On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:39:02 -0700, JD wrote:
[]
> I have tried to use privoxy along with tor and along with the firefox
> add-on torbutton. It has not provided me with the type of security I was
> looking for: namely being constantly barraged by the javascripts from
> web sites that sc
On 05/20/2011 06:20 PM, BeartoothHOS wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 05:55:22 +, g wrote:
<>
>> you could send a link when you recommend something.
> None is needed -- "yum install privoxy xinetd" has worked for all
> releases of Fedora so far. (Privoxy required xinetd when I first got it;
> I
On 05/20/11 11:20, BeartoothHOS wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 05:55:22 +, g wrote:
>
>> On 05/17/2011 05:44 AM, Jason Turning wrote:
>>> You might take a look at Privoxy. I run that on my Fedora laptop,
>>> Mandriva desktop and even my XP work computer.
>> privoxy does not show in search at;
>>
On Tue, 17 May 2011 05:55:22 +, g wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 05:44 AM, Jason Turning wrote:
>> You might take a look at Privoxy. I run that on my Fedora laptop,
>> Mandriva desktop and even my XP work computer.
>
> privoxy does not show in search at;
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo
> Can you please point us to an elaboration of
> just what this sandbox is? Where is it located
> as far as storage is concerned?
The java execution environment for web applets only allows them to access
certain resources within the browser and connecting back to the host that
served the java obje
On 05/17/2011 03:22 PM, JD wrote:
> On 05/17/11 07:59, g wrote:
<>
>> interesting. but that still does not answer about 'privoxy' as ' synergy'
>> is not found in search from firefox add-on page. :)
> It is a package outside firefox's add-ons.
thank you.
frank murphy filled in the details.
--
On 05/17/2011 03:01 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 17/05/11 15:59, g wrote:
>> On 05/17/2011 06:06 AM, JD wrote:
>>> On 05/16/11 22:55, g wrote:
you could send a link when you recommend something.
>
> www.provoxy.net
thank you, frank.
> yum install privoxy
so, it is a fedora and yum install
On 05/17/11 07:59, g wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 06:06 AM, JD wrote:
>> On 05/16/11 22:55, g wrote:
>>> you could send a link when you recommend something.
>>>
>> privoxy and tor work in synergy to give you
>> a way to hide you true IP or proxy it altogether.
> interesting. but that still does not answe
On 05/17/11 02:28, Alan Cox wrote:
>> I was hoping for an implementation of java
>> that would indeed enforce the sandbox principle
>> and prevent all websites from sending scripts that
>> try to jump out of the sandbox.
> The standard java and javascript in the web browser enforces the sandbox
> (
On 17/05/11 15:59, g wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 06:06 AM, JD wrote:
>> On 05/16/11 22:55, g wrote:
>
>>> you could send a link when you recommend something.
>>>
www.provoxy.net
yum install privoxy
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapro
On 05/17/2011 06:06 AM, JD wrote:
> On 05/16/11 22:55, g wrote:
>> you could send a link when you recommend something.
>>
> privoxy and tor work in synergy to give you
> a way to hide you true IP or proxy it altogether.
interesting. but that still does not answer about 'privoxy' as ' synergy'
is
> I was hoping for an implementation of java
> that would indeed enforce the sandbox principle
> and prevent all websites from sending scripts that
> try to jump out of the sandbox.
The standard java and javascript in the web browser enforces the sandbox
(barring bugs that then get fixed in errata
On 05/16/11 22:55, g wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 05:44 AM, Jason Turning wrote:
>> You might take a look at Privoxy. I run that on my Fedora laptop, Mandriva
>> desktop and even my XP work computer.
> privoxy does not show in search at;
>
>https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
>
>
> you could se
On 05/17/2011 05:44 AM, Jason Turning wrote:
> You might take a look at Privoxy. I run that on my Fedora laptop, Mandriva
> desktop and even my XP work computer.
privoxy does not show in search at;
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
you could send a link when you recommend something.
You might take a look at Privoxy. I run that on my Fedora laptop, Mandriva
desktop and even my XP work computer.
Jason
On 05/16/2011 12:29 PM, JD wrote:
> Hi All,
> Repeatedly now, for several months,
> my adblock plus add-on is getting automagically
> and without my doing, disabled!!!
> I have
On 05/17/2011 04:57 AM, JD wrote:
<>
> It makes watching youtube vids impossible and youtube is one
> invasive site.
true. but with my 'options' settings, i have little problems watching
youtube videos, or the invasive sites.
if you like, i would be glad to make snapshots of my settings and send
On 05/16/11 21:47, g wrote:
> On 05/16/2011 07:29 PM, JD wrote:
> <>
>
>> Is there an alternative implementation of java that
>> will prevent java and javascript websites from touching
>> out files and directories?
> java is java. unless it is ms java. :)
>
>
> along with being a linux bigot, i am
On 05/16/2011 07:29 PM, JD wrote:
<>
> Is there an alternative implementation of java that
> will prevent java and javascript websites from touching
> out files and directories?
java is java. unless it is ms java. :)
along with being a linux bigot, i am an advocate of mozilla.
i started with
Hi All,
Repeatedly now, for several months,
my adblock plus add-on is getting automagically
and without my doing, disabled!!!
I have had to re-install it several times.
I am wondering if this is being done by java scripts
being pushed by websites like google and yahoo
and possibly others?
I tried
19 matches
Mail list logo
