Tim:
> > In the olden days, it was often the people that insisted on installing
> > absolutely every package, and would install mutually exclusive things,
> > and half-baked programs that were far from ready for general use.
Stephen Morris:
> That was probably me, there used to be installation me
On 30/11/24 20:14, Tim via users wrote:
On Sat, 2024-11-30 at 10:09 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
I've checked the fedora updates repo and the source repo is indeed
not enable, so it wasn't that.
I thought I might have had it enabled as in the past I've been in a
situation where having the kernel
On Sat, 2024-11-30 at 10:09 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I've checked the fedora updates repo and the source repo is indeed
> not enable, so it wasn't that.
> I thought I might have had it enabled as in the past I've been in a
> situation where having the kernel headers installed was not good
> e
Tim:
> > Dunno. I could guess that those servers are under continual heavy load
> > and things might hiccup more noticeably.
Stephen Morris:
> I ran another dnf upgrade this morning and got the same issue with
> the google-chrome repository, but also the docker and Fedora updates
> repositories,
On 29/11/24 16:27, Tim via users wrote:
On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 09:21 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
I assumed it was because was refreshing the updates repository and
the updates source repository and both of them had the same display
name.
The source repo is usually not enabled. And therefore co
On 29/11/24 16:24, Tim via users wrote:
On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 09:13 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
I have the number of parallel downloads set to 8 is obvious when the
packages are being downloaded, hence if parallelism is at play here,
why consistently those two rather than others as well?
Dunno
On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 09:21 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I assumed it was because was refreshing the updates repository and
> the updates source repository and both of them had the same display
> name.
The source repo is usually not enabled. And therefore completely
ignored during general updat
On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 09:13 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I have the number of parallel downloads set to 8 is obvious when the
> packages are being downloaded, hence if parallelism is at play here,
> why consistently those two rather than others as well?
Dunno. I could guess that those servers a
On 28/11/24 15:21, Tim via users wrote:
On Thu, 2024-11-28 at 09:19 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
I forced a refresh and below is the info requested. I've also just
noticed that the refresh and load is also being done twice for the
Fedora 41 repository as well. I've also listed the contents of th
On 29/11/24 04:51, home user via users wrote:
(on 2024-11-26, Stephen Morris said)
When I issue the command "sudo dnf upgrade", and it decides it needs
to update and refresh all repositories, with the command I've just
issued I noticed that it refreshed the google-chrome repository
twice. Why
(on 2024-11-26, Stephen Morris said)
When I issue the command "sudo dnf upgrade", and it decides it needs
to update and refresh all repositories, with the command I've just
issued I noticed that it refreshed the google-chrome repository
twice. Why is DNF doing that when there is only one reposi
On Thu, 2024-11-28 at 09:19 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I forced a refresh and below is the info requested. I've also just
> noticed that the refresh and load is also being done twice for the
> Fedora 41 repository as well. I've also listed the contents of the
> google-chrome.repo.
>
> sudo dnf
On 27/11/24 12:59, Tim via users wrote:
On Wed, 2024-11-27 at 09:20 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
When I issue the command "sudo dnf upgrade", and it decides it needs
to update and refresh all repositories, with the command I've just
issued I noticed that it refreshed the google-chrome repository
On Wed, 2024-11-27 at 09:20 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> When I issue the command "sudo dnf upgrade", and it decides it needs
> to update and refresh all repositories, with the command I've just
> issued I noticed that it refreshed the google-chrome repository
> twice. Why is DNF doing that when
> On 26 Nov 2024, at 22:21, Stephen Morris wrote:
>
> Hi,
> When I issue the command "sudo dnf upgrade", and it decides it needs to
> update and refresh all repositories, with the command I've just issued I
> noticed that it refreshed the google-chrome repository twice. Why is DNF
> do
Hi,
When I issue the command "sudo dnf upgrade", and it decides it
needs to update and refresh all repositories, with the command I've just
issued I noticed that it refreshed the google-chrome repository twice.
Why is DNF doing that when there is only one repository definition in
the .repo
16 matches
Mail list logo
