On 08/06/11 10:29, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 22:35 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>> Changing Saturation to 200 did the trick.
>
> It would be helpful if you could file a bug report so that we can
> hopefully make that the default behaviour for that printer at 100%
> saturation in futur
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 22:35 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> Changing Saturation to 200 did the trick.
It would be helpful if you could file a bug report so that we can
hopefully make that the default behaviour for that printer at 100%
saturation in future.
Thanks,
Tim.
*/
signature.asc
Descripti
On 07/06/11 17:56, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 03/06/11 00:29, Konstantin Svist wrote:
>> On 06/02/2011 03:14 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>>> I have an HP Photosmart 8400 printer which can be accessed from both a
>>> linux box
>>> and a windows box. When printing the same image from the two boxes the
On 03/06/11 00:29, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 03:14 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>> I have an HP Photosmart 8400 printer which can be accessed from both a linux
>> box
>> and a windows box. When printing the same image from the two boxes the
>> windows
>> print is far superior to the lin
On 06/02/2011 03:14 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> I have an HP Photosmart 8400 printer which can be accessed from both a linux
> box
> and a windows box. When printing the same image from the two boxes the windows
> print is far superior to the linux print. I have used for testing an image
> scanned
I have an HP Photosmart 8400 printer which can be accessed from both a linux
box
and a windows box. When printing the same image from the two boxes the windows
print is far superior to the linux print. I have used for testing an image
scanned by a flat bed scanner (HP ScanJet 7400c) and the col
