On 06/30/2012 07:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.06.2012 11:20, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
>> On 06/30/2012 09:11 AM, Andre Speelmans wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:51 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
>>> wrote:
>>>
This is futile, I'm no longer interested in understanding your position
Am 30.06.2012 11:20, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
> On 06/30/2012 09:11 AM, Andre Speelmans wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:51 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This is futile, I'm no longer interested in understanding your position,
>>> whatever it maybe.
>> It might on the other han
On 06/30/2012 09:11 AM, Andre Speelmans wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:51 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
> wrote:
>
>> This is futile, I'm no longer interested in understanding your position,
>> whatever it maybe.
> It might on the other hand be worthwhile to see and understand your
> own position.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:51 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
wrote:
> This is futile, I'm no longer interested in understanding your position,
> whatever it maybe.
It might on the other hand be worthwhile to see and understand your
own position.
You are the one thinking Reindl has a problem, while in f
On 06/29/2012 09:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.06.2012 22:35, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
>> I make no apologies for trying to help
> nobody did say that
>
>> but it appears to be a futile
>> experience in this case. You are entitled to your opinion, as you are
>> entirely convinced that y
Am 29.06.2012 22:35, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
> I make no apologies for trying to help
nobody did say that
> but it appears to be a futile
> experience in this case. You are entitled to your opinion, as you are
> entirely convinced that you have made yourself clear, well if that was
> so, h
On 06/29/2012 09:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.06.2012 22:05, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
>>> how comes? my systems are working since many years
>>> on many many fedora setups and a local repo was never
>>> a solution for anything
>> Well that doesn't mean it never will be, does it?
> it w
Am 29.06.2012 22:05, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
>> how comes? my systems are working since many years
>> on many many fedora setups and a local repo was never
>> a solution for anything
>
> Well that doesn't mean it never will be, does it?
it will never be a solution in case of the OP's probl
On 06/29/2012 08:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.06.2012 17:08, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
>> On 06/29/2012 03:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> where is any single benfit in creating a local repo
>>> to put the one-shot RPMs compared between
>>>
>>> "yum install localfile.rpm"
>>> or
>>> "yu
Am 29.06.2012 17:08, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
> On 06/29/2012 03:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> where is any single benfit in creating a local repo
>> to put the one-shot RPMs compared between
>>
>> "yum install localfile.rpm"
>> or
>> "yum install --nogpgcheck localfile.rpm"
>>
>>
>>
>>
On 06/29/2012 03:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 29.06.2012 15:53, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
>> On 06/29/2012 02:31 PM, Mark Haney wrote:
>>> I've googled this a couple of times, but can't seem to find a straight
>>> answer on this problem. I installed the
>>> rpmfusion repos both with the GUI
Am 29.06.2012 16:28, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 04:07:27PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> where is any single benfit in creating a local repo
>> to put the one-shot RPMs compared between
>>
>> "yum install localfile.rpm"
>
> yum localinstall [--nogpg] file.rpm [1]
>
>>
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 04:07:27PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> where is any single benfit in creating a local repo
> to put the one-shot RPMs compared between
>
> "yum install localfile.rpm"
yum localinstall [--nogpg] file.rpm [1]
> or
> "yum install --nogpgcheck localfile.rpm"
>
>
>
>
Am 29.06.2012 15:53, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
> On 06/29/2012 02:31 PM, Mark Haney wrote:
>> I've googled this a couple of times, but can't seem to find a straight
>> answer on this problem. I installed the
>> rpmfusion repos both with the GUI and from the CLI and I get this same
>> problem,
On 06/29/2012 02:31 PM, Mark Haney wrote:
> I've googled this a couple of times, but can't seem to find a straight
> answer on this problem. I installed the rpmfusion repos both with the
> GUI and from the CLI and I get this same problem, 'Cannot find valid
> baseurl'.
>
> Any ideas?
>
The followi
On 06/29/2012 09:38 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
You downloaded the appropriate RPMs from here?
http://rpmfusion.org/
In my .repo files the base URL is commented out and instead depends
onthe mirror lists from http://mirrors.rpmfusion.org
Yes, downloaded straight from the source. And the
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:31:03AM -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> I've googled this a couple of times, but can't seem to find a
> straight answer on this problem. I installed the rpmfusion repos
> both with the GUI and from the CLI and I get this same problem,
> 'Cannot find valid baseurl'.
>
> Any id
I've googled this a couple of times, but can't seem to find a straight
answer on this problem. I installed the rpmfusion repos both with the
GUI and from the CLI and I get this same problem, 'Cannot find valid
baseurl'.
Any ideas?
--
Mark Haney
Software Developer/Consultant
AB Emblem
ma...@a
18 matches
Mail list logo
