On 10/10/24 12:20 AM, Tim via users wrote:
Tim:
While checking on my systems I see that some mail from:
List-Id: Fedora Package Announcements
Was getting false-flagged as spam, this header indicates the prime
reason:
5.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs
Tim:
> > While checking on my systems I see that some mail from:
> >
> > List-Id: Fedora Package Announcements
> >
> >
> > Was getting false-flagged as spam, this header indicates the prime
> > reason:
> >
> > 5.0 URIBL_BLA
On 10/9/24 8:45 PM, Tim via users wrote:
Hi,
While checking on my systems I see that some mail from:
List-Id: Fedora Package Announcements
Was getting false-flagged as spam, this header indicates the prime
reason:
5.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs
Hi,
While checking on my systems I see that some mail from:
List-Id: Fedora Package Announcements
Was getting false-flagged as spam, this header indicates the prime
reason:
5.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs:
datalad.org]
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0
mail to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, r
0 Nov 2022, at 14:19, Tim via users
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 22:32 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>>> While we're on the topic: all the GNOME mailing lists are moving to
>>>> Discourse (similar to HyperKitty but much *m
x27;re on the topic: all the GNOME mailing lists are moving to
> >> Discourse (similar to HyperKitty but much *much* worse). The ostensible
> >> reasons for this included "better control of spam" and "Mailman depends
> >> on Python 2", the latter being clearl
le
>> reasons for this included "better control of spam" and "Mailman depends
>> on Python 2", the latter being clearly nonsense as the Fedora lists run
>> on Mailman3 - which is why we have this HyperKitty crock in the first
>> place. (Note that GNOME h
ostensible
> > reasons for this included "better control of spam" and "Mailman
> > depends
> > on Python 2", the latter being clearly nonsense as the Fedora lists
> > run
> > on Mailman3 - which is why we have this HyperKitty crock in the
> > first
On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 22:32 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> While we're on the topic: all the GNOME mailing lists are moving to
> Discourse (similar to HyperKitty but much *much* worse). The ostensible
> reasons for this included "better control of spam" and &
a private platform.
>
> I am the same way, but forums need not be social media and are essential
for any community that wants to embrace new users. Many of my younger
colleagues
are not interested in email lists (because their email gets overwhelmed by
SPAM).
Its not social media. Its disc
via users wrote:
>
> Well, so much for the notion that web forums are better at stopping
> spam than mailing lists...
>
> I didn't believe it then, and I don't believe it now.
>
>
> Reported it.
>
> While we're on the topic: all the GNOME mailing li
...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject
delines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> On 30 Nov 2022, at 01:03, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 5:33 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
> mailto:pocallag...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 06:38 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
>>> Well, so much for the notion that web
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 5:33 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 06:38 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> > Well, so much for the notion that web forums are better at stopping
> > spam than mailing lists...
> >
> > I didn't believe it then,
On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 06:38 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> Well, so much for the notion that web forums are better at stopping
> spam than mailing lists...
>
> I didn't believe it then, and I don't believe it now.
Reported it.
While we're on the topic: all the GNOME
Well, so much for the notion that web forums are better at stopping
spam than mailing lists...
I didn't believe it then, and I don't believe it now.
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 8 15:48:59 UTC 2022 x86_64
Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my
ves for
reasons of taste, but on the Mailman lists "how do I get this hazmat
out of my archive" is a FAQ. It's a little inconvenient, but could
easily be applied to retro-modding.
Why? GDPR, for the obvious hors d'oeuvre. Then there's the
occasional spam that makes i
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Checking for spam from NM, I instead found this nonsense:
Jun 6 00:01:19 zooty nmbd[2999]: [2021/06/06 00:01:19.675514, 0]
../../source3/libsmb/nmblib.c:923(send_udp)
Jun 6 00:01:19 zooty nmbd[2999]: Packet send failed to 192.168.2.255(137)
ERRNO=Operation not permitted
That 192.168.2
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:00:47PM -0400, George N. White III wrote:
>> SPAM message -- reported to ab...@gmail.com
>
> Please report these to https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues so
> they can be removed from the archive and the spammer blocked
On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 21:28 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> George N. White III wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 at 18:40, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 19:57 +, ravi fieldengineer wrote:
> [Snipped spam content, it'
George N. White III wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 at 18:40, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 19:57 +, ravi fieldengineer wrote:
[Snipped spam content, it's bad enough they got it on the
list once. I also changed the subject. If that breaks
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 16:52:50 -0400
sean darcy wrote:
> On 08/27/2018 12:39 PM, stan wrote:
> > Was there a kernel where the touchpad worked and there was no
> > spamming of the log? A diff between the two drivers for the
> > touchpad would probably indicate the change to the driver that is
> >
On 08/27/2018 12:39 PM, stan wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:09:29 -0400
sean darcy wrote:
Yes, the driver loads and the touchpad works. This bug is about the
driver not working, not warnings spamming the log.
OK, I thought that the driver wasn't working and spamming, not working
and spammin
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:09:29 -0400
sean darcy wrote:
> Yes, the driver loads and the touchpad works. This bug is about the
> driver not working, not warnings spamming the log.
OK, I thought that the driver wasn't working and spamming, not working
and spamming.
I found this recent report on ar
On 08/25/2018 04:39 PM, stan wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 11:59:40 -0400
sean darcy wrote:
20+ times per _second_ syslog has:
i2c_hid i2c-ELAN0501:01: i2c_hid_get_input: incomplete report
(14/65535)
It makes it impossible to use journalctl. How do I get rid of this ?
So this is your touchpad.
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 11:59:40 -0400
sean darcy wrote:
> 20+ times per _second_ syslog has:
> i2c_hid i2c-ELAN0501:01: i2c_hid_get_input: incomplete report
> (14/65535)
>
> It makes it impossible to use journalctl. How do I get rid of this ?
So this is your touchpad.
Does the driver for the devi
20+ times per _second_ syslog has:
i2c_hid i2c-ELAN0501:01: i2c_hid_get_input: incomplete report (14/65535)
It makes it impossible to use journalctl. How do I get rid of this ?
sean
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
install modulename /bin/true
blacklist won't prevent a dependency from loading a module, I have
sometimes just did a mv on the ko file and depmod to rebuilt the
module index, but that has to be redone each new kernel.
___
users mailing list -- users@list
ontroller SAA7131/SAA7133/SAA7135
Browsing /sys/class/rc/rc1 showed a uevent with NAME = rc-hauppauge,
DRV_NAME = ir_kbd_i2c, DEV_NAME = HVR 1110 (now well into its second decade)
and 'sudo modprobe -r ir_kbd_i2c' has stopped the spam.
The only parameter listed for ir_kbd_i2c is 'e
On 05/26/2018 02:48 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
Yes, there are 2 tuners cards, one PCI and one usb. The spam continued
when I unplugged the usb device; I don't want to disable them unless
all else has failed.
It's not about disabling it. Just try removing the kernel module using
qf to find
>> which package it is.
>>
>> You could also try disabling dmesg logging, and see what complains.
>> Does anything show up in journalctl -r?
>
>
> Thanks to both Samuel and stan for your responses.
>
> Yes, there are 2 tuners cards, one PCI and one us
s anything show up in journalctl -r?
Thanks to both Samuel and stan for your responses.
Yes, there are 2 tuners cards, one PCI and one usb. The spam continued
when I unplugged the usb device; I don't want to disable them unless
all else has failed.
I had looked at atop, and can com
On Sat, 26 May 2018 13:38:29 +0100
John Pilkington wrote:
> I just upgraded my kde/f26 system to f27 using dnf. It seems to be
> working well but dmesg has
>
> rc rc1: error -5
>
> repeated around 10 times per second. ISTR that when I first saw it
> it was rc0:
>
> Searching hasn't been mu
On 05/26/2018 05:38 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
I just upgraded my kde/f26 system to f27 using dnf. It seems to be
working well but dmesg has
rc rc1: error -5
repeated around 10 times per second. ISTR that when I first saw it it
was rc0:
Searching hasn't been much help. I use MythTV but
I just upgraded my kde/f26 system to f27 using dnf. It seems to be
working well but dmesg has
rc rc1: error -5
repeated around 10 times per second. ISTR that when I first saw it it
was rc0:
Searching hasn't been much help. I use MythTV but not the lirc
infra-red remote-control features
Hi Stephen,
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Please do not reply to this mail; join mailman3-users instead.
I'm resplying despite reading this, since I think the reply
may be of interest to (at least some) folks on the fedora
users list. :)
> If users-owner and/or postmaster happens to be listening,
Please do not reply to this mail; join mailman3-users instead.
Tim writes:
> It's likely due to Google's anti-spam technique falling afoul of how
> this list forwards our messages (written addressed "from" us but coming
> from the list server). While detecting t
On 12/03/2016 03:35 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
On 12/03/2016 04:41 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/03/2016 01:00 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
During the boot from bootable thumb drive, several hundred messages of
the following ilk showed up:
[nn] printk messages dropped [timestamp] pcieport :00:1c.0 PCIebus
E
On 12/03/2016 04:41 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/03/2016 01:00 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
During the boot from bootable thumb drive, several hundred messages of
the following ilk showed up:
[nn] printk messages dropped [timestamp] pcieport :00:1c.0 PCIebus
Error: severity: corrected, type=physical l
nd SMTPAUTH and I use MX records to direct my incoming
mail to their servers. I also have a "catchall" address for anything
coming in that doesn't match a real email box. If I start getting spam
at an imaginary address, I just go into my settings at the hosting
company and block that a
the end splits into "jon" and "NotToJon".
If any of the aliases begins to get spammed, I set the server to reject
that address and, assuming I want to continue the relationship, have to
establish a new address only with the one vendor.
> On that note, having more than one email
d sends them to their junk folder forcing me to
> have to also pull emails that they _think_ are junk along to get my
> good emails that they do not bounce, i missed first post of this thread,
> so i will start with your post.
Hence why I don't let others do spam filtering for me. The
x27;s why it goes to spam no matter what
> anti-training is applied.
>
> Old article too, 2014, so not a new problem.
>
> http://www.pcworld.com/article/2141120/yahoo-email-antispoofing-policy-breaks-mailing-lists.html
Aren't that looking at the wrong "from" addre
d that's why it goes to spam no matter what
> anti-training is applied.
>
> Old article too, 2014, so not a new problem.
>
> http://www.pcworld.com/article/2141120/yahoo-email-antispoofing-policy-breaks-mailing-lists.html
Thanks.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorap
On 04/16/2016 12:17 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Short version as I understand it: yahoo's addition of dmarc=fail is a
request to consider any email not sent by a yahoo mail server as spam,
and Google is one of the few to honor that request.
And no wonder. To quote from Wikipedia:
Reject p
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Short version as I understand it: yahoo's addition of dmarc=fail
dmarc=reject rather
--
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/l
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Tim wrote:
>>> Chris Murphy :
>>>>
>>>> FYI, gmail puts your emails in spam for the following reason: Why is
>&g
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Tim wrote:
>> Chris Murphy :
>>>
>>> FYI, gmail puts your emails in spam for the following reason: Why is
>>> this message in Spam? It has a from address in yahoo.com.
This seems to explain the issue. Yahoo basically wants everyone to
reject yahoo emails sent from other mail servers, which is what
mailing lists do. But Google is one of the few, I guess, that honor
this request, and that's why it goes to spam no matter what
anti-training is applied.
Old ar
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 01:18:29 +0930
Tim wrote:
> Misha S.:
> > But you have to put a notice that makes you look like a douche in
> > all your outgoing mail.
>
> And up yours, too... If you go around throwing insults, expect to get
> slapped in the face for it.
Both of you please stop the pers
isn't publicly exposed on this
>> list. Long, long, ago, I found that posting to mailing lists was the
>> main way to get spam, addresses are harvested from them en-masse. Stop
>> exposing your address, and don't use ones that get easily spammed by
>> random dictiona
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Tim wrote:
> Chris Murphy :
> > FYI, gmail puts your emails in spam for the following reason:
> > Why is this message in Spam? It has a from address in yahoo.com.au but
> > has failed yahoo.com.au's required tests for authentication.
&g
t posting to mailing lists was the
>> main way to get spam, addresses are harvested from them en-masse. Stop
>> exposing your address, and don't use ones that get easily spammed by
>> random dictionary attacks, and your spam dwindles significantly.
Misha S.:
> But you have to
ong, ago, I found that posting to mailing lists was the
> main way to get spam, addresses are harvested from them en-masse. Stop
> exposing your address, and don't use ones that get easily spammed by
> random dictionary attacks, and your spam dwindles significantly.
But you have to put
Hi,
Chris Murphy :
> FYI, gmail puts your emails in spam for the following reason:
> Why is this message in Spam? It has a from address in yahoo.com.au but
> has failed yahoo.com.au's required tests for authentication.
That's particularly odd, since to send emails using this
Found info
Sorry for too quickly asking...
Jarmo
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedorapro
Has anyone configured Spam Report plugin working in Claws-Mail?
How does procedure go?
Jarmo
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org
On 08/25/2013 12:54 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 04:06:45AM -0500, g wrote:
.snip
first, let me introduce you to ixquick and their _advanced_ search page.
https://ixquick.com/eng/advanced-search.html
their feelings about "PRISM" and surveillance;
ht
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 04:06:45AM -0500, g wrote:
.snip
>
>
> first, let me introduce you to ixquick and their _advanced_ search page.
>https://ixquick.com/eng/advanced-search.html
>
> their feelings about "PRISM" and surveillance;
>https://ixquick.com/eng/prism-program-rev
ction.
Please note that there have been no messages to the list during this
discussion from the person in question, not even messages denying
responsibility for the spam. Has anybody emailed him off-list, and if
so have you gotten a response?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 20 October 2012 00:30, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
> On 19/10/12 18:51, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 03:47:34PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>>>
>>
>> In general, quoting or not, it's best to just leave mailing list s
On 10/20/2012 11:37 AM, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> And who might this list moderator be?
Best described as "admins". users-ow...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger
and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:51:53 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
>>snip
> In general, quoting or not, it's best to just leave mailing list spam
> alone, or send an off-list message to the list moderator. Replying
> just compounds the problem.
>> snip
And who might this
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:48:45 -0700
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/19/2012 04:42 PM, Tim wrote:
> > Don't make me get out my slide rule...
>
> I was using one in high school, back before there were desktop
> computers, and the first computer I programmed used punched cards.
> Do you really want to cont
for one simple click on the delete
button (or whatever keyboard shortcut you guys use on mainframes with
punchcards ;-)
I'm sure the moderator of this list has been made aware of this spam so
let's try to keeps this list's well earned reputation as one of the
friendliest & helpful
On 10/19/2012 04:42 PM, Tim wrote:
Don't make me get out my slide rule...
I was using one in high school, back before there were desktop
computers, and the first computer I programmed used punched cards. Do
you really want to continue this DSW?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraprojec
On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 15:57 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> And calling people Newbies just because they do something you don't
> like is probably not the best idea. Some of us have probably been
> using Linux longer than you have and may have been using computers
> since before you were born. (Hint: I
ho are you calling a "newbie?" I quoted it back to make sure it
was clear what I was referring to.
In general, quoting or not, it's best to just leave mailing list spam alone,
or send an off-list message to the list moderator. Replying just compounds
the problem.
But, either way, let'
On 19 October 2012 23:47, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/19/2012 03:01 PM, David wrote:
>>
>> I had this 'fixed' about two weeks ago and then you Newbies opened the
>> sluice gate. Can't fix*your* email? At least please don't re-swan it
>>
>> for those of us that can.
>
>
> Who are you calling a "newbie
On 10/19/2012 03:23 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:01:19PM -0400, David wrote:
I had this 'fixed' about two weeks ago and then you Newbies opened the
sluice gate. Can't fix *your* email? At least please don't re-swan it
for those of us that can.
Hey, let's be nice to the
"newbie?" I quoted it back to make sure it
> was clear what I was referring to.
In general, quoting or not, it's best to just leave mailing list spam alone,
or send an off-list message to the list moderator. Replying just compounds
the problem.
But, either way, le
On 10/19/2012 06:23 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:01:19PM -0400, David wrote:
>> I had this 'fixed' about two weeks ago and then you Newbies opened the
>> sluice gate. Can't fix *your* email? At least please don't re-swan it
>> for those of us that can.
>
> Hey, let's be n
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:01:19PM -0400, David wrote:
> I had this 'fixed' about two weeks ago and then you Newbies opened the
> sluice gate. Can't fix *your* email? At least please don't re-swan it
> for those of us that can.
Hey, let's be nice to the newbies. Otherwise, they're just going to go
On 10/19/2012 02:14 PM, John Aldrich wrote:
> Can someone please do something about the spam coming on this list???
I see a lot of this coming from Yahoo addresses. Gary, it might be a
good idea to change your password and/or kill your Yahoo account.
--
-- Steve
--
users mailing list
us
Can someone please do something about the spam coming on this list???
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a
Am 27.08.2012 19:08, schrieb Heinz Diehl:
> On 27.08.2012, Tim wrote:
>
>> Yes, reporting spam to someone in control of sending spam, isn't going
>> to work, you'll get even more of it.
> []
>
> I gave up reporting spam many years ago, and let crm114 s
Am 26.08.2012 23:37, schrieb Heinz Diehl:
> On 26.08.2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> all other machines before can write what they like in mail headers
>
> You can claim to be who you want to while connecting to a mailserver
yes
> but you can't fake the IP from which you are connecting.
not
Am 26.08.2012 22:47, schrieb Heinz Diehl:
> On 26.08.2012, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>
>> Is there someway from the mail header to deduce the origin of the
>> messages?
>
> Yes, the "Received:" headers. Please post the _full_ header of one of
> these mails.
they do indicate NOTHING
the only TRUST
otherwise support the transmission by email,
telephone, or facsimile of mass, unsolicited, commercial advertising or
solicitations, including, but not limited to, spam, to entities other than
the data recipient's own existing customers;
(b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes th
On 27.08.2012, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> whois 75.103.120.181
> [Querying whois.arin.net]
> [Redirected to rwhois1.crystaltech.com:4321]
> [Querying rwhois1.crystaltech.com]
> [Unable to connect to remote host]
If all fails, try tracing it (tcptraceroute, in this case).
These are the last four ho
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 17:20 +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 27.08.2012, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>
> > Received: from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO pos81n-nds-36.positionstrends.com)
> > (184.172.130.36) by mta1050.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sat, 25
> > Aug 2012 15:51:30 +
>
> Somebody claiming to be "
On 27.08.2012, Tim wrote:
> Yes, reporting spam to someone in control of sending spam, isn't going
> to work, you'll get even more of it.
[]
I gave up reporting spam many years ago, and let crm114 sort out most
of it..
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 23:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Good luck in getting them to stop :-) :-)
Yes, reporting spam to someone in control of sending spam, isn't going
to work, you'll get even more of it.
I'm not saying /that/ person is, I'll let someone else make
On 27.08.2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
> your MTA get a connection and have the IP of the last machine involved
> in mail tzransmission, bit all other received headers before YOOR
> machine are nOT trustable because i can write whatever i want
> and how many received-headers i want and submit the me
On 08/27/2012 11:20 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> So the spammer is in the netblock of "softlayer.com", most probably a
> customer of them. Write a complaint to "ab...@fulltimedo.com" with a
> copy to "sysadm...@softlayer.com", including one of the spam emails
rk:Updated:20120125
network:Updated-By:ipad...@softlayer.com
So the spammer is in the netblock of "softlayer.com", most probably a
customer of them. Write a complaint to "ab...@fulltimedo.com" with a
copy to "sysadm...@softlayer.com", including one of the spam emails
incl.
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 22:47 +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 26.08.2012, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>
> > Is there someway from the mail header to deduce the origin of the
> > messages?
>
> Yes, the "Received:" headers. Please post the _full_ header of one of
> these
FULL HEADER
X-apparently-to:
On 26.08.2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
> all other machines before can write what they like in mail headers
You can claim to be who you want to while connecting to a mailserver,
but you can't fake the IP from which you are connecting. It is
logged by the mailserver while connecting between two squa
On 26.08.2012, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> Is there someway from the mail header to deduce the origin of the
> messages?
Yes, the "Received:" headers. Please post the _full_ header of one of
these mails.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
Suddenly last week I downloaded from a POP server 255 messages of which
over 200 were spam.
After a little study of the evolution setup it became clear that someone
had captured my e-mail address and was filling my mail queue with spam.
They advertised different services but the form of the
subscribed to, but can't arsed
> to unsub themselves), and report that mail as being spam to a third
> party. And suddenly, your actually not-spam mail, is being blacklisted.
This does have unexpected benefits, though.
Firstly, everyone knows that this is happening. No-one is bloc
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 10.08.2012 11:51, schrieb Gary Stainburn:
>>
>> I've noticed that a lot of SPAM has the recipient in the from header. Does
>> anyone know how to check for this?
>
> HEADERS are typically NOT what is inte
Am 10.08.2012 11:51, schrieb Gary Stainburn:
> Hi folks.
>
> I'm using Exim and Spamassassin at work and would like to add a check.
>
> I've noticed that a lot of SPAM has the recipient in the from header. Does
> anyone know how to check for this?
HEADE
On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 03:11 -0700, jdow wrote:
> For example:
> header JD_USER_SPIKE To =~ /spike@foobar\.com/
> describe JD_USER_SPIKE Email to self from self
> score JD_USER_SPIKE 0.001
>
> Change the score to what you think it should be. Monitor how received
>
On 2012/08/10 02:51, Gary Stainburn wrote:
Hi folks.
I'm using Exim and Spamassassin at work and would like to add a check.
I've noticed that a lot of SPAM has the recipient in the from header. Does
anyone know how to check for this?
Gary
Yes.
If you use per user rules it's
Hi folks.
I'm using Exim and Spamassassin at work and would like to add a check.
I've noticed that a lot of SPAM has the recipient in the from header. Does
anyone know how to check for this?
Gary
--
Gary Stainburn
Group I.T. Manager
Ringways Garages
http://www.ringways.co.uk
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
