lejeczek via users writes:
»Hi guys.
if some devel checks here to see users talk about - I'd interested in hearing
some thoughts, comments, for, in some places our Fedora seems to be pretty
inferior.
https://www.phoronix.com/review/ubuntu2504-fedora42-
ampere>https://www.phoronix.com/rev
Hi guys.
if some devel checks here to see users talk about - I'd
interested in hearing some thoughts, comments, for, in some
places our Fedora seems to be pretty inferior.
https://www.phoronix.com/review/ubuntu2504-fedora42-ampere
thanks, L.--
___
On 4/22/25 11:44 AM, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
Interesting, I like all the reasons given for why BTRFS. I've continued
to install to ext4 mainly for one reason (which for all I know isn't
valid anymore). However, I seem to recall an issue with figuring out
how much space was available. There were a
On Sat, 2025-04-12 at 10:48 -0400, John Mellor wrote:
>
> Today, you really need a COW filesystem that can easily be
> dynamically extended to new disks as needed, a solution to the
> RAID5/6 inability to recover in a reasonable amount of time on
> today's large disks, do not need the additional
On 4/12/25 7:48 AM, John Mellor wrote:
like LVM has, and no native encryption yet. Fedora has only partially
moved to BTRFS, leaving the boot mechanism still on EXT2 for unknown
reasons. The Suse distros have been all-in on BTRFS for a lot of years
You can delete the `/boot` entry while ins
On 2025-04-12 9:00 a.m., ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/12/25 5:27 AM, lejeczek via users wrote:
Hi guys.
might be interesting - https://www.phoronix.com/review/fedora-42-
ubuntu-2504-zen5
L.
"Fedora Workstation 42 remains on the Btrfs file-system
while Ubuntu 25.04 is sticking to the
On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 10:01 AM ToddAndMargo via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 4/12/25 5:27 AM, lejeczek via users wrote:
> > Hi guys.
> >
> > might be interesting - https://www.phoronix.com/review/fedora-42-
> > ubuntu-2504-zen5
> >
> > L.
> >
> "Fedora Workstation 42 rema
On 4/12/25 5:27 AM, lejeczek via users wrote:
Hi guys.
might be interesting - https://www.phoronix.com/review/fedora-42-
ubuntu-2504-zen5
L.
"Fedora Workstation 42 remains on the Btrfs file-system
while Ubuntu 25.04 is sticking to the EXT4 file-system
out-of-the-box."
Hmmam. I reall
Hi guys.
might be interesting -
https://www.phoronix.com/review/fedora-42-ubuntu-2504-zen5
L.--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http
> On 30 Jan 2023, at 10:23, James Wynn via users
> wrote:
>
> I noticed a massive performance regression for WireGuard in Ubuntu 20.04 &
> 22.04, but it also affects Fedora. I don't know since which version.
>
> Should I report this as a bug or did I mess something up?
>
> I have fully rep
I noticed a massive performance regression for WireGuard in Ubuntu 20.04 &
22.04, but it also affects Fedora. I don't know since which version.
Should I report this as a bug or did I mess something up?
I have fully reproducible steps to demonstrate this issue on a vanilla
DigitalOcean droplet,
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 08:22:37PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Just wondering: why is the fedora minimal install iso (266 M) so much
> larger than the ubuntu one (26 M)? Clearly, these are two different
> distributions and I do not mean to imply that one is more preferable
> than the other in thi
Just wondering: why is the fedora minimal install iso (266 M) so much
larger than the ubuntu one (26 M)? Clearly, these are two different
distributions and I do not mean to imply that one is more preferable
than the other in this aspect, so I was just wondering.
For the Fedora minimal install
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:54 PM, William Henry wrote:
>
> I had bought the (expensive) Linux Format mag. while on a trip recently for
> an article comparing Fedora and ubuntu. I managed to track > down a version
> of a Linux Format mag article (ubuntu vs fedora) that doesn't require a
> subscri
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 00:10 -0500, Robert Myers wrote:
>> I used to be a samba stud. Once I saw that ubuntu would do it for me,
>> I thought, "Why should I have to?" I have a pretty complicated
>> network. One less application/server to c
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Craig White wrote:
>
> I find that Ubuntu has an astounding number of documentation pages on
> various wikis that are often out of date, do not track the upstream
> packagers and sometimes add to the confusion of the users and while it
> may work for some, it als
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 00:10 -0500, Robert Myers wrote:
> I used to be a samba stud. Once I saw that ubuntu would do it for me,
> I thought, "Why should I have to?" I have a pretty complicated
> network. One less application/server to configure is nice.
>
> >> These are not typical clueless "des
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 16:20 -0500, Robert Myers wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 14:14 -0500, Jesse Palser wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >> I use Ubuntu 10.10 32bit Linux.
>> >> Tried
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 16:20 -0500, Robert Myers wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 14:14 -0500, Jesse Palser wrote:
>
> >>
> >> I use Ubuntu 10.10 32bit Linux.
> >> Tried F14 and was very disappointed.
> >
> > That's not a useful comme
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 14:14 -0500, Jesse Palser wrote:
>>
>> I use Ubuntu 10.10 32bit Linux.
>> Tried F14 and was very disappointed.
>
> That's not a useful comment unless you explain what you didn't like.
>
I'm running both Fedora an
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:54 AM, William Henry wrote:
>
> I had bought the (expensive) Linux Format mag. while on a trip recently for
> an article comparing Fedora and ubuntu. I managed to track down a version of
> a Linux Format mag article (ubuntu vs fedora) that doesn't require a
> subscrip
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 14:14 -0500, Jesse Palser wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 01:54 PM, William Henry wrote:
> > I had bought the (expensive) Linux Format mag. while on a trip recently for
> > an article comparing Fedora and ubuntu. I managed to track down a version
> > of a Linux Format mag article (ub
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 12/10/2010 11:14 AM, Jesse Palser wrote:
>> I use Ubuntu 10.10 32bit Linux.
>> Tried F14 and was very disappointed.
>> Thanks!
>
> I'm sorry to read that. What didn't you like? Remember, Fedora isn't
> for everybody and doesn't try to be. If
On 12/10/2010 11:14 AM, Jesse Palser wrote:
> I use Ubuntu 10.10 32bit Linux.
> Tried F14 and was very disappointed.
> Thanks!
I'm sorry to read that. What didn't you like? Remember, Fedora isn't
for everybody and doesn't try to be. If you want a distro where
everything Just Works you're not
On 12/10/2010 01:54 PM, William Henry wrote:
> I had bought the (expensive) Linux Format mag. while on a trip recently for
> an article comparing Fedora and ubuntu. I managed to track down a version of
> a Linux Format mag article (ubuntu vs fedora) that doesn't require a
> subscription with Lin
I had bought the (expensive) Linux Format mag. while on a trip recently for an
article comparing Fedora and ubuntu. I managed to track down a version of a
Linux Format mag article (ubuntu vs fedora) that doesn't require a subscription
with Linux Format.
http://www.techradar.com/news/software/
26 matches
Mail list logo
