On 08/03/2011 04:57 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 05:51pm on Tuesday, August 02, 2011 (UK time), Tom H scrawled:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
>>>
>>> I know. If you read my website it says that the firewall can cause a
>>> file to be read-only.
>>
>> Which firewall s
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 05:51pm on Tuesday, August 02, 2011 (UK time), Tom H scrawled:
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
>> >
>> > I know. If you read my website it says that the firewall can cause a
>> > file to be read-only.
>>
>> Which
Around 05:51pm on Tuesday, August 02, 2011 (UK time), Tom H scrawled:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
> >
> > I know. If you read my website it says that the firewall can cause a
> > file to be read-only.
>
> Which firewall settings cause NFS exports to be ro?
I already po
On 08/03/2011 02:05 AM, Tom H wrote:
> NFSv4 works without Kerberos or LDAP/NIS/NIS+.
Of course it does, but can the permissions be exported per user by
UID/GID mask or are the exports still blanket ro/rw (which is the real
point of this thread)? Further, can you escape from the nfs_mount_t
co
2011/8/1 夜神 岩男 :
> You can achieve the same user and group permissions on the clients as on
> the server, but you have to create the users and groups on the server
> side to get this and you must use some form of authentication across the
> network. The server exports the user names and group nam
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
>
> I know. If you read my website it says that the firewall can cause a
> file to be read-only.
Which firewall settings cause NFS exports to be ro?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
2011/8/1 夜神 岩男 :
> On 08/01/2011 10:25 PM, Jatin K wrote:
>> On Monday 01 August 2011 06:41 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2011 09:59 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/01/2011 08:03 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
...
> NFSv4 has become both more awesome and more complex.
> Before getting into
On 08/02/2011 01:09 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
> On 08/01/2011 07:41 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>> I have really been meaning to collect my notes about small/medium office
>> Kerberos/LDAP/NFSv4 setup and write a small series on how to do this
>> without giving up, settling for less (ie. logically unauthenticate
On Monday 01 August 2011 08:11 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
> On 08/01/2011 10:25 PM, Jatin K wrote:
>> On Monday 01 August 2011 06:41 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2011 09:59 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/01/2011 08:03 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
...
> NFSv4 has become both more awesome and more com
On 08/01/2011 07:41 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
> On 08/01/2011 10:25 PM, Jatin K wrote:
>> On Monday 01 August 2011 06:41 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2011 09:59 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 08/01/2011 08:03 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
...
> NFSv4 has become both more awesome and more complex.
>
On 08/01/2011 10:25 PM, Jatin K wrote:
> On Monday 01 August 2011 06:41 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>> On 08/01/2011 09:59 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2011 08:03 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
NFSv4 has become both more awesome and more complex.
Before getting into specific issues that can
On Monday 01 August 2011 06:41 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
> On 08/01/2011 09:59 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
>> On 08/01/2011 08:03 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> NFSv4 has become both more awesome and more complex.
>>> Before getting into specific issues that can cause this...
>>>
>> If you intend to use POSIX
On 08/01/2011 09:59 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 08/01/2011 08:03 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
> ...
>
>> NFSv4 has become both more awesome and more complex.
>> Before getting into specific issues that can cause this...
>>
>
> If you intend to use POSIX ACLs with NFSv4 forget about it, because user
> umask
On 08/01/2011 08:03 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
...
> NFSv4 has become both more awesome and more complex.
> Before getting into specific issues that can cause this...
>
If you intend to use POSIX ACLs with NFSv4 forget about it, because user
umask is always applied at the client side over the default POSI
Around 01:47pm on Monday, August 01, 2011 (UK time), Jatin K scrawled:
> On Monday 01 August 2011 02:18 PM, Steve Searle wrote:
> > Around 09:23am on Monday, August 01, 2011 (UK time), Jatin K scrawled:
> >
> >> what should be the permission of NFS shared directory on RHEL6 ???
> >>
> >> I've shar
On Monday 01 August 2011 02:18 PM, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 09:23am on Monday, August 01, 2011 (UK time), Jatin K scrawled:
>
>> what should be the permission of NFS shared directory on RHEL6 ???
>>
>> I've shared a directory on rhel 6 ...following are the configuration done
> You might need t
On Monday 01 August 2011 02:00 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Jatin K wrote:
>> Dear all
>>
>> what should be the permission of NFS shared directory on RHEL6 ???
>>
>> I've shared a directory on rhel 6 ...following are the configuration done
>>
>> created a directory /office
>>
>> --/etc/exports--
On 08/01/2011 05:23 PM, Jatin K wrote:
> Dear all
>
> what should be the permission of NFS shared directory on RHEL6 ???
>
> I've shared a directory on rhel 6 ...following are the configuration done
>
> created a directory /office
>
> --/etc/exports
> /office *.officebox.local(rw,sync)
>
>
>
>
Around 09:23am on Monday, August 01, 2011 (UK time), Jatin K scrawled:
> what should be the permission of NFS shared directory on RHEL6 ???
>
> I've shared a directory on rhel 6 ...following are the configuration done
You might need to change the firewall configuration on the NFS server.
There
Jatin K wrote:
> Dear all
>
> what should be the permission of NFS shared directory on RHEL6 ???
>
> I've shared a directory on rhel 6 ...following are the configuration done
>
> created a directory /office
>
> --/etc/exports
> /office *.officebox.local(rw,sync)
>
>
>
> ---ls -ld /offic
Dear all
what should be the permission of NFS shared directory on RHEL6 ???
I've shared a directory on rhel 6 ...following are the configuration done
created a directory /office
--/etc/exports
/office *.officebox.local(rw,sync)
---ls -ld /office
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Aug 1 13:4
Dear Experts,
Please help me with my red hat linux problem.
I am sure this might be the easy for you guys.
I am managed to set up transfer protocol from my red hat linux to the unix
machine via gFTP 2.0.17
When I tried to transfer the file accross, its always come with
Error: Cannot open loc
22 matches
Mail list logo