
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ARyh47: line 1: fg: no job control
error: %preun(nscd-2.17-13.fc19.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
Error in PREUN scriptlet in rpm package nscd-2.17-13.fc19.x86_64
Verifying : nscd-2.17-1
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Deron Meranda wrote:
> One more interesting thing... I just completed my reboot, and my
> system now seems quite happy.
> However when I selected the kernel to use in the grub menu, it quickly said
>
> Loading Fedora (3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64)
>
> even though I had e
>> Thanks again everybody. Oh, any idea about the grubby error?
>
> Did you update from F15?
>
> You probably have /etc/grub.cfg and /boot/grub left lying around. That
> confuses grubby. You can remove /etc/grub.cfg to shut it up, then, in a few
> /boot/grub.
Yes, it was an upgrade from F15, whi
Deron Meranda writes:
Thanks again everybody. Oh, any idea about the grubby error?
Did you update from F15?
You probably have /etc/grub.cfg and /boot/grub left lying around. That
confuses grubby. You can remove /etc/grub.cfg to shut it up, then, in a few
months, once the confidence level
Kevin Fenzi said:
> ok. Then I fear you will need to go to:
>
> package-cleanup --cleandupes
Great news. I think I've finally got my system back to a clean and
updated state! Thanks everybody who helped. I only have one curious
error message about a missing grubby template (explained toward the
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:36:47 -0500
Deron Meranda wrote:
> > I'll suggest again:
> >
> > yum history redo last
> >
> > (or you may need to find out which tansaction it was with 'yum
> > history list' and then use that number instead of 'last')
>
>
> Thanks. I read right over that the first time.
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:36:47 -0500
Deron Meranda wrote:
> And then doing a "yum check" again confirms that it is still confused
> and has multiple versions installed.
The last time I got in this state, I finally resorted to
doing low-level rpm commands to remove the old versions of
the duplicates
> I'll suggest again:
>
> yum history redo last
>
> (or you may need to find out which tansaction it was with 'yum history
> list' and then use that number instead of 'last')
Thanks. I read right over that the first time.
Unfortunately it doesn't seem to have worked
# yum history redo last
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:45:14 -0500
Deron Meranda wrote:
...snip...
> How can I clean all this up? I tried just re-running the yum update
> on the specific packages, but it complains, such as:
>
>Error: Protected multilib versions: at-3.1.13-5.fc16.x86_64 !=
> at-3.1.13-3.fc16.x86_64
>
>
I have run an rpm verify against all of the packages that were part of
the crashed yum update:
at-3.1.13-5.fc16.x86_64
bind-libs-9.8.1-4.P1.fc16.x86_64
bind-9.8.1-4.P1.fc16.x86_64
bind-license-9.8.1-4.P1.fc16.noarch
facter-1.6.2-1.fc16.noarch
kernel-3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64
kernel-headers-3.1.1-2.fc16.
I ran the yum-complete-transaction but it seems to have refused to run
(output below).
# yum-complete-transaction
...
There are 1 outstanding transactions to complete. Finishing the most recent one
The remaining transaction had 10 elements left to run
--> Running transaction check
---> Package at.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 16:03 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:39:48 -0700
>> > T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm surprised YUM didn't tell you to run "yum
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 16:07 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> >Google indicates that there used to be a "package-cleanup"
> > argument to shut it up, but it doesn't seem to exist anymore. :-(
>
> $ rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/bin/package-cleanup
> yum-utils-1.1.28-1.fc14.noarch
Correct. package-cleanu
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 16:03 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:39:48 -0700
> > T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> >
> >> I'm surprised YUM didn't tell you to run "yum-complete-transaction".
> >> I'd try running that first to s
If you've not done any more yum commands that change things
(installs/upgrades/removals), do:
yum history redo last
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:39:48 -0700
> T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
>> I'm surprised YUM didn't tell you to run "yum-complete-transaction".
>> I'd try running that first to see if that can clear up your errors.
>
> As near as I can tell, yum only
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:39:48 -0700
T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> I'm surprised YUM didn't tell you to run "yum-complete-transaction".
> I'd try running that first to see if that can clear up your errors.
As near as I can tell, yum only prints the message about running
"yu-complete-transaction" when
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Deron Meranda wrote:
> Some more information,
>
> I did a "rpm --verify kernel-3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64". All of the files
> seem to be okay and they all have the verify flags of "5S...",
> nothing else.
>
> As far as grub, the 3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64 revision of the k
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Deron Meranda wrote:
> What are my next steps? If it was just a normal application package,
> I'd force a yum re-install. But since this happened during a kernel
> update, I don't want to risk messing my system up further.
I'm surprised YUM didn't tell you to run
Some more information,
I did a "rpm --verify kernel-3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64". All of the files
seem to be okay and they all have the verify flags of "5S...",
nothing else.
As far as grub, the 3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64 revision of the kernel is
listed in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg. However I'm still running
I'm running Fedora 16 and I attempted to install the most recent set
of released updates (from fedora-updates - I'm not using the testing
repo), using "yum update".
While it was installing the kernel package
(kernel-3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64), the entire system locked up. It was
unresponsive to anything
44 matches
Mail list logo
