also one another observation - this does _not_ happen
Chrome's window is full-screen.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fe
Hi guys.
Since a few days back, my Chrome's tabs lost background -
I'm using dark theme so won't tell how it does otherwise -
only tab's text is there, kind of, but the whole tab (top
bar tab) is translucent, whatever is underneath shows.
It's now a matter of Chrome's setting - those I did not
lowing setup:
> >
> > I start Xephyr with:
> >
> > Xephyr :99 -screen 1920x1080 -ac -br -noreset &
> >
> > Then, I launch Openbox inside the Xephyr display:
> >
> > DISPLAY=:99 openbox &
> >
> > Inside Openbox, I open Chrome.
LAY=:99 openbox &
>
> Inside Openbox, I open Chrome.
>
> When I try to save a page in Chrome using Ctrl + S, the save dialog
> window pops up as expected. However, I’m unable to interact with this
> dialog window using xdotool. It seems the dialog is not reachable or
>
Dear All,
I’m currently working with the following setup:
I start Xephyr with:
Xephyr :99 -screen 1920x1080 -ac -br -noreset &
Then, I launch Openbox inside the Xephyr display:
DISPLAY=:99 openbox &
Inside Openbox, I open Chrome.
When I try to save a page in Chrome using Ctrl + S,
s ok [y/N]: y
The key was successfully imported.
Transaction failed: Signature verification failed.
OpenPGP check for package "google-chrome-stable-133.0.6943.53-1.x86_64"
(/var/cache/libdnf5/google-chrome-beta-6ed7e4f336f6863c/packages/goo
gle-chrome-stable-133.0.6943.53-1.x86_64.rpm) from
On Fri, 2024-11-08 at 17:19 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> So my question is, how do I get a middle click to lower a PWA app in
> KDE? I have not been able to find any articles on how to enable title
> bars in Chrome apps, although I may be searching using the wrong terms.
>
use a fair number of Chrome applications (PWAs - see
https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/9658361) for things like Google
Calendar, Google Chat, Google Messages for Web, and Slack (I know about
the Slack app for Linux, but I've had wonky results with it, so I prefer
a PWA).
Now, und
The solution to this was upgrading to Fedora 40. Was running FC37.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 1:01 AM Sreyan Chakravarty
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am facing the annoying problem of not having any sound in Google Chrome
> or any other web browser.
>
> All other places the sound works fin
Hi,
I am facing the annoying problem of not having any sound in Google Chrome
or any other web browser.
All other places the sound works fine(playing an audio or video file from
disk).
Please help and let me know if any diagnostic information is needed.
--
Regards,
Sreyan Chakravarty
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 12:48 PM Jonathan Billings
wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2024, at 15:32, Neal Becker wrote:
> > But I don't think it worked, because I don't see these options in ps.
> Also the original said:
> > Exec=/usr/bin/google-chrome-stable --incognito
On Jul 30, 2024, at 15:32, Neal Becker wrote:
> But I don't think it worked, because I don't see these options in ps. Also
> the original said:
> Exec=/usr/bin/google-chrome-stable --incognito
Are you positive you edited *EVERY* Exec line in the file? The incognito entry
/share/applications take precedence over
>>>> .desktop files with the same name in /usr/share/applications and you can
>>>> hack up the ones in your home directory all day long - worst that could
>>>> happen is you'd do it wrong and have to start over b
in your home directory all day long - worst that could
>>> happen is you'd do it wrong and have to start over but the original
>>> .desktop file is still on your system :)
>>
>> I tried copying /usr/share/applications/google-chrome.desktop to
> ~/.local/share/a
sktop file is still on your system :)
>
> I tried copying /usr/share/applications/google-chrome.desktop to
~/.local/share/applications and then modifying to say:
Exec=/usr/bin/google-chrome-stable enable-features=UseOzonePlatform
--ozone-platform=wayland
But I don't think it worked,
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 15:38, Will McDonald wrote:
> The default behaviour for the desktop application invocation will be
> in /usr/share/applications/google-chrome.desktop in the Exec definition if
> you don't mind hacking packaged files.
>
> There's probably a canonical mechanism to override th
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 15:32, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> On 7/30/24 10:28, Will McDonald wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 15:12, Daniel Walsh wrote:
>
>> On 7/30/24 10:01, George N. White III
>>
>> Fedora 40.
>>
>> $ rpm -q google-chrome-stable goog
On 7/30/24 10:28, Will McDonald wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 15:12, Daniel Walsh wrote:
On 7/30/24 10:01, George N. White III
Fedora 40.
$ rpm -q google-chrome-stable google-chrome-unstable
google-chrome-stable-127.0.6533.72-1.x86_64
google-chrome-unstable-129.0.6614.3-1
On 7/30/24 10:28, Will McDonald wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 15:12, Daniel Walsh wrote:
On 7/30/24 10:01, George N. White III
Fedora 40.
$ rpm -q google-chrome-stable google-chrome-unstable
google-chrome-stable-127.0.6533.72-1.x86_64
google-chrome-unstable-129.0.6614.3-1
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 15:12, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> On 7/30/24 10:01, George N. White III
>
> Fedora 40.
>
> $ rpm -q google-chrome-stable google-chrome-unstable
> google-chrome-stable-127.0.6533.72-1.x86_64
> google-chrome-unstable-129.0.6614.3-1.x86_64
>
> Happened
.
Could help to mention the Fedora version, whether it is fully updated,
and what
has changed since the last time it worked.
You may find useful details with "journalctl --no-hostname -b -g
google-chrome".
--
George N. White III
Fedora 40.
$ rpm -q google-chrome-stable google-chrom
ersion, whether it is fully updated, and
what
has changed since the last time it worked.
You may find useful details with "journalctl --no-hostname -b -g
google-chrome".
--
George N. White III
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedora
On 7/30/24 06:09, Alex Gurenko wrote:
for i in $(find ~/.config ~/.var -type d -name "GPUCache" 2>/dev/null); do rm
-ri ${i}; done
Thanks but that did not fix it.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
Have you tried gpucache clean trick? It's actually been a while since it was
triggered for me personally (fixed at some point?), but maybe worth a shot:
```
for i in $(find ~/.config ~/.var -type d -name "GPUCache" 2>/dev/null); do rm
-ri ${i}; done
```
---
Best regards, Alex
On Tuesday, Ju
I have destroyed $HOME/.config/google\* $HOME/.cache/goolge* and still
does not work.
Anyone else see this happen?
I have checked SELinux and it is not causing the problem.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 9:45 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:34 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> After installing this morning's large set of updates I rebooted into
>> 6.9.9. Now chrome doesn't work, every process is crashing. After
>> reboot
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:34 AM Neal Becker wrote:
> After installing this morning's large set of updates I rebooted into
> 6.9.9. Now chrome doesn't work, every process is crashing. After
> rebooting, restarting chrome the problem persists. Finally I rebooted into
> 6.
On 22 Jul 2024, at 12:34, Neal Becker wrote:After installing this morning's large set of updates I rebooted into 6.9.9. Now chrome doesn't work, every process is crashing. After rebooting, restarting chrome the problem persists. Finally I rebooted into 6.9.8 and chrome is fine.Yo
After installing this morning's large set of updates I rebooted into
6.9.9. Now chrome doesn't work, every process is crashing. After
rebooting, restarting chrome the problem persists. Finally I rebooted into
6.9.8 and chrome is fine.
--
___
On Tue, 2024-07-16 at 13:43 +, Enrique Artal wrote:
> I am not sure what you mean. I try to be more direct.
This is a perfect illustration of what I mean, and shows that you
didn't understand my comment, which has nothing to do with your
question about certificates but about how you are answer
I am not sure what you mean. I try to be more direct.
I use to import certificates that identify me in browswers, mainly Firefox and
Google-chrome. In my case, there are pk12 certificates issued by Spanish
administration. I have used them in several versions of Fedora with no issue.
Recently I
On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 17:16 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> To reiterate, when replying with HyperKitty, please quote some context.
> HK doesn't do this automatically and many (most) of us are reading your
> post on the mailing list rather than the web.
Even on webpages, replies like that are
On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 06:09 +, Enrique Artal wrote:
> At least in Spain certificates are used to sign official documents
> with okular or with a software called autofirma, and it works fine in
> Fedora 40. It is also possible to sign using browsers and
> certificates in browsers serve to be ide
At least in Spain certificates are used to sign official documents with okular
or with a software called autofirma, and it works fine in Fedora 40. It is also
possible to sign using browsers and certificates in browsers serve to be
identified (mainly in official sites). To do this, one needs to
On Sun, 2024-07-14 at 07:59 +, Enrique Artal wrote:
> I confirm you are right. Thanks!
Who is right about what? Many (possibly most) people are reading this
in their mail client, not on a web browser, so it's important to quote
some context to make the reply understandable.
poc
--
__
I confirm you are right. Thanks!
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Gu
it in google-chrome (still not in firefox).
You can check your current cryptography policy by running:
update-crypto-policy --show
It should return DEFAULT
If you set it to LEGACY (update-crypto-policy --set LEGACY) does it work? If
this is the case, most likely the encryption type is simply n
stored inside
firefox or google-chrome to be accessed from the browser.
In an older Fedora 40 installation (and in previous Fedora releases) all of
this worked out flawlessly. I started to have issues in this new installation,
such that I decided to reinstall it again in case there were some issues
On Sun, 2024-06-30 at 18:17 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/30/24 2:41 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
> > For me when an update happens for firefox (not sure if it is a
> > firefox
> > update or just some libraries it uses, or both) it does not crash
> > (that I notice) but simply stops working (web page
On 6/30/24 2:41 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
For me when an update happens for firefox (not sure if it is a firefox
update or just some libraries it uses, or both) it does not crash
(that I notice) but simply stops working (web page refresh and other
things don't work anymore).
You shouldn't update
uns okay) for execheap, which appears to be related to
mprotect() calls. It's possible that from run to run, the memory layout
happens to be a little different, and eventually it's "okay".
IIRC there's been kernel changes in that area recently (related to some
work being done
akage) is happening for chromium also.
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 12:20 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Jeffrey Walton said:
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 12:52 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> > > After some recent updates, I seem to get an illegal instruction the
> > &g
Once upon a time, Jeffrey Walton said:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 12:52 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> > After some recent updates, I seem to get an illegal instruction the
> > first time or two I start Chrome/Chromium after boot. If I close it and
> > reopen it a time or two, i
Once upon a time, Tom Horsley said:
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:52:06 -0500
> Chris Adams wrote:
> > Not sure if this is a problem with Chrome/Chromium, some library
> > dependency, or even the kernel.
>
> Don't discount memory or disk problems either, though int3 seem
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 12:52 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> After some recent updates, I seem to get an illegal instruction the
> first time or two I start Chrome/Chromium after boot. If I close it and
> reopen it a time or two, it'll work like normal from that point on,
>
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:52:06 -0500
Chris Adams wrote:
> Not sure if this is a problem with Chrome/Chromium, some library
> dependency, or even the kernel.
Don't discount memory or disk problems either, though int3 seems like
something deliberate (usually used as a breakpoint b
After some recent updates, I seem to get an illegal instruction the
first time or two I start Chrome/Chromium after boot. If I close it and
reopen it a time or two, it'll work like normal from that point on,
until I reboot again. It's the weirdest thing, I can't think of
anything
This is happening to me as well.
uname -r
6.8.9-200.fc39.x86_64
but
there is no /etc/cron.daily/google-chrome
(the directory exists but only contains google-earth-pro)
On 2/14/24 08:57, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:46:15 -0500
Neal Becker wrote:
The GPG keys listed for the
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 9:17 AM Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:06:44 -0500
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
> > running /etc/cron.daily/google-chrome gives:
>
> I just ignore any gibberish it prints and do the update again,
> always seems to work for me.
> --
>
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:06:44 -0500
Neal Becker wrote:
> running /etc/cron.daily/google-chrome gives:
I just ignore any gibberish it prints and do the update again,
always seems to work for me.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:58 AM Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:46:15 -0500
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
> > The GPG keys listed for the "google-chrome" repository are already
> > installed but they are not correct for this package.
>
> After getting t
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:46:15 -0500
Neal Becker wrote:
> The GPG keys listed for the "google-chrome" repository are already
> installed but they are not correct for this package.
After getting this many times, I finally figured out I need to
manually run /etc/cron.daily/google-c
Today's dnf update fails with:
The GPG keys listed for the "google-chrome" repository are already
installed but they are not correct for this package.
Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository..
Failing package is: google-chrome-stable-121.0.6167.184-1.x
On Nov 1, 2023, at 18:25, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Sorry for the late response, I wasn't aware that google-chrome was in the
> fedora repositories, as the only way I've been able to get chrome was to
> installed the chrome specific repo. From the bug track above, there is an
On 23/10/23 02:25, Tim Evans wrote:
On 10/21/23 20:12, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 11/10/23 21:59, Neal Becker wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 7:46 PM Tim Evans wrote:
On 10/10/23 18:38, Tim Evans wrote:
> Usually, dnf updates take care of updating Google Chrome.
Lately,
On 10/21/23 20:12, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 11/10/23 21:59, Neal Becker wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 7:46 PM Tim Evans wrote:
On 10/10/23 18:38, Tim Evans wrote:
> Usually, dnf updates take care of updating Google Chrome.
Lately, for
> the past week or so, h
On 11/10/23 21:59, Neal Becker wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 7:46 PM Tim Evans wrote:
On 10/10/23 18:38, Tim Evans wrote:
> Usually, dnf updates take care of updating Google Chrome.
Lately, for
> the past week or so, however, there's a big pink button
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 7:46 PM Tim Evans wrote:
> On 10/10/23 18:38, Tim Evans wrote:
> > Usually, dnf updates take care of updating Google Chrome. Lately, for
> > the past week or so, however, there's a big pink button in Chrome's
> > status bar labeled "
On 10/10/23 18:38, Tim Evans wrote:
Usually, dnf updates take care of updating Google Chrome. Lately, for
the past week or so, however, there's a big pink button in Chrome's
status bar labeled "Update," but dnf insists I have the latest version
(google-chrome-stable-115
Don't know if it is relevant, but a few weeks ago google chrome
utterly refused to update due to some mysterious error it printed
meaningless gibberish about.
I uninstalled it completely, and downloaded new rpm from scratch from the
google download site. I installed it again, and it has been
On 10/10/23 19:11, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Tim Evans said:
Usually, dnf updates take care of updating Google Chrome. Lately,
for the past week or so, however, there's a big pink button in
Chrome's status bar labeled "Update," but dnf insists I have the
la
On 10/10/23 15:38, Tim Evans wrote:
Usually, dnf updates take care of updating Google Chrome. Lately, for
the past week or so, however, there's a big pink button in Chrome's
status bar labeled "Update," but dnf insists I have the latest version
(google-chrome-stable-115
Once upon a time, Tim Evans said:
> Usually, dnf updates take care of updating Google Chrome. Lately,
> for the past week or so, however, there's a big pink button in
> Chrome's status bar labeled "Update," but dnf insists I have the
> latest version (google-chrom
Usually, dnf updates take care of updating Google Chrome. Lately, for
the past week or so, however, there's a big pink button in Chrome's
status bar labeled "Update," but dnf insists I have the latest version
(google-chrome-stable-115.0.5790.110-1.x86_64).
If you click t
On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 13:37 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I'm sure it hasn't always been this way. I'm using kde desktop.
> After I login, 1st thing I usually do is start chrome. But recently
> when I do this, chrome window doesn't appear for a long time.
>
I'm sure it hasn't always been this way. I'm using kde desktop. After I
login, 1st thing I usually do is start chrome. But recently when I do
this, chrome window doesn't appear for a long time. Eventually, a dialog
box pops up asking me to unlock my wallet, or something li
On Sun, 2023-06-04 at 09:41 -0400, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using fedora37 on my desktop, and it appears a recent update
> caused google-chrome-stable-114.0.5735.90-1.x86_64 to no longer play
> DRM
> protected content like Netflix. I've installed all the latest
&
Hi,
I'm using fedora37 on my desktop, and it appears a recent update
caused google-chrome-stable-114.0.5735.90-1.x86_64 to no longer play DRM
protected content like Netflix. I've installed all the latest updates.
Anyone know what changed?
I've confirmed that protected conten
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 5:40 PM Neal Becker wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 2:17 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 1:13 PM steven stern wrote:
>> >
>> > Something in one of the updates I installed today (but not Chrome) has
>> >
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 2:17 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 1:13 PM steven stern wrote:
> >
> > Something in one of the updates I installed today (but not Chrome) has
> > broken chrome. It's now showing any text. Ideas?
> > https://i.i
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 1:13 PM steven stern wrote:
>
> Something in one of the updates I installed today (but not Chrome) has
> broken chrome. It's now showing any text. Ideas?
> https://i.imgur.com/5DsPMMe.png
Someone reported something similar on Reddit at r/Fedora,
https:/
Something in one of the updates I installed today (but not Chrome) has
broken chrome. It's now showing any text. Ideas?
https://i.imgur.com/5DsPMMe.png
(No, not using Chrome isn't really an option.)
___
users mailing lis
After updating f37->f38, now chrome-stable is unusable. This is intel
graphics.
The displays of all web pages are unreadable.
I tried installing google-chrome-beta, and this seems to be working fine.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Neal
___
users mailing l
I did visit that page. Alas, not much help. I needed to reinstall F37.
First thing I did was to install chrome from rps. Working fine now.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 9:38 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 5:26 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> >
> > On S
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 5:26 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2022-12-11 at 13:34 -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > So, no joy. Chrome help suggests closing other apps, and then (the
> > ultimate windows fix) reboot. That's given me trouble in the pas
Reinstalled from live and -- first thing--installed chrome, No problems.
Should the problem reoccur I'l delete them, although they are very few.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 5:26 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-12-11 at 13:34 -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> > So, n
On Sun, 2022-12-11 at 13:34 -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> So, no joy. Chrome help suggests closing other apps, and then (the
> ultimate windows fix) reboot. That's given me trouble in the past,
> but I'll try anything :-)
Did you disable extensions? That's usually the
On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 09:02:27 -0700
stan via users wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 09:06:40 -0800
> Geoffrey Leach wrote:
>
> > Firefox (which is installed by the install process) runs without any
> > problems.
>
> Does chrome then start successfully after you exit
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 09:06:40 -0800
Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> Firefox (which is installed by the install process) runs without any
> problems.
Does chrome then start successfully after you exit firefox?
I just had a recollection that part of the vaapi stack in mesa was
removed because of
El 10/12/2022 a las 17:08, Geoffrey Leach escribió:
New install of Fedora 37. Everything seems t be working, except for
Google's chrome (both flavors). Does anyone have a workaround?
Thanks.
___
Did you tried Chr
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 09:45:56 -0700
stan via users wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 08:08:14 -0800
> Geoffrey Leach wrote:
>
> > New install of Fedora 37. Everything seems t be working, except for
> > Google's chrome (both flavors). Does anyone have a workaround?
>
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 08:08:14 -0800
Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> New install of Fedora 37. Everything seems t be working, except for
> Google's chrome (both flavors). Does anyone have a workaround?
>
> Thanks.
Do any other browsers work? I run the development version of firef
New install of Fedora 37. Everything seems t be working, except for
Google's chrome (both flavors). Does anyone have a workaround?
Thanks.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to use
On 7/12/22 01:02, Chris Adams wrote:
I upgraded several systems from Fedora 35 to 37 a few weeks ago. I
realized yesterday that one (my primary desktop of course) was not
getting updates to Google Chrome, which has had some important security
fixes recently. I realized that the Google Chrome
thenameoftheprogram@theversionoftheprogram
I believe you understand some of begun are to install chrome for example with
this:
npm install chrome
I hope help the community with those examples,
Regards.
Dorian Rosse.
From: Roger Heflin
Sent: Tuesday, December 6
ded several systems from Fedora 35 to 37 a few weeks ago. I
> realized yesterday that one (my primary desktop of course) was not
> getting updates to Google Chrome, which has had some important security
> fixes recently. I realized that the Google Chrome yum repo had been
> disabled - chec
I upgraded several systems from Fedora 35 to 37 a few weeks ago. I
realized yesterday that one (my primary desktop of course) was not
getting updates to Google Chrome, which has had some important security
fixes recently. I realized that the Google Chrome yum repo had been
disabled - checking my
Bonjour,
Since an update (I can't remember when...) google-chrome changes my
sound status at strartup: whatever the settings of loud-speakers and mic
are, it opens them and sets them at 50% each.
How to forbid chrome to do that?
Thank you.
google chrome v 94.0.4606.81
--
François
What video card do you have in this laptop? I had a problems with a
lenovo X1 where the whole display was jumping and it was related to the
i915 driver, had to add i915.enable_dc=2 to my kernel boot params to
stop it.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 04:47:02PM +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-1
On Fri, 2021-10-29 at 14:55 +1100, Philip Rhoades via users wrote:
> I still have problems using the up / down cursor keys, PgUp / PgDn
> keys, mouse wheel for moving around on web pages - there is usually a
> second or more delay and then a jump . .
>
> Admittedly I do tend to load up the browser
People,
I have had a reasonably powerful PC for the last few Fedora versions:
i7-7700K CPU @ 4.20GHz 8 core
32GB RAM
40GB Swap
50% free on 4TB Seagate drive
and even though the PC seems unloaded according to Glances eg:
< 40% CPU loading
< 80 RAM used
~ 1% Swap used
- Disk IO m
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 06:53, lejeczek via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> .. or is it Mesa and/or 'amdgpu'?
>
> Hi guys.
>
> Lately, I'd say for ~1 month, my Chrome has been really
> misbehaving even to the point when becomes unresponsive
.. or is it Mesa and/or 'amdgpu'?
Hi guys.
Lately, I'd say for ~1 month, my Chrome has been really
misbehaving even to the point when becomes unresponsive and
I have to kill it.
Chrome shows log full of things , with:
-> $ google-chrome --enable-logging --v=1
of which
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 03:18:06 +1000
Philip Rhoades via users wrote:
> On 2021-09-22 23:01, stan wrote:
> > This sounds like a bug. You could look at the list here,
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues
> > to see if it is listed. Otherwise, you could open a new issue.
stan,
On 2021-09-22 23:01, stan wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:41:04 +1000
Philip Rhoades via users wrote:
Some told me they thought that browsers talked directly to the
soundcard?
Not for a long, long time. If you have pulseaudio or pipewire
installed, and are using them as default, then
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:41:04 +1000
Philip Rhoades via users wrote:
> Some told me they thought that browsers talked directly to the
> soundcard?
Not for a long, long time. If you have pulseaudio or pipewire
installed, and are using them as default, then no matter what the
browser thinks, it is
People,
Some told me they thought that browsers talked directly to the
soundcard?
With upgrading from F33 (X/XFCE4/ALSA) to F34 (Wayland/Sway/PipeWire) I
have been thrashing the system a bit to see how it goes and found trying
to serially record stuff online from three different browsers and
:3.38.0-3.fc34
mplayer version 1.4.1-0.1.20210313svn.fc34
firefox-wayland version 88.0-5.fc34
google-chrome-stable 90.0.4430.93-1
Journalctl output while plugging in usb cable:
Apr 30 20:45:48 dubby.jlhimpel.net /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1792] (EE) event3
- Das Keyboard Das Keyboard P13: client
bug
On Wed, 09 Dec 2020 16:22:45 +
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Are you using the built-in password manager?
For web pages that I don't consider important I use the
chrome built in password manager. For banks and such I
use keepass. These examples are all using the chrome pas
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 10:31 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> A few months ago, every remembered password I had would just
> automatically fill in the user and password fields on web
> pages.
>
> Now, some random assortment of web pages come up with those
> fields blank, and I have to click in the passw
1 - 100 of 656 matches
Mail list logo
