On 2/20/24 08:57, Tim Evans wrote:
On 2/20/24 07:51, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 6:43 AM Tim Evans <mailto:tkev...@tkevans.com>> wrote:
The new BackupPC server starts up--I can see it in process listing;
httpd web server is working as well. I get prompted to
On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 07:43 -0500, Tim Evans wrote:
> The new BackupPC server starts up--I can see it in process listing;
> httpd web server is working as well. I get prompted to log in to the
> server admin page as expected, then get the following httpd "503" error:
>
On 2/20/24 07:51, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 6:43 AM Tim Evans <mailto:tkev...@tkevans.com>> wrote:
The new BackupPC server starts up--I can see it in process listing;
httpd web server is working as well. I get prompted to log in to the
server admi
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 6:43 AM Tim Evans wrote:
> The new BackupPC server starts up--I can see it in process listing;
> httpd web server is working as well. I get prompted to log in to the
> server admin page as expected, then get the following httpd "503" error:
>
[ I have also posted this to the low-traffic BackupPC-Users list, but
wanted a broader look ]
I'm replacing the very old computer that has run as my local BackupPC
server, and want to retain the server's data pool (i.e., all the
existing backups).
The old server wrote its data
If you type:
dnf info backuppc
It will tell you you can find the homepage at:
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
and from there find documentation on how to configure and run BackupPC.
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I have a (maybe stup
Also, there are no stupid questions.
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Ger van Dijck
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>
>> I have a (maybe stupid) question : I have installed BackupPC , but I can
>> not la
Also, there are no stupid questions.
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Ger van Dijck
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>
>> I have a (maybe stupid) question : I have installed BackupPC , but I can
>> not la
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Ger van Dijck
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I have a (maybe stupid) question : I have installed BackupPC , but I can
> not launche the application.
>
> I also can not find the app listed in Applications.
>
> So where can I find the app and
Hi folks,
I have a (maybe stupid) question : I have installed BackupPC , but I can
not launche the application.
I also can not find the app listed in Applications.
So where can I find the app and start the program BackupPC ?
Regards,
Ger van Dijck.
--
Using Opera's mail client:
f I
> restore a version that is _not_ the most recent backup?
Hard links were only used in v3 for deduplication, the restored file would
not be a hard link to my knowledge, however, that question may be better
asked on the backuppc user list.
Thanks,
Richard
___
On 03/30/2017 07:32 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I have taken over maintenance of the BackupPC package and have made the update
to 4.1.0 available through COPR[1] for now for a couple of reasons:
1. It's a huge change, hardlinks are no longer used for deduplication, but v4
can read v3 backup
I have taken over maintenance of the BackupPC package and have made the
update to 4.1.0 available through COPR[1] for now for a couple of reasons:
1. It's a huge change, hardlinks are no longer used for deduplication, but
v4 can read v3 backups.
2. Some of the settings in /etc/BackupPC/conf
On 02/28/2016 07:52 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Where to look? Thanks.
See
http://forum.videohelp.com/threads/314405-Can-t-overcome-the-8gb-barrier-on-NTFS
https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/094f42d7/
https://www.ualberta.ca/dept/chemeng/AIX-43/share/man/info/C/a_doc_lib/aixbman
On 02/28/2016 05:44 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
I have just upgraded, to F23, a CentOS 6.7 system that has been
reliably running BackupPC (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/) to back
up a Windows 7 system via SMB for several years.
After the F23 upgrade, which also included an upgrade of BackupPC to
I have just upgraded, to F23, a CentOS 6.7 system that has been reliably
running BackupPC (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/) to back up a Windows
7 system via SMB for several years.
After the F23 upgrade, which also included an upgrade of BackupPC to
version 3.3.1, backups are now always
Hi,
I've just installed BackupPC on my home server from the Fedora repos
( Fedora 21 ). It doesn't seem to have installed a systemd service
file. So the question is how do I start BackupPC. I have it installed
on CentOS 6 at work so configuration shouldn't be a proble.
I k
On 25 June 2014 16:09, Liam Proven wrote:
> On 24 June 2014 12:03, Ian Malone wrote:
>> PS, you've misspelt Microsoft. If you want to be consistent you need
>> to make up humorous[1] misspellings of NetworkManager and Evolution
>> too.
>> [1] For low values of humorous.
>
>
> I suggest MICROS~1.
On 24 June 2014 12:03, Ian Malone wrote:
> PS, you've misspelt Microsoft. If you want to be consistent you need
> to make up humorous[1] misspellings of NetworkManager and Evolution
> too.
> [1] For low values of humorous.
I suggest MICROS~1. It's what Win9x turned the name of the "Microsoft
Off
On 23 June 2014 21:16, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/23/2014 11:43 AM, Liam Proven wrote:
>>
>> Now let's assume we were both Japanese. Could we record and search
>> accurately for a written sentence in English?
>
>
> Considering that most Japanese students study English in school? Probably.
:¬) All
Allegedly, on or about 24 June 2014, Ian Malone sent:
> PS, you've misspelt Microsoft. If you want to be consistent you need
> to make up humorous[1] misspellings of NetworkManager and Evolution
> too.
They've worked very hard to earn their denigrations...
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux
On 24 June 2014 09:13, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 23 June 2014, Ian Malone sent:
>> Though I'll bet the error doesn't actually mean that the clock is not
>> set correctly. The usual experience is it'll be something else going
>> wrong for which the underlying cause is the clock set incorr
Allegedly, on or about 23 June 2014, Ian Malone sent:
> Though I'll bet the error doesn't actually mean that the clock is not
> set correctly. The usual experience is it'll be something else going
> wrong for which the underlying cause is the clock set incorrectly and
> anonymous error is being rep
On 23 June 2014 19:43, Liam Proven wrote:
> On 23 June 2014 20:33, Tim wrote:
>> Tim:
Why the hell couldn't the computer just have said to set the clock
manually, since it couldn't manage to do it itself, instead of some
moronic number code?
>>
>>
>> Liam Proven:
>>> I know this wa
On 06/23/2014 11:43 AM, Liam Proven wrote:
Now let's assume we were both Japanese. Could we record and search
accurately for a written sentence in English?
Considering that most Japanese students study English in school? Probably.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
On 23 June 2014 20:33, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
>>> Why the hell couldn't the computer just have said to set the clock
>>> manually, since it couldn't manage to do it itself, instead of some
>>> moronic number code?
>
>
> Liam Proven:
>> I know this was a rhetorical question, but:
>>
>> These days softwa
Tim:
>> Why the hell couldn't the computer just have said to set the clock
>> manually, since it couldn't manage to do it itself, instead of some
>> moronic number code?
Liam Proven:
> I know this was a rhetorical question, but:
>
> These days software is expected to be localised into hundreds o
On 22 June 2014 17:04, Tim wrote:
> Why the hell couldn't the
> computer just have said to set the clock manually, since it couldn't
> manage to do it itself, instead of some moronic number code?
I know this was a rhetorical question, but:
These days software is expected to be localised into h
On Sun, 2014-06-22 at 15:24 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Do you mean that rsync actually sent the message,
> or that it was an error in rsync that motivated BackupPC to send it?
IIRC when I saw it it was something in /var/log/rsnapshot
or /var/log/cron, but it was a while back.
poc
--
Allegedly, on or about 22 June 2014, Timothy Murphy sent:
> Incidentally, in defence of my rant, I've found that
> when I actually try to trace an error message in the source -
> I used to do this quite a lot with NetworkManager
> when it used to send out error messages which just said
> "Failure 2
was an error in rsync that motivated BackupPC to send it?
I've never had the message directly from rsync,
although I use it all the time.
Also, I'm pretty sure (but not certain)
that I've had the message from BackupPC for other reasons,
perhaps before rsync is called.
In any case, Ba
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:21:52 -0400
George Avrunin wrote:
> It can also occur with BackupPC when keyless ssh isn't set up right
> and ssh is giving a prompt (e.g., on the first ssh login to a host). Has
> happened to me more than once...
Yea, that's the reason you find every
ot it recently trying to copy a very old system's root
> > to a virtual image and I had to download the source rpm
> > for rsync and build the new rsync on the old system.
>
> Yes, that sounds about right. I was too lazy to backtrack and look it up
> again :-)
>
> poc
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 12:13 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:48:38 +0100
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > AFAIK it's actually an error from rsync (I've seen it in rsnapshot as
> > well, which is also rsync-based). Google for more.
>
> And apparently, what it actually means is:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:48:38 +0100
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> AFAIK it's actually an error from rsync (I've seen it in rsnapshot as
> well, which is also rsync-based). Google for more.
And apparently, what it actually means is: "Hey! I'm trying to
talk to an incompatible version of rsync on the
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 15:50 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Many applications give unhelpful error messages,
> but I've never met any quite as useless
> as the invariable message from BackupPC:
> "Unable to read 4 bytes"
> If only it could sometimes say
> "Una
Is BackupPC packaged for Fedora now?
While this particular error message is, I agree, pretty useless, I'll make a general comment.
Software is, necessarily, notorious for generally only being able to "present the evidence immediately before it". Most applications, for example
Many applications give unhelpful error messages,
but I've never met any quite as useless
as the invariable message from BackupPC:
"Unable to read 4 bytes"
If only it could sometimes say
"Unable to read 3 bytes"
or even "Hooray, was able to read 1 byte"
to add "namespace inbox {inbox = yes}" to my dovecot.conf to let
claws-mail get my e-mail, but otherwise things seem to mostly be working
fine.
But I'm having some problems with BackupPC. I use this machine to
backup itself and a couple of other Fedora boxes (still at F16 and
F15)
Neal Becker wrote:
> BackupPC[2535]: /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/perl5\
> /vendor_perl/auto/Cwd/Cwd.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Gthr_key_ptr
>
> Any ideas?
>
Fixed. Seems that anaconda left a bit of a mess. I had a mix of f15 and f16
packages for perl. Most
BackupPC[2535]: /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/perl5\
/vendor_perl/auto/Cwd/Cwd.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Gthr_key_ptr
Any ideas?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2011 02:04 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh
> wrote:
>> On 08/11/2011 12:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> On a side note, I think the current 3.2.1 release has some
>>> SELinux issues. I updated mine ba
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 08/11/2011 12:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On a side note, I think the current 3.2.1 release has some SELinux
>> issues. I updated mine based on the SEAlterts and created my own
>> package. I sent my updates to the package maintainer fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2011 12:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On a side note, I think the current 3.2.1 release has some SELinux
> issues. I updated mine based on the SEAlterts and created my own
> package. I sent my updates to the package maintainer for Fedora but
ard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
>> It looks like I needed to create /var/run/BackupPC, owned by account
>> backuppc. I notice in the changelog for the most recent package that
>> the socket creation was moved there, but it seems it didn
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> It looks like I needed to create /var/run/BackupPC, owned by account
> backuppc. I notice in the changelog for the most recent package that
> the socket creation was moved there, but it seems it didn't make sure
> the
It looks like I needed to create /var/run/BackupPC, owned by account
backuppc. I notice in the changelog for the most recent package that
the socket creation was moved there, but it seems it didn't make sure
the directory exists.
Reid
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Reid Rivenburgh
On a side note, I think the current 3.2.1 release has some SELinux
issues. I updated mine based on the SEAlterts and created my own
package. I sent my updates to the package maintainer for Fedora but I
do not believe he's incorporated them yet.
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproj
Ah, that's a good point, those two lines of the LOG file may not be
related, which would be misleading. I should check if any sockets are
being created. Thanks for the tip.
Reid
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:55 AM, j.e.aneiros wrote:
> Well I never have used BackupPC software but fo
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
>> Hi. I'm running F15 and have been using BackupPC successfully for
>> years. I rebooted my computer this morning and noticed that BackupPC
>> failed t
Well I never have used BackupPC software but for me the problem is not the
hosts file.
I think the program is trying to open a UNIX socket file and for some reason
(the directory where the file should reside no longer exists or some
permission problems) is failing.
I was able to replicate you
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> Hi. I'm running F15 and have been using BackupPC successfully for
> years. I rebooted my computer this morning and noticed that BackupPC
> failed to start. Its log file has this:
>
> 2011-08-11 08:00:25 Reading hos
Hi. I'm running F15 and have been using BackupPC successfully for
years. I rebooted my computer this morning and noticed that BackupPC
failed to start. Its log file has this:
2011-08-11 08:00:25 Reading hosts file
2011-08-11 08:00:25 unix bind() failed: No such file or directory
But the
53 matches
Mail list logo
