Re: Another systemd annoyance

2015-01-31 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:52:10 +0100 Heinz Diehl wrote: > In addition, I'm curious what happens when the next systemd update gets > pulled in. > Most probably, my manual settings will be overwritten with what systemd thinks > is good for the user.. I use a big hammer for this: yum-plugin-post-tra

Re: Another systemd annoyance

2015-01-31 Thread Ahmad Samir
On 31 January 2015 at 14:01, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote: > 2015-01-31 13:52 GMT+02:00 Heinz Diehl : >> Hi, >> >> tried to safely bring down a crashed Fedora 21 machine today, but M-sysrq >> didn't do anything. After bringing the machine up again, the logs showed >> that M-sysrq functionality was disab

Re: Another systemd annoyance

2015-01-31 Thread Joonas Sarajärvi
2015-01-31 13:52 GMT+02:00 Heinz Diehl : > Hi, > > tried to safely bring down a crashed Fedora 21 machine today, but M-sysrq > didn't do anything. After bringing the machine up again, the logs showed > that M-sysrq functionality was disabled. After investigating further, it > seemed > that only Sy

Another systemd annoyance

2015-01-31 Thread Heinz Diehl
Hi, tried to safely bring down a crashed Fedora 21 machine today, but M-sysrq didn't do anything. After bringing the machine up again, the logs showed that M-sysrq functionality was disabled. After investigating further, it seemed that only Sysrq-S (emergency save) was actually working. In /etc/s