Hi All,
I noticed this over on Xfce's Fedora 40 download page:
https://fedoraproject.org/spins/xfce/download
Seems they have a ARM version.
https://imgur.com/inUFui5.png
Any computers/tablets for that to go on?
-T
--
~~
Computers are like air conditi
Hi All,
I noticed over on
https://fedoraproject.org/spins/xfce/download
That there is an ARM spin for XFce posted.
Now all I need is a tablet to go with it.
Anyone know of one(s) what work well with
Fedora and Xfce ARM?
Many thanks,
-T
___
users
Den tis 29 aug. 2023 kl 07:35 skrev ToddAndMargo via users
:
Hi All,
You guys give me the link to the current
Fedora ARM project. And I lost it.
Would you mind giving it to me again?
Many thanks,
-T
On 8/28/23 23:06, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM
Den tis 29 aug. 2023 kl 07:35 skrev ToddAndMargo via users
:
>
> Hi All,
>
> You guys give me the link to the current
> Fedora ARM project. And I lost it.
>
> Would you mind giving it to me again?
Hi All,
You guys give me the link to the current
Fedora ARM project. And I lost it.
Would you mind giving it to me again?
Many thanks,
-T
--
Yesterday it worked.
Today it is not working.
Windows is like that
On 6/28/23 18:34, olivares33561 via users wrote:
Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, June 28th, 2023 at 3:20 PM, ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
Hi All,
Is there a Fedora ARM web
Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, June 28th, 2023 at 3:20 PM, ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there a Fedora ARM web page out there
> somewhere that up
Hi All,
Is there a Fedora ARM web page out there
somewhere that updates you on the status of
the project? FAQ's, etc.
Many thanks,
-T
--
~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open wi
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 4:30 PM ron flory via users
wrote:
>
> Hi- am hopefully missing something dumb/obvious here---
>
> Am trying to cross-compile for raspberry-pi, but some basic headers appear
> to be missing, or not redirecting to 'generics'.
>
> -
> Install the cross-compiler(s):
>
> On 4 Jun 2023, at 21:48, Ron Flory via users
> wrote:
>
> If another noarch or arm header-only RPM happens to contain the missing
> headers (which I have not stumbled upon yet), it would be helpful for this to
> be marked a co-dependency so dnf can install it too.
I
binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu
...the binutils is automatically installed as a dependency (similar
deal for the "gcc-arm-linux" sibling).
The (very few) related headers are installed in
/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/12/include/ as confirmed by 1)
dnf repoquery -l gcc-aarch64-linux-gn
> On 1 Jun 2023, at 21:30, ron flory via users
> wrote:
>
> Install the cross-compiler(s):
>dnf install gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu gcc-c++-aarch64-linux-gnu
I am not near my fedora to check, but are there more packages with the CRTL
devel stuff? Maybe the output pf this will help?
dnf sear
On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 20:29:54 -
ron flory via users wrote:
> Results:
> hello_world.c:1:10: fatal error: stdio.h: No such file or directory
> 1 | #include
> | ^
> compilation terminated.
>
> -
> Hello_world sample consists of:
>
> #include
> #include
>
> in
Hi- am hopefully missing something dumb/obvious here---
Am trying to cross-compile for raspberry-pi, but some basic headers appear to
be missing, or not redirecting to 'generics'.
-
Install the cross-compiler(s):
dnf install gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu gcc-c++-aarch64-linux-gnu
-
Compi
On 5/7/23 20:35, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Any of yo guys have experience with Fedora
running on an AM processor?
I was thinking of running it on this:
https://pine64.com/product/pinetab2-10-1-8gb-128gb-linux-tablet-with-detached-backlit-keyboard/
It would need a decent touchscree
. The
preinstalled OS is still in beta – most core functionality
works but some features (e.g. cameras) remain a
work-in-progress.
Be sure you know what you are getting into.
Jeff
I wanted to scratch the DanctNix and install Fedora.
The questoin was about Fedora on ARM
On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 11:36 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> Any of yo guys have experience with Fedora
> running on an AM processor?
>
> I was thinking of running it on this:
>
> https://pine64.com/product/pinetab2-10-1-8gb-128gb-linux-tablet-with-detached-backlit-keyboard/
I have a Pineboo
Hi All,
Any of yo guys have experience with Fedora
running on an AM processor?
I was thinking of running it on this:
https://pine64.com/product/pinetab2-10-1-8gb-128gb-linux-tablet-with-detached-backlit-keyboard/
It would need a decent touchscreen driver.
-T
__
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 1:30 PM Cătălin George Feștilă <
myth...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I want to run on qemu a raw Fedora ARM image from the official website.
> Can you tell me how I can do this?
>
This is for Ubuntu so everything might not translate 1:1, but it does show
I want to run on qemu a raw Fedora ARM image from the official website. Can you
tell me how I can do this?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
On 3/15/22 3:48 PM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
I try to create a hello word arm static executable, with the default example
but I got
these errors.
I search on the web and fedora packages to find a way to solve this issue.
I used a basic example source code:
cat hello.cpp
#include
using
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 21:47 +, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> I try to create a hello word arm static executable, with the default
> example but I got
> these errors.
> I search on the web and fedora packages to find a way to solve this
> issue.
> I used a basic example sou
> On 15 Mar 2022, at 21:49, Cătălin George Feștilă
> wrote:
>
> I try to create a hello word arm static executable, with the default example
> but I got
> these errors.
Please show the commands you use to build the exe, also the errors are missing.
Are you building on a
I try to create a hello word arm static executable, with the default example
but I got
these errors.
I search on the web and fedora packages to find a way to solve this issue.
I used a basic example source code:
cat hello.cpp
#include
using namespace std;
int main(void)
{
std::cout <<
I try to create a hello word arm static executable, with the default example
but I got
these errors.
I search on the web and fedora packages to find a way to solve this issue.
I used a basic example source code:
cat hello.cpp
#include
using namespace std;
int main(void)
{
std::cout <<
Peter Robinson writes:
> > After successfully testing an OpenVPN link on a x86_64, I get the
following
> > error on aarch64, as root:
> >
> > # nmcli connection import type ovpn file .ovpn
> > Error: failed to find VPN plugin for ovpn.
>
> So having tried that same command with a openvpn profi
Thank you all for the answers! :-)
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedo
x27;m new both in the ARM and Raspberri Pi world.
>
> Managed to install Fedora 29 Server on a Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+ with an
> USB SSD.
> The system works flawlessly but I can't find vcgencmd and relative
> commands to manage the hardware of the RPI.
> Looked for an RPM pac
On 2/5/19 11:44 AM, Ulf Volmer wrote:
On 05.02.19 20:28, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2/5/19 9:43 AM, Simone Marchioni wrote:
Is there a package with tools to manage HW? Temperature, CPU
Frequency, and so on. Or is better to replace vcgencmd with something
else?
That information and control should
On 05.02.19 20:28, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2/5/19 9:43 AM, Simone Marchioni wrote:
>> Is there a package with tools to manage HW? Temperature, CPU
>> Frequency, and so on. Or is better to replace vcgencmd with something
>> else?
>
> That information and control should be available through /sys, b
On 2/5/19 9:43 AM, Simone Marchioni wrote:
Managed to install Fedora 29 Server on a Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+ with an USB
SSD.
The system works flawlessly but I can't find vcgencmd and relative commands to
manage the hardware of the RPI.
Looked for an RPM package but I can't find nothing.
That
Hi to all,
I'm new both in the ARM and Raspberri Pi world.
Managed to install Fedora 29 Server on a Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+ with an USB
SSD.
The system works flawlessly but I can't find vcgencmd and relative commands to
manage the hardware of the RPI.
Looked for an RPM package but I
Allegedly, on or about 15 November 2018, Doug sent:
> I realize that this is off-topic, but it sounds like you are an
> expert on modern TV equipment, so I have this question:
I work in video production, and I occasionally service such equipment.
> I have a Samsung 24" HDTV (1920 x 1080) purchase
On 11/15/2018 03:00 PM, Doug wrote:
On 11/15/2018 11:05 AM, Tim via users wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 12 November 2018, Jiri Vanek sent:
Yes. I tried four cables. Each of them on both TVs. Each behaved same
for me. *however* factr that I had tried several different cables,
does not mean I u
On 11/15/2018 03:00 PM, Doug wrote:
On 11/15/2018 11:05 AM, Tim via users wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 12 November 2018, Jiri Vanek sent:
Yes. I tried four cables. Each of them on both TVs. Each behaved same
for me. *however* factr that I had tried several different cables,
does not mean I u
On 11/15/2018 11:05 AM, Tim via users wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 12 November 2018, Jiri Vanek sent:
Yes. I tried four cables. Each of them on both TVs. Each behaved same
for me. *however* factr that I had tried several different cables,
does not mean I used different type of cable. they are
Allegedly, on or about 12 November 2018, Jiri Vanek sent:
> Yes. I tried four cables. Each of them on both TVs. Each behaved same
> for me. *however* factr that I had tried several different cables,
> does not mean I used different type of cable. they are very
> likely from same shop in my neighb
baord, and next
>> udpate break networking. So
>> I turned back.
>>>
>>> Have you tried updating your system from the repositories since install?
>>>
>>> Here is an older version of alsa you can try. There were two updates
>>> of a
>>> control.1 {
>>> iface PCM
>>> name ELD
>>> - value
>>> '1700671200014c2d9b0353414d53554e47090707000
'
>> + value
>> '1700671200014c2d9d0253414d53554e470907070000000
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 03:03:32PM +0200, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
> Hello Ralf.
>
> Am Samstag, den 07.10.2017, 14:43 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
> > On 10/07/2017 01:49 PM, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
> > Try
> > touch tmp.c
> > arm-linux-gnu-gcc -v tmp.c
>
Hello Ralf.
Am Samstag, den 07.10.2017, 14:43 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
> On 10/07/2017 01:49 PM, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
> Try
> touch tmp.c
> arm-linux-gnu-gcc -v tmp.c
> and check the search paths being reported.
Thank you, this did the trick. The shown Path are wrong, or th
On 10/07/2017 01:49 PM, Dirk Gottschalk wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem cross compiling using autotools for my Raspberry Pi 3.
I wrote a server program which runs good with Linux and under windows
(compiled with MinGW) on my X86_64 machine.
Since there is no configure wrapper for ARM like
Hello,
I have a problem cross compiling using autotools for my Raspberry Pi 3.
I wrote a server program which runs good with Linux and under windows
(compiled with MinGW) on my X86_64 machine.
Since there is no configure wrapper for ARM like MinGW has, i use the
following configure call
This is odd ... and I might be missing something stupid, but ...
I am trying to build an sd card for my raspberry pi using rather nice
*python* program that I've used for YEARS ...
It's acting weird ... and something clearly doesn't seem right ...
# rpm -q fedora-arm-insta
On 07/23/2014 10:40 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:22:39 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
# ifconfig wlan0
Are you sure that isn't just a leftover ifcfg file named wlan0?
Other than when the dongle is not plugged in, there is no entry for wlan
in ifconfig.
On my f20 box, wh
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:22:39 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> # ifconfig wlan0
Are you sure that isn't just a leftover ifcfg file named wlan0?
On my f20 box, when I plug in a wireless dongle I get
some really helpful name like wlp0s29u1u2 (and to be
even more helpful, the name changes if I move t
I have this old Trendnet usb 802.11bg adapter plugged into my server.
It is not showing in Network manager (see prior message) so I am trying
via command lines:
# ifconfig wlan0 up
# iwlist wlan0 scan
wlan0 No scan results
Don't tell me that, my notebook is connected wirelessly and I can
In my vnc connection to my server, the xfce system bar's network manager
tells me:
Networking disabled (when I place the mouse over the network icon)
Network Manager not running (when I click on the network icon, and this
text is grey)
Yet in my ssh session to the server:
# systemctl status
I had in the past followed the instructions in
https://www.berrange.com/posts/2013/03/31/automated-install-of-fedora-18-arm-on-a-samsung-google-chromebook/
But I wanted to try to install fedora 20 and have a a simpler
partition layout. In the process I found out a bit on how the system
works.
I
ess to
GNOME’s “sharing” controls.
* https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-April/198041.html
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FirewallD
* https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/desktop/2014-June/009862.html
Update on 64-bit ARM and
To correct the 'file' output, instead
$ file -b *
RPM v3.0 bin noarch kdenetwork-devel-7:4.12.2-1.fc20
RPM v3.0 bin ARM mdds-devel-0.10.2-1.fc20
we can drive something like this,
$ rpm -qp --qf "RPM v%{RPMVERSION} %{ARCH}\
%{NAME}-%{VERSION}.%{RELEASE}\n" *
RPM v4.11.1 noa
On 26.02.2014 08:50, Jan Kaluža wrote:
> On 02/26/2014 03:08 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 24.02.2014 23:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 02/25/14 01:02, poma wrote:
>>>> $ file *
>>>> autocorr-en-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin ARM
>>&g
On 24.02.2014 23:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 02/25/14 01:02, poma wrote:
>> $ file *
>> autocorr-en-4.2.1.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm: RPM v3.0 bin ARM
>> autocorr-en-1:4.2.1.1-1.fc20
>> libcmis-0.4.1-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm:RPM v3.0 bin
>
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 02:35 -0400, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:05 AM, sankarshan
> wrote:
> Contacting WP and, explaining that this may be an error
> usually works.
Jon's already trying to talk to Wordpress about it. He says the shutdown
happened right af
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:05 AM, sankarshan wrote:
> Contacting WP and, explaining that this may be an error usually works.
All the links here
http://en.support.wordpress.com/disputes/
Seem to be to report "bad guys". Nothing I can see to report UNFAIR
shutdown of legit blogs.
Bed time for me.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:05 AM, sankarshan wrote:
> Contacting WP and, explaining that this may be an error usually works.
Thanks. Will try to find out the right contact venue for Wordpress
complaints.
As Jon's blog was in Planet Fedora's blogroll, I thought you guys might
want to know.
FC
-
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> It currently displays:
> "fossjon.wordpress.com is no longer available.
>
> This blog has been archived or suspended for a violation of our Terms of
> Service.
> For more information and to contact us please read this support document."
C
Sorry to post it here, it would be more appropiate on the Fedora/ARM list,
but since Fedora is Fedora is Fedora, I'm posting it here. ;-)
Any idea as to why Wordpress might have decided to suspect Jon Chiappetta's
blog where he posted about Fedora/ARM among other FOSS things?
The bl
Coreboot / TianoCore is indeed the way to go.
Presentation from earlier this year (just Coreboot), for the interested:
http://video.fosdem.org/2012/maintracks/janson/Coreboot.webm
--
t
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
We've made too many compromises already, too many retreats. They invade our
space and we fall back. They assimilate entire worlds and we fall back.
Not again. The line must be drawn here! This far, no farther!
http://www.coreboot.org/Welcome_to_coreboot
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapr
On 3/29/11, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Andras Simon wrote:
>> Have you checked the financial health of Novell and Red Hat recently?
>> I'm not sure Red Hat would like to be anywhere near where Novell is...
>
> Andras, you must have reading problems. I was citing Nov
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Novell has a sever OS lead,
Sorry I meant "had".
FC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproje
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Andras Simon wrote:
> Have you checked the financial health of Novell and Red Hat recently?
> I'm not sure Red Hat would like to be anywhere near where Novell is...
Andras, you must have reading problems. I was citing Novell not as an
example of what to do, quite
On 3/29/11, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
>> Or not. People who make decisions in IT departments on which OS to run
>> on their servers are hopefully not basing those decisions on who's
>> supplying the OS for their gadgets.
>
> Exactly, that must b
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
> Or not. People who make decisions in IT departments on which OS to run
> on their servers are hopefully not basing those decisions on who's
> supplying the OS for their gadgets.
Exactly, that must be why Novell never lost any market share and
On 3/28/11, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> In which way can porting Fedora/RH to run on tables contributes to
> MAKING A LOSS or NOT generating a profit?.
By having to pay people, infrastructure, whatever.
> In fact, having people talk about your brand/name creates mindshare,
> and thus indirectly bo
nything I want. In
fact, I can theorize and contribute my thoughts on what I _think_
Fedora and Red Hat could do do boost mind share. People *talking* and
telling others to *do instead of talk* do not contribute to the
debate. On the contrary, silences debate.
> The Debian ARM port to one of the
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:36:40 -0600
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> Ubuntu does ARM right now.
>
> Ubuntu has a netbook version.
>
> Ubuntu has Unity.
>
> http://www.canonical.com/engineering-services/oem-services/why-ubuntu/products
>
> If Redhat isn't going to cater
Ubuntu does ARM right now.
Ubuntu has a netbook version.
Ubuntu has Unity.
http://www.canonical.com/engineering-services/oem-services/why-ubuntu/products
If Redhat isn't going to cater to this market, I have a feeling someone
else will.
Its great that Redhat focuses on its markets,
On 03/28/2011 11:35 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> The only people who can realistically target tablets are the ones with
>> commercial backing and a business plan. It is not a market where a
>> volunteer community can easily thrive in. It
On 03/28/2011 11:28 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 14:35 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>>> Okay, so you know that ARM is a secondary ARCH in Fedora. You're just
>>> wanting someone with a bit of
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> The only people who can realistically target tablets are the ones with
> commercial backing and a business plan. It is not a market where a
> volunteer community can easily thrive in. It requires custom built
> kernels, patching all over
On 03/28/2011 11:05 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> Okay, so you know that ARM is a secondary ARCH in Fedora. You're just
>> wanting someone with a bit of spare money (quite a bit, really) to
>> start making hardware
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 14:35 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> > Okay, so you know that ARM is a secondary ARCH in Fedora. You're just
> > wanting someone with a bit of spare money (quite a bit, really) to
> > start makin
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:15:51 -0600,
Linuxguy123 wrote:
>
> Well... given the demise of Meego, more or less, and the pending demise
> of Symbian and the fact that Nokia just signed a deal with the software
> devil to use Windows on their handsets, I think there is a huge
> opportunity for Re
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> Okay, so you know that ARM is a secondary ARCH in Fedora. You're just
> wanting someone with a bit of spare money (quite a bit, really) to
> start making hardware with Fedora pre-installed.
Not exactly. Re-read what I said. Fedo
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> I think there is a huge
> opportunity for Redhat to go after the mobile device market. Just look
> at the success of Android. A lot of players in the mobile market would
> love to partner with someone other than Google.
I think you will fi
ile device market. Just look
> at the success of Android. A lot of players in the mobile market would
> love to partner with someone other than Google.
So you've got a business plan - you know what to do.
Seriously if you want ARM tablet support in Fedora build a Fedora for ARM
tab
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 15:20 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> What is the commercial reason to do this then? I understand what -you-
> want - but redhat needs to have a business reason to leverage this -
> like RHEL derives from fedora ...
>
> Unless there's a rational business plan it makes no se
st like not everything Microsoft
> does generates a profit inmediately, but has the long-term goal of
> having people talk about the brand and the windows software ecosystem.
>
> Specially if the required investment is relatively minuscule, compared
> to the firm´s overall R+D budget.
the windows software ecosystem.
Specially if the required investment is relatively minuscule, compared
to the firm´s overall R+D budget. I´m not talking about porting Fedora
to ARM. That´s been already done, so the work would be mostly
packaging and buying one of each of these popular tablets
On 03/25/2011 02:26 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> It doesn´t have to be a commercial product, because if it becomes one
> it´ll be immediately subject to the press and the pundits labeling it
> a "failure" or compare it to the established Andro
ding
it and reflashing the OS on popular tablets (Samsung´s Galaxy Tab, the
HP TouchPad, or the RIM´s Playbook), and replace it with "Fedora
Tablet Edition". "As is" of course.
If one day the project becomes good enough, then surely tablet makers
will select it for pre-install
r I have
> seen many things, including Motorola's Atrix, and the MoDu (modular
> phone leading by an engineer from Sandisk), and even low power
> consuming modular ARM based servers, I don't understand why don't
> have Red Hat support to MIPS, ARM platforms.
>
ular
phone leading by an engineer from Sandisk), and even low power
consuming modular ARM based servers, I don't understand why don't
have Red Hat support to MIPS, ARM platforms.
The most of the new generation phones are mostly becoming an tiny
universal server (with multiple cores) in the
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 19:55 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I really, really would like to see RedHat putting some effort into
> seeing Fedora running on modern tablets...
+1 on this. Especially now that I have lost all confidence in Meego
and Google seems to share less and less of Android.
--
be comfortable with QNX
The CPU is confirmed to be a dual-core TI ARM.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Blackberry-PlayBook-CPU-Confirmed-1GHz-Dual-core-TI-OMAP4430-177205.shtml
So what are the chances of RIM making it easy to replace the OS with Fedora/ARM?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/
On 02/26/2011 12:14 AM, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Is it possible to have an ARM minimal as the Fedora-mini ks?
>
> I would like to have gnome 3 mobile if will released... and the
> another question: What kind of hardware could be enough for this?
GNOME Mobile is not
On 02/26/2011 12:14 AM, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Is it possible to have an ARM minimal as the Fedora-mini ks?
>
> I would like to have gnome 3 mobile if will released... and the
> another question: What kind of hardware could be enough for this?
GNOME Mobile is not
Hi guys,
Is it possible to have an ARM minimal as the Fedora-mini ks?
I would like to have gnome 3 mobile if will released... and the
another question: What kind of hardware could be enough for this?
Zoltan
--
PGP: 06853DF7
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
91 matches
Mail list logo
